Survey finds Nebraska women face discrimination
By JoANNE YOUNG / Lincoln Journal Star
Working women in Nebraska have talked about the same issues for at least four decades.
Equal pay.
Child care costs and family friendly work environments.
Sex discrimination and harassment.
“Discrimination is alive and well in Nebraska,” said Kathleen Neary, attorney with Vince Powers and Associates.
“I’m so busy. I can’t tell you the number of cases I turn down every day.”
And the cost of child care is still making women think twice about whether work is worth the effort, especially when a large chunk of their salary goes to the people watching their kids.
Child care costs can run as high as $200 for babies, $175 for toddlers and $120 for school-age children. If you have more than one child — and especially if you’re single — it just doesn’t pay to work, said Christy Arfman, formerly with the Working Mom Safe Kids coalition.
Nebraska Women Work! unveiled an informal survey Tuesday of more than 1,000 women in 73 counties that showed much still needs to be done to satisfy working women in the state.
The volunteer respondents give insight into the issues women are facing.
The group, an affiliate with the Women Work! national network for women’s employment, began collecting comments for the anonymous survey nearly two years ago, said Pat Funk, research consultant and volunteer project manager for survey.
The Nebraska organization has a small budget, Funk said, and could not afford to do a scientific, random survey. But the informal survey is still useful, she said.
The women who answered the survey on paper and on the Internet were more likely to have a college degree and higher incomes, she said. Only 7 percent were women of color.
Funk said the survey showed that many of those who answered believed they had experienced sex discrimination at work. But when that happened, many did not raise objections, saying it would not do any good or they were afraid of the consequences.
Those who did complain said either their complaints were ignored or negative consequences ensued.
Neary said women aren’t raising the issue because they need to pay their bills and their mortgages and take care of their families. They need the job, even if they are experiencing discrimination or harassment, and don’t want to be labeled boat rockers or be targeted for dismissal.
Many companies have anti-discrimination policies, she said. “But a lot of times they’re not worth the paper they are printed on.”
Employers rarely do a good job of investigating a discrimination complaint, she said. They would rather ignore the problem, unless it is costing them money.
The survey also indicated many respondents felt advancement was limited. More training or education was needed, which takes time and money, Funk said.
Erin Ching, an attorney with Nebraska Appleseed, said many working women face challenges in getting child care. Policymakers should continually be called upon to support high quality, affordable child care.
In past years, Nebraska lawmakers reduced the number of families qualifying for child care subsidies by reducing the income to qualify from 185 percent of poverty level to 120 percent. People who live at 185 percent of the poverty level are generally not on other types of assistance, but could still use help with child care, advocates say.
Arfman said some women who can’t afford day care leave kids as young as 9 home alone after school, reasoning that it’s only for an hour or two. Or they put kids in less expensive, unlicensed child care, which may be lower quality.
Catrice Jackson, president of Nebraska Women Work!, said the organization will serve as a gateway for information, resources and opportunities for women.
Members will work with other agencies to prepare girls at an early age for satisfying professional careers and to be supportive future policy makers, she said. It may take a generation or two for these changes to occur.
“We need to wake up Nebraska, to kind of shake things up a bit,” Jackson said.
Reach JoAnne Young at 473-7228 or jyoung@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit


Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Psychological studies have shown time and time again that when two people are given the exact same quantity of something, they each think the other got more. And this is especially true in the work place where you never really know how much your coworkers earn. Everyone figures they are getting cheated.
This is the third time in a month that I have read an article that reports on a poorly designed study which produces completely meaningless results. Real socialogical and psychological studies have to be very carefully designed to eliminate bias on the part of the participants and those conducting the study. Asking someone if they get paid enough doesnt work.
Although I do believe women get biased treatment when applying for traditionally male jobs. But, men are also descriminated against when applying for traditionally female jobs. Just try to get a job as a secretary or receptionist when you are a guy. You wont even get an interview! "
R. SCOTT wrote on August 26, 2008 8:34 am:
Nebraska Woman wrote on August 26, 2008 8:41 am:
Smile wrote on August 26, 2008 8:50 am:
goldwater wrote on August 26, 2008 9:02 am:
Char wrote on August 26, 2008 9:56 am:
Mags wrote on August 26, 2008 10:07 am:
zippy wrote on August 26, 2008 10:47 am:
I was unhappy with my pay once. Know what I did? I improved my skills, changed my field and got a better job! And now I am very happy with my job and my pay!
If we women feel cheated and want the world to be a better place for us, we need to stop whining, buck up, and change our own circumstances! "
me wrote on August 26, 2008 10:51 am:
Nina wrote on August 26, 2008 10:58 am:
Yeah wrote on August 26, 2008 11:17 am:
their shoes!!! I can find you huge companies where 99% of the women are
still paid half or less than a man for the same job. Yeah, if your a
young blond and honey up the boss you can get paid double the man and do
nothing!! Seen that for years! I worked double the hours a man did and
was paid half, company sold, bosses moved to another company and BEGGED
me to go with them, then they REDUCED my salary. Joke was on them, that
company was sold and my boss died in his 50's!!! Golly, a good example
right now is Hillary!! Theres a world of men out there that weren't
going to let Hillary win! I believe she had as much or more experience
than Obama!!!! If you get into unions ya have more of a chance, but I
don't like unions and if you can't be appreciated for your hard work as
much as a man then I have NO respect for for the management!! "
Eric wrote on August 26, 2008 11:42 am:
Pat wrote on August 26, 2008 12:14 pm:
Regarding Hillary Clinton...maybe she has more experience than Obama. Her gender isn't the reason why she's not getting the nomination. People don't like her! They probably also are sick of the same families running our country.
Women also use gender to their advantage in the workplace. I've seen several hold it over management's head just to get what they want. And I hate to tell you this, but female management does this to male employees. Women think they're the only ones at a disadvantage, but that's just not the case. Older women and older men are passed over for younger workers who will do the same job for less pay.
Also, Yeah, I think the "half or less" pay claim is absolutely ridiculous. That is totally exaggerated. "
Silly Study wrote on August 26, 2008 12:42 pm:
As for getting jobs, I have been applying and keep getting told that someone else "fits into the company better" and that it is not me. Well, could that be because I am not a minority nor a women?
Darwin has a really good point. These are not scientific studies. Do you think that the women that are happy with their situation even care to spend time filling out stupid surveys? It is a fact that the people with complaints are more likely to fill out a survey than people that are happy.
This is just an article written trying to sway the future voters against the ban on our current AA law. "
Yes wrote on August 26, 2008 1:13 pm:
Educated Female wrote on August 26, 2008 2:11 pm:
Boo Hoo wrote on August 26, 2008 2:11 pm:
HPG wrote on August 26, 2008 2:12 pm:
MarkyMark wrote on August 26, 2008 2:14 pm:
not surprised wrote on August 26, 2008 2:31 pm:
Further, the lack of empathy for women who are not in your shoes is an outrage. Shame on all who think the answer is so easy. This being a white, male dominated culture ("none of our women friends have a problem"), over 80 years of effort to educate legislators, repair, replace poor policies, legislation - it still goes on perpetuating or exacerbating the problems.
We are damned if we do and damned if we don't. How many men would have tolerated this crap, accepted failure to implement laws, accepted being ignored for so long. But, if we make a big fisted deal about it ... well obviously that's not ladylike or acceptable.
Get informed. Vote smart. When they say "pro-life" and family values govern their voting - don't believe it. This situation would not be so entrenched if that were true. The report is available on www.nebraskawomenwork.org.
One more thing fellers: be careful what you vote for. The anti-affirmative action amendment on the ballot (besides misrepresenting what AA is) will be back to haunt you when the white males are outnumbered by 2040. Coupled with your "who cares" attitude about enforcement of civil rights laws you should have quite an awakening! "
Tom wrote on August 26, 2008 3:47 pm:
You know wrote on August 26, 2008 4:21 pm:
I have a degree. I graduated with honors, and was very involved in extra-curricular activities in both high school and college (and continue to be active in the community) and I'm a female. First, Lincoln almost scoffs at degrees--unless it's actually required. You'd think it'd give you a leg up, but when you can speak and spell and generally perform better than your uneducated boss and co-workers, they fear you. Couple that with being-well-not a troll, you run into a lot of issues around here. Probably everywhere, but we're talking Lincoln. Discrimination exists in a big way around here, and people are going to make judgments about me (which will support what I've experienced). Where it's allowed, it will happen.
Incidentally, 'not surprised' makes an excellent point about 2040. "
Pat wrote on August 26, 2008 4:51 pm:
Tara wrote on August 26, 2008 4:55 pm:
To Tom wrote on August 26, 2008 5:52 pm:
Hairy wrote on August 26, 2008 6:09 pm:
help is coming wrote on August 27, 2008 9:01 am:
state worker wrote on August 27, 2008 10:04 am:
number of women below her in the 'decision making' positions.
they out number the men by probably 3 to 1. then imagine
working in one of those agency and you are a male. yes -
discrimination DOES happen - and it's not always to a 'minority'.
take a good look at 'Title IX' - it protects EVERYONE except white
males. I'm not kidding. Look how it is worded and the only
'group' left of the protected list is white males.... "
Women earn less for the same work wrote on August 27, 2008 9:26 pm:
Affirmative Action wrote on August 27, 2008 9:34 pm: