Now
Fair
79°
High
81°
Low
63°

For first time, Bush agrees to 'time horizon' for Iraq pullout

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY WARREN P. STROBEL / McClatchy Newspapers

Friday, Jul 18, 2008 - 04:29:29 pm CDT

WASHINGTON — The United States and Iraq have agreed to a “general time horizon” for further reductions of U.S. combat troops in Iraq, the White House said Friday, the first time the Bush administration has agreed to set any kind of timeline for U.S. troop withdrawals.

President Bush has bitterly opposed any timetable for troop withdrawals from Iraq in the past, vetoing bills favored by Democrats in Congress that included such measures.

The new agreement was announced after talks this week between Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Story Photo
President Bush

U.S. officials said the language was a concession to Maliki, whose increasingly confident government has been demanding commitments on troop withdrawals in ongoing negotiations over a permanent U.S.-Iraq security agreement.

The statement did not contain any specifics on the date or size of any further troop reductions, and it is not clear whether the final agreement will do so.

White House officials insisted that the language on troop reductions was different from proposals made by congressional Democrats and their allies.

“There’s a substantial difference between what they proposed months ago about arbitrary withdrawal dates ... versus setting aspirational goals that are still based on conditions on the ground,” said White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe. “There’s a right way and a wrong way to withdraw troops from Iraq.”

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, in a speech earlier this week, reaffirmed his pledge to remove U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months of taking office.

Obama foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes said the White House announcement “is another indication that the administration is moving toward Senator Obama’s position on negotiating the removal of our forces as a part of our ongoing discussions with the Iraq government.”

“We continue to believe, though, that a timetable will press the Iraqis to step up to their responsibilities,” Rhodes said.

McClatchy Newspapers correspondent Margaret Talev in Washington contributed to this report.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
ta wrote on July 18, 2008 4:40 pm:
" after he ruined the world. "

Bushs Spin Machine wrote on July 18, 2008 4:49 pm:
" Bush must be realizing the pressure Obama is creating as McCain falters in his campaign. The substance of this agreement lacks specifics, lacks a strong message to Maliki and only serves to fill space in the media. Our troops remain at unnecessary risk. And there is still not a solid plan to win against the Taliban in Afghanistan. Nothing has changed, the press release was designed as a gimmick to attempt to convince voters policy has changed. "

Chris wrote on July 18, 2008 5:32 pm:
" If only we could've read the headline 6 years ago, "Bush agrees to delay invasion until evidence of ANYTHING is found." We wouldn't have thousands of dead servicemen, thousands of families destroyed, untold casualities to Iraqis, and maybe we'd have a shred of crediblity in the eyes of our peer nations. If only.....

worst president ever. "

JT wrote on July 18, 2008 5:58 pm:
" Wait, I thought timelines gave the enemy all kinds of advantages? This couldn't be a flip flop could it? Pretty funny how McCain and Bush are both moving toward positions that Obama has held for years. "

jogale wrote on July 18, 2008 6:05 pm:
" bush is the beginning of the end of this country as we know it "

Zoomie wrote on July 18, 2008 8:53 pm:
" So is this another Rovian tactic? Pretend to set a "time horizon" for withdrawal, and try to remove the war as an issue that McSame can be attacked on? Or is Bush actually turning into a "surrender monkey"?
Funny though, how both Bush and McSame have flip-flopped to Obama's long held positions (McSame on more troops in Afghanistan, Bush on a withdrawal timeline), yet the press have actually written this up in major papers as Obama "moving to the center"! "

does wrote on July 18, 2008 9:35 pm:
" anyone else recognize this for what it is? Mc Cain has a very good chance of defeat unless bushie starts going along with what the citizens want. I'll bet oil goes down, iran and the u.s. talk, the troops start coming home, and the housing fiasco starts to straighten out before november. Someone in the party told bush that it has to start now because the fair haired candidate is in trouble. This is dated 7-18 and I plan on saving it till november to see what happens. The whole political game is a scam and the citizens just seem not to care about watching these shisters. I can hear the bush and cheney lovers now , saying see he does care. I care more about the 4000+ kids dead. "

Ricky wrote on July 18, 2008 10:32 pm:
" Could it be that Bush is mellowing 150 days from the end of his term?
America now might talk to Iran also.
These events would seem to boost Obamas position.
Taking away the only advantage McCain has over Barack; a hard line on Iraq that appeals to the Rep. base.

ricky from omaha "

Mindless Robot wrote on July 18, 2008 10:38 pm:
" The Horizon is a place you never reach. "