Pickens in Lincoln: Time to break oil dependence
By RICHARD PIERSOL / Lincoln Journal Star
A standing-room-only crowd at the Lancaster Event Center heard Oklahoma oilman turned new-age energy advocate T. Boone Pickens’ plea Wednesday for a public commitment to independence from foreign oil.
Pumped up and prepped with country music, the electricity of 1,200 people flowed through the center like Pickens wants it to flow from windmills on the Plains, something like those Lincoln Electric System runs within sight of the event center.
Pickens was in Lincoln on his $58 million, nationwide campaign to use wind energy production to replace natural gas use for electric generation, so the gas can be diverted to powering motor vehicles.
Related Link(s):
A crowd of more than 1,200 people gathered to hear oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens, Wednesday. The group, eager for answers to the country’s energy woes, seemed to include representatives from all demographic categories in Nebraska.
Here’s a sampling of what they said:
"I believe in him. We have to get off of oil any way we can or the whole planet is going to be like Beijing. I'm worried about the environmental effect and dependence on foreign oil -- it will kill us." --Maxine Messing, Lincoln
"We need to use less oil, it doesn't matter who is saying it, we need to use less oil and coal." --John Mekota, Crete
"I'm surprised to see a big oil man swap horses, but I presume he's a good American and that's the reason why he's changed." --Don Crecelius, Lincoln
"Anything American is good, everything needs to be on the table ... This is being environmental the responsible way, through renewables, solar energy." --Mike Johanns, U.S. Senate candidate, Republican
"There is tremendous potential to develop energy sources in the U.S. -- oil, wind, solar, nuclear, biofuels, but there has been a failure of leadership in Washington ... American ingenuity can help solve energy problems.” --Scott Kleeb, U.S. Senate candidate, Democrat
-- Lisa Munger
“Let’s talk serious,” Pickens said, folksy as only a billionaire can be, after opening with the obligatory Cornhusker and Okie State jokes. Pickens is a patron of the Oklahoma State Cowboys.
The root of America’s energy problem, and the intolerably high prices now, is the history of cheap oil, which encouraged dependence on foreign sources, he said.
“We didn’t have leadership that did anything about it,” he said, drawing applause. “It’s really all of us to blame. I am, you are. Because of cheap oil. Cheap oil stopped all the alternatives.”
Now, we’re 70 percent dependent on foreign sources, which Pickens described as a few friends and some enemies.
“I’m convinced we’re paying for both sides of this war,” he said. “We’re doing something that could be identified as stupid.”
In five to 10 years, assuming fast action on production tax credits by Congress and the executive branch, the U.S. could replace more than one-third of imported oil with energy from domestic sources, according to Pickens, saving more than $230 billion a year.
It can’t be done drilling more on either coast or in Alaska, Pickens said, but he doesn’t want to rule out any domestic energy source — biofuels, nuclear, oil, natural gas, wind, coal, hydro and others.
“I’m for anything that’s American,” he said.
Renewable energy represents only 2 percent of U.S. energy today, but there is conclusive evidence that 20 percent could come from electricity generated by windmills in the “wind corridor” between West Texas and the Canadian border, according to the Pickens Plan.
The potential is there to revive rural America economically in that corridor, Pickens said, with a developed wind-energy industry that can move electricity to the nationwide grid.
The key, he said, is to tap natural gas trapped in shale formations in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Appalachia.
If wind energy can replace gas used in producing electricity, then the gas can be used to drive motor vehicles, especially the nation’s trucks and fleets.
“I’m after the trucks,” he said. “The battery won’t move the 18-wheeler.”
Pickens said his public campaign started in the middle of the night July 1, talking to his wife.
He said he told her the American people weren’t being told the whole story about energy.
“She said, ‘Look, I want you to tell them the whole story, and I want to go to sleep.’ Next day, I said, ‘OK, I’m gonna do it.’”
Pickens said he spoke last week with the two presidential candidates, and both were receptive enough to his plan for him to feel confident taking it to Congress.
He also sought and says he picked up an endorsement from the richest guy in Nebraska.
“Warren says I’m on the right track,” Pickens said.
He’s also picked up a wide range of news media followers: Among those attending the Lincoln event were representatives from Australian television, MTV and 60 Minutes.
Taking questions from a few among dozens of people lined up in the audience, Pickens emphasized the natural gas solution he describes as merely a “bridge” to hydrogen-powered and electrically driven motor vehicles.
“Natural gas will only work for 20 or 30 years,” Pickens said. “After that, you’re going to have to figure it out. I won’t be here.”
Reach Richard Piersol at 473-7241 or rpiersol@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
#1. His plan requires massive subsidies to work. Any business plan worth its weight in salt is viable without subsidies.
#2. What's in it for him? The basic rule in economics is always lookout for number 1, so what is number 1 getting out of this? A quicker turn around on his own investment.
#3. Wind and Solar energy generation is not reliable enough to build 1/5th of our power grid without some sort of coal/oil backup.
I agree that solutions need to be considered, but Pickens plan is a bit too shady to support. "
Rudy wrote on August 20, 2008 9:55 am:
Steve wrote on August 20, 2008 10:31 am:
If, windmills are such a good idea, why does T. Boone need our money? The fact of the matter is, windmills are not practical electrical producers. They are expensive, not reliable, and are inefficient producers of electricity. In addition, windmills are unsightly and environmentally unfriendly, as they are known to kill great numbers of birds.
For an investment of $1 trillion dollars, private enterprise could build 50 nuclear power plants that would equal the electrical output of 1,000 Hoover dams. These plants could reduce the USA's $6-700 billion annual energy trade deficit into an annual trade surplus of $400 million. This plan would be paid for by private investors, not the American taxpayer. "
Late ODay wrote on August 20, 2008 10:36 am:
JB wrote on August 20, 2008 10:37 am:
water... wrote on August 20, 2008 10:38 am:
Matt wrote on August 20, 2008 10:40 am:
John wrote on August 20, 2008 10:41 am:
Curious wrote on August 20, 2008 10:50 am:
amazed wrote on August 20, 2008 11:02 am:
Tim wrote on August 20, 2008 11:06 am:
The reason we buy so much oil from overseas is because of all the limitations placed on the oil companies by our big brother, for the children government.
I am not knocking him for trying to get us off of oil but please don't act like a saint for doing it. {Can you say Al Gore and how he owns a carbon credit bank (where we have to buy carbon credits to live).} Do you know Nancy Pelosi is a share holder in Mr. Pickens company? To get government subsidies just follow the money trail. "
Husker Girl wrote on August 20, 2008 11:10 am:
Susan wrote on August 20, 2008 11:14 am:
Captain Logic wrote on August 20, 2008 11:33 am:
That being said, no doubt Mr. Pickens is looking forward to getting into the action early and receiving those subsidies. "
Tom wrote on August 20, 2008 11:39 am:
Sherri wrote on August 20, 2008 11:52 am:
ET wrote on August 20, 2008 11:56 am:
Used to be GOP wrote on August 20, 2008 11:56 am:
Bush and his supporters have focused on the short term; typical American corporate thinking. Those who want to drill offshore or in Alaska are also neglecting the big picture. We must develop solutions that are long term and sustainable. I don't know if Mr. Pickens' plan is feasible, but I salute him for trying.
No matter what we do, worldwide demand for oil is going straight up. It is used not only to power vehicles, but also in plastics. If we burn up all of our oil reserves in gas tanks, manufacturing will grind to a halt. Reducing the consumption of oil must become an immediate national priority. I personally believe that cellulosic ethanol is one of our best alternatives; it would bring tremendous prosperity to this region.
I'm sick of hearing people say that renewable energy sources cannot meet our needs. I happen to have faith in American ingenuity and innovation. If we had adopted this defeatist attitude in the past, we would have never become a nation, built an atomic bomb, or gone to the moon. An effort of this magnitude requires the government to provide coordination, resources and incentives. This has been sorely lacking. "
JR wrote on August 20, 2008 12:10 pm:
Whether Pickens plan is the one that works, or someone else's, I don't really care. What makes me happy is the fact we are finally talking about it. Something we should have been doing since the 80's. "
Mike wrote on August 20, 2008 12:16 pm:
Truth Detector wrote on August 20, 2008 12:23 pm:
Wake up, America. You need more domestic oil. More domestic nuclear. Quit letting the self-interested profiteers and self-destructive enviros fool you into bad investments or -- worse yet -- become completely unproductive. "
was there wrote on August 20, 2008 12:23 pm:
Berten... you state in your question the answer... wind/solar IS reliable to build 1/5th of our power needs. What is it you think the other 4/5th is coming from? Wind is a supplement, not a cure all. It is all about lowering on dependence on foreign oil, not eliminating oil use. Not in the short term.
I suggest you learn a little more about how the implementation of alternative energies work and then reconsider your questions. I would guess you probably assume that because the sun goes down, that you can no longer produce solar energy at night? That would tell me you have only looked at solar panels and nothing of storage processes. Or that Solar can be used to generate heat to power steam turbines which run well after the sun has gone down.
glad to see you did some research and are thinking this through rather than accepting blindly. Just do a little more research and better yet, get out and speak with people who actually work with these technologies.
Me. I am excited to see someone of influence leaning their weight to such an important issue.
Pickens is a Patriot and should be commended for his efforts! "
SB wrote on August 20, 2008 12:30 pm:
#2 – Any good business man or investor and the US as a whole stand to make a lot of money from homeland energy investments.
#3 – if tens of thousands of businesses, buildings, corporations, and industries throughout the world are currently running either completely on renewable energy or with no net energy consumption, please explain how renewable energy (including wind and solar) is not viable? "
backup wrote on August 20, 2008 12:48 pm:
check him out wrote on August 20, 2008 12:59 pm:
Berten Earnest wrote on August 20, 2008 1:03 pm:
Wind bags wrote on August 20, 2008 1:23 pm:
Y wrote on August 20, 2008 1:36 pm:
Mike in DC wrote on August 20, 2008 1:41 pm:
local wrote on August 20, 2008 1:51 pm:
topaz wrote on August 20, 2008 2:53 pm:
He has much to gain by all this. What is scary is that this paves the way for a corridor through the Midwest where he can use emminent domain and other methods to build a water pipeline that piggybacks onto the wind corridor. He'll then use that to drain water out of the Ogallala Acquifer to sell water to Dallas and other urban areas. He's just using wind to set the stage for his water interests. Watch out! We'll be paying more for increasingly scarce water in the future, and Pickens will be dead and gone while we suffer from his greed that he disguises as a desire to help America. "
Jay wrote on August 20, 2008 2:57 pm:
All you doubters... wrote on August 20, 2008 3:16 pm:
It is very unfortunate when forward thinkers such as Pickens get insulted for thinking outside the box. Not to mention the guy is a billionare, do you really think he wants more money? "
Nina wrote on August 20, 2008 5:32 pm:
Dana wrote on August 20, 2008 5:58 pm:
wow wrote on August 20, 2008 7:32 pm:
My next question for those of you that say he is going to be lining his pockets with this plan... Did he ever say he wasn't trying to make a profit? Better yet. How many of you spend a large percentage of your time doing something other than trying to line your own pocket to pay for oh... say gas? "
Big Bird wrote on August 20, 2008 8:36 pm:
#2. What's in it for him? The basic rule in economics is always lookout for number 1, so what is number 1 getting out of this? A quicker turn around on his own investment. A good question, but why not first look at the naysayers and find out what their interest in maintaining the status quo is.
#3. Wind and Solar energy generation is not reliable enough to build 1/5th of our power grid without some sort of coal/oil backup. How do you know that? "
DBone wrote on August 20, 2008 9:23 pm:
BooneObserved wrote on August 20, 2008 9:54 pm:
lookthefuture wrote on August 20, 2008 10:50 pm:
DJ wrote on August 21, 2008 6:46 am:
It comes to 55 square miles. That's to provide electricity for a town of 300,000 people. "
Outside the Box wrote on August 21, 2008 8:54 am:
Of course Pickens will profit. This is America - the industry leaders should be ones to profit.
Yes, the wind does not blow 24/7, but when it does why should we not harness it's potential to ultimately save us money? Seems like a no brainer. "