Now
Fair
22°
High
32°
Low
20°

Housing stimulus plan still bad idea

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Wednesday, Sep 03, 2008 - 12:55:58 am CDT

The proposed subsidy for home buyers may have been revised since it first came out, but it’s still a bad idea.

Mayor Chris Beutler ought to stop pushing it. The Lincoln City Council should drop it.

Government has a role in fostering economic growth, but it should aim at providing benefit that flows widely in the community.

The housing stimulus proposal would set a dangerous precedent with a significant new expansion of local government into the private sector for the benefit of a narrow set of business interests. As economist Milton Friedman reportedly said, “There is nothing as permanent as a temporary government program.”

The proposed changes to the proposal do nothing to address its fundamental flaws. When Beutler initially floated the idea, he suggested offering prospective home buyers $1,000, using $610,000 in unspent interest on the $10 million stormwater bond issue voters approved in 2005.

After working with homebuilders and Realtors, Beutler revised the program to offer cash grants of $1,000 to $5,000 for new homes up to $325,000 or existing homes up to $150,000. In addition the homebuilders and Realtors would contribute an additional $100,000 to the program.

The changes appear designed to placate critics who thought that the $1,000 cash grant was not adequate incentive to entice prospective buyers. The money would be offered on a first-come, first-served basis.

There’s little doubt that the home building industry is in a slump, which hurts related business like appliance stores, lumber yards, plumbers, electricians and so on. Through the first six months, sales of new homes are down 15 percent. Sales of existing homes are down more than 30 percent.

Lincoln is not alone. The slowdown is nationwide. In some locations the housing industry woes are much more serious than in Lincoln.

But this is no time to try to solve a problem by throwing local tax money at it.

The city is cutting scores of jobs. It’s having a difficult time just scraping up money to keep the parks mowed.

Even if the city did have a few bucks in the treasury it would still be a bad idea to start subsidizing a narrow segment of business interests. Even duplexes would be excluded from the program, not to mention apartments buildings and commercial and industrial construction.

All businesses have cycles. History teaches that that the housing industry in Lincoln will rebound eventually without government intervention.

City officials have prodded and poked at this idea long enough. It’s time to move on. Surely City Hall can find better uses for the $610,000 than this misguided subsidy program.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
russell wrote on September 3, 2008 8:20 am:
" We overlook the subsidy all Lincoln water and sewer rate payers have been providing to developers on the Lincoln's fringe. 75% of the 2008/2009 water Capital Improvement Program is necessitated by fringe growth. Approximately 85% of sewer CIP will be used for the fringe. To fund this growth our sewer & water rates have increased approximately 40% since 2002. Yet the developers still want more but, what is even worse, they feel it is their right to demand it. "

Edgar Pearlstein wrote on September 3, 2008 8:24 am:
" Agreed! You'd think Beutler was a Republican, with his idea of a giveaway to business. "

RMM wrote on September 3, 2008 9:22 am:
" Leave the sewer bond issue interest with the principle. Maybe the bonds would be paid of sooner? what a concept. I assume that's what voters would anticipate would happen to this money, not a governmental hand-out to a limited number of home buyers, real estate agents, and contractors.

Our government by credit card has to stop. We need to pay the bills before spending money on other projects. "

george wrote on September 3, 2008 9:06 pm:
" We sure have a jewel for a mayor. He sat in the legislature for years and got fat off of taxpayer money as a so-called grant writer. Any body want to bet the next mayor will not be a Dummocrat? "

George J. wrote on September 3, 2008 10:11 pm:
" Thank you LJS for standing up for what you believe in. Great job, you said what I have been wanting to say but didn’t have time to document it so well. This is such a terrible idea! I am sure if the Realtors, Home Builders, and Land Developers had their way, Lincoln would not be called Lincoln, it would be called Realtorville or Buildertown or Big Developership of Nebraska. "

whatever wrote on September 4, 2008 5:33 am:
" Right on JS. It's insane that the taxpayer should have to subsidize the poor business decisions of these home builders. It's shameful that these "business" people are lining up at the trough when the "free market" they so cherish should be allowed to "sort it all out". "

Outside the Box wrote on September 4, 2008 10:33 am:
" Yes! Yes! Yes! This was a dumb idea that was upgraded to a bad idea. It encourages sprawl, ignores the core neighborhoods, and looks like a gift for the builders & realtors. It needs to go away.

Frankly, I've come to expect more from our fine mayor. "