Now
Fair
46°
High
40°
Low
22°

For the ultra-rich, is it the end of bling?

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY CHRISTINA BINKLEY / The Wall Street Journal

Friday, Oct 10, 2008 - 01:03:54 am CDT

Francesco Trapani, chief executive of Bulgari Group, is cutting back on the fixed costs of his jet-setting lifestyle. The jewelry, luxury-goods and hotel magnate recently sold his 137-foot yacht, the “Christianne B,” and he’s holding off on buying any more homes. Even his Micocci shirt was slightly frayed at the collar last week — a fact he acknowledged with an apologetic smile.

“I’m being more prudent,” Trapani said. “I spent a lot of money this summer renting houses and things. But when the summer’s over, it’s over.”

Not even the richest people are feeling untouched by our current financial crisis. In their personal lives, as in business, the purveyors of luxury are sizing up what it all means. Some of the questions: Is it unseemly to spend money publicly? Will people still shop for the all-important holiday season? Is this the end of bling?

Story Photo
Models present outfits and new fine jewelry during a rehearsal for a collection of international brands including Chanel, Dior, Cartier, Hermes, Tiffany & Co., last month in Taipei, Taiwan. Some say the failing economy is even affecting the extremely rich. (AP Photo)

Francois Henri Pinault, chief executive of French luxury giant PPR, said a few weeks ago that there will always be rich people, but the question is how they will behave as consumers.

The answer may have a lot to do with how these consumers want to be seen. It’s not necessarily a good thing to show up at the tennis club with a new $30,000 crocodile handbag when your friends’ net worth has been halved and the Federal Reserve is spending billions to keep the banking system afloat.

Some luxury executives are simply waiting to see what happens. Barry Sternlicht, chairman and chief executive of the private investment fund Starwood Capital, has been on a luxury investment tear in recent years, buying up such things as champagne maker Taittinger, the Hotel de Crillon in Paris and Baccarat. Last week, when asked how he’s doing these days, he said he’s “just waiting out the tsunami.”

“That’s what this is,” Sternlicht said, “a financial tsunami.”

Yet the luxury industry built up quite a head of steam in recent months, boosted by the new riches in India, China and Russia. Until recent weeks, the economic troubles seemed surmountable. Trapani spoke as construction workers around him prepared to open Bulgari’s new store on the Avenue Montaigne in Paris.

Sure, retailers like Saks Fifth Avenue and Bergdorf Goodman were planning to buy more carefully for the spring season — “we’re sharpening our pencils,” as Linda Fargo, Bergdorf’s fashion director, put it last week. Still, not even such cautious retailers envisioned a tsunami.

So it will take some time for the market to sift through all the luxury expansions that are in the works. Last week in Paris, grand new stores opened one right after another.

At the opening of its new women’s store in Paris last week, Ralph Lauren upped the ante on its notoriously expensive Ricky bag: It will now be available made-to-order in 20 shades of alligator skin, including platinum, “vibrant cherry” or cobalt, and priced from $12,995 to $28,995. The company is confident that it’s well-positioned with its customers, said Charles Fagan, an executive vice president at Ralph Lauren, before racing off to open a new store in Istanbul.

Yet London-based designer Graeme Black cut his prices by about 20 percent for his spring 2009 season, and the design house Viktor & Rolf tried to save money by airing an online film of their collection rather than staging a show. (It turned out that the filming cost as much as a show would have, according to a spokeswoman.)

Desiree Bollier, chief executive of London-based Value Retail, which operates premium outlet malls in Europe, says luxury brands are increasingly willing to unload their unsold goods at her company’s outlets. Among those that have recently opened stores or will soon at Value Retail malls: Baccarat, Jimmy Choo and Dolce & Gabbana. Value Retail, which earns a percentage of sales at its malls, may be one of the winners in the post-crisis economy: The company expects its revenue to rise 20 percent this year.

For those in the full-priced retail business, this doesn’t bode well for the holidays.

“My sense is that this Christmas is not going to be a successful one,” Trapani said. “The things that are happening are so big,” he said, “that it would be silly to assume they won’t have an impact.”


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
402 > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
DS wrote on October 10, 2008 9:38 am:
" Oh boo hoo, poor spoiled rich people have to cut back on the number of houses and cars they buy. The economic policies designed to line these peoples pockets is the reason we are all paying the price now...... "

Sorry wrote on October 10, 2008 3:53 pm:
" DS...

Actually it's the policies that were designed for poor people to own a home that have caused this collapse. Google "Community Reinvestment Act" and you'll see how banks were forced to lend money in risky vehicles to poor families that had no means of paying the loans back.

As a result, more people bought homes, home prices became greatly overinflated, and soon the bubble reached it's bursting point. Once it collapsed you began to see record numbers of foreclosures and the risky sub-prime loans behind the mess.

You'll never guess who was behind the CRA. I'll give you three chances. The first two don't count. "

Proud Democrat wrote on October 12, 2008 6:25 pm:
" Nice bit of revisionist history, Miss Sorry. Trying to blame Carter and Clinton, again? Too bad that none of what you're saying is the truth. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977(CRA) required consumer banks to not automatically "redline", or refuse to consider loan requests from, certain neighborhoods in their communities. It never said they had to make the loans and it certainly didn't require that any bank ignore credit ratings or loan more on a home than it's actual value.

As a matter of fact, the CRA didn't even apply to the vast majority of the mortgage lenders who got us into this mess. Moreover, the relaxation and expansion of banking regulations you claim to place under Bill Clinton's watch were initiated by a Republican controlled Congress. John McCain's principal financial policy advisor, Phil Gramm, was the architect of most of the legislation that changed the rules.

What I find particularly amusing is that a very well written column in the Lincoln Journal Star by Clarence Page contradicts every one of your claims and also points out how certain AM radio talking heads and neo-conservative pundits are incorrectly blaming the CRA and ACORN for the mess we're in. Please read that column, Miss Sorry; you might just learn something. "