Letters, 12/3: What will we learn?
When the dust settles from the current government-created emergency, what will be the lessons voters learn? Will it be that free markets are evil? That socialism works? Or will we begin to believe that government isn’t the answer?
Will we realize that big government only protects those things like itself (anything large, inefficient and corrupt)? As our future and that of our children, grandchildren and now great-grandchildren gets sold down the river, will we put blame where it belongs?
Our federal government set the stage for this crisis through interference in the home mortgage markets when it created the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac enterprises. They were created to provide every American with the American dream: a house of their own. It worked like a charm, and those who traditionally wouldn’t have been able to obtain a mortgage did so with ease.
Now, as taxpayers, we pay the price. Oh, and while we’re at it, how about bailing out the banks, insurance companies, automakers and their bloated union, the credit card companies … the list is endless. The price tag? A possible $7.76 trillion. That’s about $24,000 for every American, and that’s on top of the already impossibly large federal debt (more than $10 trillion).
Will we ever say no? I don’t think it matters much anymore if we do; the consequences of allowing big government to go this far will make the hard choices for us … but what will we learn?
Dave Kendle, Lincoln
AG contradictory
With regard to the Nov. 24 story, “AG asks for tougher penalties”: I was in the courtroom when Tom Wiese, who sold ethanol-blended gas as regular gas, appeared. Attorney General Jon Bruning’s assistant asked the court not to impose a jail sentence.
If Bruning’s office does not request jail for the misdemeanor offenses the defendant committed, there is no point in changing the crime to a felony. Jail is the deterrent.
Stuart Mills, Pender
Other parks need fixing
I think it’s great Lincoln supports Union Plaza (LJS, Dec. 1). It’ll be a great park, but I believe Lincoln residents aren’t aware of existing parks in desperate need of renovating.
Sherman Field is one of a few fields in Lincoln that supports at least seven local schools in their baseball programs (spring and summer seasons, plus the University of Nebraska-Lincoln occasionally), and the park structures are in some of the worst conditions I’ve seen.
The field is always in great condition, which is truly applause for the crew that maintains a field that probably endures about 200 games a year. Sherman’s ticket stand, concession stand and especially the restrooms and maintenance shed are in horrible condition and are a dreadful representation of Lincoln.
I’ve been to many baseball parks, and Lincoln by far has one of the worst facilities.
Some great players have played baseball at this legendary landmark: Bob Cerv, Alex Gordon, Joba Chamberlain.
Lincoln seems to care about parks; why not Sherman? If we don’t fix Sherman, not only is a historical park within Lincoln going to disappear, but the youth programs also will suffer more than they already do!
To the people who work to maintain Sherman, run the concession stands, sell tickets, my hat goes off to you. You all haven’t received the recognition you deserve!
M. Raye Miller, Lincoln

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit


Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
stignob wrote on December 3, 2008 8:24 am:
exactly right wrote on December 3, 2008 8:37 am:
fearless wrote on December 3, 2008 8:55 am:
Vote for Freedom wrote on December 3, 2008 9:17 am:
And yet this economic fundamental which our great country was founded upon (freedom of choice) seems to be demonized by the media, politicians, and not taught academia.
Dave, hopefully the lesson voters learn is: Vote for freedom! "
MarkyMark wrote on December 3, 2008 10:39 am:
And why are the Republicans seeming to want to "out-socialize the Democrats? "
Tim wrote on December 3, 2008 11:54 am:
As for fearless - When you take from one to give to another it is "Socialism/Communism".
When people freely give on their own to another it is compassion.
Someone telling me how much to give is "Socialism/Communism".
Freely giving to ones ability and caring heart and soul is compassion. "
Ned wrote on December 3, 2008 12:04 pm:
Sean1 wrote on December 3, 2008 12:11 pm:
Lessons Learned wrote on December 3, 2008 12:22 pm:
We can play the blame game for as long as we like but it still comes back to John and Mary Q Public. No matter how you try to twist this with words, we are responsible for this mess. We the public voted in incompetence, greed, corruption. In the last 30 years, we have been very complacent, we voted people into offices on nonsense issues( Abortion and Gay Marriage don't matter very much when your government is going down the toilet). We failed to insist that infrastructure, balanced budgets and accountability be upheld.
We the public can do better, we have to make our leaders accountable to us or we will keep repeating this constant pattern. "
Not New wrote on December 3, 2008 12:50 pm:
Farmers daughter wrote on December 3, 2008 1:12 pm:
Pete Allen wrote on December 3, 2008 2:20 pm:
As Alexis DeTocqueville observed: "Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality."
"But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty,
socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."
Democracy and a free market give every worker a chance to excel. Socialism enslaves everyone not a member of the ruling elite.
Pete Allen "
RJ wrote on December 3, 2008 3:14 pm:
the Unions, yet say nothing about the over paid CEO's & their buddy, buddy
board of Directors.
As for Rush Limbaugh, Ann Culter, until NE people wake up that, the Republican right wing will keep them in there to brain wash the people & to hate. They are doing a good job of it, too. Seeing how the NE people voted last time. "
Cole wrote on December 3, 2008 6:30 pm:
Bruning's request makes sense, but it's hypocritical to talk tough and issue press releases citing the very cases your office is quietly pleading out.
Why ask for a change in the rules when you won't use the rules you have? It wastes tax dollars and the legislature's time - something a true Republican shouldn't do.
We all know why. The same reason we see Shane Osborn's name in the paper all the time. They're just laying a foundation to seek higher office - something else a true Republican shouldn't do. "
davidb wrote on December 3, 2008 9:22 pm:
Dave Kendle wrote on December 3, 2008 9:58 pm:
I do believe strongly in free markets, and agree that socialism is just another name for slavery.
$18 trillion and counting. It's hard for me to believe that anyone thinks we can borrow our way to prosperity in this way, or tax our way to freedom for that matter. "
Dear Pete wrote on December 4, 2008 12:30 pm:
MarkyMark wrote on December 4, 2008 2:38 pm: