Now
A Few Clouds
82.0°
High
84°
Low
66°

LPS execs get more than money with OK’d benefit packages

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY MARGARET REIST / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, Dec 17, 2008 - 12:08:56 am CST

When the Lincoln Board of Education approved a 4.5 percent salary increase for the district’s top administrators last week, it approved more than that.

The salary and benefits packages approved by a 5-2 vote included contributions to a tax-deferred annuity, a cell phone and laptop allowance, life insurance premiums, health insurance, and contributions to the state public employees retirement system.

Superintendent Susan Gourley’s salary increased from $228,591 at $238,878 for the 2008-09 school year. That includes $13,393 in merit pay this year.

Story Photo
Susan Gourley (LJS file)
Salaries increases for top LPS administrators

Salary increases approved last week by the Lincoln Board of Education for the superintendent and her executive team include:

* Susan Gourley, superintendent, from $228,591 to $238,878.

* Marilyn Moore, associate superintendent for instruction, from $165,307 to $172,566.

* Dave Myers, assistant to the superintendent for general administration and communications, $131,186 to $136,909

* Nancy Biggs, associate superintendent for human resources, from $149,898 to $156,463

* Mark Shepard, associate superintendent for business affairs, $154,227 (new contract)

* Mary Campbell, assistant to the superintendent for general administration and governmental relations, $127,000 (new contract)

 On top of that, the district will contribute the equivalent of 8.5 percent of her salary to a tax-deferred annuity. Gourley negotiated that contribution percentage when she was hired in 2004; with her salary increase this year, it amounts to a little more than $20,000.

The district will make similar contributions of 8 percent of the salaries of Marilyn Moore, associate superintendent for instruction; Nancy Biggs, associate superintendent for human resources; and Dave Myers, assistant to the superintendent for general administration and communications.

Two new members of the team, however, negotiated annuity contributions of 14 percent of their salaries.

Board member Keith Prettyman said that’s because Mark Shepard, the new associate superintendent for business affairs, asked that the district match the contribution he was getting with the Fremont Public Schools.

When the district hired Mary Campbell as assistant to the superintendent for general administration and governmental relations, she negotiated the same contribution.

Prettyman said the existing executives asked for an increase in the contribution to match Shepard’s and Campbell’s, but that didn’t happen this year. He said he would be willing to look at such an increase next year, depending on the budget situation.

“I just did not think it was appropriate to increase that particular benefit this year,” he said.

Typically, the executives’ salary increases match the salary and benefits packages negotiated by teachers and other employees.

Prettyman said next year he’d like to consider executive raises based on merit.

“It’s far more typical of executive positions to have increases based on merit criteria,” he said.

Teachers this year negotiated a 4.5 percent increase in salaries and benefits, but because that includes benefits like health insurance contributions, salary increases average 2.95 percent.

The district increased its contribution to teachers’ health insurance by 35.6 percent, said Ken Babcock, director of LPS personnel relations.

Board members Richard Meginnis and Kathy Danek voted against the administrators’ salary and benefits package increases, in part because they were approved on the first reading (normally the board votes after the second reading) and in part because of budgetary concerns.

Gourley’s salary is slightly lower than the Omaha Public Schools superintendent’s $240,000 salary.  OPS Superintendent John Mackiel’s package includes a $20,000 annuity contribution, said OPS spokeswoman Luanne Nelson.

Grand Island Public Schools Superintendent Steve Joel is paid $187,409, which doesn’t include a mileage allowance, cell phone stipend or health or life insurance.

Kearney Public Schools Superintendent Brian Maher is paid $177,500, which includes other benefits, he said.

Prettyman said the board doesn’t set its executive salaries based on comparability to other superintendents, though they’re aware of what other superintendents get paid. The board wants to to make sure the top LPS administrators are appropriately compensated so they don’t look elsewhere.

“We want to make sure the (executive) team remains a team,” he said.

Reach Margaret Reist at 473-7226 or mreist@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Ted wrote on December 17, 2008 1:00 am:
" "...are appropriately compensated so they don’t look elsewhere."
If $200,000 is the reason our administrators are not looking elsewhere perhaps we need new administrators. I would hope that the people we are entrusiting our future generations to are motivated by something more noble than cash. I suspect most of them are, but $200,00 is a lot of reasons to keep plugging away at something your hearts not really into. "

Taxpayer wrote on December 17, 2008 1:20 am:
" This is crazy!!! I just got a notice that my salary is being CUT by 10% due to the economy yet LPS spends more and more... Only in the education system... "

Christine wrote on December 17, 2008 2:40 am:
" Beautiful, give more to those who already have, take away from those who do not have. This is one of the reasons my children will NEVER attend LPS. Shame, Shame, Shame! "

OMG wrote on December 17, 2008 2:41 am:
" how on earth do you justify that sort of money (and perks) ???? "

Please wrote on December 17, 2008 3:30 am:
" It would be nice if the board would consider having the community remain a team on this one. "Wow" 20,000 for benefits besides the salary increase, that is about as much total as most people in Lincoln receive as a salary or wage, if you will. How is it that with a down turn in the economy we still see that it is necessary to provide such a large amount to one person. That is just a staggering figure. She should be very thankful for the graciousness of the board. However I want to applaud the efforts of Kathy Danek and Mr. Meginnis, although I am not sure from the article that they were totally against it, just in the method of arriving at the vote. So it might be that my applause is not warranted. This is unreal. "

Art wrote on December 17, 2008 4:38 am:
" I know that this is going to sound "off the wall" , But it looks like our school administrators are making mega-bucks while our teachers are earning near the bottom of the 50 states. WHY ??? "

2-mysteried wrote on December 17, 2008 4:44 am:
" Unnnn.....believable!!!!! Education reform now is sure to be a cinch!!!! "

But wrote on December 17, 2008 5:33 am:
" But can they enjoy these increases in their salary without a guilty conscious knowing the taxpayers are being even more burdened than before in this rotten economy? Enjoy it folks! "

okay taxpayers wrote on December 17, 2008 5:35 am:
" Our taxes are going to SALARY not education of a student.I received my tax bill also and most goes to schools. I am happy with that if it goes to supplies, building etc but not to help pay for these huge salary and retirement increases. If they were any type of CEO in this tough time they would not accept that. Shows where their priority is. I want a raise too, we all do and my little thing of 2% with the state won't even cover my health insurance increase. LPS bulks they are short budgetary wise and I can see why. Instead of taking--why don't you give instead. The lunch program for low income is soaring with the economy, why don't you DONATE a portion of that huge increase to this program--it feeds kids that are hungry. Oh forgot you can afford food. "

LPS administrators the new CEOs wrote on December 17, 2008 5:35 am:
" I would like to see the figures that suggest a $10,000 raise to a salary that is nearly a quarter of a million dollars a year was justified for Dr Gourley. I didn't realize that so many LPS employees made $100,000+ a year. What are their talents that they make so much money? Guess we know where much of those bond issues are being spent, as well as the lion's share of my property taxes. "

Mike wrote on December 17, 2008 6:24 am:
" Hey, its all for and about the kids. Maybe they could throw a little at the school lunch program instead of scooping up food from the back yard each day. Or give some to the kids activites so I wouldn't have to pay the booster club, pay for food for the refs and other coaches, pay to drive them to and from practice everyday, and then pay to get in to see my own son participate. Oh and then I get to pay taxes for them too. Then every Tuesday I get to rearrange my work schedule so the teachers can chit chat. By all means more raises for the those who are overpaid already! Is this being run by the same folks who run AIG and Chrysler, cause that business model is real winner. "

xgman wrote on December 17, 2008 6:37 am:
" With the current economic situation and other factors, such as the LPS financial situation, the drop in graduation rates, etc, how can they justify a $13,393 in merit pay and essentially an over 8% total pay raise? Can LPS really afford this? Let's wait and see which school they want to close next to "save money", or what other projects or program are cut. Guess they don't need to worry, since our property taxes keep increasing to keep up with the executives pay raises. "

BicycleMike wrote on December 17, 2008 6:56 am:
" A 10K raise, that's not to shabby considering we're in an economic downturn not seen since the Great Depression and has brought this country to it's knees. Further, associate superintendent for instruction, associate superintendent for human resources, assistant to the superintendent for general administration and communications assistant to the superintendent for general administration and governmental relations... I honestly don't know if I should laugh of cry. Are the people holding these positions and the school board honestly expecting me to swollow the idea that we need all of these highly paid, fancy titled positions? There is no doubt in my mind what so ever that there is profit to be made off the back of children. I've been blue collar all my life and one thing I've see through the years is the executives will always create more positions for themselves with fancy names. A guy I worked with long ago told me "Too many chiefs, not enough indians." I think that very well could apply in this situation. Why don't yall kick some of that coin down the hill a ways and maybe you could scare up enough for a new teacher or two. What a joke, if there was some way to vote for the kids on school bond issues but leave out the prowling cats at the top I would. "

Good wrote on December 17, 2008 7:02 am:
" I think teachers have one of the most important jobs in the community helping to educate and inspire our children! I'm thankful that they are getting this pay increase! "

So Sad wrote on December 17, 2008 7:23 am:
" As a teacher, it is so sad to see what has happened to our leadership in LPS. The Board of Education gave the public half truths at their last meeting by announcing the 4.5% increase instead of the more accurate 11.6% (Didn't Mrs. Larsen say that the 4.5% raise was within their budget projections?)and now they have the audacity to try to refocus this issue on teacher health care contributions. I am afraid that the Wall Street arrogance is alive and well at 5901 O St. I'm not sure how any of the executive committee can even look a classroom teacher in the eye. As a middle school teacher, our principal just gave us our budget for next year. For 250 students we will receive $700.00 dollars for all supplies. At least we now know that our money is in the hands of Dr. Gourley, Moore, and the rest of the "leadership" of the district. Oh my, what a sad day for LPS. "

Well wrote on December 17, 2008 7:26 am:
" How else is Gourley going to be able to afford her $478,000 house? If I were these people, I would be walking scared that a lightning bolt is going to strike me at any moment... "

Mike in DC wrote on December 17, 2008 7:32 am:
" Wow. Salary for a medium-sized school system is greater than that of Office directors in Federal Government that oversee ENTIRE programs. Twice what the world's greatest Academics make (unless they get side-business income). Honchos at the Dept of Ed don't even make that. So, state gov't pay is very well below Fed pay, but not local? Someone in that position is mostly a figurehead anyway, a psycological leader; and we know this from two facts: 1) congitive psychologists talk about how a true leader is based more on what we believe in them than their actual skills--the superduperleader CEO dude/chick is a false concept and 2) they're thinking at too high of a level to have any meaningful interaction with the instruction quality of the students. When you're involved with large organizations, it's too busy of a time to implement innovative and optimizing ideas when you're pretty much given the same amount from the legislature every year anyway; you just have your budget minions divide it up and you sign your name. Long story short, it seems to be that coast to coast, school administrators are GROSSLY overpaid compared to other government officials. Go ahead. Compare it to the president. One millionth of the job gets 75% of the salary... and makes $70,000 MORE than the vice president. Yet, the rank and file state employees make about half what the Fed rank and file do. I guess when you get a bigger slice of the pie -- schools hog half of local funding -- you think you should get to wast...errrr... eat a bigger piece too. I guess, when I was a kid, the answer to "what do you want to be when you grow up?" should be, "secretary... errr... admin assisstant... to the local school board super!" If the state instead invested more in a good process, put more into data gathering, then these jobs all over the state could be handled by monkeys at a computer terminal. If P&G can tell you how many tubes of brand X toothpaste were sold overnight in Lincoln real-time, you'd think we have a better handle on spending and performance of the school system by people being paid like they run the most powerful country on the planet. "

frustrated wrote on December 17, 2008 7:35 am:
" What???? The Superintendent of the Lincoln Public Schools makes more than the Vice President of the United States ($208,100)? And her salary increase alone is $10,000, one-fifth of the median household income in our community? Yes, I think the Board has assured she won't be looking elsewhere... Where else is there to look with that kind of pay?

Truly these salaries represent a breach of trust with our community, especially in our current economy when so many people are losing jobs, threatened with losing jobs, or underemployed. "

To Good wrote on December 17, 2008 7:37 am:
" I hope you are being sarcastic because these peoeple that receive these high salaries and huge raises probably hardly ever step into a classroom and teach. With their already high salaries they should only receive half the raise of the actual teachers. So if the teachers only get 3% they should only get 1.5%. While a 4.5% seems low, when you make $220k that is almost an extra thousand dollars a month. What do you need an extra thousand dollars a month for, most peeoples raises give them maybe an extra $150 a month. Seems like the rich get richer and the teachers stay poor. "

Wheres LIBA wrote on December 17, 2008 7:44 am:
" LIBA seems to stick it's snout in every OTHER public interest in the City. Where are they now when we need the caped crusaders to save us from the LPS monster?? "

Julie wrote on December 17, 2008 7:51 am:
" This is just obscene. What about the teachers who REALLY deserve this? I guess this should come as no surprise. With the increase in LES and our house taxes...the money had to go somewhere. I hope you all enjoy your salary hikes...while all the 'little people' who gave you your positions suffer from the economy. "

Tired Tax Payer wrote on December 17, 2008 7:51 am:
" 4.5% for top administrators? Are you kidding me? People are losing their jobs, people are having their homes forclosed on, people are having trouble making ends meet and are having to "cut back." Yet it appears that our property taxes will increase so that someone who is making over a quarter of a million can get over a $10,000 a year increase, not to mention the perks?! Lets see that is more than some people in this city make in a year. I count myself lucky that my raise gave me ALMOST a $100 more a month pay increase yet I am being asked to pay for someone to receive almost 8 times that?! I think it is time to stop playing "keep up with the Jones'" game. I personally don't give a flying leap through a rolling O, if the Omaha super makes more than our Lincoln super or not. I think both ARE OVER PAID!! They are not in the classroom with our children, they are sitting behind a desk, removed from it all of the problems and issues that are occuring in our schools. I say that tax paying jobs, should follow that average pay of those who's backs they ride. Do we need well educated children to bail out the mess we have created? Most definately, but again, those are the teachers and not the administrators. How many teachers in the classrooms are making $200,000 a year, is there even one? No I seriously doubt there is!! I think the Board of Education needs to cleared out and refreshed because anyone who can approve such a pay increase in these times for only the top officials, should be ashamed of themselves!! And anyone who excepts the pay increase, should also be ashamed of themselves!! "

Deb wrote on December 17, 2008 7:53 am:
" I don't want the Board of Education or LPS officials to start crying that they don't have any money to run the school system. This is ridiculous!! The administration has always been top heavy and now I wonder how much this will be in total costs. We need that figure. "

Machiavelli wrote on December 17, 2008 7:53 am:
" Why are the responders here so surprised. Now, if you really want some action, demand an audit of the school system. Want some real surprises? I challenge the citizens of this community to go to an LPS board meeting and demand that they contact the state and tell Foley to begin an audit of LPS. "

Figure it out people wrote on December 17, 2008 7:56 am:
" We are not a small town with a small school district. We are a population of 200,000+ people with 6 high schools of a population of 12,000. The numbers get bigger as we add in the middle and elementary schools. A public school system is not a mom and pop shop, it is a big business. To claim you tax money is going to nothing but salaries means you aren't looking for what the money is going into. Instead it is easier for you to turn LPS into the villain for pay increases. I guess everyone here works minimum wage and never asked for a raise for their hard work. That is the only thing that seems to make sense to me. If you feel like your money isn't going anywhere important look at the districts around the state that compare to LPS in size and realize all the opportunities available to YOUR children here that aren't elsewhere. "

LLB wrote on December 17, 2008 8:01 am:
" To: Where's LIBA. Sadly LIBA was the prime mover in making her the final choice. It is also interesting to note that Gourley does not seem actually to advocate for teachers or their salaries. I've been a critic of the Board and the admin since the bogus closing of Hawthorne. The Board and the admin of LPS are clearly benefitting from the fact that members of the community have no methods for organizing for reform. "

Confused wrote on December 17, 2008 8:07 am:
" "contributions to the state public employees retirement system"

What the heck is this? I thought she was employed by LPS?

How does she qualify for State benefits? She was not hired by the State. She does no work for the benefit of the entire State, only the City of Lincoln. Someone please explain to me how this is possible?

I'm sure State workers in Scottsbluff will be happy to learn they have to share with a Lincoln Public Schools employee. "

How do you measure success wrote on December 17, 2008 8:09 am:
" Well Ms. Gourley, after reading this article my opinion of you ranks right up their with the CEO's who created the mortgage and automotive crisis. For heaven's sake, when will enough be enough. When will you stop equating how important you are by the salary you get.

As a nurse with a 35-year career history, I have never made more than $25/hr, get absoulutely no retirement benefit package except for the 401K I support myself, am burdened with an insurance package where mine is $60/month, but adding the family cost me $400/month and it has a $1500/person deductible. In this time, I have delivered babies when the doctor didn't make it, have been bled on, pooped on, thrown-up on, cried on, held the hands of the dying, have been hit, kicked and bit. I have back problems from the years of lifting, have accrued years and years of continuing education hours to keep abreast of the latest knowlege/skills coming down the pipe, have worked over-time and double shifts through staff shortages and blizzard conditions, and have been absent from family gatherings at every holiday that exists on the calendar. Through all of this, I feel I have made a true difference in the lives of others. Does your paper shuffling talents do the same???? "

The Problem wrote on December 17, 2008 8:15 am:
" The problem here is with the LPS board. They agreed to unreal contracts when they hired these over paid administrative personel. The board did not look deep enough into the hiring negotiations to realize the public would get the shaft as well as the students and teachers. Let's get rid of those on the board that caused this mess. No one is indispensable! "

UAW tried this wrote on December 17, 2008 8:21 am:
" No matter whether you are working your spots off, now is NOT the time to be doing dumb political moves like this. It undermines LPS credibility and may very well bite back later.

How many people will be put off by this action, only because of the timing.

I think the staff do a great job, but the nation, state, county, nor this school district are in a position to justify raises which far exceed what is reasonable for our current situation.

This is bad policy, bad politics, bad fiscal planning, a good idea--presented and executed badly.

Please, administrators, refuse your raises. It's the right thing to do. And it could save your jobs in the not-distant future. We ALL are being careful, not vengeful, just careful. Help us by graciously turning down these perks. "

out of line wrote on December 17, 2008 8:22 am:
" Is the Superintendent's job so important that it merits a pay that's almost two and a half times what the Governor of our state makes ($105,000)? These salaries are completely out of line with the kinds of pay that we give to other taxpayer-funded positions, whether local, state or federal. Members of Congress make $169,300. Our mayor makes $75,000.

Cut the pay of these administrators by $50,000 to $100,000 each. They'd all still be doing quite well, thank you, and their pay wouldn't be nearly the insult to the people of Lincoln who are struggling to remain employed in decent jobs so that we can keep paying our taxes to pay their salaries. "

Bob wrote on December 17, 2008 8:26 am:
" If I had a choice I wouldn't give these people another dime... "

Mrs. Johnson wrote on December 17, 2008 8:28 am:
" With the current economic conditions most of my friends and family are getting no raises at all. There's a lot of huge salaries being paid to the top dogs in both public and private positions. It's time this stops. These people aren't worth it. Find someone hungry for a job and they'll take less. They'll do a better job too! "

NS wrote on December 17, 2008 8:31 am:
" It is a big school district, however this is just ridiculous. As a taxpayer I would rather see this money go towards more school supplies or better teacher salaries so that we can keep quality teachers in the classroom, not quality administrators in office. The person interacting with my child every day is more important to me than the person administering the system. If you really want quality education, pay for quality teachers. These salaries are completely out of line, especially considering that our dropout level just went up. "

annoyed wrote on December 17, 2008 8:39 am:
" this is soooooo rediculous!!! I am glad that everyone agrees with me!! I worked as a para to a teaher for many years and my increase every year was less than $.30 every year!! And without any health or other benefits. Now we see who is getting the money!! I hope these people enjoy their holiday with all that extra income!! This increase in pay should really go to all the teachers who work sooo many hours and spend their own money on our children!! "

Cowboy George wrote on December 17, 2008 8:45 am:
" I am assuming that property valuations are going to remain level for the next couple of year due to increased foreclosures and lower commodity prices. If that is the case, how are these raises going to happen without eventually raising tax rates? Also, this is a great way to gain the trust of the public the next time LPS asks for us to approve a bond issue for new or renovated schools - just great. Everyone else (in the private sector) is being asked to reduce hours, take a pay cut, or get fired; but not the good old public sector. Let's just give them all 4.5% raises. I am assuming that they will get a corresponding salary decrease next year since we are in a period of deflation - NOT. Someone needs to get LIBA on this budget situation quickly. It's funny how the city always gets blasted about how high their taxes are when 2/3 of the property tax goes to the school district and not the city. "

Outraged wrote on December 17, 2008 8:51 am:
" What the hell? LPS has to cut programs because of funding and these people are gettting raises-Why not use that money and put it back into programs for the KIDS "

HVJ wrote on December 17, 2008 8:51 am:
" Additional evidence that our general education system has failed us. How else does one rationalize the high cost of administration in public education today? "

Nic F wrote on December 17, 2008 8:53 am:
" When did we come to a point where we think everyone deserves a raise no matter what? Why aren't raises decided by merit anymore? What has Dr. Gourly done to actually deserve this raise? The cost of living didn't go up 10k a year, and I can guarantee she hasn't done anything worthwhile to deserve this raise (correct me if I'm wrong people, but we're worse of then we were 5 years ago in regards to education). We need to come together as a community and demand that we won't put up with these overpaid admins anymore (there are a ton of admins making more then 100k a year in LPS). A teacher will never make more then 100k working for LPS their entire careers, and they're the ones actually doing the hard work. I bet we could find people who are motivated by more then money, and we could find a superintendent who actually cares enough about education that they wouldn't require more then 100k a year. We need to protest at every LPS meeting. People need to send Gourly letters. This is ridiculous and we need to stand up against it. We cannot afford to sit back and let it happen anymore people. No more overpaid fatcats in positions that we, the taxpayers, are paying for. I'll never understand how a local administrator for a school agency that doesn't have the issues like New York or D.C. can make more then the Vice President...I'll never understand how some people and organizations can be so corrupt. "

frustrated wrote on December 17, 2008 8:55 am:
" As an LPS employeed I am mad and frustrated by this while I received a $.13 cent raise this is given to the admin. OUTRAGIOUS. "

Ignignokt wrote on December 17, 2008 8:56 am:
" Someone needs to take their own advice and "figure it out". Comparing what the LPS administration makes to a minimum wage worker? C'mon, did you honestly expect anybody to take you seriously from that point on? A minimum wage worker asking for a DESERVED raise is far different from the school board paying exorbitant ransom fees just to keep a group of people in place. If they're so worried about them leaving, then shouldn't we be questioning the administration's level of commitment to students in Lincoln, Nebraska?!

This is Lincoln PUBLIC Schools...PUBLIC!!! This is NOT a business!!! The administrators should not be making CEO pay! They should be treated the same as any other public entity, and their pay should be on par with what city directors make...which would effectively cut Doc Sue's pay to less than half of what it is now. If she thinks her 'service' is too valuable for pay like that, then she can hit the bricks and we can put someone in there who wants to help kids without needing to get rich in the process. "

another voice wrote on December 17, 2008 8:56 am:
" Responding to "Figure it Out" -- you make a good point, but face it, these administrators are making an obscenely huge amount of money individually, and collectively, they are taking home wayyyyyyyy more money than the jobs they do deserve. I agree with many posters who say that if this money is going to be snatched from property taxes, it needs to go to programs/supplies/benefits for the kids. It's just wrong that kids have to pay to be in sports, music, and other extracurricular growth activities, when the top heavy administration is raking in the dough. "

Ill tell you where LIBA is... wrote on December 17, 2008 8:57 am:
" Look at LIBA's very own website Gourley a member of the LINCOLN INDEPENDENT BUSINESS ASSOCIATION. I'd only be guessing as to why she'd belong to such an organization and they'd be so muted on the subject of our tax dollars being spent in such a manner. (www.liba.org/members.php) use keyword Gourley "

Poor Leadership wrote on December 17, 2008 9:04 am:
" This is not so much about the salary size, this goes right to the heart of poor leadership at the very top. The most inspirational and right-minded approach for Gourley (LPS's supposed leader) to have taken would be to say that in tough economic times like this while tax payers are making less and also realizing property increases on their homes, I will only accept a 2 percent increase in salary. That would have been a huge PR move for LPS and garnered community support for LPS leadership. With this lack of common sense and leadership by Gourley and the Board (in difficult economic times) LPS hasn't a prayer of passing another bond issue for new schools anytime in the next decade. "

Funny wrote on December 17, 2008 9:05 am:
" People go into a lot of businesses that do no good at all for money, but when somebody makes great money in education AND DOESN'T CHEAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, they get castigated. "

Ponyboy wrote on December 17, 2008 9:06 am:
" According to these comments, only people who want to be poor and struggle financially should go into education. "

interesting wrote on December 17, 2008 9:07 am:
" The LPS Superintendent will be making in salary alone, not including benefits, what it takes almost 20 Nebraska state senators to earn.

And voters voted in term limits so senators would leave their $12,000 a year jobs. "

Willie wrote on December 17, 2008 9:11 am:
" Whatever happened to actually rewarding the individuals in our community/state that are helping to teach the children. As the relative of a teacher, and a friend to other teachers, I find it ridiculous that these executives of LPS are getting such an increase in pay, while the teachers are among the lowest paid in the country. For the 06-07 year Nebraska ranked 43rd in the nation in average teacher salary! (American Federation of Teachers) When do the teachers of the state actually get some appreciation for the work they put in with the youths of the state? "

rescind these perks wrote on December 17, 2008 9:14 am:
" The board has a responsibility to take care of our community. The members can easily rescind the unreasonable and untimely perks, and they should, immediately. In fact, given the financial situation, maybe they should apologize for needing to LOWER their compensation packages, to better fit with the general condition of our real economy. You want to educate the public--do it. Do the right thing, teach me this is still possible. Make me believe that reason still exists, that ethics demand some self sacrifice. Anyone who just can't stay because they're in such tremendous demand elsewhere would not be condemned if they moved to a better situation. Our economy can't afford this right now...so stop it. It can be done in minutes at the next board meeting, or a special meeting, which can be called quite soon. "

Property tax woman wrote on December 17, 2008 9:14 am:
" Nuts! How can Prettman and the school board justify this in these tough economic times? "

team or gang wrote on December 17, 2008 9:18 am:
" They want to remain a "team"? A team of what? Just because they have a pact to increase their own perks doesn't make them a useful team, I'd use the word "gang". They're working together, loyally, to undermine others within their community, to enrich themselves. That's not a team, that's a gang. Gang activity ought not be encouraged. "

What is Leadership wrote on December 17, 2008 9:19 am:
" I don't think that the salaries/benefits are exceptionally out of line. My disappointment lies in the fact that the executive team did not show leadership by refusing to accept salary increases in these difficult and unprecedented economic times. If there was ever a time to show that LPS has a community conscience, this was it. "

BYOB wrote on December 17, 2008 9:28 am:
" Is this a merit raise? Seems to me that about 40% of these kids upon graduation can hardly do math, read, write, read a clock, a calender or carry on a conversation besides this being the worst economy of our lives, who does L.P.S think they are? As far as I am concerned, this is criminal. You get a raise but our home gets forclosed on because we have to pay high school taxes, I am appauld! "

Jim wrote on December 17, 2008 9:31 am:
" I think LPS Should take a stroll outside of town to some communities that highschools and take a look at what is needed and what is not. I have been able to visit highschools all across Nebr and can see the damage to the town that cuts in education have done. Granted these school districts are much smaller then PS but maybe a lesson in humility would do a good thing here. A lesson in how to get by with what we have and not what we want. I have seen schools that what LPS pays its superintendent would last 2 or 3 years. If you think that the education is lacking in these schools outside Lincoln on tight budgets your wrong, talk 1005 grad rates, and 90% going on to secondary educations, a presidential merit scholar coming from a class D-2 school. There is great education going on out there and it is time we all suck it up and make sure it doesn't go away. LPS we need to make due with what we have, not go crazy with raises for admin when teachers go with little or nothing. "

Wrong wrote on December 17, 2008 9:45 am:
" How do "we the people" refuse to pay for these inflated salaries? What can be done? I agree that our educators deserve a pay raise, but this is administration. The men and women with the really hard jobs (teaching our kids) make bottom dollar while the administration gets several thousand dollar increases? Insane!

Someone else here had a good idea. Demand an audit of LPS. "

Alan wrote on December 17, 2008 10:20 am:
" Pure greed, plain and simple. While I wonder if I can afford my health insurance these folks get $20K added to their annunities. Why do the people making less than $50k per year have to skrimp and cut corners so the people making $250k can get a raise? Critics of LPS have been bringing these numbers to light for years, Maybe now the voters will listen and put an end to this nonsense. What we need now is tar, feathers and a rail to take Gourley to her next job. "

This Is Nuts wrote on December 17, 2008 10:26 am:
" I don't see how Susan Gourley, her senior staff, and the board of education can accept these huge compensation packages and then look the teachers and other staff, who actually teach, in the eye.

I don't know what's worse. The fact that Gourley and her staff ask for and accept these raises, that the board of education rubber stamps and approves these raises all the time, or that LPS will be asking for higher property taxes again! "

State Retirement wrote on December 17, 2008 10:36 am:
" All public school employees pay into and receive state retirement benefits. I have no issue with that. But since Gourley and the rest of the administrators do so, there is absolutely no reason for the district to be paying them money to contributed to a tax deferred annuity for retirement. Quite frankly, if these people can't save for retirement out of these huge salaries, they need financial advisors more than they need raises. Perhaps the young teachers in the district who are making the lowest salaries, paying for insurance, student loans, supplies for their classrooms that the district claims they can't afford, as well as food, shelter and clothing could go down to O St. and give them some tips on how to budget their money. "

Here Comes Higher Property Taxes wrote on December 17, 2008 10:40 am:
" Susan Gourley and her staff should be ashamed of themselves. I am embarrassed for them and LPS. I hope everyone remembers this next time LPS is whining for more money. The Lincoln board of education needs a overhaul if this is the garbage they are approving. Even if we weren't in a recession, these huge pay increases are unacceptable. "

Benifits wrote on December 17, 2008 10:42 am:
" all staff members of LPS get state benefits from the state because they are state employees like every other teacher and admin in the state. You can't get mad at them for getting retirement benefits. Yes this seems like a lot of money but who's not to say they aren't working for that money.
If you want to complain about the schools I guess complain about how reading and math scores are up or that the buildings are finally being fixed and modernized. Complain about the opening of new schools to allow for more growth and less over populating of the classroom.
Oh wait these are good things. I am sure many of you will find a problem with those as well. "

KJN wrote on December 17, 2008 10:47 am:
" My husband just retired from the Nebraska State Patrol after 21 years of "serving" the public. Many missed holidays with family, many call-outs early morning to fatalities, bad weather, long hours, etc, etc, etc. Did he make big bucks? Hardly. Fortunately, for the public, he did what he did because he loved it. But he was out there protecting all of those people who make the big bucks, wearing a bullet-proof vest and carrying a loaded gun. Our law enforcement folks don't get what they deserve, much like our teachers don't get what they deserve. 35-year career nurse said it all. The folks at the bottom of the totem pole work their you-know-what's off and the folks at the top get the rewards. Something is not quite right with this picture and that's why our country is in the state that it is in. Someone else also said "the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer." No truer words were spoken. "

Sara wrote on December 17, 2008 10:50 am:
" This is outrageous. Can someone guide me where I need to complain? Who do I write a letter to? Will it matter? "

BicycleMike wrote on December 17, 2008 10:54 am:
" As much as I like living in Lincoln as as important as it is for me due to my bicycle commuting, I'M DONE! If my property taxes are raised one more time due to school funding I'm outta here, I'll move outside of this city. I have the means and the ability to do so, I will not sit by idle and allow a school board to pad the wallet of overpaid, fancy name officials while the vast majority of my fellow citizens experience stagnant wages, increased energy costs, high food prices, uncertain job security and retirement plans evaporating into thin air. This is uncalled for and utterly disgusting. I'm truly taken aback at how brazen this is. "

Racket wrote on December 17, 2008 11:07 am:
" LPS would be a great place for Arne Duncan to start with education reform. "

tim wrote on December 17, 2008 11:09 am:
" Hey why don't we take some or all of the moneys that we are allowing for the top people and give it to some of the bottom people and the kids in Lincoln for more money for education or special needs I know these people work hard for their money but it is way less hard than the people that clean the walks and scrub the floors. Everyone should be tightening there belts right now and the poor people need the money MORE Poverty level is around 16,000.00 or below So why do we need to increase any one top persons salary by 20,000.00 dollars when they are already making way more that enough money. Let them eat mac and cheese more often I do. Thank You "

Chris wrote on December 17, 2008 11:11 am:
" I understand that we need to pay competitive wages. My question would be how the heck the system got so far out of wack. $230K for a public servant is extravagant. "

Wanda Caffrey wrote on December 17, 2008 11:18 am:
" In response to "Where's LIBA", last week, LIBA submitted a formal request for copies of the recently completed contracts. They were delivered to us yesterday. Also, LIBA issued a position statement on May 13, 2008 that addresses the issue of the potential conflict of interest that exists due to the LPS Executive Committee negotiating the teacher raises. In the last 6 yrs, the negotiated % increases to the teachers has been idential to what the admin receives (plus any additional perks) and is not based on any established performance standards. We encouraged the Board and Supt to establish a formula for Exec Comm raises that gives consideration to district-wide measures of student achievement.
Wanda Caffrey, LIBA School Liaison Committee Chair "

Smiling wrote on December 17, 2008 11:19 am:
" No wonder she is always walking around smiling, if I made what she makes I would smile too. "

pts wrote on December 17, 2008 11:20 am:
" It is "our fault" if we the people let this continue. Who with authority will listen to us talk? "

RealityCheck wrote on December 17, 2008 11:21 am:
" This is interesting. We tell LPS to act more like a business. And then when they do we get upset at them.

These increases have nothing to do with a poor economy. They have everything to do with what the market will bear for these positions and the fact that these execs are high performers.

It's true that grad rates have slipped two points -- but they slipped from the HIGHEST EVER, RECORD SETTING number they set last year. Grad rates (and student achievement in general) are the highest they've ever been and it's due to this staff under the direction of this school board.

I know their salaries are way higher than what most of us make. But these folks are highly educated, very experienced, and have huge responsibilities. Dr. Gourley is essentially the CEO of an organization with 5000 employees. Go look up what CEOs in the private sector make. It's a *lot* higher.

The reality is, this is what having good people in these positions costs.

To the folks comparing these positions to the Governor or Vice President, I would remind you that those are elected positions. When it comes to the business of running a school district, quality and performance are the top criteria. And quality costs.

But I guarantee this is much cheaper than what poor leadership would cost us. "

Contact LPS Board Gourley wrote on December 17, 2008 11:24 am:
" Below is the link to the page will all LPS board member e-mail address. Written correspendence can also be sent in regular mail.

LPS website says: Opinions may be expressed to the board in writing, and will be distributed to board members.

Written comments to the board may be addressed to:

Superintendent of Schools
Lincoln Public Schools
P.O. Box 82889
Lincoln, NE 68501


http://www.lps.org/about/board/ "

Youve got to be kidding wrote on December 17, 2008 11:41 am:
" A 4.5% increase in pay???? PLUS all of their other perks??? How about giving that to the teachers who are underpaid anyway? When is the last time most people have ever seen a 4.5% raise, especially in THIS economy? This is ridiculous! This is why people get mad about their high taxes...not because of the taxes themselves, but because of how they are WASTED on things like this! "

soccermom wrote on December 17, 2008 11:43 am:
" Chris... you said the key words 'public servant' One of my college professors said during teaching methods class, "the pay scale should be reversed, kindergarton teachers should make the most and administrators should do it for free" And as another poster said if we have to pay them that much to get them to stay then maybe we shouldn't want them. The Catholic schools in Lincoln run on far less and than the public ones and don't go down the 'Catholic pick and chose their students' line because in Lincoln we do not and no Catholic student is denied entry to a Catholic school based on ability to pay tuition and our tuition is darn cheap because our schools, from the admin to the teachers and the parents and community are commited to quality education. Perhaps the LPS admin could take a lesson from the Lincoln Catholic schools. "

ComeOnPeople wrote on December 17, 2008 11:44 am:
" To all the people complaining that you didn't get the same raise this year:

Do you have a PhD and 30 years (or whatever) of industry experience? Does every difficult decision you make end up in the newspaper? Are you responsible for thousands of employees? Could you leave your current job and immediately double or triple your salary at a big corporation? Do you work your tail off to make your organization and the community better and then constantly get criticized by people who don't really pay attention to the issues? Have your successes been far reaching and reported in the LJS (higher test scores, increased grad rates)? "

This is great leadership wrote on December 17, 2008 11:52 am:
" Here are a few refreshing news items of GREAT public schools leadership from across the country.
**********************
UNITY, Maine (Dec 10): Superintendent Joe Mattos received a one-year contract extension from the SAD 3 School Board Monday, Dec. 8, but did not ask for any pay raise. "These are really bad economic times," Mattos said Tuesday.
**********************
COLUMBIA, Michigan. (Feb. 26 08) The Columbia School Board extended Superintendent Brent Beamish's contract through June 2010 Monday night and honored his request to not give him a pay raise.

For Beamish's annual performance evaulation, he had a rating of 4.48, with 5 being the highest, the board said.

"If every community had the likes of a Brent Beamish as their school superintendent, the students, community, and staff could consider themselves and the futures of many blessed," board President Martha Kelly Spicer wrote in a statement.

*************************

Now wouldn't that show GREAT leadership if LPS had a superintendent who did that. Imagine the PR and good will LPS would gain. "

Roger wrote on December 17, 2008 11:54 am:
" Once again I urge everyone to vote out any incumbant School Board member when they come up for election. I don't care how anyone wants to paint it, but LPS is extremely top-heavy. Why does LPS need 65% of my property tax dole but OPS is more around 45%?

The biggest problem here is that there is really no incentive for the admin to bargain properly with the teacher's union when it comes for raises, because they give themselves "the same increase the teachers got". That's what the real issue is. "

lets see results wrote on December 17, 2008 11:57 am:
" I'm fine paying taxes when I see results - Can LJS look into the public school ratings compared with the rest of the US? If school system ranks in the top 100 well kiddos I guess they earned their pay "

no wonder wrote on December 17, 2008 12:09 pm:
" No wonder she looks so happy, I would be too! It's that way everywhere - the administrators get paid way too much while the teachers are getting paid way too little. Most schools have more administrators than they need. A big waste of taxpayers money. How does this get approved?!?!?! "

Denise wrote on December 17, 2008 12:09 pm:
" For those of you that would defend these administrative raises; please look back earlier this year when we were is such diar straits that we would have to close some schools. PLEASE...this so typical; we have the money when it's something that would benefit Ms. Gourley, but we have no money when it's for the good of the children and underpaid Teachers. THIS IS ENOUGH!!!!! The school board needs to have some common sense, they had to know this would not sit well with the taxpayers; these wages are OBSCENE no matter what you title. Apparently they work for Ms. Gourley and NOT the taxpayer. "

Dustin wrote on December 17, 2008 12:09 pm:
" why should they get a raise when graduation rates dropped 2% and the budget increased at a greater amount per pupil and inflation???? GIVE ME A BREAK!!! "

Misplaced anger wrote on December 17, 2008 12:20 pm:
" Okay, first of all, the reaction to these raises is sad and requires a little perspective. The administrators being attacked have nothing to do with the economic downturn or your personal circumstances.

Second, most of the loudest complainers here don't appear to be fans of education or learning (based on the poor spelling, grammar problems, and thinking errors). Be honest--you don't know what they do--you don't know what their jobs pay in other comparable cities--and you are not qualified to determine if they are overpaid or not. While you might be mad about how much they are paid, it is not based on anything rational--you simply are being angry at the wrong people.

Third, educating our children is the one of the most important jobs of government. I look at my son and know that his life will be determined by how well he learns--education largely determines lifetime income. I can already hear some folks say, well, I know Jed, he is uneducated and he is a millionaire--you're actually proving my earlier point by illustrating how little most folks understand about causation and relationships between variables like education and income (do a little research--if you want to make more money, learn more).

Read the article a little more closely and consider that some of the administrators are well-paid because other districts pay MORE than Lincoln typically does...which means that the going rate is probably higher than in Lincoln.

I'd also like to point out that it is completely out of line to personally attack these administrators and demand that they do anything with their pay increases (give them back, give them to charity). That is completely inappropriate--no one has any right to tell these folks how to spend their money or to insinuate that if they don't spend it the way you think they should that they are not as good as you.

Just admit that money in our culture does seem to translate into our sense of self worth. Some of you don't appear to make enough money to feel good about yourselves, that is not because of anything these administrators did. "

justify the RAISE wrote on December 17, 2008 12:23 pm:
" How can you live like this, when you know that there are people living from little paychecks to little paychecks, lets me tell you it hurts. You must like feeling that you are the only person in the world too have taken that much, when your employees that really needs the money dont get it. How can you sleep at night????? "

To figure it out people wrote on December 17, 2008 12:29 pm:
" Your logic is off. The superintendent of Omaha Public Schools is stated in this article to only make 240K and how much bigger is Omaha than Lincoln? Quite a bit I'd say and right now the person doing Gourley's exact job, just in a differnt and BIGGER city is only making 2K more a year?? Makes no sense, this woman is overpaid. Graduation rates dropped and paying her more isn't gonna help that. But maybe paying the teachers more would... "

Bill in Lincoln says... wrote on December 17, 2008 12:32 pm:
" ....the Distribution of wealth is not fair in this country. I thought at first that I approved of an educator, not a football player, getting this kind of money. Now the story is how much more $$$ she got than what we were originally told. Now is a terrible, terrible time to blast how much money they are going to make during this Christmas season. There are a lot of people who will think unfairly of Susan Gourly after this "bad timing" article. "

FORMER EMPLOYEE wrote on December 17, 2008 12:36 pm:
" I worked for the schools for 17 yrs. and got little raises over the years. I mean 2% almost every year, that is not even a cost of living raise. How can Susan Gourley get more in two years, then I got in 17 yrs????? I can see were the money and GOOD benefits go now. Hope all you LPS employees get it now, I hope you do. "

POd parent wrote on December 17, 2008 12:41 pm:
" I had to beg to get my daughter, who has Autism, some help at school and I was told they didn't have the staff to help her. They don't have the staff because they don't have the money. This is crazy. Why can't we as parents vote on this. Why don't they give the teachers this raise, who really do the hard work, and the not the administrators who only know how to tell school districts no. The next time I am told no by the school district you can be sure that I will refer to this article. If you have the money to do this, you have the money to help my child. Shame on you administrators for being yet another example of an organization who doesn't get it "

Taxpayer Also wrote on December 17, 2008 12:42 pm:
" To Misplaced Anger: The taxpayers do have a right to voice their concerns. It is because of this administration that a lot of people cannot afford to live in their homes. I think it is wrong to give them an increase when the dropout rate increases. I also think it is okay to ask them to not accept the raise or give it to charity. I'm asked daily to give to charities why should they be any different. "

Educated And Proud wrote on December 17, 2008 12:43 pm:
" All of these ignorant, foaming at the mouth postings conveniently overlook that LPS is a large, vital organization that Lincoln could no more do without than it could do without the water system, streets, police, supermarkets, etc., etc. These salaries look outrageos to the uniformed, but for what our LPS leaders are expected to do they are working at bargain rates. These leaders with their education, intellect and ability could be earning twice as much in business. LPS is a bargain at even if we have to pay twice the modest level of taxes we now do to support it. Sure, LPS administration and teachers get much more than those working in some podunk school ssystem out in the sticks, but how many of you parents would send your kids to such pathetic excuses for schools just to save your "precious" tax dollars. Wake up and get a life. "

STF wrote on December 17, 2008 12:46 pm:
" Look on the bright side, she'll be one of the chosen (over $250,000) to contribute extra when Obama gets in office. After all, it's her patriotic duty per Biden. The wealth is to be spread around, so we'll all get some of our own money back! "

Colonel wrote on December 17, 2008 12:51 pm:
" Another board that is out of touch with a need for economic austerity. From Wall St. to Detroit, the message of salary reductions is loud and clear. Why is the board out of step with the times? More important, why aren't taxpayers concerned enough to initiate change? "

Mr. T wrote on December 17, 2008 12:55 pm:
" Maybe we should start giving teachers raises based on merit also. My wife is a high school teacher with LPS and I know she works twice as hard as many of her collegues yet gets the same raise. Also, the benefits at the teacher level are for lack of a better word "crap." Luckily my job has decent benefits. It's great that they have a "guaranteed" 403B plan that earns less than 3% per year. I guess the "guaranteed" part means their guaranteed to work past age 70. "

Wes wrote on December 17, 2008 12:57 pm:
" The "comparative value" logic is flawed and dangerous. The same logic was used in the housing market in California...look where that got us. The same was used in the making of the .com bubble. Comparative logic isn't the same as value logic. The vallue of the district's program seems to have decreased, didn't the drop out rate increase? Why are so many students failing writing tests? "

To Misplaced wrote on December 17, 2008 1:05 pm:
" Your comments suggest an elitist point of view. No one has said no to funding education. Just as CEOs always get theirs, it seems that the administration always gets huge raises in the interest of "comparible pay" so they don't bolt for other jobs. It is ridiculous how much property tax goes to LPS just to support these poor paper shufflers. Everyone who reads this article should be outraged and sick to their stomach. "

Lincoln Taxpayer wrote on December 17, 2008 1:07 pm:
" To Educated And Proud
Which LPS administration area do you work for?
From your comments that is the only thing that makes sense. "

MCLRD wrote on December 17, 2008 1:09 pm:
" OH, my, this is atrocious. "

Brent L wrote on December 17, 2008 1:17 pm:
" Sick 'em Mike Foley!! "

What wrote on December 17, 2008 1:17 pm:
" "Misplaced anger" is speaking as if KING. I had self worth, 46 years of
an executive position with a huge corporation and never made that kind of
money or raises. Yes I had 46 years of self worth until I moved back to
Nebraska unfortunately. Its not what those people want to spend their money on. The point is, when I left big wonderful schools, never encountered these huge salaries debates, and property taxes 6 times lower
than here in Lincoln. The economy downturn effects everybody, NOT just
everybody BUT Gourley, the board and friends!!!! NEVER in my life have
I ever seen a city with schools in CONSTANT BUILDING AND ADDING ON. Its
like the contractors have moved in for life. You tell me why, in a
little town of 200,000 am I paying property taxes that mostly go to the
schools, $4,200.00 verses $910.00 in my former city & state with bigger schools, and I have a lessor house here in Lincoln. This is the problem
in Lincoln, people have set back and been the "YES" people and let the
few bully them into these WAY OVER VALUED homes and WAY OVER ASSESSED TAXES!! Judgement of these board members is absolutely frightening. My
word, there are people and businesses hurting in this town, what is wrong
with you people???? "

Nic F wrote on December 17, 2008 1:27 pm:
" Interesting article on CNN.com about most companies are cutting raises and the average raise will be 2.5%, the first time it's been this low in a long time. Compare that to LPS admin raises (I think the teachers should actually get higher raises) and you wonder why our city is so messed up. Here's the article:

money.cnn.com/2008/12/16/news/economy/salary_increases/index.htm?postversion=2008121613

Check it out. "

Bob wrote on December 17, 2008 1:33 pm:
" No wonder taxes keep going up, while the property valves go down. The tax payer's money is wasted like this. Lincoln has over 140 "MANAGER's
that make 100k plus,,,,,,,,,,,,,,insane! "

Kelly wrote on December 17, 2008 1:49 pm:
" IS there anyway to force school administrators out of office? I hope they do the "right thing" and decline a part if not all of their raises. "

Robert wrote on December 17, 2008 1:49 pm:
" Time to quit writing letters. Let all meet at at the board of education and protest this robbery! "

On The Streets wrote on December 17, 2008 1:49 pm:
" I agree with the few commentors who are standing up against the mob mentality on here that is attacking LPS. I have a very good friend with in the LPS system and this person tells me like it is. What I've been told is that people here in Lincoln don't understand the value of a good education because the residents of Lincoln are insulated from the examples of poor educational system stories. Lincoln's education system is highly regarding in the nation as one of the best for the city of its size. This has been the norm for far too long and I hope this encouraging trend continues because our society needs intelligent people to become future leaders. Lincolnites are spoiled in that regard because we do not have a comparable city to compete with in the state. So LPS has to look elsewhere across the nation. Also, Omaha isn't a real good example to use because their educational system had to get help from the Legislature to fix its imbalance of tax revenue. Here in Lincoln, we don't need hand outs like what Omaha got because we have smart, dedicated and talented administrators who know what they are doing. And the LPS Board of Education aren't push overs to those administrators. Our Board members are diligent in their fudiciary duties as elected officials. My challenge to those who are generally angry at the world is; if you don't like how LPS is run, then change it yourself and campaign for the school board. Let the voters decide on how Lincoln should value its educational system. But from what I am observing on the streets, the only change that Lincoln needs is in City Hall and on the County Board. "

Ignignokt wrote on December 17, 2008 2:00 pm:
" These are FACTS folks...
1. Lincoln Public Schools takes a whopping 64.1% of EVERY property tax dollar paid annually...an increase of 1% over the previous year.

2. To balance the 2007-08 fiscal year budget, the City of Lincoln cut 63.5 positions, saving $2.8 million, including $1.8 million in tax funds.

3. In 2008, the School Board, including Kathy Danek, approved an increase of 5.7% in the LPS budget. Among the biggest increases in the budget was $11 million for salaries and benefits.

4. The LPS budget included putting $4 million into a cash reserve.

5. When the Legislature passed a law that changed the formula determining how state aid is distributed, LPS "only" got a 26% increase in state aid, compared to the 42% increase they were expecting. That same change in formula actually resulted in a decrease in state aid for a lot of smaller schools.

6. In February 2008, LJS writer Margaret Reist wrote an article defending 'poor' Doc Gourley, stating that she doesn't drive a Hummer, as it had been rumored, but instead drives a lowly 1997 Mercedes...how rough.

7. In that same article, Lincoln Board of Education President Keith Prettyman said the board got what it was looking for when it hired Gourley.

My conclusions based on the facts...Lincoln taxpayers are more greatly affected by the LPS than by any public entity in the city or county; in 2008, the City of Lincoln took serious steps to cut the budget and curb spending, while Lincoln Public Schools went hog wild; the City of Lincoln cut almost $3 million from its budget, while LPS tacked on $4 million it didn't even need; LPS had the opportunity to lower their tax levy, but elected not to because they didn't get as much money as they wanted; Gourley, quite obviously, is not rich because she drives a '97 Mercedes-Benz...practically an ol' beater; and finally, we know who we have to blame for this mess...the same guy who is SUPPOSEDLY standing up for us. "

Jim B wrote on December 17, 2008 2:16 pm:
" To Misplaced: Um, maybe YOU should read the comments more carefully. Did you "happen" to pass by the one's that say "pay the teachers what they're worth", or "the teachers TEACH the kids, not the administrators." If YOU were a teacher, you would want to be paid more!! Admit it!! How can teachers by paid so poorly but yet the administrators be paid so "luciously"? Explain that one if you will. However, you are right in that we have no idea or clue what these high paid people spend their money on, however you are wrong in that it is not right to tell them to refuse their raise. I have known THREE (3) CEO's, vice-presidents and presidents of companies who have refused to take their annual raise because of either the economy, the state of the company, or just because they thought it was too high and not deserved. "

sally wrote on December 17, 2008 2:27 pm:
" I agree the salary and the increase of these administrators are ridiculous. We need to remember this when we go to vote for the School Board members. "

Paul Ellenberger wrote on December 17, 2008 2:52 pm:
" Wow, what a great job they must be doing? Has the quality of education gone up? LPS is closing schools and doing cut backs on education and the Board is uping over paid salaries and benifets? As a tax payer in Lincoln I am very concerned. No wonder this country is in financial ruin. LPS needs to be run like a bussiness not a free ride! "

Watchout wrote on December 17, 2008 2:58 pm:
" LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS WATCH OUT! Someone will run that will have the guts to say lets cut some salary's lets cut some positions Save taxpayer money not spend it wildly when everyone else is hurting. They will win in a landslide. "

iconoclast wrote on December 17, 2008 3:15 pm:
" From reading these comments, I can tell that large numbers of people are going to be heading back to college, earning their teaching degrees, teaching for a few years while they earn their Master's and Doctoral degrees. They will then start out as an assistant principal someplace, if they are lucky. They might have to go to a rural district to get that first principalship. They will work their way up the ladder until, if they are really lucky and really good, they can be a superintendent.
Then people who have no more clue than the man in the moon can criticize them anonymously.
Face it folks, you cannot do it, so you complain about it.
By the way, although it was mentioned earlier, if any one of these people ran a business with this many employees and a budget this size, their salaries would be double or triple what they are now.
This administration is running what is probably the best school system in the country for a city this size. In business, they would all get sizeable bonuses.
And it is certainly not the administration's fault that Nebraska has chosen to fund its schools primarily through property taxes. Our per pupil spending is still remarkably low, for a system of this quality.
Some people cannot succeed, so they criticize those who do. "

SULIEMON wrote on December 17, 2008 3:17 pm:
" TO ALL OF YOU WHO ASK, WHAT CAN WE DO? Is it at all possible that as the board is elected that a recall petition can be circulated? Perhaps some worthy soul can get one started and we can be on the way to fixing this travesty. "

Intelleigent Liberal wrote on December 17, 2008 5:34 pm:
" All of the blather in these anti-education postings is pathetic and sad, but quite hilarious as well. These know-nothings will probably go out and spend 100s, maybe 1000s, of dollars in the near future on Xmas junk and all manner of indulgences for themselves while they would deny much-needed and much-deserved pay rewards for LPS personel because they assume their very modest (yes, I said modest) taxes might increase a tiny bit. I came from a nothing little town outstate where I had to listen to the same claptrap from the spoiled brat farmers who were always whining about their taxes. I thought when I moved to Lincoln for a teaching job I wouldn't have to such ignorant types. Boy, was I ever wrong! "

Educator in MO wrote on December 17, 2008 6:57 pm:
" It's incredibly disappointing to see Adminstrators and Executives receive raises like this, when teachers in Nebraska are EXTREMELY underpaid. I think it's time that teachers of Nebraska get more organized and start vying for some of this money that the board seems so eager to give its adminstrators and supers.
A few years ago, I left the state of Nebraska and took a job in Missouri. I made more in my first year of teaching then teachers in LPS do in their eighth year. My benefits are completely covered and my retirement program is matched dollar for dollar after 5 years. It's a shame that Nebraska can't reward the people who really deserve it, and it's a shame that the teachers there do little to change it. Just because this is the way it is, doesn't mean this is the way it has to be... "

Kevin Of Lincoln wrote on December 17, 2008 6:57 pm:
" I would love to see a $10,000 a year raise from my employer. What planet do these people live on. This is not wall street. Sounds like we have some house cleaning to do with the board of education. I will remember this at the next election.

All of this during a time when so many people are having troubles making ends meet. Do us all a favor LPS Board..... Resign now! "

Chip wrote on December 17, 2008 7:04 pm:
" Point 1: Our economic situation in Nebraska is FAR BETTER than much of the rest of the nation according to multiple media sources.

Point 2: Our school systems in Nebraska are FAR BETTER than many systems in the nation. WE ARE NOT falling behind like the failing schools that so many people refer to when complaining about OUR educational system in Nebraska.

Point 3: Many people who complain haven't set foot in a classroom in Nebraska since they graduated high school. Honestly, when have you watched teachers teach? Have you seen the workload of an administrator?

Point 4: I'm tired of uninformed people making sweeping generalizations about people, situations and concepts that they have no knowledge about.

Point 5: I don't agree with the pay raises, but I'm not informed enough to come to a conclusion. Just cuz I didn't get a raise doesn't mean somebody else shouldn't. "

Mat R wrote on December 17, 2008 7:06 pm:
" These raises are close to what I make in a year!

It's completely unreasonable to expect taxpayers to support and increase in salary when the value of the property being taxed to pay for it is falling.

It's unconscionable to accept such a high salary when some staff are struggling to pay rent in a cheap apartment. "

wrong model wrote on December 17, 2008 7:12 pm:
" People keep comparing the school system to a business model. It's more like a not-for-profit Hospital (like St. E's). In the hospital setting, you have different divisions, patients, and all of the special technicians physicians, nurses, department chiefs, etc. who help the patients(just like schools help students). THEN, you have hospital administrators who oversee the hospital. Now, I'm quite sure that the Hospital Administrators do not make 10 times the salary of the surgeons and physicians who are working directly with the patients. If you want a model to compare it to, use this setting before you use a business model. "

Must Be Kidding wrote on December 17, 2008 7:33 pm:
" To: Intelligent Liberal and other LPS lovers:

First check your spelling of intelligent. LPS does NOT stand out in the national rankings nor does it offer anything special.It really fails to even challenge our students. I came from a city in South Dakota where they did challenge my children. One of those small podunk towns some idiot mentioned before. When we moved here my kids were bored because they had already learned the material they were being taught. Second the people on this board are stating what they feel and have every right to. That is how our free system works. During a year when schools were to be closed due to a lack of money it seems to me that perhaps we pay too much at the top when we all know it is the teachers in the trenches that make the real difference here. This is bad timing and in comparison to what was offered to the teachers was also out of line. I am guessing after reading these post and talking with people the LPS Board need not reapply.I know of too many people that have had to sell their homes because they have been taxed right out of it. We all have to live within our means and LPS needs to do the same during these difficult times. "

DEEESGUSTED wrote on December 17, 2008 7:49 pm:
" Okay, everyone. You're mad, and you have a right to be. Keep it up, and next time LPS comes to you with their hand out, pleading "It's for the CHIIDREN' remember this day. LPS should be held accountable for what they do with taxpayer money as much as any other tax recipient. Don't forget the insight you've gained into the greedy guts of LPS admin., and vote, spend and act accordingly. "

Eh wrote on December 17, 2008 7:54 pm:
" I sure hope my kids teacher isn't "Intelleigent Liberal"!!!! Apparently
spelling and english classes were missed!! "

Just Look wrote on December 17, 2008 7:55 pm:
" ...at all the negative comments and I read each one of them, think I am #115 here. I am struggling to pay you and your administration but none of you, including board members have utter one justifible word, not one explanation, not one good logical reason for this. I have written several school board members and to my dismay they are Gourley lovers. I work for Education and will NEVER see a raise like that, more a 2% or if I am lucky 2.5%. People will complain then too because it is tax money but I don't think they will now. So come on state, it shows we are worth far more and I want a 5% increase---letting you off easy this negotiation time. "

wow wrote on December 17, 2008 8:30 pm:
" It shows a lot about their character to accept this during these times. I will vote for change. "

TP wrote on December 17, 2008 8:45 pm:
" Art wrote on December 17, 2008 4:38 am:
" I know that this is going to sound "off the wall" , But it looks like our school administrators are making mega-bucks while our teachers are earning near the bottom of the 50 states. WHY ??? "

--------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with this 100% We need to cut the Administrators high wages and pay the theachers a lot more. That would be the best thing for the students. It seems to me the Lincoln Board of Education cares more about making sure the Administrators are happy and well paid, then the well fair of are childeren.

WHAT A MESS!!! "

whatever wrote on December 17, 2008 8:46 pm:
" When the economy finally bottoms out, and we have a long way to go before that happens, it's people like this that will become the scapegoats. Mark my words, dire times are coming. "

Big Red Commentator wrote on December 17, 2008 9:15 pm:
" Has anyone thought of the obvious here? Namely, that LPS is just that--a tax-eating governmental entity that is not necessary. The USA would be much better off without public schools, which will never be accountable to the taxpayers and which will continue to suck up more and more tax dollars. And,yes, if education were private and paid for by the customers, innovation would be the order of the day, and we would truly have an incredible variety of quality education modes that would be accountable to the customers. And the total cost of such education would only be a small fraction of what we're paying now. "

disgusted wrote on December 17, 2008 9:22 pm:
" Isn't this special...don't they make enough money? What about the people below them? How can they justify making as much as they do? There are children in their schools that are going hungry!!! This is so sad.... "

Change Starts at Human Resources wrote on December 17, 2008 9:31 pm:
" The only way this is sad state of affairs at LPS is going to change will be if the Human Resources Department is removed. Simple and plain, it all starts there. The salary recommendations, questionable hiring practices and overall lack of integrity. Even the school board members don't understand how the district human resources department works! "

TO Mike wrote on December 17, 2008 9:55 pm:
" "Do you work your tail off to make your organization and the community better and then constantly get criticized by people who don't really pay attention to the issues?" Well Mike, yes I do. And I have attended plenty of school board meetings, along with others, and never had my opinion valued. They just do what they want to do and make a big show of pretending like they are listening. It's very disappointing. I realize these people have a big job to do, but this kind of raise is ridiculous. Don't we all have 'goals' to achieve when we have a review? Did any of the board set goals for these people or even give them a review? They are so afraid these people are going to leave. I would be willing to bet there is a very big line of people wanting to get into LPS administration, because that's where the $ is. "

taxpayer000 wrote on December 17, 2008 9:56 pm:
" Outrageous! The school board owes the taxpayers a public explanation. Two of these execs are brand new in their jobs. One is the LPS lobbyist. Have they demonstrated anything to justify a raise like this? NO. "

Deflation wrote on December 17, 2008 9:57 pm:
" Since the economy is in a state of deflation based on the "experts", I am assuming that the board will vote for a corresponding decrease in salaries next year. I think I am going to work in the public sector if I loose my job. It used to be that the private sector people earned more money because the job security wasn't necessarily given. Heck know it seems that the public sector make more money and they can't be fired. Sign me up! "

Upset wrote on December 18, 2008 1:03 am:
" Greed, Greed, Greed, Gourly and her well paid kronies that bsurround her sure know how to scratch each others backs, probably with hundred dollar bills. And these are the people that are supposed to teach our children about values. Bull "

teachers need more wrote on December 18, 2008 8:55 am:
" I will agree with iconoclast on one issue...public school systems need administrators to make it run just like a business needs CEO's. However, we have seen that businesses need to value their workers to remain solvent and school systems need to recognize the true value of their teachers. There are many more than the administrators that make the schools work...the administrators are no more important than the teachers who are in the classroom every single day. Together you all make it work...Iconoclast would paint the picture that LPS would be nothing without them (the administration). Well, I think LPS would be nothing without the teachers who give so much to the system without expecting a big cash incentive to keep them from looking for a job elsewhere. My respect goes to them. "

Still wrong wrote on December 18, 2008 9:16 am:
" We complain about these raises because while over half of our tax dollars go to the schools, they're STILL making cuts in programs and not giving actual TEACHERS raises, all the while complaining that they need more money. I know where they can get it. "

Seen It All Before wrote on December 18, 2008 12:19 pm:
" After all of this huffing and puffing, marching to and fro, and rattling of sabers by all of the indignant posters here, everyone should relax, drink a tall cool one, and come to the sad realization that nothing is going to change in the absurd world of public education. Said absurd world is really run by the administrators, teachers, etal; and the so-called representatives of the public, ie, the school board members are in reality rubber-stamp figureheads. Yes, the inmates are truly running the loony bin, and the sad results are there for all to see. Excuse me, I should have said all those who are willing to see. "

Thanks Gourley wrote on December 18, 2008 2:53 pm:
" People wonder why Lincoln continues to rank at the bottom of test scores. You would rathe make more money than the people who do the actual teaching. Im serious, how can you go to sleep at night knowing that you directly effect kids? How? Shame on you. I feel sorry for every LPS teacher but for the execs, karma is not your friend. All of Lincoln now knows where you priorities are. If you people actually think these people do work that deserves this amount of money you are crazy. Anyone who works with execs knows this. "

whatever wrote on December 18, 2008 7:04 pm:
" To "comeonpeople" your points, comments are completely irrelevent to the concern most posters have regarding this. And they are completely off base given current economic circumstances and the historical reason most chose education as a profession. The raises are out of line and the salary scale of LPS employees is completely out of line. And yes tomorrow I could double my income even in current economic circumstances but chose not too for higher reasons other than self gain. And make no mistake about it when the economy finally bottoms out the populace will have zero tolerance for this sort of spending. Empty stomachs and cold homes simply don't bode well for a stable country. Think the late 1800's and think France. I swear I can't comprehend how thinking people who are aware of what's going on in this country and around the world can believe "business as usual" is acceptable and can continue. We aren't talking a simple "cyclical event". We are talking about an event when measured on the human timeline of, umm, let's limit it to the last 2000 years something on the magnitude of the Fall of the Roman Empire, The French Revolution, The Dark Ages etc.. The United States that anyone over the age of 40 learned about in school doesn't exist anymore, the game is over it's truly a new world with new rules. Sure it'll take 10 to 20 years to play out but most people under the age of 20 will never understand the difference. LPS like many other institutions is "going through the motions" of it's existence without even realizing that it too shall pass soon from this world and will be replaced by something else. Things don't change normally with a big bang, they whimper and disappear over time. These are the times we are living through. The United States had a good run, now it's time for something else. And frankly I'm ready for it. "

Not out-of-line wrote on December 18, 2008 10:22 pm:
" I agree with "Misplaced Anger". And if only many of the posters here would channel their passion and enthusiasm for criticism toward common good!? My neighbors would drop their teeth if they knew my salary (but I still choose to live in a $125k home). Everyone and every position is NOT equal. I realize that hurts to hear. Until you're at the helm and understand the built-in pressures and tasks beyond what you can fathom, don't bother to criticize. I always look at employment and salaries when hiring like this: "How easily replaceable is the person in this position?" Teachers? Not as hard to find as qualified administrators. Both are VERY important and willing to throw their all into a position for less pay than available for their talents in other industries. Kudos to all in education. But don't judge until you've walked in executive level shoes. We're not talking $100 million golden parachutes, here, people. More people in Lincoln make $200k+ than you realize. "

JERRY wrote on December 23, 2008 9:54 pm:
" As a former LPS teacher from the distant past and now a resident in a Texas city comparable in size to Lincoln, I perceive the LPS administrative salaries and benefits are justifiable and competitive inasmuch they appear to be in same range as here. My perception from afar is that the Lincoln schools are of high quality and this quality is easily lost if the top leadership is lost. "

To Reality Check wrote on December 31, 2008 8:43 am:
" If you believe graduation rates tell the story, fine. But in my exprerience, I have yet to find a LPS graduate in the past 2 years who can fill out a job application or rental application correctly, in correct English, or complete a simple math test (with no time limits).

LPS is a total failure and, in my opinion, amounts to an overpriced day care center for delinquents. "