Now
Fair
22°
High
32°
Low
16°

Letters, 8/30: No validation coming for W.

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Saturday, Aug 30, 2008 - 12:18:49 am CDT

Is William Stone’s letter (LJS, Aug. 24) attempting to justify George Bush’s criminal presidency: A) myopic, B) absurd, C) laughable, D) preposterous, E) all of the above?

It is true that the United States has not been attacked since Sept. 11, 2001, “as was … predicted.” What is overlooked, however, is the fact that it was on Bush’s watch that we actually were attacked — as was predicted! (I love irony.)

Describing Bush as being “too Christian” is an interesting concept. We certainly want to keep our Christianity in check so we don’t follow Jesus’ teachings too closely — who knows where such appeasement might lead! I do believe, as does Mr. Stone, that George Bush saw something in Vladimir Putin that was not there. Bush has an almost infallible record of believing in things that don’t exist (do the letters WMD come to mind?)

Speaking of letters and, unlike Mr. Stone, I believe that Bush saw, as did John McCain, KGB when he peered into Putin’s eyes. For Bush, though, KGB stands for King George Bush.

Leaving Bush’s absolution to “history” is a convenient way to avoid holding him accountable for the havoc he has wreaked in the here and now. And we all know how adept W. is at shunning responsibility. He even arranges for others, like Mr. Stone, to do it for him. Mr. Stone is correct that history will ultimately validate George Bush’s reign for what it is, but not as a “better-regarded president” (that’s the laughable part). Just as time has proved Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Idi Amin and Pol Pot to be the arrogant, self-serving, compassionless tyrants they were, so will it do likewise for the current despot.

Incidentally, the answer to the question posed is E.

Larry McClung, Lincoln

Way to stop robberies

I have a suggestion that just might help cut down on all the convenience store robberies we’ve had lately. This is actually so simple it is borderline brilliant. Here it is: Remove all the “Conceal Carry Prohibited” stickers off the doors of the convenience stores!

Obviously, those who are robbing the stores either don’t know what the signs mean or more than likely don’t care about breaking the law. Perhaps if the crooks weren’t sure if there was a customer or a clerk with a conceal-carry permit carrying, they just might move on to a place that doesn’t allow conceal carry.

I think we should try it for a year and see if things change.

Doug Vandervort, Lincoln

Council needs leadership

At the Lincoln Electric System hearing on Aug. 5 regarding the rate increase, some residents and community organizations acknowledged that the rate increase is the result of a failed energy policy in our country. Members of the community stated that efficiency and renewable energy development are critical in solving sustainability problems. When the Lincoln City Council met on Aug. 18 to vote on this issue, LES and the City Council failed to discuss these concerns.

The public is calling for solutions, and it is not coming from city-elected leadership. One person who did speak about his plans for a renewable energy future recently was T. Boone Pickens of Texas. A crowd of 1,200 eager Lincolnites gathered to hear about this vision. Throughout the nation, cities like Lincoln that are experiencing increases in costs are comforted by local leaders who are pursuing mechanisms to resolve these problems before they resurface. I will be excited when that type of leadership emerges from Lincoln’s City Council.

Margaret Milligan, Lincoln


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Cat wrote on August 30, 2008 1:15 am:
" Mr. Vandervort: Then how about those who want to walk around legally with their firearms stop concealing them? Even before the conceal carry law, it was legal to have a firearm in plain sight. No conceal carry at a kwik-e-mart? Wear it openly.

Or maybe it has nothing to do with the ability to shoot people. Maybe it's more that the criminals know that convenience store employees are forbidden to act in any way other than to give them what they want. "

Tired of it wrote on August 30, 2008 6:54 am:
" Larry, you need to get a life. Stop reading the left leaning rhetoric on the blog sites and watching your biased network news. Your type are ready to condemn FOX as propaganda, but fail to see or understand what your are told is also political propaganda. Bush is no differant than any President, we can do massive comparisons of "illegal" acts with JFK, Johnson, Clinton, but most of us have moved on, and let history do it for us. If you are lucky McCain/Palin will get elected and you and those like you can continue your "hobby", if not and we get Obama, you can praise the new "cult of personality" president. And if you are a true historian the Obama campaign is more akin to Germany in 1933, promote a "cult of personality",promise everything the people want to hear, promise change, and deliver little or nothing of the promises.
Historians years from now, free of the current bias will judge the Bush presidency, free of the current bias and yes, prejudice of many here and across the country. "

Edgar Pearlstein wrote on August 30, 2008 7:37 am:
" Bush claims that, because of his actions, America is now safer than it was in 2001. Wrong! There are 150,000 Americans in uniform, plus many civilians, who are demonstrably not safer. "

RELarry wrote on August 30, 2008 9:49 am:
" I agree with you however if bush had been thrown out of office then chickenhawk cheney would have come into power. More than he has. This would have led to more wars that help the oil companies. Georgie is no more than a mouthpiece for dickey. Dickey should be banned from all politics. And, Tired of it. Maybe rush can fill your head with roses and popcycles but the rest of us are tired of the republican claims that all is ok with the u.s. and its economy. I don't care if mccain has gahndi running with him, the trickle down effect don't work and I don't want any more of it. "

MarkyMark is Sick Tired wrote on August 30, 2008 12:00 pm:
" Neo-Cons often often compare apples to oranges, but this case, is even more extreme. Comparing any illegal acts of the former presidents (Don't see any examples), is ludicrous, even Nixon (no one died).

What Mr. Bush's ILLEGAL WAR (see the Constitution of the United States, and also Lying to Congress) has done is sacrifice another 4,000-5,000 of our finest and bravest, without a clue as how to fight and win a war.

This illegal war has also cost you, your kids, your grandkids, your great grandkids (family values) upwards of a trillion or more dollars. Now that's not Conservative. Did he possibly even think about what he has done to several generations of Americans? Doubt it. I would imagine he is clueless. How Conservative is it, to be so irresponsible, that you refuse to even pay for your ILLEGAL WAR?

You people are more interested in listening to AM radio and being Cheerleaders than you are in being Americans. This president belongs in prison. Period. "

Boonie wrote on August 30, 2008 12:23 pm:
" Good letter Larry. The hope of being vindicated by history is about all that Bush/Cheney have left. There is little they can look backward on with pride of accomplishment, but a lot that has turned the world and country against them (except for those like "Tired of it" who will never see anything wrong as long as consevatives did it). "

Greg wrote on August 30, 2008 1:45 pm:
" "Tired of it" must be so exhausted as to be bereft of the ability to present a cogent argument and so resorts to name-calling and unsubstantiated assertions. The comparison of the Obama campaign to the machinations of the Nazis in 1933 is odious beyond description, betraying on the part of the writer either an abysmal ignorance of history or an even more appalling willingness to spread patent untruths without even a shred of moral introspection. But being subjected to "Tired's" drivel is the price we pay for freedom of speech. "

Truth is wrote on August 30, 2008 2:37 pm:
" Very accurate letter, Larry. Real Conservatives are livid with the Bush administration, while Neo-Cons prepare to stick up for whatever pile of dung he steps in next. "

GepGuy wrote on August 30, 2008 3:21 pm:
" "Tired of it" evidently gets his information from far-right blogs because comparisons of Obama's campaign with 1933 Germany and Nazi tactics are slithering around there. Godwin's Law, already. Pretty pathetic and pretty dumb.... if only so many people didn't believe it. "

Superman wrote on August 30, 2008 6:28 pm:
" I'm glad to see Mr. Vandervort thinks if he has a concealed weapon he would be faster than a speeding bullet like Superman.

Let me ask you one question, what makes you think a person who is holding up a convenience store wouldn't think twice about pulling the trigger and killing the clerk or anyone else trying to stop them?

If you still think stop a speeding bullet, let me point a loaded gun at you and see if you can pull your gun and shoot me before I can shoot you? Are you willing to take this bet? "

Old enough to remmember wrote on August 30, 2008 9:59 pm:
" I remmember a generation calling Johnson's war "illegal" and immoral, which did start with a lie, Tonkin Gulf, and 56,000 plus American "boys" paid for that Democratic lie. I also remmember JFK lieing to us about our involvment with the Bay of Pigs "invasion", how he promised support and abandoned them on the beaches. History and today's Democrats prefer not to remmember the lie that caused 56,000 American deaths and untold millions of deaths in SE Asia. "We are not about to send American boys 9 or 10 thousand miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves." LBJ 1965. So please stop standing on the soapbox and pretend that your Presidents get a pass on thier historical "crimes". "

Big Chief wrote on August 30, 2008 11:00 pm:
" A note to Superman: Even if a CCW licensee is present during a robbery he is NOT obligated to use that weapon to stop the robbery. Any weapons class I have ever taken emphasizes the fact that a weapon should be used only as a last resort! Just because the weapon is available does not mean it has to be drawn and used. It is optional! However if there is no weapon available there is no recourse but to hope and pray that the robber doesn't kill you and everyone around you. With no other weapons but his a robber has total control of the situation. "

Hey Superman wrote on August 31, 2008 9:20 am:
" That's not the point. Imagine you're a thief and have decided to rob the gas station. Are you going to rob the one with the chance that the clerk and numerous other patrons are carrying pistols, or are you going to rob the one that has outlawed them from doing that? If I'm a thief, and I'm headed to start a gun fight: I'd prefer to be the only one with a gun.

What makes gun control people think that criminals will start following the law if we outlaw guns (even if only in certain areas). Check out "just the facts .com - it's a neutral based site for various topics, and has some interesting info on guns and gun crime. "

I too am old enough to remember wrote on September 1, 2008 8:46 pm:
" that there was outrage and protest of "Johnson's war" and much of it by fellow Democrats. This has never been a case of Democrats protesting Bush's War over politics. Democrats have protested Bush's War over so many reasons, including dishonesty, illegality, tremendous economic, moral, social costs, not to mention the loss of life, but it has never been over simple Republican-Democratic party politics. Republicans who were watching and listening and thinking, and were not in a position to be intimidated by their fellow R-Bullies were also protesting Bush's War from the outset. "

Sure Cat wrote on September 2, 2008 2:55 pm:
" Open carry has long been legal in Nebraska. It was never a popular method of carry in Lincoln because too many people were afraid of any gun that was worn unaccompanied by a clearly displayed badge.

Even though open carry is legal, a person carrying openly can be charged with disturbing the peace resulting from a complaint about a pistol sighting, regardless of whether or not the carrier was in violation of any other law.

More importantly, an openly carried pistol is as good as a sign saying "Shoot me first and take the gun" if the carrier is standing in line in front of kwik-e-mart robber.

A concealed pistol is not a target for a criminal, but it is a surprse. "