NU reports more diverse faculty
By MELISSA LEE / Lincoln Journal Star
The University of Nebraska is making progress in increasing the racial and gender diversity of its faculty, according to a hiring report released Monday.
But one campus leader fears a proposed race- and gender-based affirmative action ban could foster a “chillier” recruiting environment as NU works to continue that progress.
Nearly one-quarter — 24.1 percent — of NU’s full-time, tenured or tenure-track faculty hires in the past year were racial minorities, the report says. That brings NU’s total percentage of minority faculty to 14.5 percent, below its peer average of 16.6 percent.
Female and minority faculty at NU
A report released Monday shows the faculty of the University of Nebraska is steadily growing more diverse. The Legislature had directed NU to reach its peer average in percentages of female and minority faculty by Friday, a goal NU just missed.
Women:
1997: 27.1 percent of NU’s full-time, tenured or tenure-track faculty were women
1999: 28.6 percent
2001: 30 percent
2003: 30.8 percent
2005: 32.5 percent
2007: 33.1 percent
Peer average: 31.9 percent
Minorities:
1997: 9 percent
1999: 10.1 percent
2001: 12.5 percent
2003: 12.9 percent
2005: 13.7 percent
2007: 14.5 percent
Peer average: 16.6 percent
Source: University of Nebraska
And 39.9 percent of hires were women, bringing NU’s percentage of female faculty to 33.1 percent. That’s above NU’s peer average of 31.9 percent.
The figures reflect a campuswide commitment to diversity, said Linda Pratt, NU’s executive vice president and provost.
“I attribute it to hard work,” Pratt said. “We advertise (open positions) more widely than ever before, and we track down possible leads on outstanding candidates and encourage them to apply. And that’s for all faculty.”
In 1997, the Legislature directed NU to develop a plan to reach its peer midpoint in percentages of women and minority faculty by 2005. When that goal was not met, lawmakers extended the deadline to Friday, understanding that NU has worked hard to boost diversity, Pratt said.
She didn’t know whether NU would face repercussions by the Legislature for still lagging behind its peers in its percentage of minority faculty.
Pratt said she’s largely uncertain how a proposed ban on some forms of affirmative action might affect faculty recruitment. The ban will be on the November ballot if backers collected enough valid petition signatures.
“I think (a ban) would definitely create a chillier environment in which to do it,” Pratt said, echoing other university leaders who have said an affirmative-action ban could send a message to out-of-staters Nebraska doesn’t care about diversity.
Diversity, Pratt said, is critical in an academic environment.
“Our students are going to be making their way in a very diverse global world,” she said. “Part of what we have to do is educate them about these different cultures, about how different groups of people can view the same thing and attach very different values to it.”
Doug Tietz, executive director of the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative, the group behind the affirmative-action ban, accused NU of employing “fear tactics.”
Universities in other states where similar bans have passed, such as the University of California, Los Angeles, haven’t suffered tarnished reputations, Tietz said.
“This fear tactic of our opposition is to be expected,” he said. “They say this every time. Yet some of the nation’s best universities continue to thrive in states where this has passed.”
NU must continue its push for diversity, Pratt said. Competition for all top faculty is tough, including for top women and minorities.
NU always hires the best candidates and has no quotas in place, but has worked to expand recruitment practices so hiring searches draw pools of diverse candidates from across the nation, Pratt said.
“We don’t hire anyone that we don’t think can meet the needs of the position that was described in our recruitment,” she said.
In fact, NU is competing for faculty not only with its peer institutions, but with more prestigious universities as well, she said.
“We lose some of the people we’d really love to hire, but we get a great many of the ones we’re most interested in,” she said. “That’s good news for the people of Nebraska. We’ve been hiring very, very well.”
Reach Melissa Lee at 473-2682 or mlee@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
well... wrote on August 4, 2008 6:34 pm:
mTm wrote on August 4, 2008 6:37 pm:
EthicalOne wrote on August 4, 2008 6:48 pm:
Simple Simon wrote on August 4, 2008 7:12 pm:
Shirelly wrote on August 4, 2008 7:18 pm:
the system is racist wrote on August 4, 2008 7:27 pm:
Big Deal wrote on August 4, 2008 7:38 pm:
m wrote on August 4, 2008 8:27 pm:
Smile wrote on August 4, 2008 9:07 pm:
Until people stop thinking that jobs that don't go to white males must have gone to someone less qualified, we will continue to have a problem in this country. "
Define Diverse wrote on August 4, 2008 9:17 pm:
Home Steader wrote on August 4, 2008 9:59 pm:
Scott wrote on August 4, 2008 10:28 pm:
What about wrote on August 4, 2008 11:14 pm:
eh...UNL student wrote on August 5, 2008 1:07 am:
Woman wrote on August 5, 2008 6:32 am:
to ethical one and system is racist wrote on August 5, 2008 7:40 am:
By the way, if someone who has the "power" to hire makes racist decisions, their "checks and balances" are called lawsuits. They happen, and they are meant to stop people in power from doing unethical things (like hiring someone based on race, gender, etc). "
Butch wrote on August 5, 2008 8:06 am:
the system is racist is ignorant wrote on August 5, 2008 3:06 pm:
Petitioner wrote on August 5, 2008 3:23 pm:
These statistics show we don't need racial and gender preferences to move towards equity; simply hiring the best person for the job will be sufficient, and does not carry the stigma that the person hired was chosen because of sex or race instead of merit.
One more reason to support the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative! "
Outside the Box wrote on August 5, 2008 4:00 pm:
Institutional reputation is one thing, being able to recruit qualified minorities to a state that is over 85% white is another. An affirmitve action ban wouldn't have as big of an impact in Los Angeles as it would in Lincoln because LA has a large, more diverse pool of candidates. Nice try. "