Now
A Few Clouds
32°
High
32°
Low
21°

Billionaires say U.S. debts need attention

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By JOSH FUNK / The Associated Press

Thursday, Aug 21, 2008 - 10:11:41 pm CDT

OMAHA — Two billionaires used the screening of a documentary in theaters across the United States on Thursday to urge the country to come to grips with its staggering debt load.

Warren Buffett and Pete Peterson were at the premiere of the movie “I.O.U.S.A.’’ to add their views to the film’s message: An economic disaster will befall the nation if the federal government’s $53 trillion in debts continue to grow.

But Buffett said at a news conference before the movie’s showing that he doesn’t think the country’s financial picture is quite as dire as the filmmakers portray.

Story Photo
Billionaire investor Warren Buffett listens to panelists during a news conference ahead of the screening of a film called "I.O.U.S.A." in Omaha on Thursday. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

“I do not regard our national debt as unduly alarming,’’ said Buffett, who is chairman and chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., and is listed by Forbes magazine as the world’s richest man.

Buffett said he’s confident the country will be able to address its debts and remain prosperous, but he doesn’t want to see the share of the U.S. gross domestic product devoted to debt continue to grow.

“We’ve overcome things far worse than what is going on right now,’’ Buffett said, who was interviewed in the movie but is not backing it financially.

The film that was shown Thursday in 358 theaters nationwide details the federal government’s debts. The movie is backed by Peterson — who co-founded the Blackstone Group LP private equity firm and served as commerce secretary under President Nixon — and is part of his foundation’s campaign to give the ballooning debt a central role in the presidential campaign.

“What concerns me more than anything is our savings rate,’’ Peterson said.

Peterson said the meager U.S. rate of savings today means that roughly 70 percent of the nation’s debts are being bought by foreign investors, and that could create geopolitical and economic problems for the country.

A panel discussion in Omaha followed the movie and was broadcast live to the other theaters, except on the West Coast where it was shown tape-delayed. Thursday’s panel discussion featured Buffett, Peterson, AARP Chief Executive Bill Novelli and William Niskanen, chairman of the libertarian-leaning CATO Institute.

Niskanen said the nation has to increase the retirement age in Social Security to at least 70 from the current range of 65 to 67. He also backed adding an income test to Medicare so those with more money pay a larger share of their health costs.

Peterson said he hopes the movie will help explain the problems debt can bring, so politicians will feel more pressure to act.

“The problem is getting the public understanding and the political will to do something about it,’’ he said.

The “I.O.U.S.A.’’ filmmakers followed former U.S. Comptroller David Walker as he toured the country, speaking to college groups, newspaper editorial boards and community groups about the nation’s financial problems.

Most of the talks in the movie took place while Walker still ran the Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of Congress that audits and evaluates the performance of the federal government.

Walker and the movie cite GAO figures that show the U.S. government owed roughly $53 trillion more than it had at the end of the 2007 fiscal year, the most recent figure available.

About $11 trillion of that covers publicly traded government debt, the amount the federal government owes to employee pensions and the cost of environmental cleanup of federal land. The rest of the $53 trillion figure accounts for projected shortfalls in Medicare and Social Security.

The cost of covering those obligations is expected to soar as more baby boomers become eligible for the two programs.

Buffett said he doesn’t believe those programs that help provide for the elderly will consume the bulk of the government’s resources in the future because America will be wealthier.

“The important thing to remember is that the pie gets larger over time, and there’s more to divide up,’’ Buffett said.

But Walker, who also took part in the panel discussion, said he disagrees with Buffett’s assessment because the predictions the movie highlights about the country’s debt already assume the nation will be wealthier.

Walker said he hopes both the Democratic and Republican candidates for president will acknowledge the staggering amount of debt the nation carries, and pledge to appoint a bipartisan coalition next year to look for solutions.

The film also featured interviews with prominent businessmen and officials from both major political parties, such as former Federal Reserve chairmen Alan Greenspan and Paul Volcker and former U.S. Treasury secretaries Paul O’Neill and Robert Rubin.

Greenspan warned that the nation cannot continue consuming more than it produces indefinitely.

“Without savings, there is no future,’’ Greenspan said in the movie.

Thursday’s screenings and panel discussion will be followed by a 12-city theatrical run beginning Friday. Peterson says he wants to have the movie shown on TV next year.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Business > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
BK wrote on August 21, 2008 9:50 pm:
" This is really scary, and right here in Lincoln, what are we doing?
We're building for fun and games, fun and games, fun and games and gonna
drain every last person to do it. Person after person I talk to is fed up
with the enormous taxes, many wanting to move out and are backed into a
corner not able to sell their homes unless they take a terrible loss. A
family on my street, unable to sell, just packed up and left because they
were so unhappy with this towns high taxes, spending and rude attitudes.
Lincoln has backed itself into a greedy corner and the middle class
are paying dearly!!! "

Chandler wrote on August 22, 2008 12:42 am:
" Niskanen and Peterson might fantasize about an ideal world, but Medicare and Social Security were a part of the federal vision baby boomers felt would be there for them. Maybe that was a myth. But they remain programs that have been underfunded...and that has been largely because Republicans began to dismantle the programs. It has become too late to "tell people to save", to cover costs. This has become a problem no less significant than government allowing Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to take on high risk loans. The snowball has gained momentum and while these billionaires have good advice, government must be there for the people or the great USA will again face economic disaster. Seventy per cent of debt held by foreign entities? Sounds like Bush fought the wrong war. "

WCG wrote on August 22, 2008 7:48 am:
" Well, what did we expect? This is what you get when you elect Republicans. Conservative? Don't make me laugh! The GOP long ago decided that NOTHING matters except getting elected (look at how John McCain has flip-flopped on every single issue - it's no wonder he keeps forgetting his own positions). So they'll continue to spend heavily (voters like that) and promise ever-increasing tax cuts ("read my lips"), because they know that we're too stupid to worry about the future, too greedy to make short-term sacrifices, and too cowardly to face reality. In a democracy, we get the kind of government we deserve, and we certainly asked for our current problems! George W. Bush took over a government with surpluses (finally paying down Reagan's enormous debt) and created the biggest budget deficits in history. And Nebraska voted for him,... TWICE! And we'll likely 'stay the course' with a man who swears he loves everything Bush ever did (though I'm not sure McCain himself even knows if that's really true anymore, he seems to be so confused). McCain is campaigning in the sewer because he knows it works (I did mention that we've become dumb as a stump, right?), and NOTHING else matters to him,... or to any GOP politician, apparently. Oh, we citizens deserve EVERY BIT of what's happened to us. We asked for it, after all. "

stignob wrote on August 22, 2008 7:50 am:
" Chandler, please explain this;
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent "Trust Fund" and put it into the General fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically
controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the "tie-breaking" deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S "