Now
Fair
51°
High
51°
Low
29°

Health insurance woes: Stuck in the middle

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By MARK ANDERSEN / Lincoln Journal Star

Saturday, Sep 27, 2008 - 11:51:07 pm CDT

It’s a steamy morning in Lincoln, and the air conditioner of the Consumer Reports recreational vehicle does little but stir the smell.

Three of the magazine’s road warriors rolled into Lincoln the night before, on an odyssey to sample America’s health insurance woes.

The vast emptiness of the Plains has numbed them, but the health insurance struggles they’ve heard recently are as familiar as soaring gas prices and fast food.

Story Photo
When Matt Herman sold his beer distributorship and retired, he had little idea of the large health insurance premiums he'd soon be paying. (Robert Becker)

“What we’re seeing,” says Meg Bohne, senior member of the Consumer Reports Health Cover America Tour, “is people are not poor enough to qualify for help or not well enough to get the coverage they think they need.”

In that vast gap between poverty and prosperity where most Americans reside, she says, people have begun losing faith in this country’s health system.

The nation’s spending on health increased from $253 billion in 1980 to $2.4 trillion in 2008.

For employers, increases in health insurance premiums have greatly outpaced payroll costs in 16 of the last 20 years.

Much of the public knows only that they’re having troubles finding health insurance, keeping it, using it, paying for it, understanding it.

The Consumer Reports travelers heard that story in Maine, in Virginia, in Texas, and just now at the kitchen table of Matthew and Lynne Herman, the Lincoln couple they’ve come to film.

Like Matt Herman, people have become suspicious of and confused by the relationships between doctors, insurance companies and hospitals, Bohne says.

Nationwide, says Blake Hutson, another Consumer Reports RV traveler, there’s growing concern not only over obtaining health coverage but of using it.

Even if they have coverage, how much will it cost to walk into an emergency room for chest pain?

How long will it take before the final bill arrives?

Will they know it when they see it?

Nobody can say.

Matt Herman was irked when he responded to Consumer Reports’ invitation to share his health coverage woes. His insurance company had hired a telephone nanny to shame him into making doctor visits and watching his diabetes.

The 53-year-old retired beer wholesaler has spent roughly $12,000 a year on insurance premiums since COBRA coverage through his former business ended a few years ago.

COBRA gives workers who lose health benefits for reasons such as the loss of a job the right to keep their group health plan for a while, although generally they must also pay for that portion of the premium their employer paid.

In the years since, Matt’s insurance — obtained through the state’s Comprehensive Health Insurance Pool, or CHIP — hasn’t paid out a dime.

It comes with a $5,000 deductible for in-network care (twice that for out-of-network care).

He’s never hit his deductible.

By the time people contact Consumer Reports, Bohne says, they’ve hit a point where they need care or they’re struggling to pay for it.

The Hermans, having sold a business, are better off than most. Their story shows that almost everybody is affected, Bohne said.

Opinions over how to fix the nation’s health care system have varied more than the scenery beyond the RV dashboard, Bohne says, but the message that something needs to change is coming across. It repeats itself like stripes on the road ahead.

Conceivably, if Matt and Lynne Herman continue to be healthy, they could pay more than $100,000 to insurers before Medicare kicks in — if it’s still there — at age 65.

Matt’s father lived to be 70.

“At what point is it not going to be affordable?” Matt asks. “Where you throw your hands in the air and say, ‘We’ll see what happens.’”

He’s not yet there, not ready to absorb a possible $20,000 bill for something like an overnight hospital stay for a cardiac stent — something that costs $2,000 and looks like it fell out of a ballpoint pen.

If he ever needs specialized cancer drugs it will cover up to $1 million in lifetime benefits.

And the $1,000 he spends monthly for premiums he almost makes up in the discounts he gets on medicine and physician fees by being insured.

A 2007 Health Affairs report found hospitals often charge self-pay patients 2½ times as much as what some insurers pay and more than three times what Medicare pays.

“How do insurance companies decide what they’ll pay?” Matt asks. “I’d like to see it be more transparent.”

It didn’t used to be like this.

Matt and his father were the area’s wholesaler for Budweiser. The company employed 75 people when it was sold. Their group insurance covered 100 percent of health care for employees and families.

Then, 18 months after the company sold, Matt tried to get health coverage from eight different insurance companies.

Nobody would cover him, he said.

He’s diabetic and his wife is overweight, but they’re relatively healthy and follow their doctors’ advice.

Matt imagines the reasoning that led to denial of coverage: Oh, you have diabetes. You might have circulatory issues. It might cost us money. We don’t want to cover you.

He knew Nebraska’s CHIP program existed for high-risk individuals unable to procure health insurance elsewhere. It was the price that shocked him.

“State-mandated coverage,” he says, “I would have thought would be more comprehensive and more affordable.”

He wonders about where health care may be headed.

Businesses can’t afford to continue to bear those expenses, he says.

But he worries that a national health care program might harm the quality of care available.

“There’s no quick fixes or easy answers,” he says.

And yet: “At what point are we all going to be in the ER for free care?”

That’s the other fear the travelers on the Consumer Reports RV hear everywhere, Bohne says: “I’m having problems, but I’m really afraid of what’s going to happen to my kids and grandkids.”

Reach Mark Andersen at 473-7238 or mandersen@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
welcome to the boat wrote on September 28, 2008 12:26 am:
" Everybody who is self-employed pays that exact same amount with the same deductibles. I have a family of 5 and I pay around $1200 a month for moderate coverage. If you do not like the cost you have two options, take on the risk yourself or get a j-o-b where that is part of the package. Part of the problem in America is everybody wants to retire and nobody wants to work. 53. Come on. I am sure your beer distributorship over the years has contributed greatly to the healthcare costs around here with the ramifications of the alcohol consumption. Pay the piper. "

j83 wrote on September 28, 2008 12:52 am:
" If you care about health coverage as your top issue in this election campaign, you must vote for Barack Obama for President. McCain's health care plan is not realistic, and if enacted it would likely increase costs to the consumer even more then they already are. America's access to affordable health care is an embarrassment to the industrialized world. "

Lars wrote on September 28, 2008 8:13 am:
" As the US population ages, healthcare is going to be the ticking time bomb that could destroy a well planned retirement for millions of people.
Rather than goverment run healthcare, we need an efficient, private network of providers such as Linc Care and retail health clinics with health insurance available to cover major medical treatments at a cost that is more affordable. This will be a challenge, but it needs to be run as a back up to Medicare, not as a Nationalized government program. "

Dee wrote on September 28, 2008 9:56 am:
" Health insurance is run by corporations who look for money. The insurance i get through work is terrible, the company will pay for some if its just me, so it ends up costing 45 a month, but here is the kicker, if i put my wife/children on it, it goes to 430/700 dollars a month..how can one possibly afford this and live? "

Reader wrote on September 28, 2008 10:28 am:
" I have health insurance with my employer. It is a real let down when our national leadership, from President Bush and Congress on down, do not address this problem. If they did not have coverage, I am sure they would do something, probably give themselves health insurance and forget about everybody else. "

Oh goodness wrote on September 28, 2008 10:42 am:
" Seems that the less you are informed before you make the big decision to do something like quit your job or sell you income opportunity, the more vulnerable you are and the more you get hurt.
"throw up your hands" and get free medical insurance and then let the rest of us pay. But better yet. Get a job and let the next insurance provider take the responsibility. There are jobs out there, however, most people won't take them because that would require getting off their back side and doing some work. "

Its Not Health Care ... wrote on September 28, 2008 10:52 am:
" ... the correct name of what we have in this country is health business. We spend 40% more on health care than the next closest country and have poor health outcomes to show for it. We have the best technology, but the system does not allocate services in a logical way and we do not pay in a logical way. Different insurance companies reimburse at different rates for the same services. The un-insured get charged the highest rates for services while the large insurance companies pay the lowest rates. When a health care dollar gets set on the table, there is not an orderly process by which it is divided up by the service providers, it is a grabfest where each entity grabs as much as they can. That is because the true goal of health care for these providers tends to be profit. I can tell you that when a patients approved number of days in the hospital (set by their insurance company, not their doctor) runs out, regardless of the doctor's or patient's wishes, they suddenly become appropriate for a lessor level of care. I had a patient where the doctor wanted an additional night at the hospital, but she had to leave as insurance would not cover the doctor's recommendations and the patient would have to pay out of pocket. She couldn't and she had to leave despite her doctor's recommendation. This is the system of "choice" we hear about. I had a prescription of a drug denied by my insurance company and they wanted to substitute a different chemical compound which was cheaper. I am a mid-level practitioner and had consulted with my physician about the treatment involved. We went through the pharmacological options, including the one the insurance company insisted on (we dropped that option due to the unfavorable side-effect profile of the medication) and settled on the best choice for me. In the end, my "choice" was to go without treatment, pay for my own treatment despite my and my employer paying for insurance, or allow my insurance company to become my prescriber. Not a great choice. We are not getting our money's worth for our health care. It's a bloated and profit taking system we have now. I firmly believe there should be a basic health plan for all US citizens. We give subsidies to oil companies (so hard to make a profit these days, eh) we bail out huge financial brokerages whose greed induced them to use very poor business practices, and we wage a war in a country we invaded (one who had never attacked our country, NEVER) and spend 10 billion a month there because "we want to win" and because oil companies want the oil. Yet we hear a great cry of "socialism" every time the idea of universal health care comes up. I got news for you people, we already have socialism for the wealthy. How ironic can it be? "

ted wrote on September 28, 2008 11:06 am:
" Lets stop the litigation against doctors and hospitals because it forces them to overprescribe unnecessary medical tests and prescriptions. This would lower malpractice insurance, and lower medical costs. Japan sets a legal price for medical litigation per person..you can only get so much.Then lets limit health care benefits for individuals who smoke, drink, take drugs, are overweight and don't exercise, etc. It's one thing to contract a medical condition, and another to wreck you own health. "

To Ted wrote on September 28, 2008 11:21 am:
" You can't limit health care for only those who are healthy or who lead a "healthy lifestyle". There will always be people who don't always maintain YOUR desired weight, don't always eat what YOU eat, live like YOU do, or go to bed the same time YOU do. God made each one of individual. I don't want to live in a world where everybody is like YOU. "

Jeff wrote on September 28, 2008 12:27 pm:
" I like when people say we can't afford Barack Obama's plan. The truth is, we can't afford to keep doing what we are now, which is basically nothing. We let all the for profit entities work the system for all they can get. New technologies, new drugs, etc that seem to make everyone think they can live forever, whether they take care of themselves or not. We spend too much money for end of life care. I'm not referring about pallitive care or hospice, but rather the idea that machines and mircle drugs exist to reverse almost anything. "

its ok wrote on September 28, 2008 2:12 pm:
" matt, with mccanes plan you'll get $5000 back so you'll really only pay $7000. . .items and services not covered not included. "

mp wrote on September 28, 2008 2:46 pm:
" Health insurance is a major rip-off. We've paid premiums for years, had two sons, now grown, and never, ever came close to meeting the deductible. Granted our medical expenses are minimal, but if something is covered, we have to pay because we haven't met the deductible. What is the point of having health insurance. Employers need to get out of being providers. Everyone should be able to shop for their health insurance just like auto or homeowners insurance.

It would be nice to have expanded health savings account available to all to save for medical expenses. "

whatever wrote on September 28, 2008 2:59 pm:
" There is no health care crisis and the fundamentals of the economy are strong. John McCain will fix it all by taxing employer paid health care premiums and we'll all get get a 5,000 buck credit. Right? The private sector can take care of it all and if they can't we'll just write a check for 700 billion bucks to make it all work. Now let's all go out and vote Republican. Oops, just kidding. "

MY plan wrote on September 28, 2008 6:45 pm:
" Very simple: We all turn over every cent of our paycheck to the government. In return, they provide all of the basic needs of for each of us. This plan is flawless. "

change is needed wrote on September 28, 2008 11:29 pm:
" Every other industrialized nation has some form of universal health care except the great old USA? why should people that can't even pay taxes get free care and the rest of us don't? I'm referring to prison inmates, welfare families with Medicade, and most people on disability. Our county is already taking care of these people, it's time for a better system. We can work hard for years, but one significant hospitalization or ER visit can take it all sway. Pray for change. "