Sorensen says Obama 'up to any task'
By DON WALTON / Lincoln Journal Star
Ted Sorensen said Tuesday the election of Barack Obama makes him even more proud of his country and “more optimistic” about its future.
The president-elect is “up to any task, any challenge,” Sorensen said.
As one foreign statesman told him in a private letter, Sorensen said, “the day Obama walks into the White House, respect for the United States will rise immeasurably all over the world.”
Related Media
Ted Sorensen in Lincoln, 11.18.08
Listen is Ted Sorensen speaks with members of the media prior to his E.N. Thompson Forum appearance on Nov. 18, 2008. (JournalStar.com)...
The election of the country’s first black president “says good things about America,” Sorensen said.
Sorensen, who was chief adviser and speechwriter for President John F. Kennedy, was in Lincoln for a series of events headlined by a Tuesday night address to a full house of more than 2,000 at the Lied Center.
During a news conference prior to that E. N. Thompson Forum lecture, Sorensen confided that he once advised Obama to consider delaying any presidential ambitions until 2012 or 2016, or even later, since the next president would “inherit a country in bad shape.”
“But this was his moment,” Sorensen said.
Now, he said, Obama needs to gather “a ministry of talent” around him without regard to party affiliation or earlier opposition to him.
What is required are talented people who are “dedicated to this country’s national interest and nothing else,” Sorensen said.
Sen. Chuck Hagel is the ideal Republican choice for the Obama Cabinet, Sorensen said.
“Of all the Republicans who might fit, I think Hagel is at the top of the list,” Sorensen said.
“He’s not a narrow partisan (and) he has demonstrated statesmanship on foreign policy and national security.”
Sorensen said Hagel would be a good choice for secretary of defense.
Asked about Obama’s consideration of Sen. Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, Sorensen suggested Clinton would be “a great secretary of health and human services.”
Sorensen pointed to economic challenges first when discussing the “tough agenda” that lies ahead for Obama.
But energy, global warming and health care are also in line.
“Nebraska has a great deal to contribute” in terms of alternative energy options, he said, including biofuels and wind.
Sorensen said Obama will restore America’s use of diplomacy, including multilateral diplomacy, as the first resort in an international crisis rather than turning to military force.
“We can’t bomb our way into respect,” he said, or to “impose democracy on other countries.”
Gone will be the embrace of torture, indefinite detention, denial of habeas corpus and extraordinary rendition, he said.
Gone, Sorensen said, will be “eight years of shame and pain.”
In his Lied Center speech, Sorensen contrasted Kennedy’s actions during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis with President Bush’s decision to attack Iraq in 2003.
Kennedy, he said, respected international law, relied on a bipartisan foreign policy, consulted with allies, demanded and considered all options, exercised wise leadership, and informed the American people.
And, he said, Kennedy “communicated, or negotiated, with the enemy,” which in that case was the Soviet Union. The result was peaceful removal of Soviet missiles from Cuba, he said.
Asked how Kennedy might have responded differently to the terrorist attacks on America on Sept. 11, 2001, Sorensen said he likes to believe that Kennedy already would have “sought out moderates and modernists in Islam” to attempt to reconcile already visible differences.
And, he said, Kennedy would have reacted immediately to a CIA briefing report in August warning of an impending domestic attack by al Qaida instead of just “going to his ranch.”
Obama, he said, will be like Kennedy.
“Beginning next January we will have a new president with a creative mind, a compassionate heart and a courageous spirit,” he said.
Sorensen, who was born and educated in Lincoln, met with students at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln earlier in the day. He’ll be at Lincoln High School on Wednesday.
Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or at dwalton@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit





Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Nina wrote on November 18, 2008 5:11 pm:
Wondering wrote on November 18, 2008 6:03 pm:
DR wrote on November 18, 2008 6:10 pm:
STLNebraskan wrote on November 18, 2008 6:32 pm:
mark wrote on November 18, 2008 6:39 pm:
Assignment: read JFK's final speech in Fort Worth. Inspiring.
Extra credit: read RFK's speech re: Israel prior to being assassinated by Sirhan Sirhan. "
mTm wrote on November 18, 2008 7:30 pm:
Winnie wrote on November 18, 2008 7:39 pm:
Kristy wrote on November 18, 2008 8:12 pm:
It's amazing to me that are you conservatives out there don't remember the reason why we invaded Iraq? It was supposedly because they were linked to Osama bin Laden, or at least that is what our lovely president claimed.
But wait, there wasn't much said in the papers when it came out a year or so ago that there was no correlation between Iraq and Osama bin Laden. So easy to sweep that under the carpet now wasn't it.
So if that wasn't true, what was the real reason for invading Iraq? Look at how much money the president and his family have pocketed in that last few years because of their direct link to the oil companies. Oh, but you won't admit to that now will you? "
Jose wrote on November 18, 2008 8:26 pm:
Tearing each other down will only need to more of the same meltdown. Obama is to smart to let that happen. We are in a new time and we need to use technology and hope as an agent of change.
Challenging Obama is o.k. because if you are good you are inspired to prove people wrong. "
nemo wrote on November 18, 2008 9:37 pm:
JD wrote on November 18, 2008 9:51 pm:
Lincolnite wrote on November 19, 2008 1:41 am:
Fidel wrote on November 19, 2008 6:00 am:
As far as the Cuban Missle Crisis, the Russians got exactly what they wanted out of that....our missles out of eastern Europe. "
Tom wrote on November 19, 2008 6:52 am:
mark wrote on November 19, 2008 7:09 am:
Neo wrote on November 19, 2008 7:40 am:
Only time will tell if President Obama has the same resolve or if he will worry more about his poll results than protecting this country. "
CP wrote on November 19, 2008 7:51 am:
All things Obama and Democratic good, all things Republican, Bush, and conservative bad. The narrowness makes his points quite unpersuasive. "
WCG wrote on November 19, 2008 8:05 am:
I don't expect miracles from Barack Obama. Let's face it, he takes office during conditions worse than any in my lifetime, so he has a much tougher job than any president since Roosevelt, if not before that. But at least we'll be moving forward again, with courage, with determination, with hope,... instead of cowering fearfully in our basements, believing in politicians who push fear like it's a going-out-of-business sale. At least we'll be trusting in America's time-tested institutions, instead of trying to copy Iran's theocracy. At least we'll be making decisions based on evidence and reason, not the president's gut. "
MP wrote on November 19, 2008 8:43 am:
First off, the missils that were moved out of Turkey were old and were scheduled to be removed no matter what happened during the missile crisis, they were just removed a little earlier. And Kennedy did not order the killing of the president of Vietnam.
I also seriously doubt Kennedy would have handled the first trade center attack any different than Clinton. After all, Clinton did capture the leader. Where is the leader of the second attack? Still free.
Clinton did try to take out Bin Laden. Remember the cruise missiles he sent? He missed by a couple of hours. Clinton wanted to do it again but the Republican controlled congress refused to let him. Remember "No missiles for Monica" chant the repubs were saying? If they would have let him, we may not have had a second attack.
Bush has not kept us safe, our embassies over seas have been attacked on several occasions. Also, what about the anthrax letters in New York & DC? No one has ever been caught for those. We may not have been attacked on 9-11 either if Bush would have heeded the 8-6 PDB that warned of such attack instead of going on vacation. The only thing missing from it was the date and time.
Why not let Obama take office and see what he will do before bashing him? "
question wrote on November 19, 2008 9:10 am:
To Neo wrote on November 19, 2008 9:19 am:
Meanwhile, how's that search for Osama bin Laden coming? Oh that's right, Mr. Decisive, George W. Bush, still hasn't done anything about that yet. And he's actually the one responsible for 9/11.
Interesting. "
Sigh wrote on November 19, 2008 9:35 am:
lyle wrote on November 19, 2008 10:12 am:
mark wrote on November 19, 2008 10:21 am:
Derangement Syndrome wrote on November 19, 2008 10:43 am:
Dale Gribble wrote on November 19, 2008 10:47 am:
cat wrote on November 19, 2008 10:54 am:
And what is so wrong with spreading freedom throughout the world. Dictators hate us not the people dying to get here. "
Moultrie wrote on November 19, 2008 11:18 am:
re question and To Neo wrote on November 19, 2008 12:50 pm:
UncleSamZ wrote on November 19, 2008 12:53 pm:
T wrote on November 19, 2008 12:54 pm:
Bush's faults are too numerous to even begin listing them. But thankfully, we're just weeks away from it all becoming past history. And obviously 3/5 of the country agrees given Obama's sound defeat of McCain.
The bitterness of the Republicans in this state is just comical. With each new story on Obama, their rants get more farcical and deranged. I'm going to enjoy laughing at their ridiculous comments on these message boards for the next eight years.
Anyone who would defend George W. Bush and his presidency needs his/her head examined. He will likely go down as the worst president in U.S. history, so be careful what you're defending. You only make yourself seem of questionable mind. "
Ignignokt wrote on November 19, 2008 2:33 pm:
And to MP...perhaps if Clinton had not let Bin Laden go (which he ADMITTED to doing) '9/11' wouldn't be in our lexicon. "
Sigh wrote on November 19, 2008 5:38 pm:
No matter which way you add it up, Obama won solidly, and your guy lost. The end. But thanks for adding to the humor of the ridiculous posts and proving my point. "
reality coming soon wrote on November 20, 2008 10:20 am:
Ignignokt wrote on November 20, 2008 10:20 am:
Yahoo!'s political dashboard shows Obama winning 53% of the popular vote. That is where I got the figure.
The commenter who mentioned 3/5 specifically said, "3/5 of the country". I would interpret that to mean 3/5 of the people...not the electoral college, because it's the PEOPLE who make this country, not the electoral college.
But if you want to play the numbers game, I could point to the fact that Obama only won 56% of the states...which is still less than 60%.
BTW, I never even said who "my guy" is...I just pointed out the mathematical error, which something that both McCain and Obama supporters SHOULD be willing and able to do...after all, if we're all supposed to unite behind Obama, then neither Republican griping nor Democrat boasting is going to help that situation, now is it? The lack of graciousness in both victory and defeat is quite evident from both sides of the aisle. "
realilty already wrote on November 20, 2008 2:28 pm:
The intelligence level alone is promising as far as judgement in this new administration. "