Now
Fair
10°
High
32°
Low
24°

State plans to privatize all foster care services by summer

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Monday, Oct 06, 2008 - 12:42:01 am CDT

The state plans to privatize all foster care and other services delivered to more than 4,300 children who are wards of the state and not living at home.

State employees would initially assess and monitor children, but private agencies would provide foster homes and group homes and coordinate services, based on a report on the Department of Health and Human Services Web site.

The state expects to contract with a few large agencies or networks for out-of-home care, following the model that HHS began using for in-home care this summer.

The reform plan, called "Framework Recommendations for the Reform of Out-of-Home Care" is available at the Health Human Services Web site:www.dhhs.ne.gov

Click on Children & Family Services; then click "Framework Recommendations" on the right.

The reform would begin July 1, 2009, the beginning of the next fiscal year. Contractors would be selected by Feb. 1 and contracts signed by March 15, a short period.

Nebraskans interested in child protection and safety programs expressed praise, reservations and questions about the moves that would:

* Privatize all services for children who are wards of the state.

* Turn over the coordination of services done by state employees.

* Contract with just a few large agencies or networks.

“The plan moves the state out of the direct service business and out of making minor decisions. Yet it reserves the state’s authority on major decisions,” said Karen Authier, executive director of the Nebraska Children’s Home Society, an Omaha agency.

Putting all services under a lead agency should be more cost effective and provide for more coordinated services for children, she said.

HHS is currently responsible for more than 6,600 children who are wards of the state, either because of parental abuse or neglect, or because of the child’s misbehavior. About 2,300 of these children still live at home. The rest live in foster homes, group homes, treatment programs, detention center or in  institutions for juvenile offenders. 

 Currently HHS staff find placements for children, make decisions about changes and report to the court. HHS also contracts directly with individual families for many foster homes.

Under the new arrangement, private agency staff would place the children in foster homes or other programs and coordinate the service. HHS also would no longer recruit its own foster families.

The success of privatization will rest on how well HHS staff oversee the work, said Kathy Bigsby-Moore, director of Voices for Children, a statewide advocacy group.

“That hasn’t been their strong suit,” she said, referring to a recent Legislative report on HHS’s poor oversight of contracts for transporting children to appointments and visits with parents.

Success also will depend on whether the state provides enough money for services, she said.

Some lead contract agencies in Florida went belly up trying to make a profit in the first year of that state’s privatization plan and there were complaints that youth had fewer programs while private contractors made money, according to a memo from Carol Stitt, director of the Foster Care Review Board, a state agency that monitors foster care placements.

The reform document says that contractors will be paid a rate per family, with financial incentives and penalties related to meeting specific performance standards.

Health and Human Service Department leaders have held meetings across the state to explain the reform plan to employees and others interested in the plan.

HHS leaders have not provided information on the potential cost of the reform, although the plan document says it “will be accomplished within existing resources.” The document does not indicate whether state case workers would be cut.

The goal is to reduce the number of times children are moved; to eliminate duplication, confusion and inefficiency that occurs when there are multiple agencies providing different services, according to the document.

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Another Stupid Idea wrote on October 6, 2008 1:54 am:
" Privatization and deregulation are the two top goals of Republicans. We've just had on the national level a $700 billion example of why complete deregulation doesn't work, and I predict this will become an excellent example of why complete privatization doesn't work. The only way a private company can do a job cheaper than government is to cut labor costs. Nebraska has enough low-wage, no-benefit jobs without government creating more. Vote change. "

curly wrote on October 6, 2008 7:00 am:
" May shift of services not go the way of before/after school programs where the Lincoln Municipal Recreation Learning Programs were shifted to non profits organizations at a great cost. The parents pay twice as much more for non profit services, there a waiting lists at some site due to lack of staff and the city of Lincoln loses a revenue generating program that helps the cash flow when the Parks and Recreation Department gets another cut in their funding.
The children are our future- "

Kimberley wrote on October 6, 2008 7:51 am:
" As a former foster parent who was fortunate to adopt the children placed with us, I believe reform needs to happen, I am just concerned about the process. Fortunately our children were well cared for, however, we had no visits from the CPS worker and I checked with the school and daycare they were in at the time and there was not follow up. It is no wonder state wards are harmed! As a foster parent, I would have rather had someone randomly stopping at my home or at the very least checking with the school and daycare about how my children were doing and if there were any concerns. I am afraid that with changes to money making programs, the oversight will only be more compromised. Please ensure that these children are being monitored in their homes, schools, daycares, etc!!! Many children in foster care have behaviors that make them more at risk for abuse/neglect and parental frustration that leads to abuse. We have seen the struggles with the transition to "for profit" in the DD system, please don't let our already at risk children be jeapordized. "

Worried wrote on October 6, 2008 8:54 am:
" Some services have already been privatized, and from personal experience, I would say not to the benefit of the children or anyone else involved witht the foster care system. Greed always gets in the way. I hope there is plenty of oversight, and proper checks and balances. "

BOB wrote on October 6, 2008 10:49 am:
" Please explain why we are using a failing model? If it is not made the mustard in Florida, where is it successful? the state does need to get out of the business of mismanaging trouble kids, but a valid plan is essential prior to embarking on this change "

to bob wrote on October 7, 2008 9:02 am:
" It didn't say it failed in Florida. It said that Florida did not research enough and provide enough payment to the contractor. Kansas has been doing this for 8 years successfully. There are many states that do this, the contractors have to be fully aware of what their contract says, and the State has to do research of the other states and the successes and failures there so they are able to provide what is needed and expect what they need from a contractor. Look at the positive sometimes people. Don't just focus on one little word before ranting and raving here. "

within the system wrote on October 8, 2008 1:39 pm:
" I work for one of those contracted agencies, and it seems to me and everyone that I work with that the state is deliberatly trying to savatoge the new program. They continually change the paperwork, and we have to continually redo it on the new paperwork, about everyother week, leaving less time for us to be with clients. The case workers won't/don't call back or return contact via e-mail they are suppose to within 24 hrs. (DOESN'T HAPPEN), and thats us, foster families, parents, attny's, and or other person's working with the families. When there is a case worker change over no one is informed, NOT ANYONE, except maybe the family, Occasionally. I know they are swamped. They're expectations are not always accomplishable or reasonable, and those change on a daily basis. In home Family Prevention Services are to start within 24 hours of referral,other services within 72 hrs. (to our company), sometimes we don't get the word for hours after they get it. but we are still held to that initial time, and not when we, the workers get the referral, making it sometimes impossible to do,and our company is penalized, not to mention we already have other clients that we have schedules with. The Case workers are suppose to be with us on that 1st Face to Face, (doesn't happen) or it doesn't count. When they rewrite this new contract there needs to be some ( now in the field worker) input for it to work, Omni who was originally doing this looked at this contract and knew is wasn't do-able, and threw up their hands and let the others try it. If Florida DHHS were doing, or not doing the crap Neb.DHHS is I can see why they went broke.

I think they change the paperwork so often because they can say you didn't get it in on a timely manner, or it wasn't right, and then they don't have to pay the agencies, they'v done this in the past, to other agencies, that ended up shutting their doors, and if they arn't held MORE accountable then they shouldn"t expect anyone else to be. "