Now
Fair
79°
High
81°
Low
63°

Inmate recants testimony that won convictions in Beatrice murder

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY JOE DUGGAN / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, Aug 08, 2008 - 01:06:46 am CDT

OMAHA — The last time Ada JoAnn Taylor spoke publicly about the 1985 killing, she helped convict a man of first-degree murder.

Now, she’s hoping her words will help set him free.

In 1989, she was a 26-year-old dairy worker from North Carolina who told a jury what happened to Helen Wilson on a winter night four years earlier.

Story Photo
Ada JoAnn Taylor

She told how she and five other drug users broke into the Beatrice widow’s apartment.

She said she watched as two men took turns raping the 68-year-old.

And she admitted she held a pillow over the woman’s face.

“I didn’t want her to see the face that would haunt her,” Taylor testified.

“Why would the face haunt her?” the prosecutor asked.

“I know from previous experience that when you’re raped, the face can haunt you.”

Last week, attorneys representing Joseph White and Thomas Winslow, the men implicated by Taylor, said DNA tests have cleared them of the rape. The men are now waiting for a judge to decide whether to throw out their convictions.

If they eventually are exonerated, they will be the first Nebraska prison inmates freed by DNA testing.

But the case is complicated and the outcome remains unclear.

Before it’s decided, Taylor might have to take the witness stand again.

This time, she says, she’ll tell the truth.

“I hope they understand I was a young mom, I was dumb and I did what I had to do to save my life,” Taylor told the Journal Star Tuesday, the first time she discussed the case publicly since 1989.

Her trial testimony was false, she said.

She was never in Helen Wilson’s apartment. Nor did she see White and Winslow rape the woman, she said from the minimum security Omaha Community Corrections Center.

The story about the pillow — not a shred of truth, she said.

She lied because investigators and the prosecutor claimed they had evidence to prove her guilt, she said.

They forced her to make an agonizing choice — testify against the others and serve seven years in prison, or roll the dice at trial and face a possible life term.

Former Gage County Attorney Richard Smith prosecuted the case. Smith, who now works as a private attorney in Beatrice, said Thursday he did not want to jeopardize new legal proceedings by discussing the 1989 trial.

But he scoffed at Taylor’s claim authorities fed her details so she could help them get convictions.

“The plea agreement was that she had to testify truthfully,” Smith said.

Taylor has spent the past 18 years in prison after pleading guilty to second-degree murder, the result of a plea bargain that allowed her to avoid a much longer sentence. She has a year left before her mandatory release.

Some facts about the case are not in dispute, namely that Wilson was severely beaten, bound, raped and suffocated on Feb. 5 or 6, 1985. Despite an intense investigation after the murder, no arrests were made.

That changed in 1989 after an investigator obtained new information from a confidential informant, according to stories published that year in the Journal Star.

An investigator then interviewed Winslow, who was being held on an unrelated assault charge, and obtained more information.

Arrests followed. So did interrogations. And not long after, some of the defendants began cutting deals.

Of the six people arrested in the case, Winslow and White were the only two who didn’t testify for the prosecution.

White maintained his innocence, was convicted by a jury of first-degree murder and given a life sentence.

DNA testing wasn’t an option at the original trial. Investigators did find three fingerprints, but they didn’t match the suspects, the victim or her family.

On the other hand, they found blood with “great similarities” to one of the suspects, who apparently bled in the apartment after being unintentionally struck by White.

Winslow said he didn’t remember participating in the crime. But after seeing the result of White’s trial, Winslow pleaded no contest to aiding and abetting second-degree murder and was sentenced to 50 years in prison. He remains incarcerated today.

Following her arrest, Taylor said she endured long sessions of questioning by authorities. At a point she can’t remember, she requested an attorney and was assigned one by the court.

Investigators told Taylor they could prove she participated in the crime, she said. They told her they knew White and Winslow did the rape while she held the pillow that suffocated the victim.

“I knew I wasn’t guilty, but you get tired of being told things that after so long, you just started accepting it,” she said.

She said Smith, the county attorney, participated in the interrogations. He urged her to take the plea agreement, saying he would recommend a 15-year sentence. With good time, she could be free in seven years.

Her court-appointed lawyer said he thought he could win her acquittal, but he also advised that 15 years in prison for second-degree murder represented a good deal, Taylor said.

Finally, she agreed to the plea bargain after Smith offered it a fourth time, Taylor said.

“I was coerced,” she said. “I should have never went with what the investigators or the county attorney wanted said. I should have fought it. I hate the fact that I didn’t fight it.”

Still, she knows some people won’t believe her when she says she’s telling the truth now.

Burdette Searcey of Beatrice would likely fall into that category.

In 1989, when he was with the Gage County Sheriff’s Department, he revived the investigation into the Wilson murder.

Searcey declined to comment when told about Taylor recanting her testimony, except to say, “the evidence will prove out as it did before.”

Smith, the former county attorney, said he spoke to Taylor before she pleaded guilty, but only when her attorney also was in the room. He also opted not to debate the facts of the case with Taylor.

“I never tried cases in the press and I’m not going to start doing that now,” he said.

Attorneys for White and Winslow both interviewed Taylor as they worked to get court-ordered DNA testing for their clients. She told both lawyers she gave false trial testimony before the DNA tests proved the men were not the rapists, said Jerry Soucie, an attorney with the Nebraska Commission on Public Advocacy.

When asked to describe her testimony of 19 years ago, Taylor said she couldn’t remember details. Nor could she offer an alibi for her whereabouts on the night of Feb. 5, 1985.

At that time in her life, she spent her days drunk on Jack Daniel’s and nights high on cocaine, she said. She was a violent drunk, she admitted, getting into frequent bar fights. But she insisted she would have remembered if she participated in a murder.

She said she has quit drugs and alcohol and has obtained a GED and completed courses at Metropolitan Community College in Omaha, she said.

She attends church every Sunday, she said. She has developed a relationship with a daughter she lost because of her addictions.

She wants to help the men she lied about, she said. It’s not about reducing her sentence, since she’s almost completed it.

If anything, recanting her testimony puts her at risk of a perjury charge, although she doesn’t think that will happen.

She would like to clear her name, she said. She plans to take college courses at Bellevue University so she can work with troubled children.

She said she feels badly for the family of Helen Wilson if she’s robbing them of emotional closure. Yet she feels even worse that her testimony helped put White and Winslow in prison.

She hopes they win their freedom soon.

“I didn’t think it through” in 1989, she said. “I didn’t think what was going to happen to them and I really should not have been that cold-hearted.”

Reach Joe Duggan at 473-7239 or jduggan@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
CS wrote on August 8, 2008 6:57 am:
" Police are under no legal obligation to tell the truth during interrogation so why is this a surprise? Attorney Smith can bluster on all he wants about her possible future testimony and her past testimony, but ultimately it comes down to being 20 years later and someone messed up-everyone is pointing the finger at someone else. Murders don't happen in 'down-home' Beatrice so im sure the pressure was on to find someone, anyone, that would fit the bill. Contragulations, it only took 20 years to find out you might have been wrong. Is it any coincidence that the only ones serving any real time are the two that didn't take a plea deal? This isn't the first time in the US this has happened, to someone as young as a 16 year old kid, either. I hope she testifies. "

Hjalmer wrote on August 8, 2008 7:13 am:
" I guess whatever the truth is will eventually come out. Personally, I hope that these folks are innocent because of the lesson Nebraskans need to learn. The justice system is flawed and makes big mistakes OFTEN. Nebrskans have a knee jerk reaction to every accusation that if a person is accused, they must be guilty. There are good reasons that Constituional protections are in place to protect accused people. Right wingers seem to have a " lock them up and throw away the key" mentality that comes with stubborn denial that mistakes are often made and refusal to try to make things right when mistakes are found. The average Nebraskan refuses to accept the notion that police coerce confessions or that an innocent person could be made to confess to a crime they didn't commit. The truth is ANY person can be made to confess if pushed hard enough. Time to take the blinders off. "

whatever wrote on August 8, 2008 7:51 am:
" At this point who really knows the truth. But this who case illustrates the level of corruption in our legal process. The "hang'em high crowd" should take note that "justice" in this country isn't some uniform and fair system. It's based on political realities, connections and money. "

Liars Liars Liars wrote on August 8, 2008 8:06 am:
" You know wether they raped her or not, they did beat her to death so even if they get off for rape, they are still staying in jail where they belong. This woman doesnt have a shred of reliablity. Lots of awful things happen all over, so quit making fun of our town CS. The officers and attorneys did their job, now get over it. "

Big Chief wrote on August 8, 2008 8:21 am:
" The only thing worse than someone getting away with murder is convicting an innocent person of a crime.

Justice is not getting a conviction but convicting the guilty and freeing the innocent. "

Facts wrote on August 8, 2008 8:22 am:
" Let's skeep in mind that these men were still proven to be at the scene of the crime and murder. And they were convicted of Helen Wilson's murder, not her rape. Even if they did not commit the assault, they very well could still be guilty of smothering her to death. Hopefully, the facts will be revealed. But at this point, I am not convinced that any witnesses were coerced or any wrongdoing occurred on the side of authorities. "

Broken wrote on August 8, 2008 8:29 am:
" I agree, the system is broken. Police lie to elicit a confession, and prosecutors have to throw out evidence proving guilt when it is "improperly obtained". Good people go to prison, and criminals go free, every day.

Seems that in this age of technology it would not be unreasonable to film and digitaly retain every interview or interrogation that takes place at the police station. Cameras are dirt cheap, and tiny. Electronic media and data compression systems (like MP4) make video and audio files small. Data storage devices can hold huge ammounts of informaion in tiny packages.

Why not film every interview? Why not play the tape of every confession to the jury? Why? Because police dont want you to see how they do it. They dont want the jury to see them grill a 15 year old for 12 hours, over and over, with no food, no water, no breaks. They dont want you to see how they break people down to the point that they would say anything, believe anything, just to get out.

Police do a good job 99.9% of the time. It is that tiny last percent that ruins the lives of good people. It is easy to prevent, but I bet you it will never happen. "

Guilty wrote on August 8, 2008 8:34 am:
" Guilty, guilty, guilty. They are all guilty. She should of got life just for being there. I like how she says she can't remember anything because she was drunk on Jack and high on cocaine. She probably wouldn't even remember if she was there. If she hung out with those guys, she probably was there. And then she says she lied on the witness stand. She should get more years for that. Whether she was there or not, let them go to court again and let them have a trial. It will all come out right in the end, and probably the same result as last time. "

RR wrote on August 8, 2008 8:38 am:
" This woman was a hardened criminal before she was convicted of this crime, she's a year from release, and now you want to blindly accept this story as the truth? She wasn't the only one that testified against White and Winslow, they were all lying? Remember, a jury convicted White, and Winslow plead guilty. Criminals lie. She's not some saint now that she's served 18 years in prison. Try to keep in mind the victim's family when you say idiotic stuff like "I hope these folks are innocent." "

B native wrote on August 8, 2008 8:49 am:
" I was 15 and a sophmore at Beatrice High School when this murder took place. Her apartment was just a couple blocks from the school. You don't know what terror that put into everyone knowing a murderer was walking among you. If you are truly innocent, then no one can coerce a confession from you. You don't just make something up and confess to a crime. And why hasn't she appealed in the last 18 years. She's at the end of her sentence and she waits to tell the so called truth. I do believe that innocent people are sometimes wrongly convicted, but the majority are guilty. Stop blaming the court systems for bad people. How would you feel if Helen Wilson had been your Mother? "

Memory wrote on August 8, 2008 8:52 am:
" Isn't it interesting that the people who were convicted of this murder are now all saying 'I wasn't there'. It appears that after 20 years they all seem to think 'everyone' has forgotten the facts in this case and what happened. It appears that the 'guilty' are now jumping on the bandwagon that they weren't involved at all. Like most criminals they have convienantly lost thier memory. "

Beatrice Resident wrote on August 8, 2008 9:21 am:
" I do not care what they say. this article itself is enough for me to know they did it. She (they all were) drunk and high on drugs. They do not remember being there but have no ideas as to where they were. Hang it up, serve your sentence you are GUILTY. I am not a Smith fan and never have been, but this case was done correctly.

We have two other unsolved cases, one murder and on missing person. These cases will eventually be solved the same way. It just takes time for someone to talk and then the prosecution begins.

BTW the DNA may exclude them from the rape, but the murder is still there and they plead guilty-case closed. "

I care and so should You. wrote on August 8, 2008 9:28 am:
" The justice system is so broken. Cops and Attorneys care more about winning than they do about the truth, justice and protecting the innocent. It used to be important to be an honest person, especially if you were a cop or prosecutor. No one cares about these values or morals, and thats why criminals run free and innocent people's live's are ruined in prison. It's a shame, and a tragedy and I hope someone with the power to do it, will care enough to try to change it. WHERE HAVE ALL THE GOOD PEOPLE GONE? "

CS wrote on August 8, 2008 10:12 am:
" I'm from the area and im not making fun of anyone. If she recants, all those that copped a deal are already out, DNA doesn't place them at the scene (blood or semen), and everyone that copped a deal got out early and the two that didn't are serving all the time-you don't find that just a little bit suspect? People plead guilty all the time for things they don't do because they are lied to in questioning. Google for 5 minutes and you will find this to be true, yet many people are SO sure of their guilt. Were YOU there? "

Sarah wrote on August 8, 2008 10:41 am:
" So what was her actual sentence. The article indicates that she took a plea deal for 15 years, but also says that has been in prison for the past 18 years. Why the extra time and why wasn't she paroled earlier? Was she misbehaving in jail? "

Dagny wrote on August 8, 2008 11:03 am:
" Of course an admitted drug user would have a crystal clear recollection of all of her history. And surely the same drug user would never lie, right?

If she changes her testimony she should serve a longer sentence for knowingly sacrificing these two allegedly 'innocent men' to save her own backside. "

Truth wrote on August 8, 2008 11:09 am:
" She was probably so coked out of her head that night she has no idea what happened. Of course she kicked her drug habit, went back to school, and goes to chuch every Sunday. She is in jail, there isn't anything else to do. Dont give this person the lime light they are looking for, any testimony by her would probably be another lie anyway. How could the system work when the only witnesses are drug addicts and career criminals. I agree with the fact that the system is broken, but unless anyone has any ideas on how to fix it were just going in circles. "

BC wrote on August 8, 2008 12:59 pm:
" Shame on the legal system. Evidence is evidence, and it appears there was a mistake. I hope the people that were convicted are made equal and the people that prosecuted/judged them get there turn. Eventually everyone will meet their maker. "

Anya wrote on August 8, 2008 1:07 pm:
" Good ppl go to prison? Did I read that correctly? I worked in the prison system, and trust me, they are not full of good ppl. Sure, once in a while, you'll have innocent ppl go to jail or end up on Death Row. Does that mean we should let all the bad ppl go? Don't be ridiculous. Even if the Justice system were perfect, there would still be innocent ppl going to jail. Maybe we can have a Statistics professor figure out the odds for, oh, maybe 100 ppl. If you don't like our Justice system, move to Afghanistan or Iraq. "

Who lies wrote on August 8, 2008 2:39 pm:
" RR says unemotionally, "Criminals lie."

Well, so do the police.

And I've always been taught that two wrongs don't make a right. "

I care and You should too. wrote on August 8, 2008 4:12 pm:
" Anya, I don't think anyone said anything about letting them all go. And great thing abou THIS country is that you can work to change things you don't like about it. First you have to talk about it. SO If you don't like that, maybe you should go to Afganistan or Iraq, since that is your method of solving problems. And I worked in the corrections systems as well, there are plenty of good people there. Just because you make a mistake and pay for it, doesn't make you a bad person. Yes, there are bad people there to, where they belong. But would you feel the same way about our justice system if YOU were one of the many wrongly convicted people in prison for years? I doubt it. One innocent person is too many. All it take is for people to regard honesty and justice as more valuable than winning. And if the justice system was perfect, no innocent people would go to jail, that doesn't even make sense. "

Jane wrote on August 8, 2008 6:35 pm:
" BS. An innocent person wouldn't plead guilty to something that would get them 18 years in prison. On top of that,her sentence started in 1990. She should have been out a long time ago with "good behavior"....I don't feel sorry for her. She's obviously guilty. "

CS wrote on August 8, 2008 11:13 pm:
" Jane-not all states have 'good behavior' laws, and if someone was faced with 50-life and could plea out and get 18 you don't think a person would do that? People do all kinds of things that make sense at the time-don't presume to be an expert unless you have ever been put in that position. Just because YOU wouldn't doesn't mean everyone else has the means or the emotional strength to drag out a trial, especially when being told over and over that they have 'evidence'that is conclusive. "