Now
Fair
13°
High
27°
Low
10°

Possible LES rate hike a 'tough pill to swallow'

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY ALGIS J. LAUKAITIS / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Jul 17, 2008 - 05:26:56 pm CDT

Lincoln Electric System customers will have to dig deeper into their wallets and purses later this year — but just how deep won’t be known until after the utility’s administrative board meets Friday to make a recommendation to the City Council.

A rate hike of up to 12 percent, which would amount to about $108 a year for the average homeowner, was tossed out last week and then shot down like a clay pigeon by Mayor Chris Beutler, who threatened a veto.

“I simply cannot in good conscience quietly accept an increase of that magnitude in light of today’s economy,” Beutler said.

Story Photo
(LJS)
LES board meets Friday; budget hearing Aug. 5

* The LES Administrative Board will discuss its $9.3 million shortfall and its proposed rate hike, up to 12 percent, Friday, beginning at 9:30 a.m. at its main building, 1040 O St.

* LES also will hold a public hearing Aug. 5 at 7 p.m. at the Walter A. Canney Service Center, 2620 Fairfield St., to listen and respond to customers’ comments.

* Proposed rate schedules will be available beginning July 25 at the LES Building, 1040 O St.

* Once the LES board approves a rate hike, it must go before the City Council for a final OK.

LES: 6th lowest rate

Lincoln Electric System says its annual survey of 106 cities in January showed Lincoln had the sixth-lowest rates among cities surveyed. The lowest rates were in Boise, Idaho, followed by: St. Louis; Seattle; Tacoma, Wash.; Wheeling, W. Va.; Lincoln; Wichita, Kan.; Omaha; Springfield, Mo.; and Shreveport, La.

An updated survey in March showed LES rates were 10th lowest.

The mayor then blamed LES officials for delivering a “broadside” and said he would withdraw his proposed 1-cent city property tax rate increase.

LES Administrator and CEO Terry Bundy quickly accused Beutler of using the increase as a “scapegoat for city budget issues.”

But the mayor isn’t alone in his opposition. Some of the city’s largest businesses are in his corner, too.

“It’s a very tough pill to swallow for the employers of Lincoln, in that we just had (a 5 percent increase) this spring,” said Bob Caldwell, chairman of the Lincoln Employers Coalition.

Caldwell said a 17 percent increase in one year would cost each of the city’s largest employers “hundreds of thousands of dollars.”

His group, which comprises about 25 companies including Goodyear and Nebco, plans to meet July 30 to develop a position statement, along with budget and revenue recommendations for the city-owned utility.

“Our group wants to find a way, if it’s possible, to reduce that amount (potentially 12 percent) to protect the ratepayers,” Caldwell said, “and look for ways to make sure that LES doesn’t put us in this position again.”

An LES budget and rates committee will make its own rate recommendation to the LES Administrative Board on Friday. The public can attend the meeting but won’t get a chance to speak unless they gave the utility notice.

Shelley Sahling-Zart, LES vice president and assistant counsel, said the board could modify any committee recommendation.

LES spokesman Russ Reno said a rate hike of up to 12 percent has been discussed publicly but is not an official recommendation from the utility.

He declined to comment on Caldwell’s statement about the possibility of a 17 percent rate hike in one year and its impact on ratepayers.

LES says it needs the increase to meet an expected $9.3 million shortfall this year because of higher wholesale energy and power generation costs, reduced interest income and higher natural gas prices.

To reduce the projected shortfall, LES is proposing to use $1 million from its rate stabilization fund and cut $500,000 from its operational budget.

Other electric utilities across the nation are seeking rate increases, ranging from 2 percent to 28 percent.

And electricity bills could climb even higher next year. The U.S. Energy Information Administration, citing higher natural gas costs, projected electricity prices could climb an average of 9.8 percent in 2009.

Just how another rate increase will play out before the City Council remains to be seen. The 5 percent rate increase, which went into effect March 1, was approved on a 5-2 vote.

 “Well, I don’t want to comment on the magnitude of the rate increase because I do not have enough information,” said City Councilman Dan Marvin, who voted against the hike last time.

But Marvin acknowledged wholesale prices on the spot market for electricity have increased significantly in six months. He said a representative of the council will monitor Friday’s meeting.

A national rate survey to be presented to the administrative board Friday shows LES rates are the sixth lowest out of 106 cities. On March 1, they ranked 10th.

Low-income families, senior citizens and others on fixed incomes would be hit hardest by a major increase, said Beatty Brasch, executive director of the Center for People in Need.

“Many people are already behind in paying utility bills,” Brasch said. “If their income is low, there’s no way you can do it. So, a 12 percent hike is mammoth.”

Reach Algis J. Laukaitis at 402-473-7243 or alaukaitis@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
whatever wrote on July 17, 2008 7:27 pm:
" LES isn't putting anyone in a bad position. This is the reality of the energy market. By ANY standard, electric rates in Nebraska are among the lowest in the country PERIOD. Whining and complaining will do no good but action will. Tell me what the "pro business" Republican Congress and President did for the 6 years they had TOTAL power to do something about this "energy crisis". This "situation" has been predicted for many years, enough time to "do something". I can tell you right now that increased rates are the LEAST of our worries. My rural electric provider in the near future can not guarentee regular 24/7 delivery of electrical power because of usage increases and the lack of new power development. This is the reality folks, deal with and do something and quit complaining and looking for ruby in the bottom of a Cracker Jack box. "

grossed out wrote on July 17, 2008 11:14 pm:
" From the story - "Other electric utilities across the nation are seeking rate increases, ranging from 2 percent to 28 percent."

I bet it darn sure ain't the ones who are whuppin us in terms of good, cheap rates.

Why should we demand more excellence from our football team than our city-owned utility? "

question wrote on July 17, 2008 11:28 pm:
" Exactly...no...EXACTLY how much increased revenue is realized by LES with each 1% in rate increase.

Nothin' but the facts, please.

I guess I'm gonna have to do Bundy's job for him.

I pledge to return LES to the glory days of THE NUMBER ONE CHEAPEST ELECTRIC RATES IN AMERICA!

No longer will Shreveport , LA be lookin' down their noses at us when I am appointed LES administrator.

Walt Canney left some mighty big shoes to fill and it looks like Bundy is NOT up to the task. "

Huh wrote on July 17, 2008 11:44 pm:
" So what does Beutler expect LES to do if he vetos this. They can't just magically keep their rates at the present price if it costs them more to operate and to buy power. Either they charge what they need to keep suppling power, or they don't supply power anymore. "

ask LES wrote on July 18, 2008 12:07 am:
" Ask LES what Terry Bundy and Shelly Zart makes and what the rest of the LES employees make compared to the City employees and directors and then ask what LES's increase is going to be this year. Cutting $500,000 from their budget is a joke. Try on the $6 million dollar figure the City has to cut. How is it possible that the City is looking to cut over 120 jobs and LES goes forward without anyone questioning anything. And if you think the benefits that the City has are good, look at LES. They are better. "

stignob wrote on July 18, 2008 7:49 am:
" We'll see if the elected officials actually represent the people here and stick with a 2-3 percent inflation hike. Can you say govt. monopoly? "

Chris wrote on July 18, 2008 8:21 am:
" We simply must continue burning coal and polluting the sky in order to keep prices as cheap as possible. How can we expect to run our CO2 experiment without inexpensive wastable energy?

I love going into Target and freezing my tail off and walking by the unoriginal stores at SouthPointe while enjoying the a/c that blows OUT of their stores to entice me in... TV, tell me what to do! Tell me what to buy! I must be cool and sexy or I'm nothing!

Why should big box stores and malls have solar arrays on top of their buildings to harvest free sun? Why should rural Nebraska reap the benefits of a clean wind economy?

I want radioactive waste and CO2 now! Come on LES, let us run our dirty, polluting experiments more freely! Keep prices low so we can continue to waste non-renewable resources! "

No problem wrote on July 18, 2008 9:14 am:
" I'll just pass the costs on to my customers. I already raised rents twice this year. If the older, SSI, and poor wage earner's can't handle it, there is a bed for them at the mission.

(read:sarcasm) "

It wrote on July 18, 2008 9:18 am:
" goes beyond LES. Granted they get better wages than I ever got, but tell
me why coal has to jump an enormous price and natural gas. Are we running
out of coal like oil? I think not. We have plenty natural gas yet everybody has to get their big bucks. As if we haven't had enough huge
medical increases, an important business letter said next year medical
costs will go up 8% and the next year double digets plus big cuts in
medicare & medicaid, providers getting lower payments and they make it up
charging privately insured patients more. And why? In the beginning the
medical institutions went after the govt. big time when they thought they
hit a never ending pot of gold. This world isn't run on supply and demand, is run on pure GREED! Schools that teach supply and demand better forget it and teach Greed! Makes ya want to go out behind the
wood shed and end it all!! After all paychecks, especially for the lower
income and retireds is becoming non-existence!!! And we're suppose to
be a caring country - my foot!!!! "

you dont have a clue wrote on July 18, 2008 9:55 am:
" Almost 80% of LES's operating cost are for power supply, not personal... it's unfair to compare the city budget to LES's budget!!!! Get some of those city employees to climb up to a high voltage power line and work on it!! I'll bet most of them wouldn't do it for twice what they make now!! The people of Lincoln are paying cheap rates and getting good service. I'd like to see how everyone would act if that "good service" went away!! "

Catherine wrote on July 18, 2008 5:25 pm:
" This request is way too high! Most bosses would laugh their employees out to the street if the employees requested a raise like that. What happened to good financial planning? I could sense a downturn in the economy two years ago and I'm just an English major. I expect more from the financial people in LES and in all of our utlities. Why can't Lincoln get more competition for these utilities like LES, Time Warner Cable and Alltel/Verizon? Let's expand even more into other power sources that are abundant in Nebraska like solar, wind and ethanol. "