Boy, 12, is latest safe-haven dropoff
By the Lincoln Journal Star
Caretakers dropped off two 12-year-old boys at hospitals in Lincoln and Omaha Sunday, using the state’s safe haven law yet again.
And on Monday, a 34-year-old mother brought her 15-year-old daughter to a Lincoln hospital intending to drop her off using the safe haven law. But the mother changed her mind, said Lincoln Police Capt. David Beggs.
No other information was available on that case.
Information about local resources is available by calling 211 or at www.dhhs.ne.gov/Children_Family_Services/SafeHaven
On Sunday, a 12-year-old boy was left at BryanLGH Medical Center West by his 51-year-old grandmother — Lincoln’s second safe haven case since the law went into effect in July.
Another boy, the same age, was taken to Immanuel Hospital in Omaha.
In the Lincoln case, the grandmother had been appointed guardian of the boy less than a week before.
The boy, who arrived at the hospital at 10:50 p.m. told a nurse he had attempted to “help his grandmother clean up,” and she had become upset and took him to the hospital.
The boy’s father apparently lives in Lincoln and his mother in Saline County.
Parents, relatives or guardians have used the state’s new safe haven law eight times since it went into effect in July. A total of 16 children have been abandoned.
The Department of Health and Human Services is assessing the latest cases, said Todd Landry, director of the division of children and family services.
Lincoln Police Chief Tom Casady said Monday there have always been parents and caregivers who have struggled to care for troubled children.
“Now it’s relatively easy to take advantage of this tool legislators gave citizens,” he said. “I’m rather surprised legislators didn’t see this coming because I can assure you Lincoln police saw this coming.”
The safe haven law prohibits prosecution when a child is left at a licensed Nebraska hospital.
While they cannot be charged for abandoning a child, parents and guardians using Nebraska safe haven law can be charged for other offenses.
Courts are also likely to require parents and guardians to participate in parenting classes, family therapy, conflict resolution or other services in an effort to reunite youth with their families.
Child support payments may be ordered while children are in state custody.
The law was intended for infants when enacted, but legislators had compromised on not putting a specific age on the bill in order to pass it. Some senators have said they may make adjustments to the bill in January.
Gov. Dave Heineman said Monday he has no plans to call a special session to change the safe haven law, but he wouldn’t rule out the possibility.
“I hope we don’t have to do that, but as governor you never take any issue off the table,” he said.
HHS director Landry encouraged parents who are having difficulty with their kids to reach out for help from family, faith-based organizations and other community services when they need support, before taking such a drastic step as abandonment.
Journal Star reporters Hilary Kindschuh, JoAnne Young and Cory Matteson contributed to this story.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Think wrote on October 6, 2008 10:52 am:
BicycleMike wrote on October 6, 2008 11:18 am:
Lincolnite wrote on October 6, 2008 11:21 am:
Please leave the law alone. "
Its Okay wrote on October 6, 2008 11:31 am:
Parents and guardians wrote on October 6, 2008 11:45 am:
clint wrote on October 6, 2008 11:58 am:
Jane wrote on October 6, 2008 12:04 pm:
Tara wrote on October 6, 2008 12:09 pm:
Carol wrote on October 6, 2008 12:12 pm:
I agree with Jane wrote on October 6, 2008 12:16 pm:
Linda wrote on October 6, 2008 12:23 pm:
Mary wrote on October 6, 2008 12:29 pm:
disagree Jane wrote on October 6, 2008 12:31 pm:
sheila wrote on October 6, 2008 12:35 pm:
A REAL PARENT wrote on October 6, 2008 1:02 pm:
If you keep promoting unrealistic laws, you will reap the benefits there of.
No worries here, I plan on protecting my kid, thank you very much! "
cm wrote on October 6, 2008 1:14 pm:
Fred wrote on October 6, 2008 1:28 pm:
Governors leadership wrote on October 6, 2008 1:54 pm:
seriously. wrote on October 6, 2008 1:56 pm:
stop judging wrote on October 6, 2008 2:03 pm:
me wrote on October 6, 2008 2:12 pm:
concerned wrote on October 6, 2008 2:22 pm:
Harry the antenna guy wrote on October 6, 2008 3:26 pm:
So Sad wrote on October 6, 2008 4:08 pm:
wow wrote on October 6, 2008 4:17 pm:
Birth Contral wrote on October 6, 2008 4:52 pm:
help might be needed wrote on October 6, 2008 5:00 pm:
Unreal wrote on October 6, 2008 5:32 pm:
rid of these kids so they won't have to bother or spend their money taking
care of them. This is unacceptable. If they are having problems they
should ask for help, not dump them off. Dumping them off shows right there they are not FIT parents from day one!! They are the same as telling
the kids, "I hate you." And, the legislature, every one of them needs to
have a DUNCE hat they have to wear ALL THE TIME. Unbelieveable how they
could be soooooo stupid to pass a law like this. Goes to show you they
ALLL are just putting in their time and probably wake up only when its
time to vote on a bill!!!! And their suppose to have a college education?? "
wonder wrote on October 6, 2008 5:45 pm:
2 bc wrote on October 6, 2008 5:51 pm:
Sue wrote on October 6, 2008 6:40 pm:
Connie wrote on October 6, 2008 7:18 pm:
Idonotwonder wrote on October 6, 2008 7:18 pm:
OMG wrote on October 6, 2008 8:00 pm:
help is needed wrote on October 6, 2008 8:07 pm:
sheesh wrote on October 6, 2008 8:26 pm:
Dawn wrote on October 6, 2008 8:27 pm:
unfair to these children wrote on October 6, 2008 9:43 pm:
Almost as crazy is the fact that people think that it's good for us to allow parents to abandon their children? If parents want to abandon their children, they don't need a law to tell them to do that. Parents are responsible for their children. This is BAD BAD BAD legislation, and it needs prompt attention.
Our country, by the way, was founded on the idea of no taxation without representation, not a "right to privacy" which is not in the Constitution even today. "
Concerned wrote on October 6, 2008 9:44 pm:
hurts my heart wrote on October 6, 2008 11:06 pm:
Does Lincoln not know poverty wrote on October 6, 2008 11:10 pm:
Ruined for life wrote on October 6, 2008 11:14 pm:
stevebob wrote on October 7, 2008 2:01 am:
People Dang It wrote on October 7, 2008 5:11 am:
Okay with law wrote on October 7, 2008 7:54 am:
so you may think wrote on October 7, 2008 9:03 am:
safehavengood wrote on October 7, 2008 9:26 am:
KRK wrote on October 7, 2008 9:48 am:
for the bill wrote on October 7, 2008 10:07 am:
Maybe if kids..... wrote on October 7, 2008 10:08 am:
Connie wrote on October 7, 2008 11:58 am:
I was not given options for help or information resources. I was not told about services available. The few things I found out were by a chance meeting or someone else’s experience, not by someone in the system volunteering information. As a mother who has been there I would like to speak with other mothers. Maybe we can find a way to get these children help. Email me at Sissy_1963@hotmail.com "
Know the frustration wrote on October 7, 2008 1:18 pm:
Dont change it wrote on October 7, 2008 2:18 pm: