Up for election: two competing visions of 'change'
BY STEVEN THOMMA / McClatchy Newspapers ANALYSIS
ST. PAUL, Minn. — Now the country has a clearer picture of its choices.
The first back-to-back political conventions in half a century gave Americans a blur of late-summer political activity that nominated the two major-party presidential candidates, unveiled the vice presidential running mates, and laid out their visions for the future.
This all set the stage for a two-month sprint to Election Day that will give voters a choice between two competing stories of who can best change the country’s unpopular course — and how they would change it.
“The essential question of this campaign is who’s got a better plan, a better agenda to move this country forward and fundamentally change it from the economic and foreign policy failures that we’ve seen over the last eight years,” Obama told reporters on his campaign plane last week.
“We need to change the way government does almost everything,” McCain said in his convention speech. “I will reach out my hand to anyone to help me get this country moving again. My friends, I have that record and the scars to prove it. Sen. Obama does not.”
No one doubts the country wants to change course. Americans are sour on the war in Iraq, anxious about an economy with rising prices and unemployment, disappointed in President Bush and scornful of Congress. Four out of five Americans say the country is on the wrong track, and nearly as many disapprove of the way Bush and Congress are doing their jobs.
The country has voted only once in the past 60 years to keep a party in the White House three elections in a row. The 1988 election of Vice President George H.W. Bush came when incumbent Ronald Reagan was popular, the country had peace and prosperity, and people wanted, in effect, a third Reagan term.
There is no such sentiment today.
“It’s a tough, uphill fight for Republicans,” said Vin Weber, a former congressman from Minnesota and a top Republican strategist.
“Our only hope is that John McCain can convince voters he will change things. The more he can rebrand the party, from a Bush party to a John McCain party, the better the Republicans will do.”
McCain may have had some success at the convention, first with his surprise pick of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate.
Palin, a newcomer to the national stage and a Washington outsider who rose in Alaska politics by challenging the ethics and records of fellow Republicans, may help McCain reinforce the notion that he would shake things up in the federal government.
“Change is coming,” McCain said in his acceptance speech in a none-too-subtle attempt to say he doesn’t want to be tied either to Bush or the Congress where he’s served.
Palin also helps McCain shore up the party’s conservative base, which doesn’t like him very much; she generated newfound enthusiasm among volunteers needed to knock on doors in battleground states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia. Her presence should give McCain extra maneuvering room to court suburban independents without alienating the party’s base.
On core issues, McCain and Obama will joust over who can best end the war in Iraq and who can best boost the economy.
In Iraq, McCain vows to withdraw U.S. troops, but only when assured by commanders that the Iraqis can secure the country themselves. Obama wants to set a firmer deadline to withdraw most of the troops.
On the economy, McCain promises to make permanent the Bush tax cuts he once opposed. Obama vows tax cuts for those making less than $200,000, but would let the Bush tax cuts expire, and taxes increase, for those making more than that.
On energy, McCain stresses a do-it-all approach to energy, including allowing offshore oil drilling, nuclear power, cleaner coal technology, and wind and solar power. Obama stresses conservation and alternative fuels, but says he’d accept some offshore drilling if necessary to reach agreement with Congress and nuclear power if safety were improved.
Yet for all his effort, McCain will not easily escape being tied to Bush, particularly with his Senate record of voting to support Bush’s policies.
“They have a hard time making the argument for change,” Obama adviser Robert Gibbs said.
He added that McCain could fall into the same trap that Hillary Clinton did in the Democratic primaries if he thinks his experience will trump Obama’s. “We learned in the primaries, if you’re the experience candidate in a change election, you bet on the wrong horse.”
There’s no doubt that, as the candidate from the out party, Obama offers more changes in policy.
And as an African-American and the vanguard of a new generation, he looks like change.
But he still has to convince Americans that he offers the changes they want — and that he can implement them.
Heading out of the conventions, it appeared to be a close contest over which side was selling itself as the more compelling and convincing voice of change.
Gallup’s daily tracking poll showed McCain starting to get the traditional “bounce” of support that a convention usually generates. The poll, taken over three evenings, showed Obama leading McCain by 48 percent to 44 percent, a margin half as big as the eight-point lead Obama had opened up after the Democratic National Convention.
“It now appears the Republican National Convention may be helping McCain to recoup some of his losses, though with Obama’s current 4-point lead, the entire convention period to this point has still been a net plus for Obama,” Gallup’s analysis said Friday.
But Gallup cautioned that the three-night survey included only one night of polling after Palin’s much-watched convention speech — and none after McCain’s. The first full sample taken after the convention speeches will be released Monday.
Ultimately both camps expect the post-convention bounces to fade, as they usually do, and the race to return to a neck-and-neck competition, one that will be fought out in battlegrounds such as Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania in the Rust Belt; Virginia in the mid-Atlantic; North Carolina and Florida in the South; and Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico in the Mountain West.
Alaska, once on Obama’s target list for a possible steal from the Republicans, is now out of reach with Palin on the Republican ticket.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Josh wrote on September 7, 2008 9:24 am:
Jim wrote on September 7, 2008 10:35 am:
topaz wrote on September 7, 2008 10:47 am:
If we want change - a better economy, relief for lower and middle class, better health care, a focus on spending money on our own country instead of billions overseas, and a better standing in the world, we need to vote for Obama. "
rush wrote on September 7, 2008 3:56 pm:
Change or lose wrote on September 7, 2008 10:50 pm:
We are in debt so deep that our great,great grandchildren will be paying for this fiasco. Our jobs are leaving the country because congress and the current occupant of the white house can't understand that health care coverage is driving jobs to foreign countries where not only can they find cheap labor, they don't have to pay health insurance!
We need to start looking for ways to bring industrial jobs back to the United States, not everyone can be a manager. Everyone must start sharing the burden, taxes should not have a cap. Social Security cap is set at 97,500, there should be no cap on this so we can start putting more in the fund. In addition, we should make sure this fund is never allowed to be tapped to balance the budget.
We have a lot of issues here at home that need to be addressed. this means we need to stop being Police units to all nations. We have infrastructure problems that became grossly apparent during the Katrina affair.
I Don't believe that Obama/Biden will be able to do everything either, I'm realistic enough to know that they may only accomplish 1 thing. That would be enough for now, we must start something even if it is just to get this country weaned off of foreign oil, and on to alternative fuels, wind energy. We must change the course, or we will all lose "
todd wrote on September 8, 2008 5:56 am:
MarkyMark wrote on September 8, 2008 8:25 am:
Under Contract wrote on September 8, 2008 8:46 am:
They seriously defaulted on their contract with America and were only able to only talk about Conservatism.
Time to take a seat on the bench until your are ready to be responsible for yourselves. "
Good Riddance wrote on September 8, 2008 9:53 am:
Hey Under Contract wrote on September 8, 2008 11:20 am:
A liberal is saying that to conservatives? Conservatives are responsible for themselves and don't depend on an inept government. Keep your own yard clean, and you won't be so angry. "
reply to good riddance wrote on September 8, 2008 12:03 pm:
Your link is to the Faux News website - perfect!
What I really want to know is, why are conservatives so willing to accept their VP darling at face value? Why aren't you checking her out more thoroughly? For example, her claim that she sold the previous governor's jet on EBay is false. She did list it on EBay, and did get one serious offer, but they blew that sale. She ended up paying a third party to sell it for her, and that third party did sell it to an Alaskan businessman, and the Alaskan government lost money on the deal. The businessman just happens to be a big contributor to the Alaskan Republican party.
That's just one very tiny example of the many contradictions in her claims that will be obvious to anyone who takes the time to look. But I guess you don't mind having conservative opinions pushed down your throat. "
JPF wrote on September 8, 2008 3:22 pm:
I've been reading about how the Republican Platform, adopted at the Convention by their Party, is actually more extreme than the one that was adopted under George W Bush. To read about the changes in the party platform reguarding immigration, climate change and stem cell research, go to http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/04/us/politics/04platformcnd.html?oref=login#
As you might NOT have expected, the Republicans have become MORE extreme on these issues, while their candidate is moderate on the issues. Did McCain trade off his soul to the Religious Right to get their support? Time will tell.... "
Pro Freedom wrote on September 8, 2008 6:40 pm:
"While I was at it, I got rid of a few things in the governor's office that I didn't believe our citizens should have to pay for.
That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay."
She never said it sold on Ebay, she said she put it on Ebay.
Twisting quotes to make someone look bad only makes the twister look more twisted. "
Under Contract wrote on September 8, 2008 7:00 pm:
The proof is in the pudding. Have you been asleep the past 25 years? Especially the past 7 years? "
Pro Freedom is nit-picking wrote on September 8, 2008 7:02 pm:
sold to religious extremists wrote on September 8, 2008 9:56 pm:
Pro Freedom wrote on September 9, 2008 7:13 pm:
Spread truth, not lies. "