Georgia boy left in Lincoln is latest safe haven case
By the Lincoln Journal Star
A 12-year-old boy from the Atlanta area was dropped off at BryanLGH Medical Center East late Saturday, becoming the 20th youth abandoned under the state's safe haven law since mid-September.
Lincoln Police took the boy into protective custody around 10 p.m. and turned the case over to the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, said Lincoln Police Capt. Jim Davidsaver.
Todd Landry, director of HHS division of children and family services, said the boy's mother drove him to Nebraska from Georgia. He has been placed in residential shelter.
Nebraska's safe haven law is the only one in the nation that allows parents or guardians to abandon children up to age 18. It took effect July 18 but wasn’t used until n Sept. 13, when an 11-year-old and 15-year-old were dropped off at hospitals in Lincoln and Omaha.
The Georgia boy left off on Saturday was the third dropped off at a Lincoln hospital. All others were left in Omaha, including a youth from Michigan and one from Iowa. Both of those children have been returned to their respective states.
HHS officials are in the process of gathering information from Nebraska and Georgia on the family.
The bill was intended to be used for infants, but no child under 20 months old has been abandoned since the law took effect.
Speaker of the Legislature Mike Flood and Gov. Dave Heineman said this week most senators believe the law should be amended to apply only to infants up to 3 days old.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
warren wrote on October 26, 2008 2:00 am:
they need help wrote on October 26, 2008 5:46 am:
Curious wrote on October 26, 2008 7:58 am:
jAMES wrote on October 26, 2008 9:16 am:
St Father Flanagan wrote on October 26, 2008 9:53 am:
Hmmmm... what was their name again??? "
Lost wrote on October 26, 2008 10:00 am:
nebraskanwhocares wrote on October 26, 2008 10:02 am:
Harry the Antenna Guy wrote on October 26, 2008 11:01 am:
Dee wrote on October 26, 2008 11:10 am:
help the families wrote on October 26, 2008 12:31 pm:
Noel Epke Yuma AZ wrote on October 26, 2008 1:04 pm:
3 days wrote on October 26, 2008 1:07 pm:
Corinne Beck wrote on October 26, 2008 2:49 pm:
Lori wrote on October 26, 2008 3:10 pm:
save the children wrote on October 26, 2008 3:15 pm:
Wondering wrote on October 26, 2008 3:28 pm:
Upset Mother wrote on October 26, 2008 3:57 pm:
ALL KIDS NEED HELP wrote on October 26, 2008 4:41 pm:
Governors neighbor wrote on October 26, 2008 5:24 pm:
Lincoln Taxpayer wrote on October 26, 2008 5:29 pm:
another thought wrote on October 26, 2008 5:30 pm:
Yup wrote on October 26, 2008 5:40 pm:
jt wrote on October 26, 2008 6:09 pm:
Mark wrote on October 26, 2008 7:36 pm:
whatever wrote on October 26, 2008 7:50 pm:
proud parent wrote on October 26, 2008 8:40 pm:
Joe wrote on October 26, 2008 8:56 pm:
How do you suppose these kids are treated before they are dropped off? Does anyone honestly think they are not given a much better chance at life? How to pay for it needs to be addressed and there are several options. Kicking them to the curb can not be an option. Its not right. "
Bill wrote on October 26, 2008 9:37 pm:
Supporter of CEDARS wrote on October 26, 2008 9:41 pm:
Cat wrote on October 26, 2008 10:17 pm:
Sheesh wrote on October 26, 2008 10:20 pm:
What!? People get your information straight before spouting your rhetoric.
Ernie was the "maverick" on this bill. He was THE ONLY Senator who was opposed to this bill and specifically to it's wording and open endedness. There are those who hate Ernie so much they'll blame him for things he tried to avoid. Ernie was/is the only senator for years that kept Nebraskans on their toes.He stimulated logical and alternative answers to issues. He made people think which in this state is a very hard thing to get people to do. He's going to be missed. Mark my words. "
ASCA wrote on October 26, 2008 10:24 pm:
Nebraska is not alone. Remember the extreme cases in San Francisco where the mayor said it was his view that the city's sanctuary laws were never intended to shield immigrant drug dealers from criminal prosecution, and reiterated that juvenile offenders would now be turned over to federal immigration authorities.
We should feel lucky the extremes have not been reached here. While safe haven for parents of juveniles and "discarded" children have become a center for controversy, the real problem of a growing number of "unwanted children" isn't being dealt with in a moral way. Why would the governor try to sweep these non infants into the dumpsters? "
WoW wrote on October 26, 2008 11:04 pm:
another proud parent wrote on October 27, 2008 12:37 am:
This law was spurred by the Megan Skrdlandt case, where she felt she couldnt care for her baby. I feel a safe haven law is nessecary, and parents shouldnt be "arrested for abandonment" as you so elequently noted in your opinion. 3 days isnt enough time, but 18 is pushing the envelope to far. Maybe some type of intervention is needed before a child can be dropped off, such as requiring them to take a parenting class such as "Love and Logic", which Cedar's offers parents. "
Kearney taxpayer wrote on October 27, 2008 4:44 am:
JB wrote on October 27, 2008 7:52 am:
Bingo wrote on October 27, 2008 8:16 am:
I understand wrote on October 27, 2008 9:04 am:
Christy wrote on October 27, 2008 12:36 pm:
The Omega Man wrote on October 27, 2008 4:43 pm:
adopted wrote on October 28, 2008 3:03 pm: