Now
Mostly Cloudy
23°
High
25°
Low
11°

Obama: Iraq now needs a political solution

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DAVID ESPO / The Associated Press

Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 - 11:15:04 am CDT

AMMAN, Jordan — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Tuesday that security in Iraq has improved and that the United States urgently needs to turn its attention to Afghanistan.

“There is security progress, but now we need a political solution” in Iraq, Obama said in the first news conference of his highly publicized trip abroad. Afghanistan is now the “central front in the war against terrorism,” he added.

“The situation in Afghanistan is perilous and urgent,” he said. “We must act now to reverse a deteriorating situation.”

Story Photo
Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, D-Ill., listen Monday as Gen. David Petraeus reviews operations in Iraq. (AP)

He reiterated his goal of withdrawing combat troops from Iraq within 16 months of becoming president. But he said he would consult with military commanders to determine how many troops to keep in the country to protect diplomatic and humanitarian operations, to train Iraqis and to conduct counterterrorism operations against al-Qaida in Iraq.

“My goal is to no longer have U.S. troops engaged in combat operations in Iraq,” he said.

Obama and his two traveling Senate companions, Democrat Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Republican Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, all emphasized at the news conference the need to turn U.S. attention to Afghanistan and to help Pakistan confront a growing terrorist presence within its borders.

Obama acknowledged that the U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, does not want a timetable for withdrawal of U.S. combat forces.

“He wants to retain as much flexibility as possible,” Obama said. “What I emphasized to him was ... if I were in his shoes, I’d probably feel the same way. But my job as a candidate for president and a potential commander in chief extends beyond Iraq.” Obama said he also needs to take into account the security needs in Afghanistan, the views of the Iraqi government and the potential domestic uses for the money now being spent in Iraq.

Meantime in London on Tuesday, Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Britain will begin a major troop withdrawal from Iraq in early 2009, if security continues to improve and work to train local security forces is completed. Britain currently has around 4,100 troops in Iraq, based mainly on the outskirts of Basra.

Brown told lawmakes Britain will keep current numbers in place for several months, but Britain’s role in Iraq will change next year from combat and military training to boosting the economy of the oil-rich southern region.

Obama arrived in Jordan after a tour of war zones in Afghanistan and Iraq. He stepped off his military aircraft carrying body armor, orange earplugs sticking out of his ears.

His joint news conference with Reed and Hagel was at the Amman Citadel, an ancient hilltop ruin that bears evidence of settlements dating to 2000 B.C. The skyline of modern-day Amman, cement dwellings and the occasional mosque, formed a made-for-television backdrop.

Later, he was scheduled to have talks with Jordan’s King Abdullah.

Before he left Iraq, Obama traveled to a former hotbed of the Sunni insurgency for talks Tuesday with tribal leaders who joined the fight against al-Qaida in Iraq and now seek a deeper role in Iraq’s political future.

Obama met leaders of the so-called Awakening Council movement in Ramadi, one of the main cities of the western Anbar Province where al-Qaida once had the upper hand against embattled U.S. and Iraqi troops.

Tribal sheiks last year began an uprising against insurgents that is credited with uprooting extremist strongholds and helping bring violence around Iraq to its lowest levels in four years.

The meetings came near the end of Obama’s two-day stop in Iraq, where he held discussions with Iraqi leaders on possible troops withdrawal initiatives and was briefed by top U.S. military commanders.

Iraq was the third leg of a tour that’s included Kuwait and Afghanistan. From Jordan, his trip moves on to Israel and Europe.

He leaves Iraq with a possible political boost: Iraqi backing for his hope of withdraw U.S. combat troops by 2010.

Iraqi leaders on Monday stopped short of giving specific timetables or endorsing Obama’s proposal to withdraw combat troops within 16 months if he wins the presidency. But their comments fit roughly into Obama’s campaign pledge.

Obama’s Republican rival, Sen. John McCain, said Obama has been “completely wrong” to press for withdrawal timetables. “When you win wars, troops come home,” McCain said during a visit in Maine with former President George H.W. Bush.

The Iraqi government, however, appears increasingly confident to press for timeframes as violence drops and Iraqi security forces expand their roles alongside the 147,000 U.S. soldiers in the country.

“We are hoping that in 2010 that combat troops will withdraw from Iraq,” the government spokesman, Ali al-Dabbagh, said Monday after Obama met with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Obama released a statement late Monday noting that Iraqis want an “aspirational timeline, with a clear date,” for the departure of U.S. combat forces.

“They do not want an open-ended presence of U.S. combat forces. The prime minister said that now is an appropriate time to start to plan for the reorganization of our troops in Iraq — including their numbers and missions. He stated his hope that U.S. combat forces could be out of Iraq in 2010,” Obama said in a joint statement with Hagel and Reed.

The senators said that while there has been some “forward movement” on political progress, reconciliation and economic development, there has not been “nearly enough to bring lasting stability to Iraq.”

Associated Press Writer Brian Murphy contributed to this report from Iraq.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
its in the bag wrote on July 22, 2008 10:02 am:
" Seems to me that Obama had pretty much resolved all of our foreign policy issues. If he's able to handle domestic problems with the same ease, the Millenium could be at hand! "

Mark wrote on July 22, 2008 10:25 am:
" Hey Barak, it's nice to see you’re stating what has been reported many times now, and what other politicians have been saying for quite some time. Why did it take you this long to come to that conclusion? And you want to be President? I’m sure glad we have the great Obama here now to tell us what most of us have already knew. You’re a little late to the party Sen. Obama on this one. Where would we be without him?...lol "

Twhite wrote on July 22, 2008 11:37 am:
" This is very important for our foreign policy and our country. What we have is bipartisan efforts to solve problems with out creating some sort of slanted ideological solution. We need more of this, and I think that if Obama is elected you will see him continue to reach out to Republicans to solve problems in a pragmatic and straight forward way. "

Zoomie wrote on July 22, 2008 11:44 am:
" Lets see...Tribal groups turned on insurgents last year, and are credited with bringing down violence in Iraq. This is good, but it happened before there even was a surge and had nothing to do with the surge. Next, purpose of the surge was to achieve political accomplishments in Iraq. There have been very few, hence the surge is still not a real success (if the purpose of a surge were to win a war, but you only win a battle, then the surge failed to do its job, didn't it?). Next, Obama is standing by his 16 month withdrawal plan, and the Iraqis have endorsed it (and John McCain, back before he started flip-flopping like a dying fish, said on numerous occasions when and if the Iraqis wanted us out, it was time to go). Next, Obama has said for almost a year Iraq pulled troops we needed out of Afghanistan, and we need at least 2 additional brigades in Afghanistan to put down the resurgent Taliban/al-Quada. Until two weeks ago, John McSame mocked the idea, saying it was unnecessary. But two weeks ago he suddenly decided we really needed THREE additional brigades in Afghanistan and he'll send them there when he's President (he fails to say where he'll get them from, since he won't reduce forced in Iraq and we don't have additional deployable brigades without a reduction in Iraq)...So it seems to me, Obama has been consistent, mostly right, and has McSame rushing to copy his positions these days. No wonder the McSame team are so steamed about Obama's foreign travel! Its making their guy look like what he is: pandering, old, out-of-touch! "

mike wrote on July 22, 2008 11:56 am:
" Holy cow...B.O. is basically riding the coat tails of the administrations policies...and getting credit for it!
B.O. was against the surge, and now that its been successful, he rides in on a white horse and saves the day -- in the media's viewpoint.
What a horrible, horrible, horrible job the press has done. The media bias is sickening! "

Zoomie wrote on July 23, 2008 11:57 am:
" I didn't know Bush and McCain were in favor of a 16 month withdrawal plan? When did they announce that? If Obama is following their lead, it had to be at least a year ago, since Obama has been saying this for a year. Care to point out when it happened? Same thing on the additional brigades in Afghanistan, which Obama has also been saying for a year. Last I checked, until 2 weeks ago, McCain was opposed to more troops in Afghanistan! And in case you missed it, much of the gains in Iraq came BEFORE the surge (though for some reason the press are trying -- again -- to ignore McCain's false claim that the Sunni Awakening was a result of the surge, even though the Awakening started almost a year before the surge...you did catch that McSame told CBS on Monday that it was surge, then Awakening, which is totally and provably untrue, so CBS just cut that part of the interview out, didn't you?)... "