Faculty seek probe into Ayers cancellation
By MELISSA LEE / Lincoln Journal Star
Faculty leaders at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln have requested an investigation into UNL’s decision to cancel a speech last month by 1960s and ’70s radical William Ayers.
Tuesday, the UNL Academic Senate passed a resolution calling on Senate President Kathy Prochaska-Cue to initiate an investigation by an outside organization like the American Association of University Professors or the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
The investigation should determine whether UNL’s cancellation of the Ayers speech violated the principles of academic freedom and also should review UNL’s policies concerning such cancellations, the faculty resolution said.
Related Media
The story so far: Ayers and UNL
William Ayers was set to speak at a University of Nebraska-Lincoln conference until UNL received more than 1,000 e-mails and phone calls condemning th...
Related Link(s):
Prochaska-Cue also should appoint a committee to develop procedures that would allow for faculty input in similar decisions in the future, the resolution said.
Ayers, a founder of the anti-war group Weather Underground, now is an education professor at the University of Illinois-Chicago. He had been scheduled to speak about education research at a Nov. 15 UNL conference.
But news of Ayers’ planned visit sparked an immediate public uproar — including threats of violence at the conference and threats on Ayers’ life — and UNL Chancellor Harvey Perlman quickly canceled the event for security reasons.
Some faculty say the cancellation violated academic freedom. They believe the decision was rash and that they should have been consulted.
Perlman, according to minutes from the Nov. 4 Academic Senate meeting, said then he made the decision so quickly because he felt he "needed to bend over backwards for the safety of the campus.”
He also said he would be “leery” of a specific set of procedures for dealing with situations like the Ayers one.
Perlman said he is ultimately responsible for the safety of the campus and that he “is not going to defer this responsibility to a faculty committee or to a set of procedures that could potentially bind his hands,” the meeting minutes say.
Reach Melissa Lee at 473-2682 or mlee@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit





Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
D wrote on December 3, 2008 5:34 pm:
suliemon wrote on December 3, 2008 5:37 pm:
Nice wrote on December 3, 2008 5:47 pm:
Charlie wrote on December 3, 2008 6:00 pm:
DJ wrote on December 3, 2008 6:33 pm:
OMG wrote on December 3, 2008 6:39 pm:
Tiredoflife wrote on December 3, 2008 6:44 pm:
mike wrote on December 3, 2008 7:10 pm:
DC Husker wrote on December 3, 2008 7:10 pm:
Scott L. 83 wrote on December 3, 2008 7:14 pm:
jmjljjd wrote on December 3, 2008 7:14 pm:
JC wrote on December 3, 2008 7:21 pm:
unl student wrote on December 3, 2008 7:43 pm:
Waste wrote on December 3, 2008 7:47 pm:
Gerard Harbison wrote on December 3, 2008 7:48 pm:
Uh, no, I don't remember. Being one of those 'ivory tower' professors, I have some familiarity with 'famous philosophers', and I've never heard this. Got a name?
I'd hate to think you just made it up. "
Wondering wrote on December 3, 2008 8:09 pm:
Curt wrote on December 3, 2008 8:17 pm:
mike wrote on December 3, 2008 8:20 pm:
As it is wrote on December 3, 2008 8:21 pm:
I too would like an investigation wrote on December 3, 2008 8:27 pm:
HVJ wrote on December 3, 2008 8:36 pm:
Lucille wrote on December 3, 2008 8:40 pm:
Jeff wrote on December 3, 2008 9:09 pm:
Mark wrote on December 3, 2008 9:12 pm:
Lincoln Taxpayer wrote on December 3, 2008 9:14 pm:
CS wrote on December 3, 2008 9:27 pm:
CS wrote on December 3, 2008 9:33 pm:
Smart and Smarter wrote on December 3, 2008 9:43 pm:
Dianne wrote on December 3, 2008 10:01 pm:
freedom wrote on December 3, 2008 10:07 pm:
STOP THE INSANITY wrote on December 3, 2008 10:22 pm:
Nobody would have known that he was scheduled to speak if it wasn't for the presidential election. Please stop drinking the Republican Kool Aid by the gallon. Half of the people who post their hard core right wing views/Nebraska Republican Values fall more in the category of the "lunatic fringe" than Mr. Ayers does.
By the way, he isn't in jail because of the always ethical Nixon administration. "
wrote on December 3, 2008 10:48 pm:
JB wrote on December 3, 2008 10:55 pm:
ururpast wrote on December 3, 2008 11:12 pm:
" Common sense is why they cancelled it...get over it! ""
That is correct! The "intellectuals" cannot possibly grasp that concept as it is in such short supply in their group!
These people should actually utilize their education and go out into the real world and apply that knowledge, and thereby LEARN what is meant by "common sense". "
student wrote on December 3, 2008 11:40 pm:
Lets move on wrote on December 4, 2008 12:10 am:
UNL alumni wrote on December 4, 2008 12:12 am:
and have some faith in the justice system after all isn't this quite the turn around for someone to make. from being such a radical criminal to come to terms and begin working with the government for better education should be celebrated. "
Dave wrote on December 4, 2008 12:19 am:
Disgusting wrote on December 4, 2008 12:20 am:
Laws are made to be abided to. Ayers did not. I don't want my son learning he can pick and chose which laws he will abide by. Even IF we don't agree with them.
You know, this whole morality thing has gone by the wayside in our society. If it is opposite of truth, opposite of "normal", opposite of appropriate....then the "intellectuals" (I question the validity of that) on staff at UNL who are raising ires here think they are on the fringes of something new.
That, is what I call civil disobedience and they are wanting to esteem it as educational freedom? And we are paying big bucks for their "stage" for their personal agendas?
Tisk. "
Funny math wrote on December 4, 2008 12:36 am:
UNL Grad wrote on December 4, 2008 7:30 am:
congrats wrote on December 4, 2008 8:00 am:
Buddha wrote on December 4, 2008 8:14 am:
Dianne-I wish it were that easy. I am a college professor myself, and a good portion of my job is not even teaching related. We do have to serve on committees that have nothing to do with the teaching part of our jobs, but the functions of the institution we serve at. We also may have to advise student organizations, and be expected to attend non-academic functions if we want to look good for promotions.
Also, if it didn't matter what we professors think, then academic freedom might as well be buried forever, because we are the subject matter experts. If we are not allowed a voice into how our subjects are taught, then this country might as well as expect to become the economic wimp it should be because we'll graduate people who learned their subject matter incorrectly because administrators who have no idea what the subject matter was decided what would be taught and how. "
ALB wrote on December 4, 2008 8:20 am:
LLB wrote on December 4, 2008 8:21 am:
the real mary wrote on December 4, 2008 8:57 am:
Outsider wrote on December 4, 2008 9:16 am:
JB wrote on December 4, 2008 9:52 am:
MarkyMark wrote on December 4, 2008 11:32 am:
JB JB JB wrote on December 4, 2008 11:47 am:
Let him speak wrote on December 4, 2008 12:03 pm:
Ned wrote on December 4, 2008 1:28 pm:
Al wrote on December 4, 2008 2:02 pm:
Jim wrote on December 4, 2008 2:07 pm:
Ghost of Democracy wrote on December 4, 2008 2:13 pm:
As for the constant ranting of the Law and Order crowd, William Ayers was discharged from legal pursuit because of the misconduct of Prosecutors. Instead of examining the offenses of the Justice System that LEAD to Mr Ayers release from custody, they instead blindly call him names and insist he is a criminal and a terrorist. Mr Ayers is not in jail because of the failure of the Justice System to behave in a manner reflective of its name and purpose. If you desire a "justice system" that ignores or condones the misconduct of the Goverment, there are many countries still available for you to go and live. As for my country, I would prefer a Justice System that is worthy of the name. "
Bob wrote on December 4, 2008 2:46 pm:
Wow wrote on December 4, 2008 6:34 pm:
Per the previous article, and correct me if I'm wrong it stated some of the major donors did not want Mr Ayers here and if he did they would stop the proceeds. I guess we know who really runs the University system. "
GMD wrote on December 4, 2008 8:17 pm:
Democrat wrote on December 4, 2008 10:16 pm:
JB wrote on December 5, 2008 7:51 am:
mark wrote on December 5, 2008 7:53 am:
Divisive = OK.
Killing = not OK. "
John wrote on December 5, 2008 9:02 am:
iconoclast wrote on December 5, 2008 2:10 pm:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/12/05/BAVM14H16D.DTL
Of course, it would be great. All of those people opposing Bill Ayers' freedom of speech are just great with approving of torture.
But notice how much more civilly it is handled at a real college. "
John wrote on December 5, 2008 4:43 pm:
Just to say... wrote on December 5, 2008 8:10 pm:
timmy wrote on December 5, 2008 9:42 pm:
Bout time wrote on December 9, 2008 4:04 pm:
It's like someone's kid calling in a bomb threat so that school gets canceled for at a day. Don't parents usually want the child caught and punished appropriately? That's what all of us citizens in Nebraska want done to the individuals whom threatened the University and it's students because of one man. The staff faculty that ultimately chose to cancel the invitation due to threats upon the school, staff, and students whom invited Ayers should be congratulated on the protection of the campus. Yet, if it was due to the fact that faculty staff made the decision based on donations and funding being pulled then that should also be a punishable act. Education should not have a price. Some students did not want Ayers to speak and some did, it should have been the students decision to attend or not.
Parents who send they're children to college should believe that the University of they're choice is doing it's best to give you're child the rounded education you're child needs to make the best decisions they can for themselves. If you want you're child to be closed minded then you may hold their hand throughout the rest of their lives and decide who teaches them and interacts with them, but you are really doing them harm by not allowing you're child to be them self. They are students and old enough to do whats best for them.
The students should have discussed it amongst themselves and did what they thought was best. Ayers was invited and most students either didn't care or didn't even know who he was, so it was going to be okay as far as the University knew. That should have been the end of it, but it wasn't. I hope that those who made serious threats and have heard there will be an investigation feel as scared as a terrorist in a cave. The people who threatened the school with lack of donations and funds should just feel ashamed and guilty for what they did. I'm sure none of the guilty will though. They just justify it with their own ideals like a true terrorist. "