Now
Fair
47°
High
51°
Low
29°

Up for election: two competing visions of 'change'

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY STEVEN THOMMA / McClatchy Newspapers ANALYSIS

Saturday, Sep 06, 2008 - 04:42:04 pm CDT

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Now the country has a clearer picture of its choices.

The first back-to-back political conventions in half a century gave Americans a blur of late-summer political activity that nominated the two major-party presidential candidates, unveiled the vice presidential running mates, and laid out their visions for the future.

This all set the stage for a two-month sprint to Election Day that will give voters a choice between two competing stories of who can best change the country’s unpopular course — and how they would change it.

Story Photo
A worker carries a sign in the upper levels of the Xcel Center befor the start of the second day of the Republican National Convention. (AP)

“The essential question of this campaign is who’s got a better plan, a better agenda to move this country forward and fundamentally change it from the economic and foreign policy failures that we’ve seen over the last eight years,” Obama told reporters on his campaign plane last week.

“We need to change the way government does almost everything,” McCain said in his convention speech. “I will reach out my hand to anyone to help me get this country moving again. My friends, I have that record and the scars to prove it. Sen. Obama does not.”

No one doubts the country wants to change course. Americans are sour on the war in Iraq, anxious about an economy with rising prices and unemployment, disappointed in President Bush and scornful of Congress. Four out of five Americans say the country is on the wrong track, and nearly as many disapprove of the way Bush and Congress are doing their jobs.

The country has voted only once in the past 60 years to keep a party in the White House three elections in a row. The 1988 election of Vice President George H.W. Bush came when incumbent Ronald Reagan was popular, the country had peace and prosperity, and people wanted, in effect, a third Reagan term.

There is no such sentiment today.

“It’s a tough, uphill fight for Republicans,” said Vin Weber, a former congressman from Minnesota and a top Republican strategist.

“Our only hope is that John McCain can convince voters he will change things. The more he can rebrand the party, from a Bush party to a John McCain party, the better the Republicans will do.”

McCain may have had some success at the convention, first with his surprise pick of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate.

Palin, a newcomer to the national stage and a Washington outsider who rose in Alaska politics by challenging the ethics and records of fellow Republicans, may help McCain reinforce the notion that he would shake things up in the federal government.

“Change is coming,” McCain said in his acceptance speech in a none-too-subtle attempt to say he doesn’t want to be tied either to Bush or the Congress where he’s served.

Palin also helps McCain shore up the party’s conservative base, which doesn’t like him very much; she generated newfound enthusiasm among volunteers needed to knock on doors in battleground states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia. Her presence should give McCain extra maneuvering room to court suburban independents without alienating the party’s base.

On core issues, McCain and Obama will joust over who can best end the war in Iraq and who can best boost the economy.

In Iraq, McCain vows to withdraw U.S. troops, but only when assured by commanders that the Iraqis can secure the country themselves. Obama wants to set a firmer deadline to withdraw most of the troops.

On the economy, McCain promises to make permanent the Bush tax cuts he once opposed. Obama vows tax cuts for those making less than $200,000, but would let the Bush tax cuts expire, and taxes increase, for those making more than that.

On energy, McCain stresses a do-it-all approach to energy, including allowing offshore oil drilling, nuclear power, cleaner coal technology, and wind and solar power. Obama stresses conservation and alternative fuels, but says he’d accept some offshore drilling if necessary to reach agreement with Congress and nuclear power if safety were improved.

Yet for all his effort, McCain will not easily escape being tied to Bush, particularly with his Senate record of voting to support Bush’s policies.

“They have a hard time making the argument for change,” Obama adviser Robert Gibbs said.

He added that McCain could fall into the same trap that Hillary Clinton did in the Democratic primaries if he thinks his experience will trump Obama’s. “We learned in the primaries, if you’re the experience candidate in a change election, you bet on the wrong horse.”

There’s no doubt that, as the candidate from the out party, Obama offers more changes in policy.

And as an African-American and the vanguard of a new generation, he looks like change.

But he still has to convince Americans that he offers the changes they want — and that he can implement them.

Heading out of the conventions, it appeared to be a close contest over which side was selling itself as the more compelling and convincing voice of change.

Gallup’s daily tracking poll showed McCain starting to get the traditional “bounce” of support that a convention usually generates. The poll, taken over three evenings, showed Obama leading McCain by 48 percent to 44 percent, a margin half as big as the eight-point lead Obama had opened up after the Democratic National Convention.

“It now appears the Republican National Convention may be helping McCain to recoup some of his losses, though with Obama’s current 4-point lead, the entire convention period to this point has still been a net plus for Obama,” Gallup’s analysis said Friday.

But Gallup cautioned that the three-night survey included only one night of polling after Palin’s much-watched convention speech — and none after McCain’s. The first full sample taken after the convention speeches will be released Monday.

Ultimately both camps expect the post-convention bounces to fade, as they usually do, and the race to return to a neck-and-neck competition, one that will be fought out in battlegrounds such as Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania in the Rust Belt; Virginia in the mid-Atlantic; North Carolina and Florida in the South; and Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico in the Mountain West.

Alaska, once on Obama’s target list for a possible steal from the Republicans, is now out of reach with Palin on the Republican ticket.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Juan wrote on September 7, 2008 1:28 am:
" The Republicans have had eight l-o-n-g years. From 2002-2006 they held both houses of Congress and the White House. Where was McCain for the last 26 years? Whose zoomin who? We know know exactly what we can expect. "

Josh wrote on September 7, 2008 9:24 am:
" This really isnt a change election - just look at the tickets. McCain is an insider tied with many lobbyists, while Palin is the typical conservative wacko with no experience; Obama is the newbie, while Biden is an insider. I think Obama/Biden will be more change, than McCain/Palin. "

Jim wrote on September 7, 2008 10:35 am:
" We don't know who can change policy in Washington, we do KNOW that McCain will support the same policies. Is change then to restore integrity and value to America or to promote more of the same? Shift away from Social Security when millions of Americans pay FICA and deserve to have benefits that come with this "insurance premium". McCain would shift SS funds into the stock market, and look at the volatility there, you can't even trust our banks. The greater question is "What will you vote to change to"? Obama would increase taxes the 5 per cent of the most rich in the country, McCain would let the most rich continue to slide by and let the middle class suffer. What is behind "change"? Each has a different "change" in mind. "

topaz wrote on September 7, 2008 10:47 am:
" How can the Republicans be touting change? Their party controlled Congress until 2007, their party controls the White House, and we have a conservative Supreme Court. Are they saying they didn't like the Bush administration either?

If we want change - a better economy, relief for lower and middle class, better health care, a focus on spending money on our own country instead of billions overseas, and a better standing in the world, we need to vote for Obama. "

rush wrote on September 7, 2008 3:56 pm:
" If yo think a guy that's voted for bush's legislation 90-95% of the time then you are truly lost. "

Change or lose wrote on September 7, 2008 10:50 pm:
" I think we have a lot to lose if the McCain/Palin ticket wins. We can expect more of the same, that our currant occupant of the white house has extended to those of us who don't make million dollar a year. Quite frankly this country can't afford another 4 more years of McSame.

We are in debt so deep that our great,great grandchildren will be paying for this fiasco. Our jobs are leaving the country because congress and the current occupant of the white house can't understand that health care coverage is driving jobs to foreign countries where not only can they find cheap labor, they don't have to pay health insurance!

We need to start looking for ways to bring industrial jobs back to the United States, not everyone can be a manager. Everyone must start sharing the burden, taxes should not have a cap. Social Security cap is set at 97,500, there should be no cap on this so we can start putting more in the fund. In addition, we should make sure this fund is never allowed to be tapped to balance the budget.

We have a lot of issues here at home that need to be addressed. this means we need to stop being Police units to all nations. We have infrastructure problems that became grossly apparent during the Katrina affair.

I Don't believe that Obama/Biden will be able to do everything either, I'm realistic enough to know that they may only accomplish 1 thing. That would be enough for now, we must start something even if it is just to get this country weaned off of foreign oil, and on to alternative fuels, wind energy. We must change the course, or we will all lose "

todd wrote on September 8, 2008 5:56 am:
" Read Bob Woodward's new book about Bush and the Iraqi war surge. McCain voted with Bush. Bush is going to make Nixon look like a sunday school teacher. "

MarkyMark wrote on September 8, 2008 8:25 am:
" My problem is, Sarah Palin's speech. If it weren't the skirt and the lipstick, I would have sworn it was Dick Cheney talking. "

Under Contract wrote on September 8, 2008 8:46 am:
" I don't see how any responsible person could even think about voting Republican this time. They have made shambles of our beloved America.

They seriously defaulted on their contract with America and were only able to only talk about Conservatism.

Time to take a seat on the bench until your are ready to be responsible for yourselves. "

Good Riddance wrote on September 8, 2008 9:53 am:
" Atleast we won't have the far left MSNBC political anchors Matthews and Olbermann around anymore to push liberal opinion down our throats: http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/08/msnbc-hosts-olbermann-matthews-booted-from-political-night-duties/ "

Hey Under Contract wrote on September 8, 2008 11:20 am:
" "Time to take a seat on the bench until your are ready to be responsible for yourselves."

A liberal is saying that to conservatives? Conservatives are responsible for themselves and don't depend on an inept government. Keep your own yard clean, and you won't be so angry. "

reply to good riddance wrote on September 8, 2008 12:03 pm:
" You had more than one choice of station for watching the convention coverage, so please don't whine about "having liberal opinion pushed down our throats"
Your link is to the Faux News website - perfect!
What I really want to know is, why are conservatives so willing to accept their VP darling at face value? Why aren't you checking her out more thoroughly? For example, her claim that she sold the previous governor's jet on EBay is false. She did list it on EBay, and did get one serious offer, but they blew that sale. She ended up paying a third party to sell it for her, and that third party did sell it to an Alaskan businessman, and the Alaskan government lost money on the deal. The businessman just happens to be a big contributor to the Alaskan Republican party.
That's just one very tiny example of the many contradictions in her claims that will be obvious to anyone who takes the time to look. But I guess you don't mind having conservative opinions pushed down your throat. "

JPF wrote on September 8, 2008 3:22 pm:
" Everyone should understand: our candidates are just book covers, and their speeches are just jacket flap material. The real goods are inside.

I've been reading about how the Republican Platform, adopted at the Convention by their Party, is actually more extreme than the one that was adopted under George W Bush. To read about the changes in the party platform reguarding immigration, climate change and stem cell research, go to http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/04/us/politics/04platformcnd.html?oref=login#

As you might NOT have expected, the Republicans have become MORE extreme on these issues, while their candidate is moderate on the issues. Did McCain trade off his soul to the Religious Right to get their support? Time will tell.... "

Pro Freedom wrote on September 8, 2008 6:40 pm:
" If you chose to bring attention to something get the facts straight, Palin said in her speech,

"While I was at it, I got rid of a few things in the governor's office that I didn't believe our citizens should have to pay for.

That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay."

She never said it sold on Ebay, she said she put it on Ebay.

Twisting quotes to make someone look bad only makes the twister look more twisted. "

Under Contract wrote on September 8, 2008 7:00 pm:
" I'm not angry. Just a might bewildered about how you can call Republican politicians, responsible.

The proof is in the pudding. Have you been asleep the past 25 years? Especially the past 7 years? "

Pro Freedom is nit-picking wrote on September 8, 2008 7:02 pm:
" Fine, but she definitely implied that she sold it on Ebay. "

sold to religious extremists wrote on September 8, 2008 9:56 pm:
" Did McCain trade off his soul to the Religious Right to get their support? Time will tell.... " yep, look at palin. about as religious right as one can get. "

Pro Freedom wrote on September 9, 2008 7:13 pm:
" No matter which side you are on, you must present the facts not half truths. When you can listen objectively to a speech, look at a candidate with clear eyes and hear the realisms you can then make a truly informed choice.

Spread truth, not lies. "