Now
Fair
51°
High
70°
Low
51°

Nebraska Electric chair becoming historical artifact

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY JoANNE YOUNG / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, Jun 27, 2008 - 09:05:39 pm CDT

Robert Williams died 11 years ago sitting in Nebraska’s electric chair.

It’s almost a sure bet he will go down in history as the last man executed in Nebraska by electrocution.

After Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning announced Thursday evening he would not appeal the Nebraska Supreme Court ruling in February that the electric chair is unconstitutional, it almost guaranteed the 10 men lodged on the state’s death row today will not face the chair.

Story Photo
The electric chair at the Nebraska State Penitentiary (LJS file)

Related Media

The Story So Far: Death penalty

Nebraska has been left without a method of execution since the state Supreme Court ruled in February that the state’s only method, electrocution...

In its February ruling, the state Supreme Court upheld Raymond Mata Jr.’s first-degree murder conviction, but called the electric chair an archaic form of torture.

Bruning said the resources of his office would be better used to seek a legislative solution to the situation the state now finds itself in — having a death penalty with no legal means to carry it out.

“The Legislature has yet to identify another method,” Speaker Mike Flood said.

But it decided three times in the past two years that capital punishment should continue in Nebraska.

A number of senators are interested in the issue, Flood said, and they are talking about what kind of bill might be introduced next session.

“I fully expect it to happen,” he said.

Bruning’s office is researching the issue, looking in particular at lethal injection. But other methods exist, including hanging, the firing squad and the gas chamber.

Gov. Dave Heineman has said he would wait for Bruning’s office to study the issue, and likely would not call the Legislature into a special session this year.

The strongest opponent of the death penalty — Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha — is still in office, and capable of preventing or tying up any legislation dealing with the death penalty. He will leave office in January because of term limits.

Chambers and others have argued that the men sentenced to die by electrocution in Nebraska cannot be executed by another means.

The U.S. Supreme Court in April upheld lethal injection as a constitutional method of execution, ruling that Kentucky’s use of a specific cocktail of three drugs to exact death did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment, under the Eighth Amendment. 

Since that ruling, there have been nine executions in six states, eight by lethal injection and one by electrocution, in South Carolina, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

Nebraska was the last state to use the electric chair as its sole means of execution. In a few other states, inmates are able to choose electrocution as an alternate means.

Fifteen men were executed in  Nebraska’s electric chair between 1920 and 1997.

So what will happen to the executioner’s chair that sits at the Nebraska State Penitentiary in Lincoln?

Steve King, planning and research administrator with the Department of Corrections, said that decision will most likely be up to the Legislature or the governor’s office — not the department.

“That’s beyond us, but that’s just my opinion,” he said. “We just carry out the dictates of the law.”

Bob Houston, department director, may have his own opinion on the question, King said. Houston was out of the office on Friday.

A number of options exist, from discarding the chair to putting it into a historical museum.

“This is an artifact,” he said. “It’s a grim reminder of the punishment practices for the state.”

Flood said he personally would not want to see the chair on display anywhere. Other than that, he had not considered what to do with it.

“This is a serious and solemn issue,” he said.

And ultimately, it would be a legislative decision, he said.

Reach JoAnne Young at 473-7228 or jyoung@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Display It wrote on June 28, 2008 9:40 am:
" The chair belongs in a state museum as a reminder of the horrific way the government has killed its own citizens in the name of justice and the way that we as a society have evolved. "

gifternie wrote on June 28, 2008 10:04 am:
" Maybe they can convert it to a rocking chair and give it to Ernie Chambers as a thanks for leaving gift. "

Taxpayer wrote on June 28, 2008 10:20 am:
" Considering the cost the taxpayers endure to hold these people the rest of their lives, I see absolutly no reason for them not to be executed. The entire reason they are there is because the were deemed unfit for society by a jury of their peers and were to be sentenced to death. The people that get death sentences and get live in prison have been a menace to society and caused nothing but grief for the people that they harmed. What should they not endure some pain for the pain they have caused? There has been only 15 people in an 88 year span that have died by this method. Personally, I don't feel that is enough. Anyone that has a life sentence without the possibility of parole should be put to death, all they are is a drain on our states tax dollars that could go to help our citizens that actually need the money and have the opportunity to help society. People that cannot afford a shelter, people that cannot afford 3 square meals a day, people that cannot afford to see a doctor at the drop of a hat. This is something that our tax dollars are providing for these criminals on a daily basis and for what? What do the citizens of Nebraska get in return? These are not people that are going to "see the error of their ways" and eventually try to contribute to society. They will never step foot outside those walls again.

PS. I want to thank whoever signed the law on term limits! "

Show It wrote on June 28, 2008 10:22 am:
" Mike Flood's comments are laughable and typical politician wet noodle. Heck yes it needs to be put in a museum, regardless of whether or not you support the death penalty. "

Shelly wrote on June 28, 2008 10:40 am:
" Oh please, the "horrific way the government has killed its own citizens"? How about the horrific way that citizens killed each other and are now getting what they deserve? Raymond Mata Jr. DESERVES the death penalty, I don't care what anybody says. I'm sure all the anti-death penalty advocates out there would feel a little differently if it were them or their relatives that were the victims. Thanks for term limits, get Ernie Chambers OUT OF HERE!! I'm all for different opinions, and not all of his views I disagree with. However, this is one that needs to be left alone!! "

JPB wrote on June 28, 2008 10:49 am:
" Destroy the chair.
If it's destroyed, those who are anti-government will no longer have anything to say about how horrific the deaths were of those executed. "

Angry VET wrote on June 28, 2008 1:58 pm:
" Get rid of the chair, why because it is cruel and unusal,good, people have forgotten something important, executions should be a deterent for any person contimplating an act of violence. When joubert was executed for killing/raping children, he made me think that the Electric chair needed to upgraded. I think it would be great to add a Rheostat to the chair, let these animals cook for a while before we kill them. I am tired of prisoners rights, what of the victims? I think they should show the execution on cable access. Force the prisoners to watch the execution on thier jailhouse cable.You see Capital Punishment needs to become a deterent, not just punishment. Who cares about the scum on death row, there is a reson that they are there. All of these whiney libs, and the ACLU, want prioners to have more rights than their victems, who were not given a choice. "

bohonk wrote on June 28, 2008 3:45 pm:
" I believe there are laws regarding how a government agency can dispose of surplus property. It could be transferred to another agency (such as a museum or the university) or sold at auction. As for destroying it, I don't like the idea of destroying surplus property that has value. Sell it on Ebay, let the proceeds go back to the Dept of Corrections. "

JB wrote on June 29, 2008 8:37 am:
" "Old Sparky" retired forever? "