Mayor: Proposed 10.1 percent LES rate hike is step in right direction
By ALGIS J. LAUKAITIS / Lincoln Journal Star
Lincoln Mayor Chris Beutler says a 10.1 percent rate hike proposed by the Lincoln Electric System Administrative Board is a step in the right direction.
“I’m glad that the board is being sensitive to public opinion and trying to hold the rates down,” Beutler said.
The mayor said he and his staff will examine the board’s rationale for the proposed rate hike and make constructive suggestions.
Related Link(s):
On Friday, the LES board unanimously proposed a 10.1 percent systemwide rate increase to deal with a projected $9.3 million shortfall by year’s end. As part of the rate package, the board also wants to reduce the utility’s operational costs by $1.1 million and use $1.5 million from its Rate Stabilization Fund.
A week ago, Beutler and LES Administrator and CEO Terry Bundy squared off publicly over news the utility would seek a rate increase, perhaps as high as 12 percent. The mayor said such a jump was unacceptable in such a difficult economy; he threatened a veto and withdrew his proposed 1 cent increase in the city property tax rate. Bundy accused Beutler of using the rate hike as a scapegoat for city budget issues.
The Lincoln Employers Coalition, a rate watchdog group made up of the city’s 25 largest employers, also blasted the earlier proposal, saying that when combined with a 5 percent increase this spring, it would amount to a 17 percent rate hike in one year.
“We appreciate anything the board can do to lessen the impact on the employers and citizens of Lincoln,” coalition spokesman Bob Caldwell said Friday.
“Our concern and disappointment is that in less than a 12-month period, we will have over a 15 percent increase in electric rates,” added Caldwell, president and CEO of Hampton Enterprises.
LES management plans an Aug. 5 public hearing on the proposed 10.1 percent rate hike. Afterward, the board will vote to forward a rate increase to the City Council.
If the 10.1 percent hike is approved by the council, a typical residential customer would see an $8.50 increase in his or her monthly electric bill beginning Sept.1. The annual increase would be $102.
According to LES, higher wholesale energy and power generation costs, especially skyrocketing natural gas prices, caused the utility to seek a rate hike for the second time this year. A 5 percent rate hike took effect March 1.
“Just as the increases in fuel costs have been difficult for LES, we understand they will also be difficult for our customers,” Bundy said. “As we have in the past, we will work with our customers through this time of rising costs.”
Last year, about 17 percent of LES’s energy was generated by natural gas, compared with the national average of 22 percent for utilities. This year, LES said, about 10 percent will be generated by natural gas, because of the utility’s partnership in the Walter Scott coal plant south of Council Bluffs, Iowa.
LES plans to reduce its operational costs this year by cutting travel and training expenses, eliminating customer surveys by consultants, leaving some jobs vacant and deferring maintenance on generating equipment until next year, Bundy said in an interview. There will be no layoffs, he said.
“I expect the Employers Coalition to have concerns and to want to know the details about the numbers and we are certainly willing to provide those,” he said. “I think there will be a lot of (coalition) members ... that will recognize what is happening to fuel prices. They use natural gas like we do.”
Before the vote, Kathy Campbell, chairwoman of the LES budget and rates committee, warned that there may be more rate increases as the utility grapples with escalating energy costs.
“It’s extremely important to remember that this is not a one-time event,” Campbell said.
Bundy said LES might need a 1 percent to 4 percent increase in 2009, depending on year-end adjustments from its partner power plants, like Laramie River Station in Wyoming, and what happens to natural gas costs.
Campbell said the budget and rates committee focused much of its time on the utility’s Rate and Stabilization Fund. LES has used the fund to keep a lid on rates in the past. But over the years, the fund has been depleted, from $12 million to about $2.4 million.
“If we had a lot of money in the Rate Stabilization Fund it would make our decisions today a lot easier, but we don’t,” she said.
Omaha Public Power District, for example, has $32 million in its fund, Campbell said, which allows it more flexibility and helps the utility cover rising energy costs.
Board member Dawn Rockey said she didn’t like to see LES’s Rate Stabilization Fund depleted, but added: “I think using the $1.5 million is doable.”
Rockey said she is frustrated because LES officials went to the Lincoln City Council a couple of years ago to ask for the authority to use a “power cost adjustment” tool to deal with escalating energy costs. Similar to a surcharge, the adjustment would allow LES to adjust its rates automatically to reflect market conditions.
“We were blown out of the water,” Rockey said. “Now, maybe members of the council and the Lincoln Employers Group will understand how a PCA would be used in this situation.”
Bundy told the board LES doesn’t have the tools it needs to deal with escalating energy prices and the financial shortfall. They include: a higher level of debt coverage, more money in its Rate Stabilization Fund and the Power Cost Adjustment.
Caldwell said the coalition has generally supported having a reasonable amount of money in the Rate Stabilization Fund to cover swings in power costs, but is “absolutely” opposed to a power cost adjustment.
“We believe that is not the answer. All a PCA does is allow LES to raise rates whenever they want to without asking for a vote,” Caldwell said. “If we had a PCA today there would be none of these hearings and they would have raised rates by 10 percent.”
Bundy said a power cost adjustment would be a good tool for LES, but it does not have plans to implement that right now. He said the utility may consider a PCA if customers become more comfortable with it. In the past, they have reacted adversely to such a proposal.
“We will find a way to pay the bills,” said Bundy, noting that he is more concerned about the utility’s financial ratings with bond agencies. Those ratings allow LES to borrow money for capital improvements.
“What we are seeing here is not that unusual,” Bundy said. “These rate increases are happening across the country. Our timing is earlier because we don’t have the tools to deal with it on a short-term basis.”
Reach Algis J. Laukaitis at 473-7243 or alaukaitis@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
mik wrote on July 18, 2008 11:15 am:
come on... wrote on July 18, 2008 11:16 am:
rate payers have to say. Period. City Council was right on the money on that one. "
TG wrote on July 18, 2008 11:18 am:
Reality wrote on July 18, 2008 11:20 am:
Mike wrote on July 18, 2008 11:25 am:
Vote no wrote on July 18, 2008 11:26 am:
Alan wrote on July 18, 2008 11:30 am:
SB wrote on July 18, 2008 11:30 am:
mitchy_v wrote on July 18, 2008 11:31 am:
Outside the Box wrote on July 18, 2008 11:35 am:
Up Up Up wrote on July 18, 2008 11:35 am:
WHY NOT wrote on July 18, 2008 11:36 am:
Hey mik wrote on July 18, 2008 11:41 am:
Max A. wrote on July 18, 2008 11:42 am:
Please be quiet whiners... wrote on July 18, 2008 11:50 am:
DEAR LES wrote on July 18, 2008 11:54 am:
Best of luck on maintaining your bloated management salaries and continuing your price hikes!
The Other JR "
hondadog wrote on July 18, 2008 11:54 am:
Comm UnSense wrote on July 18, 2008 11:55 am:
net metering wrote on July 18, 2008 11:56 am:
Well wrote on July 18, 2008 12:04 pm:
People struggle with these utility bills everywhere but a good many are
not struggling with the high property taxes Nebraska & Lincoln are. LPS
has plainly raped the citizens of Lincoln and spent like drunken' sailors! They have used the public as a laughing stock and know they can
get every dollar they want for anything they want! Isn't that a wonderful
way to teach children?? The cost of housing for years has been way out
of reach compared to the cities I've lived in. Neighbors who moved from
out of state were sick at the last assessment to find they had paid an
astronomical price for their home, they would like to sell and move out
of this state, but even now with the downturn they can't because they
would loose more than an bundle!! Its not only their house but many many
and now tack on the huge utilities, means theres really no end in sight,
its just exsist!! I as a good many especially in these small towns have
only known the word exsist, and barely. Lincoln & Nebraska have not
progressed and this is the price we're paying. We the "few" are going to
pay a hefty price to survive with the progressive ones in this country.
And you can't keep comparing Lincoln with growing Omaha and other big
cities, thats like comparing apples to oranges, yet this town loves to
snow its citizens time after time!!! "
me wrote on July 18, 2008 12:05 pm:
Time for Wind power wrote on July 18, 2008 12:10 pm:
Alt wrote on July 18, 2008 12:13 pm:
Static Boy wrote on July 18, 2008 12:16 pm:
Mike wrote on July 18, 2008 12:29 pm:
Giving back wrote on July 18, 2008 12:31 pm:
Chris wrote on July 18, 2008 12:31 pm:
you all have no clue wrote on July 18, 2008 12:31 pm:
Thats the problem wrote on July 18, 2008 12:32 pm:
Dano wrote on July 18, 2008 12:32 pm:
todays economy wrote on July 18, 2008 12:38 pm:
Chris wrote on July 18, 2008 12:39 pm:
Tired wrote on July 18, 2008 12:45 pm:
Star wrote on July 18, 2008 12:50 pm:
Brian in Lincoln wrote on July 18, 2008 1:05 pm:
Mrs. Campbell wrote on July 18, 2008 1:05 pm:
CS wrote on July 18, 2008 1:05 pm:
Mike wrote on July 18, 2008 1:06 pm:
The free ride of cheap energy is over, All republicans must thank Ronald Reagan for ripping Jimmy Carter's solar panels off the white house.
http://www.neo.ne.gov/statshtml/115.htm "
Yup wrote on July 18, 2008 1:10 pm:
Compare before complaining wrote on July 18, 2008 1:16 pm:
Hey Tired wrote on July 18, 2008 1:16 pm:
... wrote on July 18, 2008 1:20 pm:
REALLY wrote on July 18, 2008 1:43 pm:
Scott wrote on July 18, 2008 1:43 pm:
Trip wrote on July 18, 2008 1:47 pm:
paying the bill wrote on July 18, 2008 1:56 pm:
A 10.1% increase will only increase my monthly home bill by $5.25, or $63 for the year. I think I can handle that. I do feel for those who are truly poor and may have to choose between electricity and food.
Hopefully it will force big companies/department stores, etc. to rethink how they use electricity. For example, when it's 90 plus degrees outside, do you really need the air set at 70? Most stores are freezing inside and could save money by simply turning up the thermostat.
If a 10% hike will make us better stewarts of energy, and make us look to wind and solar as an alternative, then I'm all for an increase. That's what this country needs to do anyway. Now that it's hitting the pocket book,maybe some energy changes will finally come. "
Poor Mom wrote on July 18, 2008 2:14 pm:
Donna wrote on July 18, 2008 2:17 pm:
Saving wrote on July 18, 2008 2:17 pm:
To you all have no clue... wrote on July 18, 2008 2:26 pm:
Im confused. wrote on July 18, 2008 2:46 pm:
homes are not big consumers wrote on July 18, 2008 3:32 pm:
Time for renewables wrote on July 18, 2008 3:33 pm:
to Im confused wrote on July 18, 2008 3:45 pm:
Time for renewables wrote on July 18, 2008 3:46 pm:
I don't know why Lincoln can't do the same? There is more potential in North Lincoln (By unuseable land around the dump!)for 2.5-3 megawatt windmills (much larger than the current .5 megawatt ones that are there). Plus, the new KANTANA windmill plant in Columbus will be able to build these windmills. Thus, increasing jobs/manufacturing in NE that produces renewable energy for nebraskans. A POSITIVE DOUBLE EDGED SWORD!!! Is it that difficult?!?! Get on in LES!!! "
JRP wrote on July 18, 2008 4:22 pm:
frivelous wrote on July 18, 2008 4:34 pm:
I wrote on July 18, 2008 4:54 pm:
I agree with the advertising. Why? For What? To who are you hoping to persuade to use your service? Why the inserts? Who actually reads them?Why don't you use the same type envelope to mail your bills as Lincoln Water System. They've had the right idea for years. More business should follow suit. "
DH wrote on July 18, 2008 6:20 pm:
JoBeth wrote on July 18, 2008 6:33 pm:
Democrat wrote on July 18, 2008 6:44 pm:
Now lets look at North Lincoln. I would suggest that Salt Creek be dammed up and used for a hydro electric power source. Everyone in Lincoln knows that Lincoln is full of stuff to power this project. "
whatever wrote on July 18, 2008 6:47 pm:
Douglas wrote on July 18, 2008 6:59 pm:
I would like to know how much they spent on the windmills, and furthermore, how much energy they contribute...other than lighting up the red light on top of the windmills. "
Stop Complaining... wrote on July 18, 2008 7:33 pm:
Hey JRP wrote on July 18, 2008 8:46 pm:
were fortunate for what we have wrote on July 18, 2008 9:58 pm:
http://journalstar.com/articles/2008/07/18/opinion/editorial/doc487e6ab063733818569798.txt "
kevin wrote on July 18, 2008 10:17 pm:
Mervin wrote on July 18, 2008 10:37 pm:
Neil wrote on July 18, 2008 11:20 pm:
nuts wrote on July 18, 2008 11:42 pm:
wat wrote on July 18, 2008 11:49 pm:
Henry wrote on July 19, 2008 8:01 am:
Omahan wrote on July 19, 2008 8:57 am:
Don't let the LES spin doctors roll over you with a smile on your face. "
Amazed wrote on July 19, 2008 9:11 am:
WELL wrote on July 19, 2008 10:23 am:
JRP wrote on July 19, 2008 4:31 pm:
Let's see that puts us at $15 + $15 + $2 for $32/month minimum increase for an extra $384 per year in living costs. Should we add any increases from the added gas tax that just went in, the added charges for garbage collection and most likely an increase in water and sewage rates?
I think "hey" missed the point. These entities work for us. If we, the citizens are having hard times and have to sacrifice extras (and some are sacrificing necessities), then these entities need to as well. "
To frivelous wrote on July 19, 2008 5:22 pm:
Did You know wrote on July 19, 2008 5:46 pm:
wow... wrote on July 19, 2008 6:40 pm:
hd wrote on July 19, 2008 7:50 pm:
sigh wrote on July 20, 2008 12:23 am:
re renewables wrote on July 20, 2008 10:31 am:
Get a grip people, energy costs are rising all over the country not just here. We have low rates compared to most of the country. "
reality check wrote on July 20, 2008 1:28 pm:
joe wrote on July 20, 2008 8:12 pm:
JRP wrote on July 23, 2008 5:19 pm: