Census: More Nebraskans without health insurance
By JEAN ORTIZ / The Associated Press
OMAHA — Nearly 13 percent of Nebraskans have no health insurance coverage, according to a new report from the U.S. Census Bureau.
The state’s two-year average uninsured rate for 2006-2007 is up 2.3 percentage points, to 12.8 percent, from the average rate of 2004-2005, 10.5 percent.
But why Nebraska is falling behind is unclear, said Dr. Richard O’Brien, co-chairman of the Nebraska Medical Association’s Health Care Reform Task Force.
“We’ve got to do something about health care in this country and in this state,’’ he said.
The state’s rate of uninsured still falls below the nationwide 2006-2007 average of 15.5 percent.
Nebraska is among 10 states that saw an increase in their two-year average rate of uninsured.
Two years of data, and in some cases three, are combined because of the smaller survey size, said David Drozd, a research associate with the University of Nebraska at Omaha’s Center for Public Affairs Research.
The data was part of a new census report on income, poverty and health insurance coverage in the U.S. that was released Tuesday.
Nebraska’s poverty rate held close to 11 percent, which isn’t much of a departure from 2006 data, but is up nearly a percentage point since 2001.
The major concern about health care for Nebraskans is cost, said O’Brien, referring to results of a survey commissioned by the association and conducted in April by KRC Research. The survey included more than 500 Nebraskans using a demographically representative cross-section.
The number of children without health insurance remains concerning, said officials with Voices for Children in Nebraska who issued a statement in response to the census report.
About 45,000 children — or 10 percent of the child population in the state — don’t have access to health care, despite efforts to provide greater access through the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, according to the release.
State lawmakers attempted a similar effort in January, when legislation was introduced that would have increased the state eligibility rate for Kids Connection, an insurance program for low-income children. The bill failed to advance out of committee.
Sarah Ann Lewis, policy coordinator for Voices for Children, said, “Nebraska’s legislators need to expand this program to ensure that Nebraska’s children have access to the care that they need to grow up healthy and strong."

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit


Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
bd wrote on August 26, 2008 10:25 am:
You do realize medicaid counts as insurance as far as the census forms? So these are 12% of people who have neither medicaid or regular insurance. But thanks to those 12%, and people's refusal to insure them or provide so sort of coverage, all our hospital bills are way up since the only way for them to get care is to go the emergency room. Hooray America's broken insurance system. "
In the Healthcare field wrote on August 26, 2008 10:33 am:
stignob wrote on August 26, 2008 10:45 am:
Hopeful wrote on August 26, 2008 10:49 am:
Jerry wrote on August 26, 2008 10:50 am:
No one wrote on August 26, 2008 11:36 am:
People need to learn there are options. Sure, you won't be covered 100 percent, but everyone ought to have at least SOME insurance. "
BC wrote on August 26, 2008 11:38 am:
Yup wrote on August 26, 2008 11:44 am:
Change needed wrote on August 26, 2008 11:45 am:
I don’t know if universal health care is the answer, but the path we are on now certainly isn’t working! "
Darwin wrote on August 26, 2008 11:46 am:
For those of us who work outside of the major corporations, health insurance is prohibitively expensive. Not only that, it doesnt even cover 99.999% of the claims that "normal" insurance does. I would like to see any of you pay 1200$ a month for the worst coverage in the world, then tell me I am "playing the system". "
Ed wrote on August 26, 2008 12:00 pm:
Rey wrote on August 26, 2008 12:00 pm:
Used to be GOP wrote on August 26, 2008 12:33 pm:
If you look at the numbers, you will find that entitlements to the elderly are the programs that are really going to kill us; especially as the Boomers get older. The immigrants and welfare queens that everyone is so shook up about account for only a fraction.
The only way out of this is to standardize and centralize the whole process and then let it out for competitive bidding. Walmart is far more efficient than a bunch of mom-and-pop shops. Right now, our healtcare system is a bunch of mom-and-pop shops. This is why we spend twice as much per capita and have worse outcomes than every other developed nation. "
Medicaid urban legends wrote on August 26, 2008 12:35 pm:
BicycleMike wrote on August 26, 2008 12:47 pm:
no coverage wrote on August 26, 2008 1:16 pm:
BicycleMike wrote on August 26, 2008 1:16 pm:
New York Baby wrote on August 26, 2008 1:25 pm:
Goverment Haters wrote on August 26, 2008 1:33 pm:
Back in the 1970s my wife took out student loans at 3% from the Goverment Student Loan Program. She was a poor girl from right here in the Heartland. Her father suffered a stroke early in the life of their family and her mother sewed for a living. They made pennies, folks. But all three of those kids went on to college via grants and loans. One worked for NASA, one works with a PhD at Los Alamos National Labratory and my wife became a dedicated school teacher.
Now we are trying to put our kids through school and you can imagine whats happened. To "slim down goverment", the National Student Loan Prgram was privatized back in the 80s sometime. Now our interest rates are 8 and 9 percent, while broadbased interest rates are still what they were in the 70s (if not lower). Yes, thanks to SLIMMING DOWN EVIL GOVERMENT the private sector has doubled what it costs me in interest to send my kids to college.
The same argument can be made for the NATIONALIZATION of medical insurance. The secret to savings has ALWAYS been to cut out the middle man. We don't need the insurance industry to double and quadrupple our health care bills. We need to get rid of them. "
clarification wrote on August 26, 2008 1:39 pm:
2) I had independent single coverage for $90/mo. Get a cheap policy and save the difference in the premiums to pay for routine expenses. "Insurance" for routine health care is merely prepaid medical care, which jacks up the cost for everyone and leads people to believe they can consume as much as they want for "free." "
Donna wrote on August 26, 2008 1:41 pm:
HPG wrote on August 26, 2008 2:17 pm:
Covered wrote on August 26, 2008 2:49 pm:
I think if someone has a full time job, they should qualify for health care. and yes, they should have to help pay the premiums. I know people who are taking advantage of the system, working full time, and using the employer for the insurance, and still milking the state for things such as daycare for their children?! The rules need to be more strict on eligibility for medicaid, as well as every other form of state assistance. "
Susan wrote on August 26, 2008 2:51 pm:
Its not Medicaids Fault wrote on August 26, 2008 2:57 pm:
MJohns wrote on August 26, 2008 3:02 pm:
$ millions for health care or avoid insuring citizens? Go figure! "
Concerned wrote on August 26, 2008 4:01 pm:
CS wrote on August 26, 2008 4:54 pm:
Family # Monthly Yearly
1 $1,604 $19,248
2 $2,159 $25,908
3 $2,714 $32,568
4 $3,269 $39,228
5 $3,824 $45,888
6 $4,379 $52,548 "
Well wrote on August 26, 2008 4:58 pm:
Jason wrote on August 26, 2008 5:59 pm:
Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced plans to purchase up to $50 million in pork products that will be donated to child nutrition and other domestic food assistance programs. The purchase also is expected to help stabilize the marketplace for pork”
This results in higher taxes and less ability for citizens to\pay for health care insurance while also facing inflated food prices. The pork case is just one area of business affected, also are the cattle, poultry, and even corn syrups, flour and yes...even soybean products when biodiesel is produced.
The governor has taken a backdoor approach to avoid a problem that has its root cause in corn for ethanol programs "
No coverage costs wrote on August 26, 2008 7:01 pm:
The government will pay about 75% of an additional $56 billion in health costs - or $42 billion - for the uninsured. "
taxpayer wrote on August 26, 2008 7:27 pm:
whatever wrote on August 26, 2008 7:52 pm:
to Whatever wrote on August 26, 2008 9:27 pm:
Misguided thinking wrote on August 26, 2008 9:34 pm:
Look at the exhorbinant costs of hospitals and doctors. If you "Choose" not to be insured and needed a $250,000 cancer treatment, you loose all your assets and leave your family with nothing. (unless you are rich). Is that the responsible thing to do? "
Typical Republican wrote on August 26, 2008 9:52 pm:
Just because drugs are not a luxury and needed by our fellow Americans, doesn't mean the government should tell them what to charge for their product. Just because they are vital to peoples lives and most people can't afford them, doesn't mean we are guilty of any extortionist, corporate terrorism. It's America.....Pure Capitalism and Supply side economics. God would want us to succeed financially. "
Grandma wrote on August 26, 2008 10:01 pm:
Tristen wrote on August 26, 2008 10:29 pm:
jon wrote on August 27, 2008 9:02 am:
Common Sense wrote on August 27, 2008 9:25 am:
CS wrote on August 27, 2008 9:59 am:
Pamela wrote on August 27, 2008 10:03 am:
To Common Dense.... wrote on August 27, 2008 1:31 pm:
Health insurance = $200.00/mo plus office visit co-pay plus prescription co-pay plus $500.00 deductible. Any common dunce can see what is affordable and what is not. "
Alan wrote on August 27, 2008 1:33 pm:
Some people just dont get it... wrote on August 27, 2008 1:34 pm:
Our daughter has a genetic disease with no known cause (other than an act of God). In her short 3-year life, we have racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills. Fortunately we have great insurance now, but we haven't always. When we had crappy insurance that didn't cover much of anything (and it was the only insurance we could get at the time besides medicaid), we had to put medical bills on credit cards.
A coworker at my old job is a breast cancer survivor...but works in a profession that doesn't provide health care. She would like an independent policy, but no one will give a policy to a breast cancer survivor. Instead she has to work a job she hates where she makes less money rather than the job she went to school for just so she can get health insurance. Where's the choice in that?
There are millions of stories out there like these...I just wish those of you who have the luxury of not worrying about health care in your every day life would wise up and listen to the rest of us who have extensive experience with our health care system. I have yet to hear a good story from those people. "
this is to common sense wrote on August 27, 2008 1:41 pm:
Nina wrote on August 27, 2008 1:54 pm:
mark wrote on August 27, 2008 2:51 pm:
Since When wrote on August 27, 2008 3:46 pm:
whatever wrote on August 27, 2008 8:50 pm:
RIch and Proud wrote on August 27, 2008 10:22 pm:
I am not going to apolgize because my wife and I made good choices. Boo hoo, some of you people made bad choices. Tough! "