Now
Overcast
31°
High
40°
Low
22°

Lessons from the Great Depression

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY THOMAS S. ZORN

Wednesday, Oct 15, 2008 - 12:55:34 am CDT

The headline (LJS, Oct. 10) when I first wrote this piece was particularly alarming, “Economic options dwindle.”

Other commentators have made the point that the Treasury and the Fed are running out of bullets.

Well let me assure you, they are no longer shooting bullets; they have unleashed cannons.

Story Photo
Thomas Zorn

I thought that investors and the public were being silly when they expected these actions to have an immediate impact. Those that bought stocks at the bottom of each of the previous episodes of financial panic made a great deal of money. There is no reason to believe that this won’t happen again. 

Did the big rally in the market on Monday necessarily signal that we have turned the corner? Perhaps, but I suspect that there is still a great deal of uncertainty and fear out there.

It was not too long ago when we were in the warm glow of real estate euphoria. A lot of bets were made on the housing market by individuals and financial institutions, and encouraged by government policy. Asset price bubbles are always based on a good story. In Florida and Arizona, it was about all the baby boomers retiring and looking for retirement homes. In California, they were running out of land. 

You can always tell when you are in a bubble if you can’t sleep and you turn your TV on at 3 a.m. and see an infomercial on how you can get rich. In recent years, it was how you can get rich by flipping houses.

Everything was working fine as long as housing prices were going up. Inevitably in these bubbles, there comes a point where the buyers start balking at the prices sellers want. This starts the process in reverse, and the downward slide is typically much more rapid than the run-up.

As people’s wealth falls, they tend to panic. An unusual aspect of this financial panic is the degree to which financial institutions were vulnerable to the bubble bursting. This has happened before, during the Securities and Loan meltdown of the 1980s and, of course, the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Let me admit my forecasting ability is less than perfect. I have been telling my classes that I expected a hard landing in the real estate market for a number of semesters now. I also said I expected this to have a negative impact on financial institutions and I thought this would result in a recession. But I seriously underestimated how badly financial institutions would be hit. In a previous editorial piece for the LJS, I predicted that the price of oil would drop. The price of oil was nearly $150 a barrel at the time, but I also mistakenly predicted that it wouldn’t happen anytime soon. I also thought that the Huskers would beat Missouri.

I know there are a lot plans to rescue the economy; I even have my own ideas. But when a ship is taking on water and in danger of sinking, that is not the time to assemble the crew and passengers to discuss plans. Nor should you waste a lot of time figuring out whose fault it is.

It is important to recognize that, as Warren Buffet pointed out, we may not have much choice but to put our trust in Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. I know that the Bernanke is a student of the Great Depression. He understands that a primary reason that the Great Depression was great is because the Federal Reserve was fighting the possibility of inflation when the problem was recession and that the government was worried about deficits when the problem was a lack of aggregate demand.

One of the other big mistakes made during the Great Depression was the attempt to artificially prevent prices and wages from falling. Everyone knew that during a depression, prices tend to fall. The attempt to keep prices up meant that people couldn’t afford the goods whose sale would have helped restart the economy. Dumping milk on the ground at a time when babies didn’t have enough to eat was foolish. Housing prices have to be such that people can again afford them. They will come back once the credit markets are operating near normality and sufficient liquidity has been injected in the economy.

While I am optimistic, for the long run it is important to be prudent. I believe that it would be foolish to think that recession will not affect us. The state, which is running a big surplus, should not throw those funds away when it is likely they will need them in the future. Nor should local government embark on ambitious plans when the economy may take a nasty turn. Prudence, not panic is needed.  

Dr. Thomas S. Zorn is the George B. Cook/Ameritas College Professor of Finance at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Columns > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
whatever wrote on October 15, 2008 5:03 am:
" You weighed your words carefully Dr. Zorn. Let's all hope they are listened too. "

H. L. Mencken wrote on October 15, 2008 9:07 am:
" Has there been a more thoroughly discredited profession than the ivory tower dwelling "economist"? I suppose they rank right up there with tarot card readers and chiropractors. I recall my University days when I had a right wing economics professor rant at our class for weeks on end, extolling the genius of the laffer curve, supply side economics, and the pernacious effects of over regulation. When the Gov comes to the rescue, when the Gov is the one tool used over and over again to keep the markets healthy and in check, it seems like its exactly the wrong moment to get supposedly "expert" analysis from an "economist". The same "economists" who failed to predict or have answers for major aspects of the very same field in which they profess knowledge of, for, and about. Why trot out the meaningluess palaver of the local minor leaguer when you could run the words of a Nobel prize winning economist like Paul Krugman or Stiglitz? Perhaps if more citizens were informed of simple economic truths, real truths not politically calculated interpreations and arguments bent to serve the wealthy, we wouldn't find ourselves in such rough circumstances. "

Big Chief wrote on October 15, 2008 12:01 pm:
" I recently read a book by Paul Erdman from the early 1970's. The title was "THE BILLION DOLLAR SURE THING". Although it was written many years ago and is fiction there are a lot of similarities in this story and the recent financial meltdown. Truth can be stranger than fiction. "

MomsHugs aka Eve wrote on October 15, 2008 3:57 pm:
" If Dr. Zorn's intent is to calm troubled waters, he does remind us to use common sense rather than panic & provides historical perspective. However, comparing the global economy of 2008 with US economy of 1929 is not using common sense. Comparing 2008 global economies with those of 1929 would result in nonsensical results. More helpful would be an explanation of how our economy survived 1987 when the market crashed by 50% or 1998 when Long-Term Capital Management, a global hedge fun, failed & threatened to take the largest banks with it.

In the meantime, note that 100 leading U.S. economists sent a letter to Congress in response to Paulson-Bernanke's Bailout Plan. The letter (dated 9/25/08) is a consensus of our nation's leading economists from major universities, colleges & institutes, including 3 Nobel Laureates. No one from Nebraska was included.

The letter was simple & clear: "As economists, we want to express to Congress our great concern for the plan proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson to deal with the financial crisis. We are well aware of the difficulty of the current financial situation and we agree with the need for bold action to ensure that the financial system continues to function. We see three fatal pitfalls in the currently proposed plan:"

Their letter & "3 fatal pitfalls" is linked in this blog: http://momshugs.blogspot.com/2008/09/true-bailout-risk-taxpayer-revolt.html

Eva Cram (An Old Nebraska Gal) "

Buffy wrote on October 15, 2008 10:29 pm:
" I defer to Mr. Buffett on this one. "

TSZ wrote on October 16, 2008 4:50 pm:
" In regard to the second comment on my article I will offer another H. L. Mencken quote, "Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstand."
I am sorry that you didn't enjoy your economics course. I am not a supply side economists nor do I rant at my classes. I mostly keep any ideological opinions to myself. My own views are a monetarist/Keynsian hybrid. But my expertise is in financial economics. When it comes to Mancroecomic or monetary policy neither Krugman or Stiglitz are as expert as Fed Chair Bernake.
It is true that I may be a minor leaguer but having met several Nobel prize winners including Stiglitz there is no one who has a lock on what should be done. On policy issues there is a great deal of uncertainty and even people who never took a single economics course feel free to comment, so do I. Let me add that on certain aspects of the economy I have done more research than either Krugman or Stiglitz. The writer might be surprised that the three of us would probably aggree on a lot of technical issues. On important policy issues there are almost as many opinions as there are economists. By the way insults are not an arguement.

On Eve's comment I will just add that I was asked to sign the letter in question, I declined. My objection to the letter was that while many economists had objections to the Bernake/Paulson plan (that has since been modified) but unfortunately they don't agree amongst themselves. It is my opinion that in an emergency (and I believe this is an emergency) we do not have time to debate everyone's ideas.

While each previous episode of a financial panic has something to teach us. I highlighted the Great Depression because this episode affects all financial institutions as was the case in the 1930's. "

whatever wrote on October 16, 2008 7:39 pm:
" I would like to thank Dr. Zorn for his additional comments. While not majoring in economics in either of my stints in college, I took a lot of economics classes because I found them damn interesting and useful. I have even dug up a couple of old text books and reviewed them as this crisis unfolds. I understand pretty well, and I believe more so than most political and business leaders out there what's going on. I have pretty much concluded the whole thing needs to run it's course without government intervention. The only thing that stops me from completely supporting that idea is the fact we have few if any ethical business and political leaders that really matter at this stage of world history. In addition we have a population, at least in this country, that is so spoiled and so out of touch with what it really takes to build a society and maintain it that we would have chaos at a level recorded history we are aware of has yet to witnesss. Perhaps the fall of Rome and the Dark Ages might be the best parallel. And actually a thought just occured to me. Not only are we living in financial times as dire as the Great Depression we are concurrently living in a time that very much mirrors the corruption and decline of the latter stages of the Roman Empire. Interesting, very interesting. I'm sorry JS I know your edititorial staff believes the good times will always be here, and aw shucks it will always be that way, but you do a great disservice to your readership by not advancing the discussion and bettering humanity by taking some risks and laying on the line what is really happening in this country. And your continued endorsements of the "status quo" do nothing to raise the level of discussion and lay open and honestly the problems we face. The WORLD as we know it, or more accurately the rules in which the "game" is played have changed dramatically. This country, the Constitution are merely sheets of paper we study and on a practical level are no longer relevent in our day to day lives. I think the JS knows that already. "

I agree wrote on October 16, 2008 8:17 pm:
" I think sometimes the "smart" people in government should sit in the professors class. People who lived through depression were always frugal with their assets in the years later. I sell real estate and have thought the last 3 years that prices had to stop and move down. Well, its happened and althought it's hurt my earnings it will make the real property more attractive in years to come. We all knew it was inflated, but, when people want to move to my area, they pay what it takes to purchase. I think Professor was right and I think he's right to be optimistic, except he was found to be VERY wrong in thinking that NU could ever beat Missouri this year. Okie State found the key this year though. Go Tigers. "