Now
Fair
32°
High
33°
Low
26°

NU chief: Cuts likely looming

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By MELISSA LEE / Lincoln Journal Star

Tuesday, Dec 02, 2008 - 12:41:13 am CST

University of Nebraska President J.B. Milliken is urging the campuses to cut spending now to soften the impact the poor economy is likely to have on NU’s upcoming two-year budget cycle.

On Monday — the same day the U.S. economy was officially deemed to be in recession — Milliken sent NU faculty and staff an e-mail alerting them budget cuts likely are looming and that they’ll need to “work together to meet the challenges ahead.”

“At this time, we do not anticipate mid-year budget cuts; however, we must use the seven remaining months of this fiscal year to prepare for more difficult times ahead,” Milliken wrote. “First, we must reduce expenditures from now through June 2009, so we will be in a position to use unexpended funds to help manage in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009.

“Second, we must begin the difficult process of planning for a biennial budget that will likely require reductions.”

Milliken and the four NU chancellors met Monday to discuss budget strategies.

They did not emerge with a specific goal on how much they want to trim spending, Milliken said in an interview, but they did agree to work to free up funds from their current budgets that could help NU get through the next fiscal year.

“We have the opportunity to use these seven months to prepare for next year,” he said. “Every major area of the operating budget will be looked at and we will begin now.”

One big area: hiring. Most of NU’s budget goes toward personnel expenses, Milliken noted, so each chancellor will have to carefully evaluate the open positions on his campus.

The positions that will get filled, he said, are the ones that contribute to NU’s strategic goals — affordability, research, economic development and others.

Such focused hiring will help ensure the progress NU has enjoyed recently in key areas will continue, Milliken said.

NU has had four straight years of enrollment growth, for example, major increases in research expansion and record levels of support from the NU Foundation, the university system’s fundraising arm.

“There are many priorities that we will continue to pursue even in a difficult budget time,” Milliken said.

Campuses also will look to reduce other costs like utilities and travel, he said.

When NU endured significant budget difficulties earlier this decade, students shouldered four straight years of double-digit tuition increases.

With affordability a priority for Milliken — he announced one week ago an expansion of an NU financial aid program for low-income students — he said he’s hopeful such increases won’t happen again.

“While we will seek additional ways to enhance revenue, I do not believe we can be true to our mission and balance the budget with significantly higher tuition,” he wrote in his e-mail.

The next session of the Legislature, during which lawmakers will craft a two-year budget for the state, begins Jan. 7.

Though the economic downturn has not hit Nebraska as hard as other states, signs still point to a difficult biennium, Milliken said.

The campuses must pitch in, then, to be cost-effective while still fulfilling NU’s mission, he said.

“It’s important to keep in mind that the university is in a strong position and we will do everything we can to try to preserve that momentum.”

Reach Melissa Lee at 473-2682 or mlee@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
soccermom wrote on December 2, 2008 5:45 am:
" maybe they can start with their salaries? "

soccerdad wrote on December 2, 2008 7:28 am:
" Thats right, they already get paid less than eqivalent jobs in private industry, so might as well pay them less. Then when they leave for better jobs, we can remove that position! "

Cost Cutter wrote on December 2, 2008 8:27 am:
" A great place to start is by eliminating the NU presidenct's office, it's not needed. Other states get along just fine without such a bureaucracy. "

cry wolf wrote on December 2, 2008 8:28 am:
" The University has over $1.5 billion in its endowment, tax free. Do "we" really need the state fairgrounds at University expense? Do Milliken and Perlman need huge raises as discussed several weeks ago in the paper? When will tuition raises end? Tuition raise suggestion from the administration to the regents is just a formality for their blank check adoption. This is not the State of University of Nebraska it is the State of Nebraska. We have numerous other higher education institutions in this state that do not "cry wolf" prior every legislative session. "

KJN wrote on December 2, 2008 8:38 am:
" These two soccer parents hit the nail on the head! The little guys are the ones who need better raises. The big guys could take a cut. Also - look at employees who are not really doing the job. Supervisors should do more supervising. As a previous employee, I saw a lot of waste - employees not having a full 8-hour day of work, yet receiving 8 hours worth of pay. Everyone should be accountable. "

alum wrote on December 2, 2008 8:51 am:
" how does the renovation of the state fair park fit into the UNL budget? "

Paul wrote on December 2, 2008 8:55 am:
" I wonder what could have been saved had the powers that be never hired Steve Pederson (and pay off the remainder of his contract), who then in turn hired Bill Callahan and co.( and pay off the remainder of their contracts)? Where is the outcry for accountability in this area? I appreciate the direction UNL's athletic department is heading, but someone must be responsible for these millions. Please don't force the students to lose out on opportunities. "

jb wrote on December 2, 2008 9:17 am:
" Ok, how about a little less spending on new buildings, maybe cut the landscaping budget, or how about dropping the mud volleyball court that is to be built. "

Wow a little bit of surprise. NOT wrote on December 2, 2008 9:32 am:
" This is no surprise. These folks should see things like this coming long before this. We hire them to be experts, yet they need outside help to get expert and then the outside help can be blamed. What a deal "

Hadrian wrote on December 2, 2008 9:33 am:
" How about not using tuition money for research and administrative pet projects? "

Hey Paul wrote on December 2, 2008 9:38 am:
" Get your facts straight. No taxpayer or tuition dollars go to the athletic department, it is solely self-sufficient. Therefore, no taxpayer or tuition dollars went to pay off pederson's or callahan's contracts...all of that money came from football ticket revenues, etc. So if you're so upset about all the waste from the athletic department, I suggest you stop subsidizing it by attending sporting events. "

tom issaquah wrote on December 2, 2008 10:42 am:
" Didn't I just read a few weeks ago about salary increases for these guys and now they are asking everyone to cut expenses?? Milliken and Pearlman need to stop talking out of both sides of their mouths and start talking straight. At the very least they should refuse their salary increases to set the example for everyone else!!!!! I think I saw this scenario in Washington D.C. when the automakers were pleading for money and not talking about their PERSONAL concessions they were willing to make. Com'n Milliken and Pearlman. "

parent of UNL student wrote on December 2, 2008 10:45 am:
" The last article I read dealt with the fact that Milliken received a raise, and that it was not enough of a raise. Excellent leadership on his part.
Also "NU’s strategic goals" are listed "affordability, research, economic development." Affordability is important, but what about educational quality? I went to UNL and my daughter is going, but it costs too much, and the quality of education is down significantly since I attended.
Let us spend the money on teachers, not on administrators and research
. "

JAZZY wrote on December 2, 2008 2:36 pm:
" I think if there are to be cuts that is should be no more bonuses. The big wigs should get a raise just because they think they need one. do they actually do anything out of the ordinary, other then the job discription. If you do you job , that is all the is expected but if you really do above and beyond. then we may talk about a raise or bonus. "

Grad Student wrote on December 2, 2008 3:00 pm:
" As a graduate student at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln who pays for his degree out of pocket (no loans, no assitantships, nothing) it really annoys me to hear every year that tuition will be raised. I pay about double what an undergrad pays for a credit hour and it adds up. It is very irritating to see the University charge students fees for everything they do while they attend (parking, housing, printing, library, etc.) and then decides it needs to charge more for attending. The only things students get for free are admittance into most sporting events. I know there is no such thing as a free lunch, but at some point is it really worth paying for a five star meal when all you get is a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. "

Eric wrote on December 2, 2008 3:39 pm:
" "No taxpayer or tuition dollars go to the athletic department" -- BULL. That is a load of crap that has spewed forth from several Husker fans throughout the past 20 years. I am a huge sports fan, and a fan of our beloved Cornhuskers ... but I am sick and tired of people saying that the athletic department is completely self-sufficient. Prove it.

On average, 20% of the Athletic Department's budget goes to other UNL units (tuition, books, fees, housing, etc.) Someone has to provide those assets, and I guarantee you the Athletic Department isn't out ordering separately from other university units. The Athletic Department pays almost $2 MILLION in taxes during the fiscal year.

You can tell me it doesn't require additional student fees or state funding ... but I tell you there would be no athletic department at UNL if the rest of the academic organization were not there, nor if this state had more competition at the same level (or higher) for athletics.

Some of you make it sound like the Athletic Department would exist in the Sandhills and be just as successful. Again -- BULL. "

Kristine wrote on December 2, 2008 4:32 pm:
" I also think you need to consider what a regular staff person 'gets' as an employee for the University. Valued employees get....to pay for their own parking, which does not guarantee a parking spot; expensive health insurance, most of which doesn't cover anything. And the wages are hardly competitive. You used to get a bus pass....I don't know if that's still a 'perk'. Really, the perks for students and staff are just plain laughable. Go ahead and cut people, make the wages even more ridiculous, but remember, you get what you pay for. "

txae1246 wrote on December 2, 2008 4:40 pm:
" How can they justify a raise if overall they are expecting cuts? "