Now
Fair
23°
High
32°
Low
20°
Full Forecast

Jobs

Cars

Homes

Rentals

Alerts

Subscribe
Home > Opinion > Letters
Bookmark Us   •   Make Us Your Homepage

Letters, 9/3: A cure for gas pains

Comments 43 comment(s)  
E-mail Story E-mail Story
Print Story Print Story
Share  Share
Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Wednesday, Sep 03, 2008 - 12:55:58 am CDT

Having to pay well in excess of $3 per gallon for gasoline week after week should be a signal for all Nebraska voters to change out the incumbent House members for a new team in November.

Just prior to the House going on a five-week recess, the Republican members stalled action on bills to eliminate excessive speculation of crude oil contract trading and then have gone on a daily showfest demonstration demanding offshore drilling. The Democrat members did not see this as the required solution to skyrocketing gas prices caused by trading speculation.

During the Great Depression caused by rampant speculation of securities and commodity contracts, trading controls were put in place by President Roosevelt to limit speculation. These controls have been deregulated under leadership of Sen. Phil Gramm and by his wife, Wendy, who was presidentially appointed to lead the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Wendy Gramm opened the barn door to allow massive speculative trading by hedge funds and swaps dealers who get access to large pension funds to gamble with. On being replaced as chairperson, she became a director of Enron.

For these misdeeds of Republican leadership, we now have to continue to pay more than $3.50 for gasoline and more for diesel fuel.

Don Eret, Dorchester

A symbolic gesture

It is curious that the Republican spin machine has decided unanimously to criticize Barack Obama’s acceptance speech Thursday for its ostentatious stage setting. It is also curious that this criticism actually began prior to the delivery of his speech. Why so much attention to the stage and so little to the speaker and his message?

The “temple of Obama” line does truly have the appearance of being (as Barack Obama alluded) the response of an opponent who has run out of ideas.

It also seems hypocritical. When was the last time any Republican made a public speech anywhere without being absolutely covered in American flags? If flagrant exploitation of symbols is so offensive, then perhaps Republicans should refrain from doing it themselves.

Joe Gores, Lincoln

Like war? Vote McCain

As this election proceeds, it is more and more clear that people want a rah, rah candidate who will deliver us from all the evil nations out there.

If people want to be at war somewhere for years and years, then John McCain is the candidate. He was raised with a military family, and he basically sees the military side of this world. War is the road to destruction, because it doesn’t lead us anywhere for long. We can end our current occupation in Iraq soon, because the Iraqis want us out of their territory. McCain doesn’t want to leave. Next is Afghanistan, where the real trouble is.

McCain as president can string that war out for years and in the meantime probably get us into war with Russia for one reason or another. He loves war games, but this country has no money for endless wars, and our military is exhausted and wants to come home. He will probably institute the draft and spend billions of dollars on military equipment.

Barack Obama, on the other hand, wants peace, not by badgering or threats to other countries, but by negotiations. He doesn’t just want to win, but to bring permanent calmness and cooperation to the whole world. He is not the almighty conqueror but a man of character and integrity. Most of the world thinks he is great, but he comes back home from his vacation with terrible lies and innuendoes greeting him. If we vote for war instead of Obama, the majority of the world will be very disappointed. Our place in the world will deteriorate again.

Anita Crouse, Lincoln


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

Post Your Comment

Standards and Rules
All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Hide Comments Hide Comments   Newest First Newest First  
Ray-J wrote on September 3, 2008 4:06 am:
" Anita,
I too want peace in the world but Obama is not the way. With countries like Russia who is currently killing civilians in Georgia, Muslims who have and are killing millions of innocents around the world, Contras who are also killing innocents in Vensuela and many other hot spots in the world it is not time to pull our heads in. Ask youself how we can allow Iran to have nuclear weapons when they have vowed to destroy Israel?
Ask yourself what would have happened if Hitler had not been defeated, Ask yourself how can we stand by when dictators like Hussiene fill mass graves with thousands of innocent bodys.
Obama's track record is very short on getting anything world wide accomplished, name one in fact. He is very anti second amendment. He has a past of "following" radical people from communists to people who "damn" the United States, his own wife not being proud of our country till he was nominated for president. Obama if elected will make George Bush look like a hero, wait and see.
In the words of Lawrence Ferlinghetti,poet of the 60's, "The world is a beautifull place as long as you don't mind some of the people dying some of the time as long as it isn't you." Peace at any cost is not the answer. "

 Ken wrote on September 3, 2008 5:24 am:
" Vote Obama and learn to speak Chinese, German. Russian quickly. If Obama had been President before World War II he would still be trying to negotiate with Hitler. If he was President after 9-11 he'd be trying to negotiate with Sadam and Bin Laden. While they continued with their attacks on us and their own people.

What kind of gutless person is he? "

 Zoomie wrote on September 3, 2008 6:30 am:
" Joe, the GOP message is called a "dog whistle" message (as in something only some will hear). They've been talking about the "temple" and the "Greek columns" for some time now, as part of their TV ads referring to him as "The One". Why? Because in Revelation, the anti-Christ supposedly will appear and excite the people in a temple with Greek columns, and of course, he'll be The One! Numerous Evangelicals have noted that when they see and hear these ads and comments, the first thing that comes to their mind is the image from the Bible of an anti-Christ. Given that McSame has hired several of Karl Rove's former staffers to run his campaign (including now, even the guy who visciously smeared McCain in South Carolina in 2000, calling him a Manchurian Candidate who betrayed his fellow POWs, mentally unstable, father of a "Black love child" -- referring to his adopted south Asian daughter -- and husband to a drug addict), its no surprise these sorts of cheap smear ads have become a steady staple of the McSame campaign.

Lost on the GOP, of course, is that the last guy to win the White House also appeared on a stage, in 2004, with Greek columns in the backset, was far more the image of a "worldly Prince", coming from a powerful and wealthy family, and he's certainly gone a long way to fulfilling the mission of an anti-Christ by bringing needless death and destruction worldwide... "

 election wrote on September 3, 2008 6:33 am:
" everyones generalizations about the obama mccain elections are just plain silly. am i to believe that mccain is going to look for every opportunity to go to war and obama is just plain soft and never will go to war if needed if thats my choices then i choose mickey mouse. "

 Jack wrote on September 3, 2008 8:36 am:
" I cannot understand why people are worried about Russians and Muslims, and whatever other villians that may want to destroy the US. Bipartisian politics are ripping this country apart the way it is. We are self-destructing just fine on our own, thank you. "

 Ignignokt wrote on September 3, 2008 8:45 am:
" Today's letters can be summarized as follows...

Democrat talking point.

Democrat talking point.

Democrat talking point. "

 Darwin wrote on September 3, 2008 9:05 am:
" Good point Anita. Most people think about war as a win - lose situation. We win in WWII, Germany loses. We fight in Iraq and other places to "win" the war on terrorism, or religion, or oil, or whatever it may be. But does anyone "win" in a war? Sure, one side may beat back the other. One side may be victorious, but who wins? Seems like in war there are only losers.

Innocent civilians lose their homes. Mothers and fathers lose their children, and children lose their parents. Soldiers lose a leg, or an eye, or their lives. Countries lose their infastructure, or lose their respect. No matter what side emerges victorious, everyone loses.

War is never the answer, although it sometimes ends up a last resort. However, in today's world, war is seen as righteous and glorious. We, the strong and holy, the virtuous and morally superior, fight to free the weak and helpless from their bonds of servitude. We fight to free them, even when they dont want us to. Even when we have to kill them. We have to kill them for their own good.

War is not glorious. It is not righteous. It is not virtuous, or holy, or fun. It is horrible. It is death and blood and the screams of the dying. A soldier may act honorably in war, but war is never honorable.

It should be the last resort. The recourse when all other attempts have failed. War does not make us strong. It does not scare our enemies into passivity. Evil begets evil. Violence begets violence. Blood feuds never end. War is easy. Peace is hard. "

 Saline County wrote on September 3, 2008 9:26 am:
" Don Eret rocks! "

 RE Ray wrote on September 3, 2008 9:26 am:
" Where is Bin Laden? SAfe I presume! After all, his family and the bush family were pretty close before 9-11 and the story back then was , bush had bin ladens sister and family smuggled out of the u.s. after the attacks. Whre is Bin Laden? Seems like the hunt had ended since bush and co took over iraqi oil. "

 karwied wrote on September 3, 2008 9:34 am:
" Ms. Crouse: You need to realize that you CANNOT negotiate with people like Amadenejad, Chavez, or any other nut case out there. They have an agenda and it isn't to "play nice". And, why should we care if the rest of the world would be disappointed if Obama is not elected? What do they have to do with it? Our country will be in dire trouble if he is given the job as the head of our country. Perhaps I will pull a "Baldwin", only I will move to Mexico instead of France. "

 MarkyMark wrote on September 3, 2008 9:42 am:
" Intelligence and diplomacy is somthing we have been sorely lacking in this country, and if you've been paying attention, you will see that most of our economic woes are directly related to the ILLEGAL war, that Mr. Bush took us into, after his conversation with God.

Obama = Magna CumLaude at Princeton & Harvard. Bush & McCain = a couple of D+ students with their fingers on the button.

By the way for you people who get your news from Limbaugh, Hussein does NOT = Hitler! "

 Tired wrote on September 3, 2008 9:49 am:
" Thank you "election". I was just going to write something very similar. All these extremists are making my head spin. Does anyone really think that McCain is going to fight everyone and let our country go into the pot and that Obama is really is going to let everyone walk all over us? It just seems silly to think that either person would hurt this country. I'm not sure who I will vote for but I do believe that either candidate would try to do their best for the country. Hey, look at Bush, we're all still here after 8 years! "

 Wake up wrote on September 3, 2008 9:50 am:
" The untruths in Obama's speech are rampant. Just one: He claimed that he
"stood up and opposed the war in Iraq." He never explains just where he did this brave standing up. He hopes that we are too stupid to realize that he was NOT a senator when the war started. He hopes that we will assume that because he is a senator now, he was a senator then, and had access to the intelligence that Congress (which voted almost unanimously to authorize the war) had. In fact, he was an unknown nobody when the war was authorized. More empty promises Obama says: "I'll recruit an
army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries." (Lincoln you think
your property taxes are high now, just wait). Even someone as ignorant of the Constitution as Barack Obama must know that a president can't hire even one teacher, much less an "army" of teachers. Nor can he pay them higher salaries (Higher than what?), or any salary. All of this is up to the states under the Constitution. Theres not enough room for all the
rest of his lies. If you look underneath it all, you've got the Kennedys'
and Clintons manipulating this whole fiasco!!!! "

 Woke Up wrote on September 3, 2008 11:00 am:
" I agree. Those who voted to give Bush Jr authority to invade Iraq should have their heads examined, but are not really to blame...the issue here is the Illegal deception handed Congress, with incomplete and inaccurate "intelligence" scripted by Bush/Cheney. A treasonous act, by the way. "

 Please clarify wrote on September 3, 2008 11:08 am:
" Karwied says, " Ms. Crouse: You need to realize that you CANNOT negotiate with people like Amadenejad, Chavez, or any other nut case out there. Is your inclusion of "any other nut case" a reference to Bush or McCain . . . or both? Methinks MarkyMark is on to something in pointing out our gross lack of diplomacy. It is all too apparent we create more danger with a warlord as President. "

 SB wrote on September 3, 2008 12:21 pm:
" So one pro-war poster says obama doesn’t support our troops by voting against President Bush’s war funding package (nothing to do with supporting the troops) and another pro-war poster says obama never stood up against the war. Isn’t voting against President Bush’s war funding package the only way a Senator has to oppose the war and its funding? I also wasn’t aware State Constitutions determined teacher salary, but I am aware the federal government gives Federal grants and research money for local education. Have I woken from this bad dream of ignorant leadership yet? "

 Blind support wrote on September 3, 2008 12:57 pm:
" Good points, Ray J. Of course, when Hussein started filling all those mass graves with bodies in 1988 the President was a guy named Reagan and his VP was a guy named Bush. And he continued filling those graves when the President was a guy named Bush who had a Secretary of Defense named Cheney. So ask yourself, why did your heroes stand by while he did that?

While you're at it, ask yourself how we can allow Pakistan to have nuclear weapons when they are an arch enemy of India. Ask yourself how saying "There is an individual right to bear arms, but it is subject to common-sense regulation" (Obama's stated position on the Second Amendment) is very anti anything (unless, of course, you are anti common sense). Ask yourself why you condemn Michelle Obama for saying she is not proud of some of the things this country has done, yet say nothing about Cindy McCain stealing from her own charity to feed her drug habit. Ask yourself how you could possibly believe that the world would be at peace with McCain starting yet another war in Iran and a new cold war with Russia. "

 Jeff wrote on September 3, 2008 1:46 pm:
" Ray-J - you're right. Let's institute the draft - and take over the world. Let's go...... we'll be the greatest nation on earth. Hell, we'll be the only nation on earth. We'll solve every problem and pestiulence on this planet. We can do it. We're the greatest nation God has given man, and God blesses everything we do. To heck with other coutnries opinions. We know best, right? "

 Re Don Eret wrote on September 3, 2008 1:46 pm:
" Don is incorrect in his assumption that stock and commodities speculation was the cause of the great depression. The great depression was caused when the Federal Reserve erroneously raised interest rates in the late 1920's and thereby decreased the supply and availablilty of money. Their mistake in doing so was that they did it at a time when commodity prices were decreasing and not increasing as Don assumes (a very similar scenario happened in 1999/2000 causing another, milder recession shortly after). This was clearly demonstrated by economist Milton Friedman who was quoted in today's LJS editorial (the editorial board and Don Eret should read about his teachings more often). The great depression was then extended through overbearing governmental welfare programs and overregulation.

Today's situation is exactly the opposite as the great depression. Lately the Federal Reserve has lowered interest rates (and thereby flooded the country with cash) while commodity prices were already rising, causing a massive commodities bubble that wasn't just for oil. Eventually the market will correct itself when rates are raised. However, here we are again with the governement trying to intervene with stimulus packages, talk of windfall profits tax, keeping interest rates too low to protect the few million people who bought more house than they could afford, and not letting bad wall street businesses fail. All they are doing is prolonging the pain of the people and increasing inflation. Let the markets take their course. "

 Correction Ken wrote on September 3, 2008 1:47 pm:
" If Obama had been president, or Clinton for that matter, 9/11 probably wouldn't have happened. George Bush Jr had just returned from his 4th month of vacation in his first 7 months, and was "sick and tired" of terrorist briefings. His head wasn't into it, virtually ignoring the sense of urgency.

Bush, in his infinite wisdom even said the "Democrats are Terrorist-Happy", according to a half dozen witnesses. Don't confuse tough talk with results.

By the way, still negotiating with Hitler would have been a good thing, had it avoided WWII, don'cha think? "

 Neville Chamberlain wrote on September 3, 2008 1:56 pm:
" wanted peace too. Maybe Obama is the second coming? "

 Charles Jones wrote on September 3, 2008 2:08 pm:
" Just remember, folks, according Republicans the flag lapel pin is ALL important. The bigger the pin, the more patriotic you are; the more flags you show, the greater your love for our nation. These folks forget that those of us who DID serve our nation, swore to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I believe this nation is facing a domestic enemy much greater than radical Islamists. The Bush administration has run up the national debt, degraded our stature around the world, compromised our Constitution, spied on our citizens and undermined our civil liberties, all the while using religion as a crutch. It IS important what the rest of the world thinks, they are financing our huge national debt. And when they start calling in our IOU's, we will be in deep trouble. We are leaving one big mess for succeeding generations. May they forgive those of us who did not vote for these greedy self serving draft dodging fools. This spend and borrow administration is pushing our nation toward bankruptcy and Republicans either don't care or are unable to understand that a broke nation is unable to defend itself from any foe. "

 Mike wrote on September 3, 2008 2:11 pm:
" Anita, keep drinking the Koolaid. Obama has a total of 143 days as a senator, and that isn't enough experience to drive a bus by yourself, never mind lead a country. McCain is not a hawk, and on the contrary, has been an avocate for not placing our troops in harm's way. (ex: Somalia). Correction Ken, what history book did you read? Negotiate with Hitler? I'm speechless. "

 Way to go Charlie wrote on September 3, 2008 2:47 pm:
" Good points all Charles Jones.

On the subject of the Republican flag worship, here is part of an editorial by Reggie Rivers of the Denver Post:

The U.S. flag means a great deal to nearly all Americans. Military veterans have strong emotional ties to the flag as a symbol of their service; politicians believe that children will be better citizens if they pledge allegiance to the flag; most Americans would be outraged if a flag were desecrated in a public setting; and, after Sept. 11, the flag was a ubiquitous symbol of our national unity.

However, the flag is not without its problems. It seems that too many Americans have forgotten that the U.S. flag is merely a symbol of our ideals - it is not the actual embodiment of them.

Totalitarian leaders have been notorious for treating symbols as if they were real, arresting people who disrespected them. But in the United States, we enjoy broad political freedom partly because we separate symbolic activities from actual threats. If you want to cut out a picture of George W. Bush in The Denver Post and throw darts at it, the Secret Service will not arrest you.

However, in the case of the flag, the distinction between the symbol and reality is murky. Many people would rush forward and punch anyone who was harming a flag. Many Americans would react as if the flag were a small child that needed to be rescued, and that's not normal...

...If a man in North Korea were arrested for stomping on a newspaper photo of Kim Jong Il, we would condemn his arrest as a form of political repression. However, if a man in Denver were arrested for stomping on a U.S. flag that he purchased at Wal-Mart, many of us would not recognize it as political repression. Many would say it's OK to arrest a man for harming a flag, because we've forgotten that the flag is a symbol.

The Christian Lord knew that humans were prone to this type of confusion, so his Second Commandment called for a moratorium on idol worship. We should heed this commandment.

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0617-32.htm "

 Sue F. wrote on September 3, 2008 2:50 pm:
" Someone needs to be woken up. Obama did speak out against the war from the very start. Obama is not "ignorant of the Constitution" since he taught Constitutional law for 12 years. I think it will be great to have a President that actually understands and believes in the Constitution. "

 Keep talking far lefties wrote on September 3, 2008 3:06 pm:
" The more you talk, the more you sway independents to the McCain ticket. You don't do the democrats any justice with your hatred and propoganda. "

 for far leftys wrote on September 3, 2008 4:16 pm:
" I am a registered republican and to be honest, I have heard much more negative propaganda from the republican side than from any "leftys". I was going to vote for mccain just to honor his service.(i'm a retired military) but, searching for anything new from his view is really hard. I havn't heard anything but more of the same as the last 8 years. I was in two wars years apart , the first being vietnam. I didn't hear of or see bush or cheney there. I didn't know gw was in the air guard until he ran for president,but, then it was written that he didn't do a physical to keep flight status, I determined that even back then he must have been a coward. Dick Cheney was known back then as being a war eagle at u of wisconsin. He had four draft deferments so I guessed he must be a coward. It's good to have had people like this sending young people off to be killed or injured. Both seem to talk tough but when it's time to put their butts on the line they find excuses.. I think daddy took care of gw and got him through college with his money. I think cheney had political pull to keep him out of the service. McCain may have served, but, being a pilot 30,000 ft about the action doesn't exactly make him a war hero.
See my fellow republicans what I have to think about. I will probably make my way towards aa democratic vote.
Ca "

 Hey Mike wrote on September 3, 2008 4:37 pm:
" "McCain is not a hawk" Is this really what you intended to write? If so you have just made irrelevant anything else that you write, you must be as disconnected from reality as Bush. "

 wow... wrote on September 3, 2008 4:47 pm:
" Anita if you actually followed your peace loving Barack you would know he wants us in Afghanistan. Please know who and what you are talking about when you leave your opinion. "

 karwied wrote on September 3, 2008 5:17 pm:
" Excuse me, but I don't believe that Bill Clinton OR Obama has served in our Military!!!!! It does not make a person a coward just because he did not enlist in the military....Bill Clinton was a "draft dodger" and I don't know anything about Obama, but I know he is not qualified to be our commander in chief....Gosh, it is getting tiring reading all this junk. I vote to have our election process shortened and only allow each candidate to spend xxx amount of $. That should take care of a lot of this. "

 ken wrote on September 3, 2008 5:29 pm:
" Correction from Ken:
Maybe you should take a lesson on the use of qoutes. You said that "If Obama had been president, or Clinton for that matter, 9/11 probably wouldn't have happened. George Bush Jr had just returned from his 4th month of vacation in his first 7 months, and was "sick and tired" of terrorist briefings. His head wasn't into it, virtually ignoring the sense of urgency.

Bush, in his infinite wisdom even said the "Democrats are Terrorist-Happy", according to a half dozen witnesses. Don't confuse tough talk with results.

By the way, still negotiating with Hitler would have been a good thing, had it avoided WWII, don'cha think? " These are all your words.

And you indicated that if we were still negotiating with Hitler, WWII wouldn't have happened. But he would have tried or attempted to take over the world. How would you like him as your President? "

 Active Military wrote on September 3, 2008 5:32 pm:
" I agree, John McCain is not capable of leading this country. Just because he was a POW and the Commander of a Flight Squadron does not make him capable of being the Commander in Chief. As all common sense military personnel know, you negoitiate first than you go to war if necessary after having all of the facts correct. If John McCain has his way he will use his POW time as an excuse for anything that does not go right if he is elected. Also on another note how come we never hear from the personnel that John McCain commanded while in the Navy. Is it because he wasn't a good commander. Also how come more personnel that were POWs during the time that John McCain was a POW speak up about how great he was. "

 None of the above wrote on September 3, 2008 6:13 pm:
" Neither Obama or McCain are "qualified" to run the country, just depends on which side of our polarized political spectrum you are on. I too am a none of the above voter, but will as allways vote for the lesser of the two presented evils. I fear Obama will not be able to deal with congress, and his promised "Hope and Change" will ring hollow in the halls of congress, leading to a social/political upheaval as the voters rebel and congress ducks and covers, as usual. At least McCain has some experience in dealing with the shark pool of congress, and possibly may not redistribute as much of my hard earned money, that Obama has promised to his voter pool. "

 Nostrodamus wrote on September 3, 2008 7:08 pm:
" Hillary Clinton vs Sarah Palin in 2012. McCain is a one term President, and Hillary is resharpening the claws for the 2012 election. Obama is a sacrificial lamb. Just a feeling. "

 Sorry Ken wrote on September 3, 2008 8:33 pm:
" Apparently that went over your head. "

 Taxes wrote on September 3, 2008 8:36 pm:
" I still see all the knee-jerk posts that actually vote the almighty tax cut, over their grandkids and great grandkid's future. That's real great family values to worship a tax cut, while not giving a crap about the huge debt. "

 No math wiz...but wrote on September 3, 2008 9:00 pm:
" Question, we are worried about the debt, eliminate the tax cuts, but spend more than we recoup on social programs, I am no math wizard, but is this what the Obama campaign is all about. Promise everything, confiscate, redistribute, and where exactly is the national debt in his priority agenda? I am missing all the true platform issues, and confused how the "Hope and Promise" is actually going to repay the debt, while promising massive new social spending. His words the economy iw a "wreck", but I will promise you the voter all this, how? "

 Don Eret is EXACTLY right. wrote on September 4, 2008 12:27 am:
" And Senator Nelson knows it, too. He tried to help reduce gas prices this summer but republicans in the Senate obstructed the legislation. Here is part of the Email I received from him:

The Senate brought up the Stop Excessive Energy Speculation Act, S. 3268, for debate. This bill sought to reign in excessive speculation and provide better oversight and transparency in the energy markets in order to end the volatility and steep inflation of oil prices. On July 25, the Senate voted on a motion to invoke cloture on this legislation (a move to end debate and allow for a straight up-or-down vote on the bill). I voted in favor of the cloture motion; however, it failed on a 50-﷓43 vote (60 votes were needed to invoke cloture and permit the full Senate to consider this measure). Like you, I was disappointed this legislation was stalled by procedural tactics and not given an up-or-down vote. Please know I will keep your views in mind should this, or any other legislation intended to give the CFTC enhanced authority to regulate certain energy trades on markets other than the regulated futures exchanges, come before the Senate in the coming months.

It happened in the House of Reps too. Big oil OWNS the GOP and wants all the drilling leases they can get their hands on. They will NEVER let us off the oil teat. "

 More evidence of obstruction... wrote on September 4, 2008 12:41 am:
" Don and any interested parties - Here is the results of my research into republican obstructionism in the House of Reps about the same time as the Senate occurrence this summer:

On July 24th, 2008

H. Res. 6578, the Consumer Energy Supply Act of 2008 was rushed before congress seeking to provide quick relief at the pump, something that drilling absolutely CANNOT do. The measure received strong majority support in a House vote of 268 to 157, but failed to receive the two-thirds necessary to pass under suspension of the rules. All Democrats present voted for the measure, while 157 Representatives voted against it. The measure would direct the release of a small amount of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, bringing down gas prices and sending a strong message to energy speculators.

The American people have paid for more than 700 million barrels of oil to be held in this government stockpile. At significant taxpayer expense, the SPR is currently 97 percent full - its highest level ever.

You can see the names of the 157 representatives who voted for BIG oil interests over yours with this link. And guess what.....you''ll NEVER believe it!....

ALL 157 are members of the Gas, Oil & Petroleum party.. Stunned?
Furthermore, give ya one guess who ALL THREE reps from Nebraska sided with.
Ding! You got it! Smith, Terry and Fortenberry all sided with Arab oil interests over yours and mine. I laugh every time I see the lies Lee Terry spouts on his commercial.

See who the 157 are here and contribute to their opponents soon and often!

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-527&sort=vote "

 osisbs wrote on September 4, 2008 1:28 pm:
" I think someone who withstood Russian and Vietnamese torture for years and years and was subject to KGB mind-control techniques would make a great leader. I think a former beauty queen and mom of 5 can back him up in case of an emergency, also. I also think Texas A&M will win the Big XII this year in football. "

 Dorchesterite wrote on September 4, 2008 10:41 pm:
" In response to Don Eret's comments, just three words: Drill, baby, drill!

The only way to lower gas prices is to ensure Republicans re-take the House and stop the Marxist Pelosi.

-Fellow Dorchester Resident "

 ken wrote on September 5, 2008 5:37 am:
" If I have $100,000 and you have $1,000 you want to tax me because I'm rich. Right. Now if you have $51,000 and I have $50,000 do you want us to tax you because you are rich? Where do you draw the line between rich and poor? The monitary difference in the first is CAPITALISM and the second is SOCIALISM. "

 Dorchesterite....... wrote on September 5, 2008 10:32 am:
" You make my point for me. The GOP is hijacked by the Arab oil sheikhs.
Sad but true. Disappointing to see them chanting drill, baby, drill at the convention. We've been addicted for too long now. After shortages in the 70's we knew we needed to get treatment but instead went into denial, like nearly all addicts. I could post a bunch of photos of Bush groveling with the sheiks......just Google it. Might as well face it .....its now the Greedy Oil Party. hey've any taken over your convention, for God's sake! drill baby drill! drill baby drill! Mindless addict.

And one other very important thing in this election. To belittle community organizers diminishes the work and teachings of Jesus Christ himself. "

Ads by Yahoo!