Now
Overcast
31°
High
32°
Low
21°

Affirmative action battle turns costly

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY MELISSA LEE / Lincoln Journal Star

Tuesday, Jun 03, 2008 - 01:23:02 am CDT

The battle over whether to end race- and gender-based affirmative action in Nebraska will be a costly one.

That much is made clear in new campaign filings with the Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission, which show both supporters and opponents of an affirmative-action ban raked in the cash during May.

The Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative, which is sponsoring the effort to end affirmative action, collected $117,000 last month. All of that came from the California-based American Civil Rights Initiative, the national effort to ban racial and gender preferences in hiring and admissions decisions.

Meanwhile, Nebraskans United, the coalition opposing an affirmative-action ban, raised more than $263,000 last month.

All of that came from Nebraska residents and organizations, including $50,000 from Warren Buffett and $25,000 from the University of Nebraska Foundation.

Affirmative-action supporters say those numbers are evidence Nebraska voters aren’t letting themselves be swayed by out-of-state interests.

The Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative “literally is an out-of-state effort,” said Nic Swiercek, a UNL graduate student and member of Students United for Nebraska, an arm of Nebraskans United.

“Nebraskans don’t like people from out of state trying to come in and change our Constitution.”

Other organizations contributing to Nebraskans United include the ACLU Nebraska and Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce.

On the other side, the American Civil Rights Initiative accounts for more than $120,000 of the $181,000 raised by the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative thus far.

Another $50,000 has come from New York businessman Paul Singer.

An Omaha man has chipped in $5,000, and initiative treasurer Marc Schniederjans has said smaller donations have flowed in from other Nebraskans as well.

Supporters of the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative need to collect about 115,000 petition signatures by July 4 to get the affirmative-action ban on the November ballot. The initiative’s executive director, Doug Tietz, declined Monday to say how many signatures the group has collected so far, but said the effort is going well.

Further, Tietz dismissed the notion the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative isn’t home-grown.

“That’s kind of insulting to the signers of the petitions,” he said. “It’s Nebraska citizens who are signing. There’s no one else.”

Reach Melissa Lee at 473-2682 or mlee@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
resident wrote on June 3, 2008 6:45 am:
" The offensive radio ads have started already. "

Petitiondrive or Pay for Signatures wrote on June 3, 2008 6:48 am:
" I used to think of concerned citizens taking their own time to gather signatures on petitions. That was what "grass roots" ment to me. On the other hand, a wealthy group or individual can pay signature collectors to get signatures. They can also present the petition in a confusing light so that the possibility of people signing a petition that does not support their beliefs is greater. A young man accosted me at Sam's Club yesterday wanting me to sigh an "equal rights" petition. I declined. Affirmative action is the lessor of two evils in this country and particularly this state. Repeal of affirmative action does not create and new "equal rights". Keeping AA does not eliminate discrimination, it just makes a trade of some possibility of opportunity for the day to day discrimination that people of color deal with in this country and state. Until people start behaving themselves, AA seems like it is the only check (a poor one for sure) to compensate for the discrimination that continues to go on in this country and state.
I wonder though what Doug Tietz would think if every petition salesperson was required to wear a sign that said, "This is a petition to repeal Affirmative Action and I am a paid signature collector, hired and paid by people in California who believe Nebraskans are stupid enough to fall for such a scam". "

employer wrote on June 3, 2008 7:39 am:
" Wow, $250k to keep from stopping racially biased non-equal opportunity hiring. Unbelievable. Hey look, UNL is an equal opportunity employer...actually, you can find plenty of people that would say the opposite because they didn't have the correct color of skin to meet affirmative action requirements. "

Ricky wrote on June 3, 2008 7:46 am:
" Before the California guys that want to change Nebraskas' Constitution got started, they should have checked to see how the Nevada casinos fared when they came here to force casino gambling on us.
Let the Californians spend their money; the drive is going nowhere.

Ricky From Omaha "

stignob wrote on June 3, 2008 7:48 am:
" "You can't legislate morality". Mr. Goldwater. "

Gerard Harbison wrote on June 3, 2008 7:58 am:
" Alumni and donors take note: contributions to the University of Nebraska may well be used to fund political causes you disagree with, such as the upholding of racial and gender preferences that may well hurt your children or grandchildren. "

Riddiculous wrote on June 3, 2008 8:14 am:
" My tuition goes up way more than average, but the University still has the money to pay $25,000 to a group that will serve to most graduates detriment- UNBELIEVABLE!!! "

MarkyMark wrote on June 3, 2008 9:00 am:
" As this post fills up today, you will see the reason this backwoods, hick, racist state is still in need of affirmative action...stay tuned. "

Buddha wrote on June 3, 2008 10:12 am:
" The elimination of Affirmative Action can be a negative thing. If Nebraska were to eliminate AA, you might as well as kick all the minorities out, and tell disable folks they're no longer welcome. Seriously folks, AA along with equal opportunity laws and the ADA,etc., maintains a level playing field for EVERYONE. If you want to get rid of AA, you might as well as put on some bib overalls, sans the shirt, and walk around toting a shotgun and say "y'all rednecks now!" "

stignob wrote on June 3, 2008 12:41 pm:
" Oh yes, if it fits the lefts agenda it's "racists" and "bigoted". And when the right tries to force their "morality" on society banning gay marriage, abortion, it's against the freedoms of America. Nice spin. No hypocrisy here is there? It's all about power and control isn't it? Yes sir, comrade! "

Mark wrote on June 3, 2008 10:35 pm:
" I wonder why I dont give money to UNL? They use it for political stuff I dont agree with. NO money to UNL, and they wont hire you if you dont meet their AA status. I hate Nebraska more now and when I come back next month, I will register to vote and sign the petition. AA must go and common sense must prevail. "

Monica wrote on November 5, 2008 10:49 am:
" You can't legislate morality? What about women's suffrage, black suffrage, the Equal Rights Amendment, animal abuse laws, laws prohibiting murder...we can and must find common ground to do just that. Regardless of religion, most people agree on certain values. "