Now
Partly Cloudy
34°
High
32°
Low
21°

Dropping convention center was prudent

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Thursday, Aug 21, 2008 - 01:07:00 am CDT

Count the Journal Star editorial board among those who think it was wise to drop the convention center from the Haymarket arena project.

None of the three proposals put before the public this week show a convention center, although hotels planned for sites near the arena presumably would include conference and meeting space.

Originally, plans for the project envisioned a $20 million, 70,000-square-foot convention center as part of the project.

This spring, however, a consultant hinted that construction of the convention center would be a risky proposition.

John Kaatz of Convention, Sports and Leisure told the arena study group that a new convention center’s cost would be “very, very high,” and would likely attract only a half-dozen big national conferences a year. Existing conference space in Lincoln can handle most of state and regional events, he said.

Around the country, convention centers have been struggling in recent years. For example, revenue from convention business at Omaha’s Qwest Center has been below expectations. Omaha city leaders finally had to go the Legislature to write a formula that allowed more of the sales tax generated by the Qwest Center to go to paying off its debt. Otherwise, Omaha might have had to raise property taxes.

Kaatz said that most communities subsidize convention centers to the tune of several hundred thousand dollars a year to more than $1 million a year on the premise that they help attract out-of-town visitors who contribute to economic vitality and provide sales tax revenue.

In recent years, Lincoln taxpayers have been providing a subsidy of around $500,000 a year to Pershing Auditorium.

Kaatz suggested that the arena study group could try to find a private developer as a partner for the convention center.

The more prudent option is to just drop the convention center from the project altogether.

The move ought to make the Haymarket arena project more palatable to voters. Financial projections for a 13,000- to 16,000-seat arena without a convention center are much more encouraging. City leaders plan to put the project to a public vote in spring 2009.

In addition, by dropping the convention center, supporters can focus attention on the positive aspects of the project, such as the proposed new Breslow Ice Center, and the advantages a new arena will have over the old Devaney Center as the possible new home for Husker basketball and the venue for other entertainment events.

The public will get a chance to see how the new arena and surrounding development might look during a meeting on Sept. 3 at Memorial Stadium’s West Stadium Clubhouse.

Visitors will find the more realistically sized arena project seems more doable. They may even find it exciting.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Hjalmer wrote on August 21, 2008 6:08 am:
" How much is the Devaney Center used currently? Could Devaney be used more? If this is going to be just another sports complex, what's the need? Devaney certainly hasn't been outgrown by the crowds trying to get into the Husker games. Does this amount to just a back door way of building new facilities for the Huskers in the hopes that it will help their recruiting? "

Thank you wrote on August 21, 2008 7:59 am:
" Thank you so much for saying it! This has been my main objection to the project. What can Lincoln hope to get for conventions that would not go to some other place? Our airport is not very good. Event Center and other places can handle what little we get. "

JT wrote on August 21, 2008 8:41 am:
" Well said JS, convention centers are money sieves. This makes the project way better. "

Dear city leaders- wrote on August 21, 2008 10:20 am:
" City leaders plan to put the project to a public vote in spring 2009.
***********

By next spring the gas companies will have taken their stab at citizens and EVERYONE except you will know that we have nothing left in our jeans to pay for ANYTHING. If I were you I would just ramrod this baby down our throats WITHOUT any vote because it is gonna get a big thumbs down from taxpaying, thinking, concerned citizens of Lincoln who are able to fathom if we can afford something......or not. "

Heres an idea wrote on August 21, 2008 10:29 am:
" Why not PROVE to Lincoln voters how this arena will be worth it.

Between now and "the vote" next spring why not schedule sayyyyyy.........three shows at Devaney Center to prove the viability of a NEW arena over Pershing, Leed Center, etc. If the shows sell out, I'll vote YAY next spring. If not.............. On second thought......if you're dead set on building it, maybe you'd better not get caught trying to prove we need it and just build it WITHOUT any vote. That's what is going to happen anyway. "

george wrote on August 21, 2008 6:16 pm:
" How much is UNL going to pay towards the total cost? WHY doesn't the Journal/Star ask that question of the 6 foot tall Perlman clone Osborne. "

Tim V in Omaha wrote on August 21, 2008 8:57 pm:
" Drop the entire arena idea. Omaha's Qwest Center is struggling, overbuilt, et al. High gas and food prices mean people won'thave money for entertainment. Plus, an arena will undermine Nebraska Athletics financially and otherwise. Everybody and his brother have built an arena. National articles have said they're just way too many arenas for too little business.Plus, arenas are NOT recession-proof. "

whatever wrote on August 21, 2008 9:58 pm:
" 13,000 to 16,000 seats isn't nearly enough to compete in the arena world of NCAA tournaments or big name acts. Especially when you have one of the top 10 venues in the world 50 miles down the road. Lincoln already has an "events center" of that capacity. And some good points have been made. Let UNL open up the Devaney Center to concerts where alcohol is served and see what it produces. Lincoln if you aren't willing to outdue the Qwest Center don't even build this. "

come on wrote on August 22, 2008 2:42 pm:
" get it all built. I am a little older than a young professional,but, I want it all and I want it all now. If you people on social security can't afford the taxes to subsidize it, then MOVE. Just get out of lincoln and let the younger progressive professionals run the town. When it's done we can have large national acts and mega conventions. The hotels should be booked every night for at least 300 dollars a night. We can be like L.A. and N.Y.C. and be the envy of all the cities in the u.s. Lets build it and if the oldtimers don't like it they can be quiet or move. "

Uhhh.... wrote on August 22, 2008 5:58 pm:
" Any way we can assess a "young professional" tax on these "young progressives" that supposedly "need" this arena.

Usually young and professional means POOR! They live in apartments and spend all their money on beer and people of the opposite sex. And then expect us "old" (read - 38) property owners that have two kids and school taxes to worry about to subsidize their concerts. I am still voting NO. If you "need" an arena so badly, move to Omaha. "

Chris wrote on August 23, 2008 8:03 pm:
" Lincoln residents, finding something new to the community exciting? Laughable man! Lincoln Residents (at least those posting here) get their only satisfaction in life complaining about anything that might better their community. Exciting is a four letter word!

In all seriousness, I really hope Lincoln follows through with this despite all of the vocal naysayers. It would be a great addition to the haymarket, and a great addition to Lincoln. I am interested in seeing what kind of money UNL is willing to put up, since two of their sports teams will be playing there. Here's hoping the majority, is indeed, silent "