Now
A Few Clouds
16°
High
35°
Low
31°

$400,000 furniture purchase scrutinized

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DEENA WINTER / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 - 12:46:43 am CST

The Public Building Commission recently hired an outside attorney to look into allegations that a new city-county building was improperly filled with $400,000 worth of furniture without soliciting bids.

Former City Attorney Bill Austin concluded no laws were broken and the furniture didn’t have to be bid out. However, the city-county purchasing agent, who wasn’t involved in the purchase, disagreed with Austin’s assessment.

Nancy Kraft, who has sold furniture for 15 years, has doggedly pursued the issue since late 2007, when she saw the furniture inside Courthouse Plaza — an office building across from the County-City Building. The Public Building Commission bought Courthouse Plaza three years ago for city and county offices. Kraft works for Office Interiors & Design, but has pursued the issue, she said, as “Nancy the taxpayer.”

Public Building Commission

The Public Building Commission -- which was created in 1991 to build, purchase and maintain public property for the city and county -- is made up of two City Council members (Jon Camp and Jonathan Cook), two County Board members (Larry Hudkins and Bob Workman) and one at-large public member, Linda Wilson. The public buildings administrator is Don Killeen.

She is now considering taking the case to the state auditor.

Don Killeen, administrator of the building commission, furnished Courthouse Plaza with furniture from All Makes Office Equipment Co. without soliciting bids, which Kraft says would have saved money.

Killeen contended bids weren’t necessary because the furniture fell under the umbrella of a 10-year contract with All Makes (signed in 1997) to furnish the new County-City Building, and other public buildings, to ensure compatibility. All Makes won competitive bidding for the 1997 contract.

Further complicating the issue, Kraft is married to the city-county personnel director, Don Taute, an attorney who is transferring to the city attorney’s office. That’s why the city attorney’s office recused itself and the building commission hired Austin to look into the matter.

On Tuesday, Austin told the building commission some of the furniture fell under the 1997 contract and other purchases didn’t have to be bid since they received government discounts. A small portion of the furniture did not receive a large enough discount, Austin said, and All Makes will make “adjustments” for that.

Kraft said Austin did not sit down with her and go over her wealth of material before forming his legal opinion.

“He didn’t do any research into what took place,” she said. “I think they wanted a legal loophole and they got it and they can hang their hat on it. At the end of the day, I think they were still fiscally irresponsible with taxpayer dollars.”

The city-county purchasing agent, Vince Mejer, believes the purchases should have been made through his office and were a violation of the county purchasing act.

“They just took the vendor’s word that they were getting the best price,” Mejer said. “The bottom line is it appears procedures weren’t followed.”

During the building commission meeting, Mejer said the furniture in the new building is not the type required by the contract and is not compatible with the furniture in the County-City Building. Killeen said “small parts” of the furniture are compatible and Commissioner Larry Hudkins said “our maintenance said it is, so that’s all we can go by.”

During the meeting, Hudkins, Killeen and Austin disagreed with Mejer. At one point, a clearly irritated Hudkins said, “So what’s wrong with that, Mister Purchasing Agent?”

Mejer — who is a stickler for details — said the furniture was only to be exchanged if the original type wasn’t available, and only if the commission accepted a “substantially equal” replacement, which he said never happened.

“Well, we obviously accepted it,” Hudkins said, then softened his stance, saying, “If we did something in error,” it was unintentional.

However, Austin contended the building commission can waive provisions of the 1997 contract that are for its benefit.

On Wednesday, Mejer said, “The building commission hired an attorney to tell them whether it was right or wrong and the attorney gave them his opinion and I have to respect that opinion. … I’ll move onward and upward with other procurements.”

Reach Deena Winter at 473-2642 or dwinter@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Middle Class Bail Out Specialist wrote on November 20, 2008 5:56 am:
" Hmmmmmmm...wonder who is going to bail out our County-City system for making unwise fiscal decisions? Yep, you're right...the hard-working tax payers AGAIN! "

Berry wrote on November 20, 2008 6:25 am:
" From federal, to state, to county, to city,our government wastes money like no one else. Didn't Hudkins just get re-elected ? Wake up people. "

rj wrote on November 20, 2008 6:53 am:
" Good for "Nancy the taxpayer." "

Mike in DC wrote on November 20, 2008 7:05 am:
" It costs thousands and thousands of dollars to bid a contract; depending on it's size. A contract that's a few tens of millions of dollars costs at least $65,000 for the Feds to bid, for an example. If you have a contract vehicle available to you in government, people will tend to use it. You may have saved a few thousand dollars by going with a contract, but you may also have spent that much. Secondly, it complicates what should be an easy process if you work well with the contractor, they perform or provide high-quality work or goods, and you already have the contract open; why would you want to rebid to save a very few relative dollars, be unsure of the quality of goods / services, and have to argue why you didn't chose the lowest bidder. Too often it's either one or the other. Danged if you do, danged if you don't: Taxpayers want it cheap, then they complain about the shoddy work when the lowest bidder gets it. Call it the Wal-mart effect, but most Americans, including myself, don't know the true cost of goods/services and don't research the pipeline of consequences of their low-cost purchases. Point is that just because this deal sounds shady, doesn't mean that it is. "

cak wrote on November 20, 2008 7:49 am:
" what a waste of time, effort and money. i wonder how she would/will feel when someone calls foul on her if she were to get this or any other contract because of her marriage to a man affiliated with the city-county. some would say she shouldn't even be eligiable. "

go figure wrote on November 20, 2008 8:03 am:
" Wow. Where was Jon Camp - who asks the hard questions - in all of this?
Isn't he supposed to be the watchdog for the taxpayers? Seems as long as
republicans flock together and can't beat down a democrat for an issue
it's not an issue to them. "

Happy wrote on November 20, 2008 8:20 am:
" I wish Mister Purchasing Agent worked for Lincoln Public Schools to save us some tax money. "

No fan of Nancys wrote on November 20, 2008 9:29 am:
" Don't let Nancy fool you with her ploy about being a concerned tax payer. Nancy sells furniture for a living and is just disgrutled that her company wasn't allowed to bid on the project. Nancy, spend your time courting clients instead of trying to bully them into doing business with you. "

Sean wrote on November 20, 2008 9:44 am:
" This whole mess sounds like a bunch of sour grapes about people that feel as though they've been personally slighted - Kraft for not getting a sale and Mejer for not being involved. Sad that are so up-in-arms over process when it appears that the results were just fine. I hope they get over themselves and allow city-county government to focus on more important matters. "

Matt wrote on November 20, 2008 9:50 am:
" ALL of the transactions of this office should be looked at. An audit is way overdue. We tax paying people deserve a review. This bunch of people seem a bit odd to me. "

Galen wrote on November 20, 2008 9:52 am:
" Couldn't they have just gotten the furniture people used to have on their porches? It would have been a LOT cheaper.... "

Mrs. Johnson wrote on November 20, 2008 10:03 am:
" You get these people who are related to attorneys and they think their so powerful. They start trouble because they know they can do it on the cheap. She needs to stop wasting others time and money! "

hmm... wrote on November 20, 2008 10:34 am:
" at least they didn't drop 85m on a painting like the UN did. "

get real sean wrote on November 20, 2008 1:13 pm:
" Sean lets look at Mejers record he tried to save us from the fire truck deal and the Mrs. mayor at the time just went around him. Its good to have guys like this trying to save us money. I'm with happy get him at lps to save the school some cash. "

mj wrote on November 20, 2008 1:15 pm:
" Another snow job by the Building Commission. Is anyone watching this group? Is this what is going to happen with the Star Tran Board when it has taxing authority? The City and County keep crying they are short of money but they let these things happen. Who is in charge. As a taxpayer I think it is right for Nancy to complain. She is not any different than any other business trying to do business with the City. As far as the Purchasing Agent goes keep up the good work, sound like you are the only one trying to save us money. "

Sultrydayinne wrote on November 20, 2008 5:58 pm:
" It seems like the City and County go by Blind Faith they are getting the best deal by going non compete let us see now Jail, because the land was there, Antelope Creek Valley oh we trust the people from the big city they are always right and now furniture. How much longer do us taxpayer have to have the taxplayers have all the fun wasting money? "

Matt P. wrote on November 20, 2008 10:39 pm:
" People, this is furniture for an ENTIRE OFFICE BUILDING!! This isn't for a 3 bedroom home. These offices do need to be furnished you know. The issue isn't "how much" was spent. The issue was whether they needed to bid it out! Even if it would have been given to another provider it would have still approached the $400,000 price tag! "

dont forget wrote on November 20, 2008 11:03 pm:
" Don't forget that since the county did business this way more tax payer money was wasted by having to hire an attorney. "

DJ wrote on November 21, 2008 5:40 am:
" Wonder if the same people who bought the Firetrucks purchased the furniture? "