Now
Fair
19°
High
47°
Low
29°

County judge tosses 'guns on campus' cases

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY LORI PILGER / Lincoln Journal Star

Monday, Jun 02, 2008 - 03:07:45 pm CDT

A Lancaster County judge dismissed charges Monday against two teenagers who took rifles onto a college campus in Lincoln last fall.

Judge Gale Pokorny said legislators didn’t specify if a law barring firearms from school grounds applied to universities.

“This judge is not unmindful of the horrific events, the carnage that mindless irresponsible people with guns have precipitated at the universities and the shopping malls of America,” he wrote.

Story Photo
In this 2006 file photo, UNL students gather outside the Nebraska Union. (LJS File)

But, Pokorny said it is not the role of judges “to legislate, to insert additional words and phrases into criminal statutes that the legislature didn’t put there in the first instance.”

At the end of the order, he dismissed the charges against Colin Fury, 18, and Craig Clark, 19.

The facts of the case weren’t at issue.

Fury asked his friend Clark to go with him to a College Republicans meeting on campus Sept. 19, for a discussion on the National Rifle Association.

Fury later told UNL Police he suggested they carry their rifles across campus to “get people’s attention.”

They did.

Calls flooded in to campus police as they walked by the Student Union that afternoon about 5.

When police arrived, Fury and Clark were gone. But within hours police found them when Fury told friends he was one of the men on campus with a gun.

They called police, who ticketed Fury and Clark with disturbing the peace and confiscated their rifles, an AR15 rifle and a .22 carbine.

Prosecutors decided to charge them with unlawful possession of a firearm on school grounds.

Attorneys for the two men argued the state law didn’t apply to colleges and universities.

Attorney Clarence Mock said   lawmakers didn’t define the word school in the statute, and it begs the question.

“The terms are simply not synonymous,” he wrote in court documents asking Pokorny to throw out the charge facing Clark.

He said it wasn’t for the courts to supply missing words to make the statute clear.

But Deputy Lancaster County Attorney Steven Schmidt said the law clearly includes college and university campuses.

The word wasn’t statutorily defined, and, because it isn’t a technical word, it doesn’t need to be, he said. One need look only to the plain meaning, which would include any educational institution.

In his order Monday, Pokorny said the term “school” is not defined in the statute or in a review of floor debate and legislative history, and there seems to be no Nebraska case law interpreting the word.

In 2007, the legislature immediately amended the Concealed Handgun Permit Act to include colleges and universities after a late 2006 opinion came out by the Nebraska Attorney General that UNL was not a “school” under the act.

But the legislature chose not to do the same with a related statute: “unlawful possession of a firearm on school grounds.”

Pokorny considered the legislature’s action on one law and not the other noteworthy. He said he concluded it meant they intended “school” to be different from university.

Chief Deputy County Attorney Joe Kelly said it was too early to say if the state will appeal the judge’s order or if other charges may be a possibility.

“All I can say is we’re going to take a look at it,” he said.

UNL policy forbids guns on campus.

Reach Lori Pilger at 473-7237 or lpilger@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Question wrote on June 2, 2008 3:33 pm:
" So if UNL's policy was broken what action did the school, uh... I mean UNL take? "

Jan wrote on June 2, 2008 5:18 pm:
" Only a lawyer could say a university is not a school. Look it up in a dictionary. This is what is wrong with our justice system. What other words in the law did they not define? that, gun, where? Stupid. "

JT wrote on June 2, 2008 6:24 pm:
" So I didn't get my degree from a school? "

Bravo wrote on June 2, 2008 6:36 pm:
" Kudos to these kids for exercising their Second Amendment rights. Nice to see college students doing something like this instead of some lame protest about polar bears or other nonsense "

Cole wrote on June 2, 2008 6:40 pm:
" How can Pokorny be so obtuse? He's wrong on BOTH counts. It's patently obvious the legislature was referring to a "group of fish". Under his own admission, it's not a judge's job to infer specific meaning to language. In the absence of specificity in this fish/K-12 controversy, we can only assume children ages 5-18 may not bring firearms to large bodies of water. "

nathan wrote on June 2, 2008 8:08 pm:
" As a firearm owner AND law abiding citizen, I am horribly offended by the insinuation that because someone has a gun, they are a criminal. For everyone's information, students CAN have guns on campus, and while I was a student at UNL, I kept a few guns at school with me. They have a locker at the police station that you keep them in. Numerous times I walked through the parking lot ON CAMPUS with guns! Like everyone, I had bad days on campus, and guess what? I didn't murder a SINGLE PERSON! GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE'S PEOPLE!
On the legal argument, Pokorny made the right call. If one takes the time to READ the actual statutes, they would find that most words ARE defined so as to avoid confusion/judicial activism. How would you feel if you had a PhD from Harvard and someone said you had a degree from some college. Words have very specific meanings, and I applaud Pokorny for NOT writing his OWN definitions and laws. "

UNL Grad wrote on June 2, 2008 9:06 pm:
" As one applies these laws, one must be consistent and must account for the teaching mission of the University in many and different settings.
For example, there an ROTC program on campus. One would assume that these men and women are trained in the use of weapons. The image at http://www.unl.edu/armyrotc/ shows a group of soldiers carrying weapons, but one would assume that this was not on campus.
Nonetheless, a quick search reveals that there is a UNL Womens Rifle Team, a UNL NROTC Rifle team, and a UNL Rifle Club. There are references on-line to a rifle range on campus. These observations suggest that many UNL students routinely have guns or access to guns on campus, and that the use of these weapons on campus is sanctioned by the University.
Many years ago when I was a student we shot guns in the physics labs to apply newly taught principals as we determined the velocity of a bullet. There may be other places on campus where projectiles are fired, too. One might also check the theater and performing arts to determine whether they have and use weapons or life-like facsimiles in their productions. "

I know wrote on June 3, 2008 2:22 am:
" a lot of UNL graduates and I would also say UNL is not a school. At least there wasn't much learning that went on among these students. In arguing a college or university is not a school, the attorney reminds me of a Clinton moment 'it depends on what the meaning of is, is' Smart guy, duplicitous. Judge is supposed to catch that stuff. You fall asleep judge? "

Jared wrote on June 3, 2008 7:04 am:
" So they walked around with rifles on campus. Were they loaded? Was a round chambered? Or, were they taking reasonable, normal precautions?

It strikes me as odd that UNL policy forbids guns, but that is just a reactionary stance. What about other weapons? Bows and arrows? Spears? Axes and swords? Does it end with new cases and laws for each different "weapon", or do we choose personal responsibility?

My hope is personal responsibility. But, if the rifles were loaded, throw them out of UNL, and never let them back. "

HPG wrote on June 3, 2008 7:26 am:
" It is nice to see a judge NOT legislate from the bench for a change. Thank you. "

things that mak you go hmmm... wrote on June 3, 2008 7:50 am:
" Hmmmmm.... UNL is not a school. So that means all that money i spent there under the pretense of getting an education was taken from me by deception. Could I sue UNL to get my money back since they aren't a school?

Also, this judge says UNL isn't a school. I think he must have gotten his law degree there since obviously he doesn't have a real degree in law if he hands out rulings like this. "

Tim wrote on June 3, 2008 7:53 am:
" Signs and school policy didn't seem to matter much at Virginia Tech. "

Hank wrote on June 3, 2008 8:13 am:
" A really dumb stunt in my opinion but as everyone knows the ones that do want to kill innocents don't worry about laws anyway. "

Bad wrote on June 3, 2008 10:24 am:
" I suspect had the law included college and university then it too could be thrown out when the exact make/model of the weapon wasn't spelled out either. Good grief, ask a student if they go to school and they say, yeah, at UNL. Who won't make the association. Doesn't law enforcement have enough trouble without poor decisions like this one? "

sam wrote on June 3, 2008 11:19 am:
" For a definition in Nebraska of a School, please see 79-101. It mentions grade school and high school specifically, but no mention of facilities for higher learning. What the kids did was unwise and could have been handled differently by them, but the decision of the Judge was accurate by state statute. "

S Blau wrote on June 3, 2008 4:10 pm:
" So calls "flooded" the campus police and they still did not get there before the gun toters were gone. This is more evidence the police cannot be there when needed and that each of us has to be prepared to defend ourselves. How dare the university prohibit us from self-protection, when they clearly cannot protect us. When seconds count, the police are only minutes away. "

Where Did Judge Go To Law School wrote on June 3, 2008 5:06 pm:
" Wrong, Sam. Section 79-101 specifically states that the definition that you refer to ONLY applies to Chapter 79. The criminal complaint was filed under the criminal code (Chapter 28), so that Chapter 79 specific definition provides no authority. I'm aware that this judge also ignored a Nebraska Supreme Court case (from the 1800's) which held that our State Supreme Court saw no good reason to exclude universities from the definition of school.

This judge appears in the newspaper for MANY controversial decisions. Hmmmm ... I wonder why?? Maybe he could use a refresher course at Law School, err ... I mean Law NOT School. "

positive note wrote on June 3, 2008 10:16 pm:
" Maybe now the system can start pursuing the REAL criminals, and not a couple of people, with no criminal intent, to prosecute. Maybe if there weren't so much news media involved, it wouldn't get the attention of those who have mental or emotional problems and DO want to hurt people. "

Mom wrote on June 3, 2008 11:28 pm:
" Wow...rules on campus..hummmmm thought there was to be no drinking or smoking on campus too??? The partying that goes on at campus, the alcohol poisoning that is frequent, the driving while intoxicated by minors.... seems these are crimes that happen with more frequency, and harm more people, and yes kill people. 2 guys carrying unloaded guns to a rally... I think I'd be more afraid of 2 UNL students driving after a football game than these 2 young men... Where are our priorities???? Protecting us from who???? I think I'm more afraid of a "loaded" student than an unloaded gun. "

DAWEEZ wrote on June 4, 2008 8:58 am:
" I am going to have to agree with "MOM". The two young men walking through campus with unloaded guns on there way to a rally.....harmless! Did they treaten anyone? Was anyone in danger? No.....these two young men turned themselves in....for what? I think maybe the system and the media should start focusing on what is really important....real crimals with real criminal intentions. I give props to Judge Pokorny for dismissing all charges.....smart guy! "