Now
Fair
32°
High
42°
Low
15°

Time to head for bankruptcy court

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Friday, Dec 05, 2008 - 12:18:45 am CST

The bailout proposals unveiled this week made perfectly clear that both GM and Chrysler already are essentially bankrupt. Ford is teetering near the edge.

GM said it needed $4 billion by the end of December. Chrysler said it needed $7 million before the month is over.

Obviously, major, painful downsizing and restructuring is needed.

The best route to that end is through some sort of bankruptcy proceedings, perhaps in a special bankruptcy court created by Congress specifically for the automaker bailout.

In a typical Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the court can wield the kind of power that is needed.

The judge could, for example, fire executives. It could roll back wages and benefits for members of the United Auto Workers. It could reduce the number of auto dealers in the United States. It could grant relief or partial relief from debts.

In short, the bankruptcy court could provide the kind of supervision that is needed if the Washington bailout is to be successful.

Congress should insist on it.

Filing for reorganization under terms such as those that exist under Chapter 11 should be a precondition for the billions of dollars in aid the automakers are seeking.

There’s little doubt that the nation’s economy would be severely jolted without some sort of federal intervention in the auto industry.

According to the most recent statistics, Nebraska has more than 8,500 jobs in the transportation equipment manufacturing sector. In Nebraska, layoffs already have been announced at the Eaton plants in Hastings and Kearney, where valves and gears are made. Leon Plastics Inc., which makes exterior and interior parts for cars and trucks, plans to close its Alda plant by May. Surely the state’s auto dealers also are feeling a pinch.

Even with federal help, Detroit’s automakers will be forced to shed thousands of jobs. The auto market is tight. Toyota and Honda, which employ thousands of workers at U.S. plants, also have seen their sales this month drop by more than 30 percent.

If taxpayers are expected to pony up about $34 billion in loans, they deserve a decent shot at getting their money back.

So far, efforts by the administration and Congress have inspired little confidence in the quality of their oversight.

Creation of yet another oversight board with nebulous powers won’t do much to restore trust.

It may be true, however, that turning to the existing bankruptcy channels would be too slow to respond to the current crisis. Washington Post business writer Steven Pearlstein has suggested a “pre-packaged bankruptcy” arranged with federal help that could zoom through Chapter 11 proceedings. Paul Ingrassia, former Detroit Bureau Chief for the Wall Street Journal, suggested appointment of a “federal restructuring trustee.”

The essential element is that the overseeing officials have the same sort of oversight authority and latitude that exist in ordinary bankruptcy courts. The automakers deserve it. So do taxpayers.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Problem wrote on December 5, 2008 5:34 am:
" The problem with Chapter 11 bankruptcy (reorganization as opposed to liquidation) is it requires substantial financing to work. In the current credit environment, the automakers will not get the financing from banks, because banks can't afford to take the risk. The government will have to lend them the money anyway to avoid Chapter 7. Congress, by demanding "business plans" as a prerequisite for the bailout (financing) is trying to be a sort of bankruptcy judge-lite.

The bottom line is that if these companies are going to survive in any form, we the taxpayers are going to have to loan them the money. Might as well do it now (with conditions) than let them go to bankruptcy court and possibly unravel altogether. "

whatever wrote on December 5, 2008 6:02 am:
" Bankruptcy is not an option, but reform is. Laws can be rewritten and warranties guarenteed to instill confidence in companies. And the non stop bashing of the Domestic Auto Industry by the media to the exclusion of foreign automakers must stop. Do some research and you'll find they are all heading to their respective governments for help. And actually if you look at Chrysler they have began serious reorganization and cost cutting measures over a year ago and may be ahead of the curve in developing technologically advanced and fuel efficient vehicles for the future. Once they are gone you can be sure the advances they have made are gone too. Detroit for years has been building the cars "America wants" if that isn't the case then why did the Asia automakers all develop minivans, SUV's, luxury cars and full size light trucks? They responded to the market after seeing the success the BIG 3 were having. The bottom line is the U.S. automobile industry must not fail. "

Scott wrote on December 5, 2008 7:18 am:
" I find it curious that the Journal Star would insist on all of these conditions for the auto industry, but never found a need to ask questions of the banking industry.
That was rhetorical, but I feel better. It's not curious at all. It is quite fitting that the LJS keep with it's mantra of siding with the monied interest over the working folk. How dare the auto workers make a decent wage? After all, it was their idea to design and market enormous vehicles which would cause the company to lose all of that money. "

Julia wrote on December 5, 2008 7:38 am:
" Also, Douglas and Lomason in Columbus makes car seats for Ford and Chrysler.

I feel for all of these people who are facing unemployment. I wish that there was an answer. All we can do is hope and pray for these people that they make it thru this problem. "

stop wrote on December 5, 2008 9:22 am:
" Perhaps the big three should be non union. There was a place and time for unions, and that time has passed. These people get paid a lot of money for doing nothing, yet are constantly threatening to picket because they want more benefits and salary. On top of it, they don't do squat. It's time to reorganize folks. That is the ONLY way that this is going to happen. "

Joseph D. wrote on December 5, 2008 10:08 am:
" I am just trying to figure out why they get the money in the first place. Why should we consider a bail-out? If I was paying a mortgage and I couldn't come up with the money could I go to congress and ask for 100,000 dollars? No let them go bankrupt otherwise they learn nothing and we continue to be a nation of borrowers and over spenders. "

Solution wrote on December 5, 2008 12:35 pm:
" I don't think this is a solution, in this case like the banks I do feel that if we don't move in to loan these industries the money, these will be sold to Foreign investors. We already have too many Foreign owned companies.
I think the Automakers and the Automakers Union have been very humble, and realize they are on a precipice. In the meetings with the Banks I did not see such willingness to be conciliatory towards the American Public. The Automakers after some well deserved tongue lashing got real!

We have an opportunity to change the way our world works here, I hope that the Senators don't drop the ball. We make it so that we become the Number one in Hybrid cars or Electric cars, would that be worth it? "

blueberri wrote on December 5, 2008 12:48 pm:
" Why can't outdated draconian american autos and their makers fail? Why not? The automakers have spend upwards of $100 million in lobbyist fees to keep the gas guzzlers and not so dependable American cars under our noses. Its time they go away with their business model. Its time for their workers to find jobs that will take them into the next decade. These folks are not unemployable. They are retrainable, not dumb. Lets remember government cannot bail out or make loans to every private business. They were too little too late. Time to move on. "

Kevin wrote on December 5, 2008 4:43 pm:
" Chapter 11 bankruptcy is reform. I agree that the manufacturing industry must not fail, well it can but our collective status as a world power fails with it. chapter 11 isn't a complete failure, darn close though.
Scott when a manufacturing company pays more to people who don't work there than who do, or for raw materials it's time to actually fix the problem. The union wages, health insurance, pensions, etc, etc, is obscene, they don't ask for a living wage, they demand a living wage for when they get laid off. None of the white collar jobs have that kind of pay off, even if they get a higher wage. "

whatever wrote on December 5, 2008 7:32 pm:
" Another thought if it goes Chapter 11. At that point mandate for a specified period of time the "market share" foreign owned auto manufactureres can have in this country to ensure a market for vehicles. Seven years seems a good number. And I don't want to hear the crap from the "free market" folks until they become educated on the obstacles placed on our companies to do business in other countries. There ain't no "free market" in the rest of the world. "

Scotious wrote on December 6, 2008 4:41 pm:
" I think one statement in the article says it all:
"The judge could, for example, fire executives"
Good. Get rid of them and get some people in there who know how to run a business. "