Letters, 7/23: LES hike is reasonable
If there were some way in good faith I could be a hero to my friends by opposing the Lincoln Electric System’s rate increase proposal, I’d grab it. But like the other LES board members, I look at the numbers from the Budget and Rates Committee — made up of two business owners and an accountant — and conclude the reasonable thing to do is to allow LES to collect enough revenue to pay its bills.
It’s good to keep perspective that LES rates are in the lowest 10 percent of comparable cities. Still, the 10.1 percent rate increase will be especially hard on customers with low incomes.
The minimum wage goes up this month to $6.55 an hour and to $7.25 in a year. If that’s not enough to pay for rising food and energy prices, then it should be increased. That’s the relevant policy tool, not obstruction of a needed rate increase.
LES’s exceptionally low rates have meant that we have been slow compared to New England and California, for example, to adopt measures that increase the efficiency of electricity use in our homes and businesses.
I was glad to see the mayor combined his revised budget for higher electrical costs with a directive to city department heads to adopt electricity-saving practices. With the city leading by example, that is the direction we need to go.
Marilyn McNabb, Lincoln
Eliminate travel altogether
The writer of the NASCAR letter (LJS, July 16) may be on to something.
Let’s do away with all events that require any travel. Sporting events, concerts, weddings, funerals, reunions, etc. Just think of the money we’d save. We could pay off the national debt and repay Social Security.
Who knows, OPEC might even pay us to drive.
Allan B. Hennecke, Lincoln
StarTran right thing to do
I would like to make a few comments about the budget impacts and StarTran. I have been an active rider for the last few years, not because of economics, but because it is the right thing to do.
The buses are traveling all across the community, making it convenient. It’s redundant to drive a car and create twice the pollution and incur the extra cost of $4 gas. This is effective transportation; I wish more people would realize this.
We have based our community around the car, from low density housing to free parking for shopping. The roads are subsidized. Our taxes pay for the initial costs of the new roads and their maintenance.
In the scientific telephone survey, 43 percent of respondents indicated that funding and services for effective transportation should be increased.
We seem to think that effective transportation is driving down the road unencumbered. We need to change our way of thinking at the problems we have before us.
Second point, let them be free. Let StarTran become a quasi-government body, like the Airport Authority or Natural Resources District. Lincoln is one of the few communities that the public transportation system is under the city government. Look at Omaha, with Metro Area Transit, or any other like-size community. Then this would not be a city problem.
As far as I can remember, StarTran has been the whipping boy for budget cuts. Lincoln is too big to let the public transportation system die of a thousand cuts.
Steve Duvall, Lincoln

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit


Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Maybe Star Tran could offer a free hour class on how to ride the bus and that would encourage ridership, too. There are many people who have moved to Lincoln that did not grow up riding a bus and may not know exactly what to do. "
mitchy_v wrote on July 23, 2008 8:02 am:
Middle of nowhere wrote on July 23, 2008 8:03 am:
C wrote on July 23, 2008 8:14 am:
peb wrote on July 23, 2008 8:39 am:
kmc wrote on July 23, 2008 8:40 am:
John q wrote on July 23, 2008 9:18 am:
To steve.... wrote on July 23, 2008 9:21 am:
Grundle wrote on July 23, 2008 9:29 am:
My question wrote on July 23, 2008 9:48 am:
Chris wrote on July 23, 2008 9:51 am:
RE Marilyn wrote on July 23, 2008 11:38 am:
Kim wrote on July 23, 2008 12:03 pm:
Josh wrote on July 23, 2008 12:14 pm:
Marilyn McNabb wrote on July 23, 2008 12:21 pm:
Marilyn McNabb wrote on July 23, 2008 12:26 pm:
Mike wrote on July 23, 2008 12:47 pm:
StarTran Yeah Right wrote on July 23, 2008 12:54 pm:
LES Resonable wrote on July 23, 2008 1:52 pm:
The Right Thing wrote on July 23, 2008 2:53 pm:
Let's assume that Mr.Duvall makes the states median wage of 18.00 per hour and it takes 3 hours per day to do the "right" thing..cost 18.00 x 3 cost 54.00 per day times 5 days of work equals 270.00 per week in lost producvtivity time plus assuming 1 bus ride each way per day the cost of the fare is 12.50 per week so it cost 282.50 to do the "right" thing....that a lot of 4.00 gas Mr.Duvall.
What I somewhat agree with is to privatise the bus business...not qusai-government but private.Then maybe they could map profitable routes that service needs instead of politician manfactured "wants" like the bogus Ride for 5 program. Pol's need unions contributions to run for and be re-elected to office not to memtion small vocal 43% intrest groups to stay and refund sloppy costly service.That Mr.Duvall is not the "right" thing! "
you dont get it wrote on July 23, 2008 3:01 pm:
busrider wrote on July 23, 2008 3:18 pm:
busrider wrote on July 23, 2008 3:21 pm:
Clueless wrote on July 23, 2008 4:05 pm:
me wrote on July 23, 2008 4:11 pm:
Yeah...Yeah.... wrote on July 23, 2008 4:14 pm:
Nina wrote on July 23, 2008 5:11 pm:
Randy wrote on July 23, 2008 9:58 pm:
Mark wrote on July 23, 2008 10:14 pm:
Anti-bigot wrote on July 23, 2008 10:54 pm:
RE Marilyn McNabb wrote on July 23, 2008 11:09 pm:
Steve replies wrote on July 24, 2008 7:34 am:
The Terrorists Won wrote on July 24, 2008 9:14 am:
The goals of the terrorists have been to 1. Strike fear and terror into the infidel Americans. What does our leader do but to initiate a "Terror Alert System" designed to do that very thing.
2. To cripple or bring down the American economy. Mr Bush's invasion of a sovereign country in the Middle East started the ball rolling there by setting up a chanin of events by obviously driving up the futures for the light sweet crude we all need. Mission accomplished. Let's hope we win the remaining battles with some real leadership. We don't need to keep over reacting and knee-jerking every response by jumping out of the fying pan and into the fire. It will be good to see some intelligence and common sense in the White House. "
dewboy wrote on July 24, 2008 9:56 am:
Re Re Marilyn wrote on July 24, 2008 1:57 pm:
Chris wrote on July 24, 2008 6:39 pm:
As far as buses go...I think the biggest thing stopping people from using the bus is the notion that it makes you a second class citizen. Often bus stops consist of a sign. If you are lucky, a sign and a bench. And if you are really, really lucky you may get a sign and a covered bench. If there is another option, a car, people take it. I would like to see Lincoln experiment with street cars and Transit Oriented Developments along the line. Street car lines are permanent, unlike bus lines which are moved at the whim of the political winds. Permanence of the lines encourages high density development and business to cater to commuters. Imagine waiting for your street car at a coffee shop instead of sitting on a curb under a sign! Now that is public transportation I would use. Given the low population density of Lincoln, sprawling suburbs, and increasing transportation/infrastructure costs, I'd say this is exactly what Lincoln needs! "
Marilyn McNabb wrote on July 24, 2008 8:53 pm:
john wrote on July 24, 2008 10:10 pm:
busrider wrote on August 1, 2008 2:07 pm:
South for instance, it is always on time though because usually only 1-2 people ride it at a time. If you have something to say, show up at the City Council Chambers on August 11th at two thirty and say what you think. "