Now
Mostly Cloudy
23°
High
25°
Low
11°

Is media playing fair in campaign coverage?

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By DAVID BAUDER / The Associated Press

Monday, Jul 21, 2008 - 12:02:55 am CDT

NEW YORK — Television news’ royalty will fly in to meet Barack Obama during this week’s overseas trip: CBS chief anchor Katie Couric in Jordan on Tuesday, ABC’s Charles Gibson in Israel on Wednesday and NBC’s Brian Williams in Germany on Thursday.

The anchor blessing defines the trip as a Major Event and — much like a “Saturday Night Live” skit in February that depicted a press corps fawning over Obama — raises anew the issue of fairness in campaign coverage.

The news media have devoted significantly more attention to the Democrat since Hillary Rodham Clinton suspended her campaign and left a two-person contest for the presidency between Obama and Republican John McCain, according to research conducted by the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

Story Photo
This July 16, 2008 file photo shows Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., as he speaks at a roundtable discussion on nuclear non-proliferation held at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. Television news' royalty will fly in to meet Obama during this week's overseas trip: CBS chief anchor Katie Couric in Jordan on Tuesday, ABC's Charles Gibson in Israel on Wednesday and NBC's Brian Williams in Germany on Thursday. (AP)

News executives say there are reasons for the disparity, such as the continuing story about whether Clinton’s and Obama’s supporters can reconcile. They even partly blame McCain. By criticizing Obama for a lack of foreign policy experience, McCain raised the stakes for Obama’s trip, “especially if he winds up going into two war zones,” said Paul Friedman, senior vice president of CBS News.

Obama has traveled to Afghanistan and is expected to go to Iraq. He is also scheduled to visit Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and England. Network anchors stayed home during McCain’s recent foreign excursions.

“The question really needs to be posed: Is this type of coverage fair?” said Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va. “This is nothing but a political stunt.”

Talk show host Rush Limbaugh said none of this should be a surprise.

“My prediction is that the coverage of Obama on this trip will be oriented toward countering the notion he has no idea what he is talking about on foreign policy and defense issues and instead will prop him up as a qualified statesman,” Limbaugh told The Associated Press. “McCain, on the other hand, is a known quantity on these issues and his position does not excite nor fit the mainstream media’s narrative on Iraq and Afghanistan, so they simply ignore it and him.”

Along with newsworthiness, the question of fairness was discussed within ABC News before it was agreed Gibson would travel, said Jon Banner, executive producer of “World News.” Also, if one network anchor decides to hit the road for a big event, chances are the others will follow.

“We have already been in discussions with the McCain campaign to try to afford them the same or a similar opportunity,” Banner said. “We have gone to great lengths to be fair and provide equal time to both campaigns.”

Shortly after Obama clinched the Democratic nomination, Gibson flew to Miami for a McCain interview, he said.

For each of the weeks between June 9 and July 13, Obama had a much more significant media presence. The Project for Excellence in Journalism evaluates more than 300 political stories each week in newspapers, magazines and television to measure whether each candidate is talked about in more than 25 percent of the stories.

Every week, Obama played an important role in more than two-thirds of the stories. For July 7-13, for example, Obama was a significant presence in 77 percent of the stories, while McCain was in 48 percent, the PEJ said.

Sure, there are some weeks Obama’s going to make more news, said Tom Rosenstiel, the project’s director.

But every week?

“No matter how understandable it is given the newness of the candidate and the historical nature of Obama’s candidacy, in the end it’s probably not fair to McCain,” he said.

The Democrat has proven an attractive commodity; TV debates involving Democrats this campaign consistently drew more viewers than the Republicans. A Time magazine cover with Obama in 2006 was the second-best-selling of the year, and a Men’s Vogue cover outsold every issue but the debut, according to circulation figures reported by Portfolio.com. Newsweek has done six covers with Obama over the past year, two with McCain. A Rolling Stone cover with Obama stopped just short of adding a halo.

If the attention gap continues, the campaign will essentially become a referendum on Obama, Rosenstiel said. While that may serve McCain’s purpose — it beats a referendum on President Bush — it could leave the nation electing a president while the media are paying attention to someone else. Past press infatuations, like Howard Dean in 2004 and McCain in 2000, didn’t turn into long-term affairs.

TV executives noted that Obama has courted attention, particularly for the overseas trip, more so than McCain. There’s some danger involved, too. One Obama gaffe while overseas, or the appearance that he’s not ready for an international spotlight, and the media’s elite will be there to judge him, said Bob Zelnick, Boston University journalism professor.

Friedman cautioned against reading too much into things like PEJ’s coverage index, noting that it’s a long campaign. Yet it’s an open question about whether Obama is simply a more interesting candidate at this point, partly because McCain has been on the scene longer.

While fairness is the goal, “what are we supposed to do, go gin up some story about McCain to get some rough equality of airtime?” he said. “I don’t think so.”

NBC News President Steve Capus said he finds it funny this is an issue, considering how much people have accused the press corps — and still do — of being too cozy with McCain. The Arizona senator had been a frequent guest of “Meet the Press.”

“We’re just trying to do our jobs,” Capus said. “There’s no question that there’s great news value in Sen. Obama’s trip overseas. That’s why we are doing this.”


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Video Games > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
FairPlay wrote on July 21, 2008 6:28 am:
" If one looks for robust and fair coverage it can be found. However the Bush-Cheney Spin and Propaganda team is often a force that inhibits the Truth from coming to light. For example,
"Who wants to exit in a quicker way has a better assessment of the situation in Iraq."
1. Maliki's top political adviser, Sadiq al-Rikabi, declined to comment on the remarks, but spoke in general about the Iraqi position on Sunday. Part of that position, he said, comes from domestic political pressure to withdraw
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/07/21/america/21obama.php "

Jocko wrote on July 21, 2008 7:20 am:
" Should we expect Rush Limbaugh to say anyhting else? He is the biggest cheerleader for the GOP; any attention Obama gets takes the spotlight away from McCain and the Republican Party. Obama's trip is newsworthy---fairness is irrelevant.
"Qualified statesman?" McCain, along with all but 7 of the GOP members of Congress, voted for the Iraq War Resolution in 2002 and the grocery list of lies and half truths it contained.
The media, of which Limbaugh is a member, rarely "plays fair." "

Media bias wrote on July 21, 2008 8:31 am:
" Really? Biased for a liberal Democrat? Seriously? No way. How can that be? Huh. "

Eric wrote on July 21, 2008 9:20 am:
" Hmmm... the nation's first viable non-white candidate vs. an old white guy? Hard to imagine why one would be a bigger story than the other. "

JR wrote on July 21, 2008 9:35 am:
" So let me get this straight. First, ol Rush and his cronies tell us they want the "Main Stream Media", (which by the way is anyone who does not push the conservative agenda) needs to look deeper into Obama and spend more time showing the American people who he is. Now, when the press is covering him, they complain about it being unfair. Ya can't have it both ways, boys. Actually, this morning with Obama out of the country, the Today Show had McCain on live, as they often do, for a lengthy amount of time. He had his moment in the spotlight, and he did not do real well. He avoided questions by giving canned answers that really weren't answers, and tried to talk over the interviewer when she asked tough questions. I think McCain is a good man and is definitely a step up from the present holder of the office, but he did not do his campaign well in this interview. But, I am sure Rush will say it is just more MSM bias. "

Fair And Balanced wrote on July 21, 2008 11:26 am:
" This article fails to point out that the survey over amounts of coverage may be skewed. A lot of news coverage has covered Obama's campaign's gaffes or controversies while McCain arguably hasn't faced nearly as much critical coverage as Obama. "

The Larger Issue wrote on July 21, 2008 7:08 pm:
" ...is the concern that Obama may establish instant credibility in Iraq and Afghanistan before he's elected president and the media is there to show the world. "

Neo wrote on July 22, 2008 7:20 am:
" Of course there is bias. As 60 minutes proved, if they can't support the desired story line with facts they will make them up.

Any story can be reported in a manner that supports one side or another. As the majority of "main stream" reporters are registered democrats it only seems natural that the coverage is bent that direction. I'm not sure whether or not the majority of the lean is done on purpose (obviously some is as cited above) or just human nature to report in the direction the reporter personally feels. "