One more teen dropped off before Safe Haven law tightened
By ZACH PLUHACEK / Lincoln Journal Star
One last parent slid in under the deadline of Nebraska’s old safe haven law Friday, the last day in which older children qualified for safe haven drop-offs..
A 14-year-old boy from Davis, Calif., was left by his mother at a hospital in Kimball, in the southwest corner of the Panhandle.
It occurred nine hours before the newly amended law, limiting safe haven drop-offs to infants up to 30 days old, took effect.
Following a special session of the Legislature last week, Gov. Dave Heineman signed the bill amending the law on Friday, and the change took effect at 12:01 a.m. Saturday.
Police believe the boy’s mother drove from Davis, a 1,160 mile trip along Interstate 80. She may have stopped at the town of 2,500 people because Kimball Health Services was the first hospital inside the state line.
Kimball Police Chief Doug Provance said officers didn’t get a chance to ask the mother questions, because she drove away almost immediately.
“She literally dropped him off and left,” Provance said.
Kimball County Attorney Dave Wilson said Saturday that police did interview the boy. Wilson said he did not know for sure whether the boy was aware of why he and his mother were on their way to Nebraska.
“It kind of sounded like he did,” Wilson said, “but I’m not sure about that.”
He said the boy, who was not named, did not appear upset.
The boy was in a foster home in Kimball County Saturday evening.
“He is not a danger to himself or others,” Provance said.
The Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services was contacting agencies in California to determine what will happen to the boy, according to a Saturday press release.
The drop-off was the 27th use of Nebraska’s original safe haven law, LB 157, in its 127-day run. One parent dropped off multiple children, bringing the total to 36 children dropped off since the law took effect July 18.
This case in Kimball and another in Grand Island earlier in the week were the only two cases outside the Omaha and Lincoln areas.
Reach Zach Pluhacek at 473-7234 or zpluhacek@journalstar.com

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Concerned mother wrote on November 22, 2008 11:26 am:
me wrote on November 22, 2008 11:30 am:
Unreal wrote on November 22, 2008 11:46 am:
free and they'll come like termites. This woman has the money to drive
clear from Calif but can't look after her child!! These people just don't
want to be bothered, because in other states where they have come from,
THERE IS HELP FOR THEM if they want to take the effort to LOOK!! But again
its the parents, not the kids. Maybe if they would start jailing the
parents they'd find out where the problem is!! "
melissa wrote on November 22, 2008 11:46 am:
Kevin wrote on November 22, 2008 11:50 am:
B. Blevins wrote on November 22, 2008 12:08 pm:
goodness wrote on November 22, 2008 12:17 pm:
Doug wrote on November 22, 2008 12:25 pm:
If you put in as much time and effort into raising your son as you did in getting him to Nebraska to give him away you might be a lot happier. I guarantee your son would be. One value you have taught him well, give up when the going gets tough. "
Tim wrote on November 22, 2008 2:27 pm:
i read the paper wrote on November 22, 2008 2:30 pm:
Seriously wrote on November 22, 2008 2:53 pm:
informed wrote on November 22, 2008 3:21 pm:
For those of you who claim people on welfare are so bad, all they do is make babies, etc etc. Have you thought about the consequences of the anti-abortion/anti-birth control influence on public policy? No public money allowed. Other impediments, like no money to pay for it yourself, maybe don't have transportation. What are the alternatives for people on public assistance to take responsibility for their personal reproductive health? Abstinence. That you, as an outsider, have imposed on them! How intrusive and arrogant of all the anti-abortion/anti-family planning voters & elected officials. Connect the dots; see the consequences on OTHERS lives, and the budget, policy changes needed to be more American - free of outsider meddling in others lives. Restore the U.S. Constitution and the right to privacy in Nebraska.
The Legislature could do one fundamental thing in the next session that would help: take HHS out of code status, make it an independent agency from the Governor, with Governance through an elected Board of Health or a Legislative appointed board made up of real citizens informed and committed to public health & all the duties of HHS to hire competent leaders, hold them accountable for serving in ways that supports modern knowledge and practices about mental illness, addictions, veterans needs, etc. RATHER THAN Republican ideologues. This is part of the change President-elect Obama voters are expecting, also. Not just at the federal level. Local and state levels of government have to get smart about relationships between their decisions (many based on myths, fears, presumptions, and biases) and how many people are being harmed in the behavioral health system. The unintended consequence of the Safe Haven law was the exposure of how bad the system really is. Staff, providers are also frustrated and displeased with this old world system. Change we need, and need now, will not look much like what the Governor and HHS are willing or able to think about. According to longtime observers and participants,the Heineman administration is the absolute worst: what they value (not the people in their jurisdiction),what they are doing, requiring, justifying, marketing, spinning has extended this shameful Nebraska system.
So, you might say why isn't this out in the open? Because people have been fired for even appearing to disagree, or perceived to be in the wrong party, or doing a very good job (but not what the administration supports), and plus all the media disinterested or unable to do real journalism. Simply stating what is released without any analysis. Real documentation has been given to LJS on mental illness issues, immigration issues, for example, and the results are a nice human interest story or no response at all. So, Nebraska has complicit elected officials, whether by intention or accident,uninformed or unaware and no Fourth Estate - isn't that what journalism is called, and called to be? A free press?
The Governor signed a pig in a poke yesterday. Defining the age of children to be turned over is not the solution. I doubt his electorate - the Republican base - will notice. There's a surplus - YIPPEE! "
Sue wrote on November 22, 2008 3:35 pm:
i also read the paper wrote on November 22, 2008 3:44 pm:
JB wrote on November 22, 2008 5:08 pm:
Good grief..... wrote on November 22, 2008 5:13 pm:
Get a Brain wrote on November 22, 2008 5:48 pm:
People think it is so exciting to have a baby. Women think the man will stay with her if she gets pregnant. Wake up people.If you elect to have a child, it is YOUR responsibility, YOUR problem to raise that child. You chose to do the deed. Now, you deal with your actions. It is not the responsibility of the rest of the citizens of this state to take care of YOUR mistake. If the child is uncontrolable, it is no doubt due to the parents it is exposed to. You reap what you sow. "
whatever wrote on November 22, 2008 9:10 pm:
Jean wrote on November 22, 2008 10:15 pm:
To all of the others who are just sure that either the parents are dropping off their children because they just don't want to be parents anymore, I really hope that you or your children never have to walk in their shoes. Mental health problems are not something that anyone has control of, it just happens. Yet you will be the same ones complaining that we have to many people in prison when these kids don' get the help that they need. "
Mike wrote on November 22, 2008 10:41 pm:
CB wrote on November 22, 2008 11:55 pm:
reorganization wrote on November 23, 2008 12:34 am:
DHHS staff care but morale is at an all time low since the Governor started his “reorganization” that is tearing the agency from the inside out. Actually, DHHS staff are more worried about losing their jobs if they disagree or having them eliminated, so Dave can campaign on eliminating “big” government. As long as Child Protective Services stats improve, the Governor doesn’t care whether the best interests of the children are being taken into consideration.
The reorganization of the different Departments was necessary, but the direct control the Governor wields of his appointed puppets is scary. This is a very political time inside DHHS. “Informed” is absolutely correct about staff being fired for even appearing to disagree, or perceived to be in the wrong party, or doing a very good job - but not what the administration supports. Veteran Medicaid administrators were let go, the national recognized Child Support Enforcement administrator was fired after he was out of town receiving more national recognition, the head of the Department’s Legal division is axed and replaced with a thirty-something attorney with extensive experience in Ag Law and other numerous DHHS Attorneys that have been fired or left the Department.
What do you expect from a guy who makes sure he is the last one to show up for meetings just to make sure that nobody that is taller than him is standing directly next to him.
The Governor wants DHHS to be transparent & accessible. Come on Dave, please come out and explain the mass turn over/ political blood bath in the DHHS Legal Division or tell us how many more Governor or Director/puppet appointed administrators/lap dogs are making 6 figures since YOUR “reorganization”. "
This has nothing to do with parenting wrote on November 23, 2008 7:26 am:
You are just plain mean. May God always bless you with a perfect life and perfect circumstances and perfect people around you. "
I was that kid... wrote on November 23, 2008 7:51 am:
I on the other hand have been extremely lucky with my own children. Talk about the unfairness of life.
I honestly used to think they were over-reacting, power hungry, nut cases who "enjoyed" torturing me. That was 35 years ago. I couldn't date till I was 16, no make-up till 12, though I was made fun of at school for lacking these privileges. I had it rough. These people had jobs, but otherwise were HOME ALL the time, just to thwart my good times no doubt. "Socializing" meant friends and family who visited each other's homes WITH THEIR KIDS. We didn't have to talk, but HAD to be home and eat dinner with the family (enter the torture of being bored to death). We were forced to go to the church of THEIR choice,the Dad person was particularly irritating, he would put a leaf or small stick on the tire of his car to see if any of us drove it without asking after he went to sleep at night! This, and I thought he was so stupid. All this, and more, and at the graduation from hs party they threw in my honor, I was begging them behind the scenes every 2 or 3 seconds "how soon do I get to leave!!!!?" I had skipped school, smoked pot, rolled a car in the name of fun, you name it...
How do I spell J-E-R-K?
Does anyone see "sacrifice" in any of this? Did they really want to stay home ALL the time with their stupid kids? Did they really want to eat in, so they would have money to take us to a dentist? Did they really want to forego the latest styles for us so we had warm clothes in the winter? I doubt it very much. As retired people they hit the casinos and go out to eat all the time. They are also very sappy grandparents. Somehow I don't think it was all that fun for them since it seems they do know what fun is.
I am not advocating a pat answer to kid delima's here but I do wonder why people expect every kid to be the parent. Why expect society to be the parent?
Are we just soft and expecting a life with no grief at all? I hate to quote my parents but "get over yourself, it isn't all about you, God gave you the job now do it." "
Living down South wrote on November 23, 2008 11:24 am:
Amanda wrote on November 23, 2008 11:45 am:
parent wrote on November 23, 2008 4:15 pm: