County judge tosses 'guns on campus' cases
BY LORI PILGER / Lincoln Journal Star
A Lancaster County judge dismissed charges Monday against two teenagers who took rifles onto a college campus in Lincoln last fall.
Judge Gale Pokorny said legislators didn’t specify if a law barring firearms from school grounds applied to universities.
“This judge is not unmindful of the horrific events, the carnage that mindless irresponsible people with guns have precipitated at the universities and the shopping malls of America,” he wrote.
But, Pokorny said it is not the role of judges “to legislate, to insert additional words and phrases into criminal statutes that the legislature didn’t put there in the first instance.”
At the end of the order, he dismissed the charges against Colin Fury, 18, and Craig Clark, 19.
The facts of the case weren’t at issue.
Fury asked his friend Clark to go with him to a College Republicans meeting on campus Sept. 19, for a discussion on the National Rifle Association.
Fury later told UNL Police he suggested they carry their rifles across campus to “get people’s attention.”
They did.
Calls flooded in to campus police as they walked by the Student Union that afternoon about 5.
When police arrived, Fury and Clark were gone. But within hours police found them when Fury told friends he was one of the men on campus with a gun.
They called police, who ticketed Fury and Clark with disturbing the peace and confiscated their rifles, an AR15 rifle and a .22 carbine.
Prosecutors decided to charge them with unlawful possession of a firearm on school grounds.
Attorneys for the two men argued the state law didn’t apply to colleges and universities.
Attorney Clarence Mock said lawmakers didn’t define the word school in the statute, and it begs the question.
“The terms are simply not synonymous,” he wrote in court documents asking Pokorny to throw out the charge facing Clark.
He said it wasn’t for the courts to supply missing words to make the statute clear.
But Deputy Lancaster County Attorney Steven Schmidt said the law clearly includes college and university campuses.
The word wasn’t statutorily defined, and, because it isn’t a technical word, it doesn’t need to be, he said. One need look only to the plain meaning, which would include any educational institution.
In his order Monday, Pokorny said the term “school” is not defined in the statute or in a review of floor debate and legislative history, and there seems to be no Nebraska case law interpreting the word.
In 2007, the legislature immediately amended the Concealed Handgun Permit Act to include colleges and universities after a late 2006 opinion came out by the Nebraska Attorney General that UNL was not a “school” under the act.
But the legislature chose not to do the same with a related statute: “unlawful possession of a firearm on school grounds.”
Pokorny considered the legislature’s action on one law and not the other noteworthy. He said he concluded it meant they intended “school” to be different from university.
Chief Deputy County Attorney Joe Kelly said it was too early to say if the state will appeal the judge’s order or if other charges may be a possibility.
“All I can say is we’re going to take a look at it,” he said.
UNL policy forbids guns on campus.
Reach Lori Pilger at 473-7237 or lpilger@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Jan wrote on June 2, 2008 5:18 pm:
JT wrote on June 2, 2008 6:24 pm:
Bravo wrote on June 2, 2008 6:36 pm:
Cole wrote on June 2, 2008 6:40 pm:
nathan wrote on June 2, 2008 8:08 pm:
On the legal argument, Pokorny made the right call. If one takes the time to READ the actual statutes, they would find that most words ARE defined so as to avoid confusion/judicial activism. How would you feel if you had a PhD from Harvard and someone said you had a degree from some college. Words have very specific meanings, and I applaud Pokorny for NOT writing his OWN definitions and laws. "
UNL Grad wrote on June 2, 2008 9:06 pm:
For example, there an ROTC program on campus. One would assume that these men and women are trained in the use of weapons. The image at http://www.unl.edu/armyrotc/ shows a group of soldiers carrying weapons, but one would assume that this was not on campus.
Nonetheless, a quick search reveals that there is a UNL Womens Rifle Team, a UNL NROTC Rifle team, and a UNL Rifle Club. There are references on-line to a rifle range on campus. These observations suggest that many UNL students routinely have guns or access to guns on campus, and that the use of these weapons on campus is sanctioned by the University.
Many years ago when I was a student we shot guns in the physics labs to apply newly taught principals as we determined the velocity of a bullet. There may be other places on campus where projectiles are fired, too. One might also check the theater and performing arts to determine whether they have and use weapons or life-like facsimiles in their productions. "
I know wrote on June 3, 2008 2:22 am:
Jared wrote on June 3, 2008 7:04 am:
It strikes me as odd that UNL policy forbids guns, but that is just a reactionary stance. What about other weapons? Bows and arrows? Spears? Axes and swords? Does it end with new cases and laws for each different "weapon", or do we choose personal responsibility?
My hope is personal responsibility. But, if the rifles were loaded, throw them out of UNL, and never let them back. "
HPG wrote on June 3, 2008 7:26 am:
things that mak you go hmmm... wrote on June 3, 2008 7:50 am:
Also, this judge says UNL isn't a school. I think he must have gotten his law degree there since obviously he doesn't have a real degree in law if he hands out rulings like this. "
Tim wrote on June 3, 2008 7:53 am:
Hank wrote on June 3, 2008 8:13 am:
Bad wrote on June 3, 2008 10:24 am:
sam wrote on June 3, 2008 11:19 am:
S Blau wrote on June 3, 2008 4:10 pm:
Where Did Judge Go To Law School wrote on June 3, 2008 5:06 pm:
This judge appears in the newspaper for MANY controversial decisions. Hmmmm ... I wonder why?? Maybe he could use a refresher course at Law School, err ... I mean Law NOT School. "
positive note wrote on June 3, 2008 10:16 pm:
Mom wrote on June 3, 2008 11:28 pm:
DAWEEZ wrote on June 4, 2008 8:58 am: