Now
Fair
20°
High
32°
Low
18°

Sorensen says Obama 'up to any task'

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By DON WALTON / Lincoln Journal Star

Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 - 09:32:15 pm CST

Ted Sorensen said Tuesday  the election of Barack Obama makes him even more proud of his country and “more optimistic” about its future.

The president-elect is “up to any task, any challenge,” Sorensen said.

As one foreign statesman told him in a private letter, Sorensen said, “the day Obama walks into the White House, respect for the United States will rise immeasurably all over the world.”

Story Photo
Ted Sorensen talks politics Tuesday on the University of Nebraska-Lincoln campus. (Robert Becker)

Related Media

Ted Sorensen in Lincoln, 11.18.08

Listen is Ted Sorensen speaks with members of the media prior to his E.N. Thompson Forum appearance on Nov. 18, 2008. (JournalStar.com)...

The election of the country’s first black president “says good things about America,” Sorensen said.

Sorensen, who was chief adviser and speechwriter for President John F. Kennedy, was in Lincoln for a series of events headlined by a Tuesday night address to a full house of more than 2,000 at the Lied Center.

During a news conference prior to that E. N. Thompson Forum lecture, Sorensen confided that he once advised Obama to consider delaying any presidential ambitions until 2012 or 2016, or even later, since the next president would “inherit a country in bad shape.”

“But this was his moment,” Sorensen said.

Now, he said, Obama needs to gather “a ministry of talent” around him without regard to party affiliation or earlier opposition to him. 

What is required are talented people who are “dedicated to this country’s national interest and nothing else,” Sorensen said.

Sen. Chuck Hagel is the ideal Republican choice for the Obama Cabinet, Sorensen said.

“Of all the Republicans who might fit, I think Hagel is at the top of the list,” Sorensen said.

“He’s not a narrow partisan (and) he has demonstrated statesmanship on foreign policy and national security.”

Sorensen said Hagel would be a good choice for secretary of defense.

Asked about Obama’s consideration of Sen. Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, Sorensen suggested Clinton would be “a great secretary of health and human services.”

Sorensen pointed to economic  challenges first when discussing the “tough agenda” that lies ahead for Obama.

But energy, global warming and health care are also in line.

“Nebraska has a great deal to contribute” in terms of alternative energy options, he said, including biofuels and wind.

Sorensen said Obama will restore America’s use of diplomacy, including multilateral diplomacy, as the first resort in an international crisis rather than turning to military force.

“We can’t bomb our way into respect,” he said, or to “impose democracy on other countries.”

Gone will be the embrace of torture, indefinite detention, denial of habeas corpus and extraordinary rendition, he said.

Gone, Sorensen said, will be “eight years of shame and pain.”

In his Lied Center speech, Sorensen contrasted Kennedy’s actions during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis with President Bush’s decision to attack Iraq in 2003.

Kennedy, he said, respected international law, relied on a bipartisan foreign policy, consulted with allies, demanded and considered all options, exercised wise leadership, and informed the American people.

And, he said, Kennedy “communicated, or negotiated, with the enemy,” which in that case was the Soviet Union. The result was peaceful removal of Soviet missiles from Cuba, he said.

Asked how Kennedy might have responded differently to the terrorist attacks on America on Sept. 11, 2001, Sorensen said he likes to believe that Kennedy already would have “sought out moderates and modernists in Islam” to attempt to reconcile already visible differences.

And, he said, Kennedy would have reacted immediately to a CIA briefing report in August warning of an impending domestic attack by al Qaida instead of just “going to his ranch.”

Obama, he said, will be like Kennedy.

“Beginning next January we will have a new president with a creative mind, a compassionate heart and a courageous spirit,” he said.

Sorensen, who was born and educated in Lincoln, met with students at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln earlier in the day.  He’ll be at Lincoln High School on Wednesday.

Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or at dwalton@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
hmmm... wrote on November 18, 2008 4:52 pm:
" You mean to tell me this Sorensen fella is someone who has palled around with Obama? And UNL was actually allowed to have him on campus? It sounds like he was spouting off some liberal rhetoric, too! I'm surprised the governor and the AG didn't have something to say about it. How did the regents allow such a thing? "

Nina wrote on November 18, 2008 5:11 pm:
" Yeah, 'hmmm,' this wonderful advisor and speechwriter for Kennedy really is back home in Nebraska this week. One of Nebraska's finest! Truly it is amazing, because I think I saw him flash the 'peace' sign back in the 60's one time. "

Wondering wrote on November 18, 2008 6:03 pm:
" I think an investigation is needed on the funding for Sorenson..I think that the Auditor needs to get involved to make sure the taxpayers are not footing the bill for a Pro-Obama biased speaker. "

DR wrote on November 18, 2008 6:10 pm:
" His extrremely biased opinion carries no weight with me. So far all I have hears is hot air from many directions and promised from the candidatea bout what he will do with a blank check and an unlimited checkbook. Reality is about o smack him squarely but just like President Bush he will ignore reality and spend beyond our collective budget. More of the same higher taxes and more welfare for those who choose NOT to work. At this date when nothing ahs been done my opinion of the future has an equal chance at value as this bias of Mr. S. "

STLNebraskan wrote on November 18, 2008 6:32 pm:
" "Gone will be the embrace of torture"......So is that to mean Obama will admit to his guilt of torture of the helpless children of cruel and inhumane abortions? Will Obama step up and give those souls the rights as Sorensen says of Habeas Corpus of detainees who were by the way caught on the battle field wanting to bring death to America! "Eight years of shame and pain". Mr. Sorenson, just who was in charge the previous eight years that elected not to take it too the enemy? You say you were concerned Obama "would inherit a country in bad shape"? The same could be said for President Bush inheriting a country soon to be attacked and at least he had the spine to do something about it! Time will tell about Obama's actions over words... Time will tell. "

mark wrote on November 18, 2008 6:39 pm:
" If President Obama takes the same stands as JFK on national defense, Marxist dictatorships, and taxes, we're going to be in great shape.

Assignment: read JFK's final speech in Fort Worth. Inspiring.
Extra credit: read RFK's speech re: Israel prior to being assassinated by Sirhan Sirhan. "

mTm wrote on November 18, 2008 7:30 pm:
" Joke!!! "

Winnie wrote on November 18, 2008 7:39 pm:
" More pro-Obama supporters. I guess I'm not alone in thinking the guy hasn't answered a thing honestly yet and never will. He can blow hot air and then we can re-elect him when he doesn't follow through in the next 4 years, because it really takes 8 years to change everything bad, right??? NO, I think he's done that damage already and will continue to do so at middle class expense. Thank God he gave all his loyal campaigners that Christmas bonus though, because he wouldn't have wanted to claim in on his accounts. "

Kristy wrote on November 18, 2008 8:12 pm:
" I don't think that Obama could do worse that the Bush administration has.

It's amazing to me that are you conservatives out there don't remember the reason why we invaded Iraq? It was supposedly because they were linked to Osama bin Laden, or at least that is what our lovely president claimed.

But wait, there wasn't much said in the papers when it came out a year or so ago that there was no correlation between Iraq and Osama bin Laden. So easy to sweep that under the carpet now wasn't it.

So if that wasn't true, what was the real reason for invading Iraq? Look at how much money the president and his family have pocketed in that last few years because of their direct link to the oil companies. Oh, but you won't admit to that now will you? "

Jose wrote on November 18, 2008 8:26 pm:
" It's not bad having all these critics out here thinking that our next president will fail. It will be that much nicer when he turns things around with common sense and input from a diverse group of advisers. I can see John M. and Chuck H. helping out because its the right thing to do and they want to see this country move forward. With all the brilliant minds and resources we have in the US it is not that hard. We just have work together for the good of our nation.

Tearing each other down will only need to more of the same meltdown. Obama is to smart to let that happen. We are in a new time and we need to use technology and hope as an agent of change.

Challenging Obama is o.k. because if you are good you are inspired to prove people wrong. "

nemo wrote on November 18, 2008 9:37 pm:
" yes, I do believe that Kennedy would have handles 9/11 differently, because it wouldn't have happened. Kennedy would have taken care of it after the first WTC bombing, unlike Clinton. "

JD wrote on November 18, 2008 9:51 pm:
" sure as heck hope so. The american voters put a lot of eggs in one basket this past election. Look for them to take credit for all successes, and blame the past 8 years for all of the failures. Politics as usual. "

Lincolnite wrote on November 19, 2008 1:41 am:
" ahh, a refreshing, rational thought process. thanks for sharing "

Fidel wrote on November 19, 2008 6:00 am:
" Did Kennedy "respect international law" when he backed the Bay of Pigs invasion?

As far as the Cuban Missle Crisis, the Russians got exactly what they wanted out of that....our missles out of eastern Europe. "

Tom wrote on November 19, 2008 6:52 am:
" Mr. Sorenson. President Kennedy was a Hawk. He did listen to the CIA when he ordered the Bay of Pigs. He did listen to the CIA when he ordered the muder of the President of Viet Nam. He did get the Soviets to remove the missles by ordering the ICBM silos open and sent the US navy to blockade Cuba not Green Peace rubber rafts. Need I go on ? "

mark wrote on November 19, 2008 7:09 am:
" and is Obama going to follow JFK in targeting civil rights leaders? get us into Viet Nam? hello Scamalot. "

Neo wrote on November 19, 2008 7:40 am:
" To Kristy - It is time you rethink history. President Bush took decisive action after 9/11 and his actions prevented further terrorists attacks in this country.

Only time will tell if President Obama has the same resolve or if he will worry more about his poll results than protecting this country. "

CP wrote on November 19, 2008 7:51 am:
" I generally see a political figure's wisdom as being inversely proportional to the bitterness and narrowness of his or her partisanship. This puts Mr. Sorensen rather low on the scale.

All things Obama and Democratic good, all things Republican, Bush, and conservative bad. The narrowness makes his points quite unpersuasive. "

WCG wrote on November 19, 2008 8:05 am:
" "Eight years of shame and pain." No kidding! After eight years of increasing embarrassment in my country, in my fellow citizens, and especially in my government, it's wonderful to feel proud again. Yes, we've still got the idiots who got us into this mess, but they've been completely discredited (to all but the true believers who'll never change their minds about anything).

I don't expect miracles from Barack Obama. Let's face it, he takes office during conditions worse than any in my lifetime, so he has a much tougher job than any president since Roosevelt, if not before that. But at least we'll be moving forward again, with courage, with determination, with hope,... instead of cowering fearfully in our basements, believing in politicians who push fear like it's a going-out-of-business sale. At least we'll be trusting in America's time-tested institutions, instead of trying to copy Iran's theocracy. At least we'll be making decisions based on evidence and reason, not the president's gut. "

MP wrote on November 19, 2008 8:43 am:
" I see the right wing is trying to push their revisionist history about Kennedy and Clinton again.

First off, the missils that were moved out of Turkey were old and were scheduled to be removed no matter what happened during the missile crisis, they were just removed a little earlier. And Kennedy did not order the killing of the president of Vietnam.

I also seriously doubt Kennedy would have handled the first trade center attack any different than Clinton. After all, Clinton did capture the leader. Where is the leader of the second attack? Still free.

Clinton did try to take out Bin Laden. Remember the cruise missiles he sent? He missed by a couple of hours. Clinton wanted to do it again but the Republican controlled congress refused to let him. Remember "No missiles for Monica" chant the repubs were saying? If they would have let him, we may not have had a second attack.

Bush has not kept us safe, our embassies over seas have been attacked on several occasions. Also, what about the anthrax letters in New York & DC? No one has ever been caught for those. We may not have been attacked on 9-11 either if Bush would have heeded the 8-6 PDB that warned of such attack instead of going on vacation. The only thing missing from it was the date and time.

Why not let Obama take office and see what he will do before bashing him? "

question wrote on November 19, 2008 9:10 am:
" to you who say Bush did a good job after 9/11. We went to Iraq because Bush said they had weapons of mass destruction... Did we EVER find ANY??? NO NO NO NO NO... we did not.. so why are we further and further going in to national debt and spending millions and millions of dollars a day to be over there?? maybe Bush and Cheney have the Halleberton Oil Co in their back pocket and are making a lot of politicians and big Oil wigs very very wealthy or maybe he is trying to finish a job his dad could not?? Whatever the case may be it has done this country no good and has put us further in debt cost good hard working americans millions in taxes and has put this country in a Humongous Terrifying Hole that we now have try and dig out of... Can Obama do it?? Who knows... Yet to be determined, but is there anyone out there for absolute positiveness that would for sure get us out?? No there is not.. McCain? who knows maybe.. I mean lets give this guy a chance before we bury him... sounds like he has the respect and the common backing and inspiration of a lot of intelligent experienced past politicians who have been around the block and have seen the show (basically 100 times smarter than any of us who are writing posts on the lincoln journal star) maybe we should take there word for it and take into effect that there is a good chance they KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT........... "

To Neo wrote on November 19, 2008 9:19 am:
" To Neo... I think it is YOU who is seeing this through rose-colored glasses and revising history. "Pres. Bush took decisive action after 9/11." Are you serious? Yeah, but too bad it was the WRONG decisive action. We invaded a sovereign country (IRAQ) under the premise that we were being "protected" from the Weapons of Mass Destruction they had. Remember Colin Powell's big dog and pony show for the United Nations. Except, whoops, Iraq didn't actually have any WMDs. Oh well, we'll just hang out there for 5 years and counting and kill thousands of U.S. soldiers in the process, just so W. can get some kind of sick, personal revenge on Saddam Hussein for his Daddy's first Gulf War. And what about VC Cheney's glorious claims that we would be "treated as liberators" and welcomed with open arms in the streets of Iraq. Whoops. That didn't seem to happen either. Brilliant!

Meanwhile, how's that search for Osama bin Laden coming? Oh that's right, Mr. Decisive, George W. Bush, still hasn't done anything about that yet. And he's actually the one responsible for 9/11.

Interesting. "

Sigh wrote on November 19, 2008 9:35 am:
" I read the first 3 posts with amazement and joy to see that there still existed some intelligent sarcasm here to show the absurdity of the conservative fears and rantings of late. Then I went on to the others below it and was reminded... there is "just no place like Nebraska". "

lyle wrote on November 19, 2008 10:12 am:
" how about that! liberal dude feels good Obama was elected. Nothing about the positions he will take to get us out of this recession or how to deal with energy problems, since it will just be more government. Which is why Hagel would be a good cabinet person he likes government intervention in our lives. "

mark wrote on November 19, 2008 10:21 am:
" Comparing obama to kennedy is a typical, liberal emotional response. History will only prove if obama has the leadership abilities of kennedy. Meanwhile obamas hype will fill the plates of those who worship mythology verses facts. Speaking of facts, Sorenson seems to forget, or ignore that congress voted for the war. "

Derangement Syndrome wrote on November 19, 2008 10:43 am:
" There are still a lot of people suffering from Bush Derrangement Syndrome--an ailment that blames Bush on everything from hangnails to hurricanes. Heres a wakeup call...one President cannot cause all of your problems, just as one President cannont solve them. I'll give Obama a chance to do what he can, and certainly will not irrationally blame him for everything. Its time for a lot of people to grow up. "

Dale Gribble wrote on November 19, 2008 10:47 am:
" and assassinating Diem was brillant! I expect Obama's team to top that move. "

cat wrote on November 19, 2008 10:54 am:
" So Mr. Sorensen, your proud for the first time in your life, where have I heard that before. Well I'm proud of a president that takes action on my be-half to keep me safe. I don't agree to negotiating with dictators and terrorist. All that happens is putting off what is in their nature(distruction).Just looking on a map shows the reason for invading Iraq, it was strategic. After 911 and the tsunami we should be proud, but then the implacent attitude and greed of citizens set in. The Economy is not the fault of one person(president) it's a mind set of all who think the government should take care of them. Anyone who says "government should do...."are the ones stuck in the rut.
And what is so wrong with spreading freedom throughout the world. Dictators hate us not the people dying to get here. "

Moultrie wrote on November 19, 2008 11:18 am:
" Let the daydreaming Left have their last few days of bliss, fairies and sugarplums. Soon enough the brutish reality of a nasty world will provide a wakeup soon enough. will these dreamers realize they have managed to not only elect an unknown cypher but this time the unintended consequences may very well be to destroy this country. Of course the Left will never be blamed, they are forever lost in childish dreams of utopia and dear leader. "

re question and To Neo wrote on November 19, 2008 12:50 pm:
" Is it a fact that Saddam has used poisonous mustard gas on his own citizens and the Iranians? Yes it is. Is it a fact that poisonous mustard gas is a chemical weapon? Yes it is. Is it a fact that chemical warfare is a Weapon of Mass Destruction? Yes it is. Have our troops found some rockets in Iraq with mustard gas? Yes they have. Here are some questions to ask yourselves now. Did Saddam have plenty of time to hide the WMDs while he stalled inspections? Do you still think Iraq NEVER had WMDs? If Saddam would've developed the program to full capability, would he have sold them indiscriminately? "

UncleSamZ wrote on November 19, 2008 12:53 pm:
" In this state of two Republican parties (Republican and Republican-lite), it should be no surprise that Nebraskans may not altogether know what to do when hearing from a Democrat. He has such national credentials as a writer and policy thinker that some doubt his Nebraskan roots. He is certainly a truer Nebraska than even our acclaimed Willa Cather. Enjoy the moment, not all of us are drop off the edge of the world right wingers. Realize that even in Nebraska there is at least one other point of view. Also note that the national electorate sees our country decidedly differently that many of us do here in the land of Senator Roman Hruska, the Nebraska champion of representation for the mediocre. We can and have done better. Thank you, Mr. Sorensen "

T wrote on November 19, 2008 12:54 pm:
" Too bad Pres. Bush DID cause a whole host of problems for people. I don't blame him that Hurricane Katrina struck. But I do blame him for the absolutely inhumane and complete mess-up of the handling of post-Katrina. Remember Mike "You're doing a great job, Brownie!" Brown and the inept FEMA? Or I suppose that's Clinton's fault, too?

Bush's faults are too numerous to even begin listing them. But thankfully, we're just weeks away from it all becoming past history. And obviously 3/5 of the country agrees given Obama's sound defeat of McCain.

The bitterness of the Republicans in this state is just comical. With each new story on Obama, their rants get more farcical and deranged. I'm going to enjoy laughing at their ridiculous comments on these message boards for the next eight years.

Anyone who would defend George W. Bush and his presidency needs his/her head examined. He will likely go down as the worst president in U.S. history, so be careful what you're defending. You only make yourself seem of questionable mind. "

Ignignokt wrote on November 19, 2008 2:33 pm:
" To "T", your math is a bit off...3/5 = 60%. Obama won 53% of the popular vote. So the fraction is actually 2.65/5. You're welcome.

And to MP...perhaps if Clinton had not let Bin Laden go (which he ADMITTED to doing) '9/11' wouldn't be in our lexicon. "

Sigh wrote on November 19, 2008 5:38 pm:
" He won 54 percent of the popular vote and 68% of the electoral college votes (365 out of 538), which is actually the one that counts. So I was being kind calling it 60% as an average of the two. You're welcome, too.

No matter which way you add it up, Obama won solidly, and your guy lost. The end. But thanks for adding to the humor of the ridiculous posts and proving my point. "

reality coming soon wrote on November 20, 2008 10:20 am:
" Soon Obama will be installed as the next pres and on that date reality will finally set in. No longer will the pipe-dreams of the left be allowed to continue without their leader knowing all of the actual information rather than speculation. And with 59 votes (probably 60 after they steal the election in Minn) they cannot blame anyone but themselves when things turn sour. Funny how reality often smashes utopian dreams and unlikely fantasies. "

Ignignokt wrote on November 20, 2008 10:20 am:
" Ugh...I shouldn't respond...but I'm going to.

Yahoo!'s political dashboard shows Obama winning 53% of the popular vote. That is where I got the figure.

The commenter who mentioned 3/5 specifically said, "3/5 of the country". I would interpret that to mean 3/5 of the people...not the electoral college, because it's the PEOPLE who make this country, not the electoral college.

But if you want to play the numbers game, I could point to the fact that Obama only won 56% of the states...which is still less than 60%.

BTW, I never even said who "my guy" is...I just pointed out the mathematical error, which something that both McCain and Obama supporters SHOULD be willing and able to do...after all, if we're all supposed to unite behind Obama, then neither Republican griping nor Democrat boasting is going to help that situation, now is it? The lack of graciousness in both victory and defeat is quite evident from both sides of the aisle. "

realilty already wrote on November 20, 2008 2:28 pm:
" Dude, reality has already set in and most of us have never see America in such a mess.....it would take a real partisan imagination for anyone to think Obama will do worse than Bush.

The intelligence level alone is promising as far as judgement in this new administration. "