Woman leaves teen at hospital under safe haven law
By JoANNE YOUNG / Lincoln Journal Star
Lawmakers were afraid this would happen: Two older children were abandoned over the weekend under the state’s new safe haven law.
In Lincoln, a 15-year-old boy’s guardian dropped him off at BryanLGH Medical Center West Saturday evening, saying she couldn’t deal with the boy’s behavioral issues, Lincoln Police Chief Tom Casady said.
He and an 11-year-old boy — taken to Immanuel Medical Center in Omaha over the weekend — are the first two to be abandoned under a Nebraska safe haven law that went into effect in July.
Related Media
The story so far: Safe haven law
Nebraska's safe haven law, which went into effect in July 2008, is broader than most and allows a parent to leave an infant or child at a hospital wit...
Neither was in any immediate danger when dropped off, said Todd Landry, director of the Children and Family Services Division of the Department of Health and Human Services.
Neither the guardian in Lincoln nor the parent in Omaha will be charged with a crime. Before the law went into effect, they could have been charged with child neglect or abandonment, both misdemeanors, or felony child abuse.
The Lincoln boy, a high school freshman, is staying in a Lincoln emergency shelter. The Omaha boy was admitted to the hospital for evaluation and observation, Landry said.
Both will be in 48-hour protective custody and the county attorneys in Lancaster and Douglas counties will make the determination if the boys will remain in custody, Landry said. The courts will decide what happens next.
Landry said that could include family reunification, alternate placement or a more permanent solution.
The Lincoln boy’s mother died in September 2003, and her sister assumed temporary custody of all five children in the family, including one half-sibling.
The four other youths have already become state wards.
A brother and two sisters now live in group homes. The half-sister became a ward after she broke the law.
The father has lived in Lincoln but has not had custody of the children. He is listed in the mother’s obituary as her life partner.
Casady said the boy’s aunt, when she brought him to BryanLGH, said she was having trouble supervising him because of all of his behavior problems.
Landry and the sponsor of the safe haven law, Sen. Arnie Stuthman of Platte Center, said what happened this weekend was not the intent of the law.
Stuthman said LB157 was initially intended for infants less than 72 hours old who were in danger of being harmed or abandoned in an unsafe place. That’s the way most other states’ safe haven bills are written.
But to get the bill passed, he said, he had to agree to expand the language to include all children.
“This is not intended to be used when a child is unruly or out of control,” he said. “People need to realize the effect on the child and what it will do to families.”
Other options could have been pursued, Landry said.
Jim Blue, president and CEO of Cedars Youth Services, said if a parent or guardian does not feel a child is safe in their own care, he or she can call the Cedars emergency hotline at 437-8888 and receive free temporary shelter for the child.
He was supportive of a safe haven law for younger children, even up to the age of 2, whose young, unprepared parents cannot deal with parenting, he said.
But the emotional cuts and scars in an older child who is abandoned can be much deeper than those of an infant, he said. An adolescent’s social attachments, let alone family attachments, can be precarious, even in normal situations, he said.
“There are good organizations that can help with teens when situations become stressed,” he said.
Cedars is one of those, he said, and has been providing shelter for more than 60 years.
Both Landry and Stuthman said they will watch closely what happens with the law in the next few months. If necessary, the Legislature could try to adjust the law, Stuthman said.
Reach JoAnne Young at 473-7228 or jyoung@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit





Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Lola wrote on September 15, 2008 10:04 am:
mike wrote on September 15, 2008 10:05 am:
Matt wrote on September 15, 2008 10:05 am:
Please don't let this be the start of a trend....please! "
jo wrote on September 15, 2008 10:06 am:
Please don't judge this woman as being a bad person, she did what she felt was best for the child and herself. It would be easy to say what a monster for leaving him but intil you are in her shoes you truely don't understand. "
Jack wrote on September 15, 2008 10:08 am:
Dee wrote on September 15, 2008 10:11 am:
good wrote on September 15, 2008 10:13 am:
Bill wrote on September 15, 2008 10:14 am:
Dan wrote on September 15, 2008 10:32 am:
Angie wrote on September 15, 2008 10:32 am:
parent wrote on September 15, 2008 10:37 am:
Carl wrote on September 15, 2008 10:45 am:
whatever wrote on September 15, 2008 10:54 am:
me wrote on September 15, 2008 10:56 am:
Mom wrote on September 15, 2008 11:05 am:
Good for the kid... wrote on September 15, 2008 11:06 am:
Is it a perfect solution? No, of course not. But now this kid is getting the help he needs and his chances at becoming a productive member of society are much much stronger. "
Sunshine wrote on September 15, 2008 11:07 am:
Mad Mom wrote on September 15, 2008 11:24 am:
nemo wrote on September 15, 2008 11:27 am:
Yo wrote on September 15, 2008 11:29 am:
poor kid wrote on September 15, 2008 11:32 am:
JS wrote on September 15, 2008 11:32 am:
wake up wrote on September 15, 2008 11:33 am:
We are the LAST state to have a such a law. The rest of the Union bashes Nebraska for being backward, now most of you want to get rid of laws that keep up with the rest of the union. We talk about being equal witht the rest of the States, but we are fighting a low that is designed to help people. If we get rid fo this law, this will only add to the sterotype that we are backwards rednecks.
It's good law, it protect those who can't be protected. Even if it's a 15 year old kid. "
to the judgemental people wrote on September 15, 2008 11:38 am:
Juan wrote on September 15, 2008 11:40 am:
Perspective wrote on September 15, 2008 11:42 am:
PK wrote on September 15, 2008 11:44 am:
Oh boy here it comes... wrote on September 15, 2008 11:50 am:
I have to admit, at first, I wondered if this was a protest of sorts by somebody who was so against the safe haven law. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. But the law should probably be altered in the future so we can't drop off teenagers. I don't know...last state in the nation to come up with a safe haven law, and we managed to flub it up. Unbelievable. "
me wrote on September 15, 2008 11:52 am:
Nina wrote on September 15, 2008 11:54 am:
Kindness wrote on September 15, 2008 11:54 am:
If you don't like it, then quit complaining and go to the legislature, they are the ones that opened the door. "
Humm wrote on September 15, 2008 11:58 am:
being dumped in dumpsters or left anywhere. Until the law unwed mothers would have a baby in a restroom and dump it in anything anywhere. Got to
be wide spread. But never heard of dumping an older child. Being an aunt
there quit possibly was alot of resentment which if out of control could
end up a serious matter, not only to her but whomever the child wanted to
take the resentment out on. But I think this law goes too far. Yeah
I'm already paying taxes for a neighbor's metally disburbed child to keep
in an institution while the family lives happily the rest of their lives,
traveling, buying new cars, exceptional living style, while I set at home
saving to pay the taxes!!!! This has gotten out of hand like everything
else. My childhood friend's mother had 9 children, one a male in a
wheel chair with cerebal palsey and cared herself constantly for that boy
until he was in his 50's and she died. He was put in a nursing home and
couple years later died. And that mother was a crippled polio person
herself. Never once heard her complain nor did it ever cost the taxpayers
a dime. But today, its dump your uncomfortable problems on everybody
else so I can live happily ever after!! "
Eric W wrote on September 15, 2008 12:00 pm:
A LOVING Parent wrote on September 15, 2008 12:11 pm:
Easy to judge wrote on September 15, 2008 12:17 pm:
Whoa wrote on September 15, 2008 12:18 pm:
One-House Clown Show wrote on September 15, 2008 12:21 pm:
NOT SEP wrote on September 15, 2008 12:22 pm:
Julie wrote on September 15, 2008 12:22 pm:
glass houses wrote on September 15, 2008 12:23 pm:
the law's there and it works. kudos to the legislature for catching up to the 21st century. And what's with all the negativity towards the aunt? What about the 15 year old?!? He's old enough to know how to behave. Blame him not his aunt. "
BC wrote on September 15, 2008 12:27 pm:
emma wrote on September 15, 2008 12:29 pm:
Mom wrote on September 15, 2008 12:29 pm:
Sadly, this child has obviosly had some issues in his childhood, evidenced by having a gaurdian. Who knows if he was abused, abandonned, undiagnosed, ect. prior to moving in with his aunt. Also, if the child does not have insurance then there are esentailly no services in this town.
Please remember, not everyone can be as perfect as the majority of the people posting here! "
Judge Not wrote on September 15, 2008 12:34 pm:
Reality wrote on September 15, 2008 12:43 pm:
Al wrote on September 15, 2008 12:43 pm:
been there wrote on September 15, 2008 12:46 pm:
Ryman wrote on September 15, 2008 12:59 pm:
rac wrote on September 15, 2008 1:05 pm:
Old fashioned tuff love wrote on September 15, 2008 1:07 pm:
Jen C wrote on September 15, 2008 1:08 pm:
To Bill...... wrote on September 15, 2008 1:13 pm:
To Carl wrote on September 15, 2008 1:16 pm:
I agree wrote on September 15, 2008 1:18 pm:
Pain in the wrote on September 15, 2008 1:21 pm:
what wrote on September 15, 2008 1:37 pm:
Linda wrote on September 15, 2008 1:39 pm:
Carol wrote on September 15, 2008 1:41 pm:
Diane wrote on September 15, 2008 1:44 pm:
Intended or Not wrote on September 15, 2008 1:52 pm:
My brother was kicked out of the house at the age of 14 years. This was before safe-haven, child abuses and other such terms were used. He floundered, struggled,and never really recovered from that situation.
He died in 1993 in an accident, but I know that memory of that situation haunts other family members. The stressful environment of the 70's along with lack of resources makes me wonder how we survived.
Is it too broad? Probably, but I prefer it this way to the alternative of young people kicked out on the street. "
Amy wrote on September 15, 2008 2:30 pm:
There are plenty of ACCESSIBLE programs to help parents/guardians and their violent or behaviorally difficult teens, many of which are free of charge. I think a combination of laziness, fear, and weakness is to blame here. Even those that are behaviorally challenged can learn respect.
And to "good," what do you mean by the woman wouldn't have hurt the child any further? The child wasn't being harmed. He is being harmed more on the long-term by being abandoned by the only person he thought he could trust! "
concerned wrote on September 15, 2008 2:32 pm:
.. wrote on September 15, 2008 2:38 pm:
dup wrote on September 15, 2008 2:48 pm:
if youve never dealt wrote on September 15, 2008 2:48 pm:
Copstar wrote on September 15, 2008 3:07 pm:
Douglas wrote on September 15, 2008 3:42 pm:
Reggie wrote on September 15, 2008 3:43 pm:
Rae wrote on September 15, 2008 3:45 pm:
I dont like this law. But I also have worked in the system and know that it isnt as easy as it looks to always get the help you need- when you are already at the end of your rope. Everyone keeps on talking about all the programs out there. Yes, we do have some great programs here in LIncoln. But those people doing the helping are often over worked, overwhelmed and have outlandish case loads. And on top of it....human service doesnt pay squat for what the workers are expected to do. So, dont fool yourself in thinking that someone can just dial a number and some agency is gonna come running to save the day.
Not specific to this story, but I have worked with some messed up kids. And I dont ask "I wonder why they are messed up?" I usually think.. "why wouldnt they be messed up with the adults they are living with." Again- I dont know anything about this family.....but I do know that alot of kids are abandoned, hurt, .....and then we wonder why they are angry and act out. It isnt always physical abuse that hurts.
How about some love.......instead of thinking we know what is really going on here......... "
Jen C wrote on September 15, 2008 3:52 pm:
this is so wrong wrote on September 15, 2008 4:02 pm:
Radio wrote on September 15, 2008 4:05 pm:
Anya wrote on September 15, 2008 4:16 pm:
CS wrote on September 15, 2008 4:26 pm:
Does anyone notice wrote on September 15, 2008 4:50 pm:
Max A. wrote on September 15, 2008 5:17 pm:
jo wrote on September 15, 2008 6:25 pm:
Sf wrote on September 15, 2008 6:32 pm:
"do the right thing" because if I didn't I knew what the consequences would be and there are "
No responsibility wrote on September 15, 2008 8:04 pm:
Pain is in Fantasy land wrote on