Now
Fair
32°
High
42°
Low
15°

Retirees fight Windstream plan to cut benefits

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By JOSH FUNK / The Associated Press

Wednesday, Dec 03, 2008 - 09:26:33 pm CST

OMAHA — Windstream Corp. wants a federal judge to affirm its authority to reduce retiree benefits even when the people affected retired from other phone companies that Windstream acquired over the years.

But the retirees argue that Little Rock, Ark.-based Windstream and the companies it acquired — Lincoln-based Aliant Communications and its predecessor Lincoln Telephone Company — promised to maintain retirement benefits unchanged. A U.S. District judge in Lincoln will hear arguments in the case on Dec. 15.

In court documents, Windstream argues that it has an absolute right to make any changes it wants to the retiree benefit plans. The retirees counter that they earned those benefits by working for the company at least 15 years.

Attorney David Domina, who represents the retirees, said the benefits should be considered vested and permanent.

An attorney for the company did not immediately respond to a message Wednesday and a Windstream spokesman declined to comment.

Earlier this year, Windstream told retirees that it planned to require them to start paying part of their health insurance costs and reduce other benefits. In court documents, Windstream said benefits for each of the more than 800 Nebraska retirees covered by the case cost three times more than other retirees.

Windstream estimates that retiree health care benefits represent a $227 million liability for the company, and two-thirds of that figure is associated with benefits for the Nebraska retirees.

Windstream provides voice lines and broadband Internet service in 16 states. The company operates in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Texas.

The publicly traded company was spun off from Alltel Corp. in 2006 and merged with Valor Communications Group Inc. of Irving, Texas.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
earned wrote on December 3, 2008 10:13 pm:
" They earned them, they should stay as is. "

sorry wrote on December 3, 2008 11:41 pm:
" You bought Aliant and every contract it had with former employees. Funny that GM and Ford have realized they are stuck with retirement obligations to former employees but li'l ol Windstream thinks they can get around it. Not saying that all these union retirees didn't get an awful sweet deal, but both sides knew when they signed retirement papers what they were agreeing to and now will live with it. "

whatever wrote on December 4, 2008 5:23 am:
" It's a new world out there. I believe on of the chief criticisms of the "big three" is the retirement benefits they pay to former workers. Former Windstream employees should be no different. It's time for Nebraskans to make a sacrifice to and why not start with former Windstream employees. Right? "

Greg wrote on December 4, 2008 6:48 am:
" As I read this I actually considered the prospect of dropping my landline and switching internet providers... This is no way for a company to treat people... Employees have become disposable in the eyes of the business world. This kind of thought process needs to be stopped. "

Don wrote on December 4, 2008 8:50 am:
" So Windstream is saying that the 800 Nebraska retirees are costing them 2/3 of the $227 million? That sounds a little excessive. "

My mother wrote on December 4, 2008 11:44 am:
" is one of these retirees that are going to have to pay these costs-she has been retired for over 10 years and I think they should still have the benefits they signed for. It is not her fault that all this crap with the economy is happening, how is she supposed to pay these costs on her fixed income. Come on Windstream you knew what you were getting into with the Labor Contract. "

What wrote on December 4, 2008 1:37 pm:
" You mean to tell me the retirees weren't paying some of their health
expense?? Non of these companies have to guarantee retirees health insurance. I pay my companies health insurance premium and they set their
prices the same as medicare and therefore, they end up paying NOTHING!!
But mine is better than a relative who's company he retired from here in Lincoln switched health care companies so it wouldn't cost his company
as much and boy is he paying huge dollars. I worked for my company 46
years, and most of those years we worked for peanuts and were told "well
part of your salary is for you present and future health care." Boy was
that a bunch of baloney! The Govt shouldn't give the big 3 a dime unless
employees and retirees both get their health insurance and salaries
reduced big time. Those unions destroyed the big 3, now they want all
us taxpayers to bail them out. I say no even if the country goes into
a depression. Been thru that once and there's a world full of people that
need to be taught a lesson on greed!! An out patient surgical procedure
normally paid 85% by medicare for the hospital, was only paid 67% because
the "average national charge for the procedure was WAY below what you
are charged here in Lincoln," medicare told me!!!! Medical costs are
high everywhere, but as normal, Lincoln and Nebraska will take you to
the cleaners big time, plus the service prices are so jacked up that no
wonder medicare is going broke. And who does it hurt, the little guy!! "