Now
Fair
32°
High
33°
Low
26°

More horses sent abroad for slaughter after US ban

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NATE JENKINS/The Associated Press

Wednesday, Nov 26, 2008 - 04:59:25 pm CST

RUSHVILLE — At dusk, after all the fancy horses had been auctioned, Doug Barnes settled into a seat at the sale barn and got down to business. Three, four, five or more horses ambled into the ring at a time.

The auctioneer stopped making sales pitches. He looked straight ahead at the familiar visitor from Fort Collins, Colo., waiting for him to tip his hand. Barnes didn’t disappoint.

In about 30 minutes, Barnes bought 25 so-called “killer horses.” Their new owner would subject them to what animal rights groups say is a growing type of abuse: trucking them nearly 700 miles to Canada for slaughter, circumventing a U.S. ban on the practice. Much of the meat is eventually exported to countries in Europe and Asia for human consumption.

Story Photo
"Loose" or "way up" horses, most of which were sold so they could be sent to Canada to be slaughtered, wait to be ushered into the auction ring in Rushville on Sept. 24. Thousands of unwanted horses are being exported to Canada and Mexico to be slaughtered since the last U.S. horse slaughterhouse closed last year.(AP Photo / Nate Jenkins)

Stacy Segal, a horse specialist at the Humane Society of the United States, and other animal rights activists want a ban on exporting U.S. horses for slaughter abroad.

“They’re jammed onto trailers with no regard for breed, size, age, temperament or sex and get no feed or rest,” Segal said.

Last year, when state-imposed bans closed the last three U.S. horse slaughterhouses, a record 78,000 horses were exported to Canada and Mexico for slaughter, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture statistics compiled by the Humane Society. That’s a 138 percent increase from 2006.

Statistics show that 76,100 horses have been slaughtered in Canada and Mexico so far this year. But the actual figure is likely higher because Canada hasn’t yet reported two months’ worth of slaughter numbers.

Barnes and others acknowledge that the long trip is stressful on the animals, but they blame animal rights activists who successfully pushed for all U.S. horse slaughterhouses to shut down. They say the increased exportation of horses is better than the alternative: horses being neglected and abused by owners who don’t want them or can’t afford to take care of them.

“In ranch country, people look at this as a necessary evil,” Barnes said one late September day after buying five older horses for $135 apiece.

His boss, Charles Carter, is considered one of the largest buyers of killer horses in the country. Barnes, who scours sale barns in Nebraska, Colorado, South Dakota, Montana and Texas for Carter, estimates he has bought more than 1,000 horses for Carter this year alone.

Carter didn’t return phone messages from The Associated Press seeking comment.

“We’re doing them a favor by buying horses that might otherwise be neglected,” Barnes said. “The big misconception animal rights people have is that all horses that go to slaughter are good, useable horses or pets ... when actually they’re animals you can’t do much with.”

Slaughter opponents got a hopeful sign from Congress when a proposed export-for-slaughter ban was approved by the House Judiciary Committee in late September. But the bill got hung up in the Agriculture Committee during the final days of the session and will have to be reintroduced next year.

The long trip to slaughterhouses where the U.S. has no oversight isn’t the only stress on horses destined for Canada and Mexico. They often spend days in feedlots, where they have blood drawn for tests necessary to get the health approval required for exportation.

One such feedlot opened last year on the outskirts of Gordon, Neb., just 15 miles away from the Rushville sale barn. Operators of the feedlot expect to hold 5,000 horses there this year alone.

Many of the horses are being bought at prices unheard of just a couple years ago. The U.S. slaughter ban, combined with overbreeding, a slack economy and high feed prices, have helped to create a glut of unwanted horses that has dampened the market. The last horse population census, in 2005, showed 9 million horses in the United States, up from about 5.5 million in the mid-1990s, Segal said.

Killer horses that used to sell for about 40 cents to 50 cents per pound before U.S. horse slaughterhouses closed now sell for about half that. At sale barns where Barnes used to compete with several other buyers, he’s sometimes the only bidder.

Supporters of a ban on exporting horses for slaughter say the solution to the oversupply is to euthanize unwanted horses or take them to rescue organizations.

But capacity is a problem.

“Typically they’re full,” said Stephen Rei, president of the National Equine Rescue Coalition, which claims about 200 horse rescue groups as members.

That’s the case at Valerie Hinderlider’s horse rescue operation near Minden, Break Heart Ranch, which has 45 horses.

Hinderlider recently was forced to make a grim choice: She bought two horses so she could euthanize them rather than allow the previous owner to sell them for slaughter.

The price to kill and bury — anywhere from $100 to $250 — isn’t one everyone can afford or is willing to pay. Nor is there room to bury all the horses.

“What would you do with all these thousands of head of horses?” Rushville veterinarian Jeff Erquiaga asked, pointing to a trench outside the sale barn that has become a graveyard for euthanized horses.

Erquiaga said he’s euthanizing about 25 percent more horses now than in the past. Still, the number he’s put down so far this year — about 70 — is a small fraction of all the horses people want to get rid of.

Hinderlider suggested that horse owners seek out other buyers before turning to kill buyers. Many potential buyers have been scared away from sale barns because they’ve learned they can’t compete with the likes of Barnes, she said.

“I’ve seen kids walk away crying because they got outbid by kill buyers,” she said.

Michael O’Connell, of Mobridge, S.D., has been buying killer horses for 40 years. He isn’t proud of his occupation but figures he fills a niche.

He said he buys thousands of horses annually, about half of them for a large Canadian supplier of horse meat.

“When I first started I hated it,” he said while sitting in the sale barn. “I still don’t like doing it. But if I didn’t, somebody else would.”


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
and so it goes wrote on November 26, 2008 8:45 am:
" Pigs, cattle, former dairy cows and poultry are already subjected to horrifying rearing, trucking, and slaughtering practices. Why should horses be any different? At least the United States is exporting SOMETHING. "

mark wrote on November 26, 2008 8:47 am:
" ok, before we freak out, I think humans are cuter than horses. proportional outrage, please "

Wasted meat wrote on November 26, 2008 9:05 am:
" Ok, it sounds silly to me: "Supporters of a ban on exporting horses for slaughter say the solution to the oversupply is to euthanize unwanted horses or take them to rescue organizations"

Why euthanize when you can export the meat. This is just plain silly legislation. If someone wants and will make use of the meat that is great! I am an animal lover. But I also believe that killing an animal for food and clothing is a good thing. It is a natural progression. It is no more stressful to the animal to transport it for slaughter than it is to transport it for euthanization. Worse... it is just plain wasted. "

cowgirl wrote on November 26, 2008 9:39 am:
" I bought my horse at a sale barn and was the only one bidding exept a kill buyer I relize they have a job and hate to say it as a horse lover and trainer but it is a needed job horses are over populated. I went to a sale earlier this fall and every horse was skin and bones how are the buyers deciding what should live what should die you cant tell by looking I saw horses going for $75 and even just free. people need to get rid of horses so bad because they cant afford them they put them in trailers of strangers, let them loose to fend for themselves and even drop them off at strangers houses like what happend this week a girl came home to find a exta horse in with her gelding luckly she can take care of it. people are desprate and their arnt enough rescues to take all these horses and people cant afford to feed extra horses. "

-chet wrote on November 26, 2008 9:39 am:
" People who are advocates for horses (treat them in a higher regard than other livestock) fail to realize that they are a liabilty, not a asset to the owner, always. Same should be true on the balance sheet, always. It's a cultural perception in america that horses are above that of a cow or sow. Maybe it's because so many incapable owners treat/use them as "pets".

My line of work deals with these types of people that are crazed over horses. I see them give up everything that they own instead of their horses which are costing them a fortune, it's borderline neurotic. This article fittingly mentions the alternative fates of horses, and other livestock left neglected.

There is a glut of horses in the US thanks to the "stud farming" breeders attempting to get perfect genetics for show and performance. If people want to eliminate this practice, look there first before getting all over the likes of O'Connell and Barnes. Closing US slaughterhouses is only a solution to a symptomatic problem, not the true underlying cause.

Some members of my family rescue these horses in the area, and I've had sliced horse sammiches abroad. Horse tastes bad. It really does. "

JB wrote on November 26, 2008 9:44 am:
" Horses are animals. People eat animals. People need to eat. If there is to many, why not slaughter them? "

Tim wrote on November 26, 2008 9:53 am:
" I am a horse owner, several in fact and shutting down the slaughter plants did a great disservice for the countries that look upon horse meat as a favored dish. The Indians (my ancestors) even liked to eat a mule or pony every now and then.

The rescue places are getting full, feed prices are going sky high and some people are letting their horses suffer or turning them loose. I have heard of horses being abandoned at Halsey National forest.

At my house we raise all kinds of livestock for 4H and they all become pets but my kids know that in the end they are all still animals and they are fine with that. The market for good horses are hurting because of no market for bad, unwanted horses.

They should change the law, create jobs, monitor the plants like they do at Tyson and fill a niche that is needed. Government needs to quit giving into a few radicals and look at the overall picture. "

Jason wrote on November 26, 2008 9:55 am:
" I've long had a problem with animal rights people saying they care only about cute animals and they care more about animals than people.

I've had horse meat in Japan. It was great. I was disappointed when I read about the ban last year. Not only are they taking away jobs and a tax base for the respective communities these slaughterhouses are in, but they are robbing people of a delicious meal. "

cowgirl wrote on November 26, 2008 10:01 am:
" If any animal advocates reads this please email me I want to ask you some questions as a horselover
1 why dont you go to the sales and buy extra unwnated horses?
2 do you know how much feed costs? vets? farriors?
3 you dont want slaughter. But what should we do with all the extra horses?
chet has a point and I want to enlighten it a little more
yes their are tons of $80,000 horses out their but people cant afford to haul them and look at the local high bred horses between gas, fees, food, equipment, with the economy nobodys showing and if you dont show those horses you cant really do anything else with them they are bred and trained to go from stall to ring their is no practicality to them at all. "

Ryan wrote on November 26, 2008 10:10 am:
" Why should horses be treated differently than cows? If there's a market for the meat why is domestic slaughter outlawed? Another case of dumb laws. This isn't the movies, all horses don't run wild in a flower-covered prairie. I see horses all the time in bare dirt corrals with their ribs showing. There's a nice life. "

gourmet food wrote on November 26, 2008 10:18 am:
" Horse are tasty "

zippy wrote on November 26, 2008 10:19 am:
" I genuinely love horses, love my horse, love all horses. BUT - I've seen what happens to horses when their owners can no longer race/show/ride their horses. They are put in a pasture and left to die. I've seen horses that looked like hair-covered skeletons, sick, neglected and literally starving to death. If you can tell me how this is better than slaughtering them, where at least they are put to a quick end and serve to feed a family, then I say yes, let's do away with slaughter.

Sadly, it is a necessary evil. I understand the Humane Society/PETA/animal rights activists wanting to stop slaughter, but they need first to consider the fate of horses that have owners who can or will no longer care for them. They are only looking at one side of a complex issue. A horse owner that can't afford wormer or feed certainly can't afford to euthenize and bury their horse. Rescues are always full; there are simply too many horses that are unwanted.

Slaughter is sometimes the most humane thing we can do for a horse. "

Compassion wrote on November 26, 2008 10:26 am:
" I am horrified by the lack of compassion for animals that have so much empathy for humans. "

whats the difference wrote on November 26, 2008 10:41 am:
" What is the difference between taking a horse to a slaughter plant, killing it and using the meat vs taking a horse to a euthanasia facility, killing it and not using the meat? "

Nildjat wrote on November 26, 2008 10:56 am:
" To answer what "and so it goes" asked, "Why should horses be any different?" They shouldn't. But I wish we would change the way we treat ALL these animals when sending them to slaughterhouses. People see horses as lovable pets more than these other animals, so they pretend to care more, but the reality is that all these animals suffer excessively when sent to their deaths. We need to shine some light on the reality of these animals' situations during their last days and demand better treatment for them all. "

WSU wrote on November 26, 2008 11:03 am:
" What a sickening article to have in the paper right before Thanksgiving. It's the slaughter techniques and total disregard for humane treatment that has most activists upset. Don't own one if you are just going to treat it like a dollar sign in the end. "

such is life wrote on November 26, 2008 11:08 am:
" Mark I agree! Also these peta groups are probably all pro-choice! Sad!
I am an animal lover, maybe those who get horses should keep them until the end. Just as with a dog you keep them till the end and then they die or you put them down. It is the pet owners responsibility. The focus should really be on these dead beat pet (no pun intended) owners! "

Jake wrote on November 26, 2008 11:31 am:
" Kill them and eat them or kill them and let them rot. Horse lovers want to make a distinction between those two options? Either way the horse is dead. It is a small but strong lobby, I guess they will be looking for billions from the government to care for unwanted horses. "

White Meat wrote on November 26, 2008 12:17 pm:
" Horses the other other white meat!! Tastes better than chicken. "

win win wrote on November 26, 2008 12:29 pm:
" Ban export of kill horses and then fine people who neglect horses heavily. If you aren't willing to take care of your animals once their "usefullness" runs out that you shouldn't have the animal in the first place. It's the price of doing business. "

BOB wrote on November 26, 2008 1:10 pm:
" What about that horse in Hickman? "

Empathy for me wrote on November 26, 2008 1:10 pm:
" I am 40-some odd years old and I have NEVER met a horse that had empathy for me. In fact, they mostly had hostility towards me. That does not mean that they should be treated cruelly in their last moments. Our slaughter practices are horrifying! Fix them for ALL slaughter animals and stop calling horses "kill" horses. They are not doing the killing. Call them slaughter horses just like cows and poultry. "

So Proud wrote on November 26, 2008 1:29 pm:
" As someone from a ranching family I want to tell all of you how proud I am that so many Nebraskans recognize horses are livestock! Yes, they can be a pleasure animal as well, but ultimately they are livestock, and I see no good reason to waste meat that could be sold to help recoup some of the cost of ownership. Kudos to the sensible citizens of Nebraska! "

Ryan wrote on November 26, 2008 3:57 pm:
" I agree that all meat eaters, including humans, must kill another animal to eat. It is the treatment before and during the life of the animal that is what really gets people upset. Why is it so hard to care for an animal that you knowingly brought into your life for whatever reason? Take care of what you have an then the horses don't end up being eaten overseas after the trip across the border. What is so hard about making sure the trip is humane - food/water and room to move. Yes they are animals and as JB stated in this forum animals eat animals. But animals as well as humans were created by God or whatever higher power you may believe in (even evolution) and as such should be treated with the utmost respect that you think you deserve yourself. "

Agriculture supporter wrote on November 26, 2008 4:36 pm:
" I think it is so ridiculous that we are letting these PETA people take over what needs to be done. Let me put it this way, where are all the horses going to go or whos going to take them when they are hitting that 20 year age, losing teeth, their ability to allow anybody to ride them and everything else. NOBODY!!! so why not make a profit and sell them to the slaughter houses thats better than wasting feed on something thats not going to be any help to you in the long run. They are WAY over populated. I ride and own my horses, but what people dont realize is that the resorts for these horses are getting full, people are just letting them go because they can't afford them anymore, and the feed prices are too high. Its just horrifying to know that someone has the control to ruin some parts of agriculture for people. HORSES ARE LIVESTOCK PEOPLE JUST LIKE CATTLE, SWINE, AND POULTRY, THEY ARE NOTHING MORE!!! "

nemo wrote on November 26, 2008 7:39 pm:
" So... when was the last time y'all had a horsey burger? You think it's such a good idea your freezers all oughta to be full. "

Joseph P. Sokolovsky wrote on November 26, 2008 9:21 pm:
" NEVER FEAR....the wife of T. Boone Picken (with her limited budget) has announced she is going to buy 1 million ac. of prime grazing land in the west...buy wild horses destine for slaughter and have them shipped to the
land she is buying!! And I am by no means making fun of her 'hobby,' I think it is GREAT...I don't like to see these wild horses slaughtered. "

tr50 wrote on November 27, 2008 8:41 pm:
" The solution to this apparently overwhelming "horse overpopulation" is not to simply sell undesirables off for slaughter - it's to stop breeding in the first place. And it's for people to take responsibility for their animals. If you can't afford a horse, do not buy it. It won't end up in the hands of an auctioneer looking to turn a profit later on.

It's not just a matter of horses being cute, by the way. No animals should be subjected to cruel selective breeding and torturous miserable lives just for the rancher's profit and for humans' selfish appetites. "

Kate wrote on November 28, 2008 8:12 am:
" I am not for slaughter of horses, but, until they find a way to handle the overpopulation of horses, I do not see another way. Make it more humane. Make the transport more humane. Horses have not been livestock for a few years. Most ranches do not utilize them anymore. They have become pets as they are not needed for work. They have not been eaten in the U.S., unless starvation was the case, for many years. (The army did feed horsemeat at one time) I do think these rescues need to be monitored though. They cram as many horses as they can on small acreages and say they are saving them. From what. 45 horses on 3 acres? Get real, this is not saving them, this is hoarding. They are no better that the kill buyers with they way they are warehousing them. With that, all I can say is, I am responsible for myself. I can't control what others do or say. If these rescues want to save the world, so be it. Do not make me feel guilty if I do not agree with your practices or throw money at you for your new hobby. The woman in the article was just begging for money to feed the ones she had. Who is responsible for these animals if someone has to step in and take care of them? You the taxpayers. "