Hagel thanks Nebraskans in farewell message
By staff and wire reports
U.S. Sen. Chuck Hagel on Thursday thanked Nebraskans for giving him the chance to represent the state in the Senate for the past 12 years.
The Republican, who leaves office in January, sent a farewell letter Thursday.
In the letter, Hagel said in many ways the world is more complicated and dangerous than it was 12 years ago, which presents implications for the state. So he encouraged Nebraskans to consider the global implications of their actions.
"World affairs and America's competitive position in the world represent the future for Nebraska," the senator, who decided last year to not seek a third term, wrote in the letter. "We are now all citizens of a global community underpinned by a global economy. Energy has done as much to integrate world affairs as any one development."
Hagel said he appreciated the decency of the people he represented. He said most were courteous and understanding, even when they disagreed with him.
"They knew that the world is complicated, combustible and interconnected and they knew that there are few easy and quick answers," Hagel wrote. "Democracies and great societies flourish through informed and engaged citizens. I will always be grateful for the support, advice and assistance of the people I have represented."
Former Republican Gov. Mike Johanns beat Democrat Scott Kleeb in November and will replace Hagel in the new Congress.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Having said that, it is also sad to see someone with this much intelligence and ethics leave. This man was the real Maverick. "
Missed. wrote on December 4, 2008 2:56 pm:
Ned wrote on December 4, 2008 3:07 pm:
MarkyMarkIsCrazy wrote on December 4, 2008 3:11 pm:
What wrote on December 4, 2008 3:20 pm:
Ninajean Rohlfs wrote on December 4, 2008 3:23 pm:
Chris wrote on December 4, 2008 3:38 pm:
Barnie wrote on December 4, 2008 3:44 pm:
Ignignokt wrote on December 4, 2008 3:50 pm:
Where would the U.S. be today if the American Colonies had given up the fight against Britain in the Revolutionary War because they were losing? When did it become acceptable to pack up and quit because we're losing? I don't like making corny analogies...but should the 1980 U.S. Men's Hockey Team have given up because they were quite clearly losing to the Soviets? Should Nebraska have given up against Colorado when the score was 31-24 because they were quite clearly losing? Losing does not equal lost...and any effort by Hagel to encourage the U.S. to tuck its tail in defeat is not 'doing good', it's not 'honorable' nor 'ethical', and it's not serving his constituents...the State of Nebraska. I will not miss him, and I reject his thanks, because I didn't vote for him. "
MarkyMark wrote on December 4, 2008 3:54 pm:
KROC wrote on December 4, 2008 3:54 pm:
Jeff wrote on December 4, 2008 3:57 pm:
CapHill wrote on December 4, 2008 4:32 pm:
Hope wrote on December 4, 2008 4:44 pm:
outta here wrote on December 4, 2008 5:18 pm:
Please plan to live and stay on the east coast after you are gone from the Senate. "
Matt P. wrote on December 4, 2008 5:30 pm:
How you find a problem with this type of mentality is beyond me. We need more people like him...NOT LESS! "
larry wrote on December 4, 2008 5:35 pm:
see ya wrote on December 4, 2008 5:50 pm:
whoa wrote on December 4, 2008 6:06 pm:
Prop wrote on December 4, 2008 6:28 pm:
Denise wrote on December 4, 2008 6:51 pm:
Ryan wrote on December 4, 2008 8:06 pm:
Thanks wrote on December 4, 2008 8:36 pm:
JB wrote on December 4, 2008 11:32 pm:
Thank you Senator Hagel wrote on December 5, 2008 8:11 am:
MarkyMark wrote on December 5, 2008 9:33 am:
I don't think Hagel did anything close to that kind of emboldening.
Your analogy makes some sense Ig, but comparing Iraq to the Revolution, really, come on now. "
Tammy wrote on December 5, 2008 10:00 am:
prop is right wrote on December 5, 2008 10:29 am:
Ignignokt wrote on December 5, 2008 10:46 am:
I also don't see anything wrong with comparing Iraq to the American Revolution. A perfect comparison? Hardly. But you have two countries whose citizens were suffering under an uncaring dictatorship. In both cases, the countries struggled with differing ideologies within the population...some remained loyal to the dictatorship...some supported the fight for freedom and democracy. Both countries needed outside help to achieve victory. Far as I can tell, the main difference between the two was the proximity of the dictator to the oppressed opposition. That...and Americans wanted no taxation without representation, whereas the Iraqis wanted no more genocide. "
Wayne Smith wrote on December 5, 2008 11:11 am:
Ilof muwidh wrote on December 5, 2008 12:16 pm:
MarkyMark wrote on December 5, 2008 5:00 pm:
I'm just an average citizen who predicted exactly what would happen in Iraq. My Conservative buddies who predicted a victory in a few days and with little to no casulties, and virtually no cost?....They now bow to me. That whole thing is overrated though, as anyone with a high school knowledge of the Middle East could have seen this coming. "