Now
A Few Clouds
16°
High
35°
Low
31°

Eschliman questions developer’s sale of Waverly land to Lincoln company

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DEENA WINTER / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 - 12:46:43 am CST

City Councilwoman Robin Eschliman is unhappy with a local real estate development company that sold Waverly land to a Lincoln electric company — which will result in 80 jobs moving out of the city.

WRK LLC — owned by Will and Robert Scott — has a minority ownership interest in Waverly Development Co., which owns the Waverly business park.

Watts Electric Co. rents property in Air Park but will move to the Waverly business park in June.

Story Photo
Robin Eschliman (LJS file)

Watts Electric owner Dave Watts has publicly complained the city of Lincoln didn’t do enough to help him build on land he bought at 7301 N. 70th St. in Lincoln. After flood maps were updated, the land ended up in a floodway — where commercial construction must be specially built so as not to exacerbate flooding.

WRK has received public assistance on several redevelopment projects in Lincoln and has taken an increasingly prominent role on the Lincoln development scene. A WRK-led team was also selected by the city to develop offices, stores, restaurants and at least one hotel if the city builds a new arena west of the Haymarket.

“As a landowner, WRK certainly has the right to recruit any and every company in Lincoln to Waverly if that’s what they want to do,” Eschliman said in a written statement.

“However, we have cooperated well with WRK’s numerous projects in Lincoln and attempts to do economic development here, and I expressed disappointment to them that they would take Lincoln jobs to Waverly.”

Will Scott was flabbergasted by Eschliman’s comments.

He was told Watts had given up on building in Lincoln.

“We definitely did not recruit anybody,” Scott said. “Watts Electric actually approached us through the city of Waverly. … I’m really surprised and disappointed. I guess I’m just confused with the logic.”

He said the business park has been a boon to Lincoln — it’s near an interchange that is the first exit into Lincoln from the east.

Since 2005, the business park has attracted a Tractor Supply Co. retail sales distribution center and an MBA Poultry packaging plant.

Scott noted the business park agreed to move Tractor Supply farther north to accommodate the city and county’s eventual plans for an east beltway. Scott said they’ve “sat on” about 15 acres of high-priced land in an effort to be a good neighbor.

“I’m not trying to steal someone out of Lincoln,” he said. “There was no intent to harm Lincoln in any way.”

But Eschliman fears Watts’ employees might move a few miles down the road to Waverly and asked WRK to “consider a policy of only recruiting businesses from Omaha, out of state, or anywhere else besides Lincoln” to their business park.

Dave Watts doesn’t see why Eschliman has a problem with WRK’s decision.

“I guess they were supposed to turn my offer down in this soft market to protect Lincoln,” Watts said. “You would think a real estate agent would understand it’s just good business to sell your goods to the highest bidder.”

Watts has estimated he will save more than $800,000 by moving to Waverly, because the city offered $650,000 in tax increment financing and doesn’t charge development impact fees or a city sales tax.

Chamber President Wendy Birdsall didn’t want to enter the fray over Watts’ exit. But she said  the Tractor Supply development “was a huge win for both communities” because the company had considered moving out of state.

The workers live in both cities, she said, and even those who live in Waverly are likely to use Lincoln’s hospitals, clinics, stores and other services.

Reach Deena Winter at 473-2642 or dwinter@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Green wrote on November 20, 2008 1:24 am:
" You become more and more out of touch, Robin. Will and Rob are working hard to spur the economy for the area...what cash have you put up? Oh, that's right, you get paid to sit up in your lofty perch and critique. Time for a change on the council...where's Shawn Traudt? "

Hmmm... wrote on November 20, 2008 4:03 am:
" Typical Lincoln business. Chased another one out of town. Now they want to complain. Maybe it's time they wake up and take notice of this terrible economy, and realize that they have helped to damage it locally! "

DOC wrote on November 20, 2008 4:23 am:
" No problem here Robin. Annex Waverly. "

Robin has got to go wrote on November 20, 2008 5:23 am:
" So now Robin is calling our developers on the carpet for DARING to sell land they own that happens to sit outside of Lincoln? She's a Republican right? I guess she missed the class on free markets and capitalism. Bye,
Bye Robin...bring on the 2009 elections. "

Sour Grapes wrote on November 20, 2008 7:33 am:
" Robin Eschliman Get over it. The horse is out of the barn. Lincoln had a chance at the company, but offered no help to keep them in Lincoln. "

ed wrote on November 20, 2008 7:34 am:
" Can anyone say wah wah wah, quit making it so hard to do business in lincoln and maybe this won't happen. Then trying to hold this over these guys heads because of the work they've done for Lincoln, where does she get off "

PJ wrote on November 20, 2008 7:40 am:
" What's the problem? Waverly will probably be annexed into Lincoln eventually anyway. It's not like they're moving these jobs to India... "

Billy wrote on November 20, 2008 7:40 am:
" This is what is referred to as a business decision, Robin. And you are chair of our Council? Yikes! Consider ourselves lucky that WRK is even interested in doing business in Lincoln. "

Doug wrote on November 20, 2008 7:41 am:
" Just another example of the ignorance in our city council.Nice move Robin.
Blame WRK for another business moving out of Lincoln.Watts chose to move out and went to them because the city and its laws/lawmakers drove him out for financial reasons. I moved my business out of Lincoln several years ago but still employ a few Lincoln people.Good business move Watts. Put the blame where it belongs-LINCOLN. "

russell wrote on November 20, 2008 8:04 am:
" Some thoughts about the flood plain since this seems to be part of the issue : 1. all buildings within Lincoln's 3 mile limit "must be specially built so as not to exacerbate flooding" which includes residential 2. the Waverly location is separated from the floodplain by the 'levee" called BNSF railroad tracks 3. Waverly has the misfortune of being downstream of Lincoln and most of Lancaster county that Salt Creek drains. This means that the RUNOFF of every project in the county will go by this development which will cause floodplain creep. This illustrates the necessity city & county enforcing the principal of "zero runoff" for all properties for the next 100 years and that is scary. "

Common Citizen wrote on November 20, 2008 8:12 am:
" Doesn't Eschliman own a real estate company? And she is calling out another? Sounds like sour grapes. "

bob wrote on November 20, 2008 8:14 am:
" So Robin thinks that if the city hires a company to do development work that now they are stuck doing whatever they want. Reminds me more of a mobster in a big city. "

NS wrote on November 20, 2008 8:50 am:
" I don't see how she can tie this to WRK in any way other than the fact that they happen to own the land this business bought. It doesn't sound like they specifically tried to get this particular business to purchase their land, they just happened to have the land this business decided it wanted. The blame, and I don't even think that it appropriate in this situation, sounds like it should be on the city for not working with this company, not on the people the business bought the land from. "

waverly wrote on November 20, 2008 8:56 am:
" I live in Waverly, and as I read this I am not sure what Robin's issue really is. The fact remains that a majority of people who live in Waverly, work in Lincoln. We also shop in Lincoln, seek medical care there, and entertainment. Therefore, I am sure that many of the people employed by this company will drive from Lincoln to Waverly. This is good for the economy of both Lincoln and Waverly. I was unaware that it was the job of a city council member to pass judgment on where private companies choose to do business. All I have to say is "Welcome to Waverly". We welcome your business. "

Annex wrote on November 20, 2008 9:19 am:
" DOC, Aneex Waverly? You seem awfully sure that is something you'd like to see done, yet offer no logic as to why that would be. Nice comment, but without any backup, it is useless. A whole lot more is needed to annex a community than one single company moving there in what will turn out to be a wise decision. "

happy camper wrote on November 20, 2008 9:43 am:
" I suspect Watts Electric left Lincoln so they wouldn't be in Eschliman's district anymore. The city council's attacks against WRK are out of bounds. Maybe WRK will move its offices to Waverly too so they don't have to put up with Eschliman's and Camp's nonsense anymore. "

Pro Small Business wrote on November 20, 2008 10:02 am:
" HELLO City Council..take a clue! Between you adding fee's (TAX) on every move a business makes and the University of Nebraska wanting to be the deciding factor in everything that occurs in Lincoln. It's no wonder why
business's are looking for cheaper alternatives. By the way, is it comfortable on the new furniture. WOW..maybe that $400,000.00 could have been used to help keep or bring business to or in Lincoln. "

Am I missing something wrote on November 20, 2008 10:05 am:
" The Council Woman's statement left me with several questions.

1. How many of Watts 80 employees does she really expect to move to Waverly from their current homes? Does this move really result in a significant loss in Lincoln jobs? Does she expect that the construction workers who work at job sites that are scattered about are going to move because their commute to the office is 5 minutes longer?

2. How much sales tax revenue does Lincoln lose out on having the company move to Waverly? Isn't this the real issue? Doesn't it sound like pandering that she is claiming job loss as the issue.

3. What is the motivation behind her statement? From what was reported on it sounds like a threat against WRK LCC.

I honestly don't know how she can place blame on WRK and say with a straight face that the issue is a loss of jobs. "

Right Hmmm wrote on November 20, 2008 10:12 am:
" When will the Scotts figure out that they WILL move when the dictators'
of Lincoln tell them when and where and what!!! Thats one city council
dictator that needs to go P.D.Q. and has from day one!! America the country of freedom, except for Lincoln & Nebraska!!!! Why building the
arena is a waste of money. Lincoln will NEVER grow because of the dictators stifling competition. Hasn't grown for 50 years so what makes
the greedy think in a near depression its gonna grow now?? "

Nebraska Truck Equipment wrote on November 20, 2008 10:30 am:
" Our company will continue to support Watts Electric no matter where they move. Good luck to them and thanks to Craig at Watts for your business. "

Unbelievable wrote on November 20, 2008 11:15 am:
" The Scott brothers are spending much time and money for developments in Lincoln. They are "minority" owners in the Waverly Dev Co which negotiated a deal with a client who came to them. Sounds like good business to me! That she even think (let alone say) they “consider a policy of only recruiting businesses from Omaha, out of state, or anywhere else besides Lincoln” to their business park, is amazingly unbelievable!! Robin should spend more time trying to lease her vacant locations rather than criticizing others. Can't wait until she goes away! "

Out with Eschliman wrote on November 20, 2008 1:17 pm:
" Can't we get her out before the next election? "

What is next wrote on November 20, 2008 4:08 pm:
" I wonder what other projects will pack up for more cooperative environments. What other potential revenue sources for the City of Lincoln will get fed up with the over regulation and politics of our local government? "

Re Annex wrote on November 20, 2008 8:47 pm:
" I don't think he has to prove whether or not it's the right thing to do. All the money putting Lincoln City water lines outside of city limits (currently underdway towards Waverly) is reason enough to believe that this will happen sooner rather than later. Just think, all the Waverly residents will get a new address like those in Elkorn did. "

Matt wrote on November 20, 2008 9:37 pm:
" First of all, the business is now in WAVERLY!! Its not like anybody holding those positions will necessarily be replaced. For crying out loud...Waverly is essentially East Lincoln. This is no more an imposition than if a business would move from North Lincoln to South Lincoln.

There is obviously an issue of tax revenues, but DO NOT act like you're upset about jobs. There is no practical change in terms of jobs! "

Real Young Professional Groupie wrote on November 20, 2008 10:05 pm:
" Lay off these guys Robin! They are doing everything really super good in Lincoln. They are super awesome and handsome and rich. I know they do only really cool stuff. They are going to make everything perfect in Lincoln. "

LinkGuy wrote on November 20, 2008 10:27 pm:
" It's acceptable for Councilwoman Eschliman to question WRK on this deal, and any other deal that opens the opportunity for a company to leave the city of Lincoln. Taxpayers will have the opportunity to decide if they want to use a developer that takes money from the city and then turns to accept business from a company wanting to leave the city tax base. It's a reasonable complaint. WRK put themselves in this position, not Councilwoman Eschliman. Councilwoman Eschliman is working to preserve the Lincoln tax base, so I don't want to hear any whining when we can't afford to mow our parks or replace aging water mains. "

UNBELIEVABLE wrote on November 20, 2008 10:43 pm:
" Free country. Free markets. CAPITALISM RULES. Go WRK. "

maybe wrote on November 20, 2008 11:21 pm:
" Maybe they are moving because Waverly allow couches on porches. I think it's pretty arrogant to ask Waverly to not compete with Lincoln for businesses. "

Realtor Union wrote on November 20, 2008 11:53 pm:
" What I find interesting is that people think that the council person is now unelectable after a long line of weird outbursts. Councilman Camp has been saying and doing goofy things for years yet he is always reelected. "

RE Re Annex wrote on November 21, 2008 10:43 am:
" Actually, Waverly addresses already coincide with Lincoln. I hope that it's never annexed though. Waverly is a nice little town. North Lincoln is a dump in comparison. "

be careful wrote on November 21, 2008 12:26 pm:
" Waverly is so close to Lincoln that I doubt many employees will move there from Lincoln.

Waverly better watch out. If it keeps out competing Lincoln then it might get annexed and their problems will really begin. "

Rick wrote on November 21, 2008 12:30 pm:
" Will and Robert, You guys are the best! You've come into Lincoln and have made an impact on the way things"should" be done! If only Government would work with the"Little people"! Then maybe the "Little Guy could take steps forward also! "

JR wrote on November 21, 2008 7:55 pm:
" So, Link guy. Let me get this straight. If you and let's say 9 other guys owned a business together, and all of the others voted to do something, even though you said no, then you should be held accountable? Is that what you are saying?

Now, if WRK had sole ownership and had gone out to recruit this company, then you might have an excuse to whine, but still, in a free market place economy, would not have an ethical leg to stand on. This council woman has been an embarrassment since she took office and should not be asked back by the voters. "