Now
Partly Cloudy
75.0°
High
82°
Low
62°

State Supreme Court ruling won’t affect Lincoln ban, attorney says

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY CLARENCE MABIN / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, May 30, 2008 - 05:58:56 pm CDT

A Nebraska Supreme Court ruling striking down a portion of Omaha’s smoking ban won’t affect the Lincoln law, an attorney for the city of Lincoln said.

On Friday, the court declared unconstitutional a section of the Omaha ban that temporarily exempted some stand-alone bars and keno parlors, horse racing simulcasting locations and tobacco retail outlets.

Writing for the court, Chief Justice Michael Heavican said the exemption provision was an unreasonable way to distinguish businesses and amounted to special legislation.

“Nothing in the ordinance’s stated purpose would explain why employees of exempted facilities or members of the public who wish to patronize those establishments are not entitled to breathe smoke-free air or have their health and welfare protected,” he wrote.

Tonya Skinner, an assistant city attorney for the city of Lincoln, said the ruling would not affect Lincoln’s smoking ordinance, which took effect Jan. 1, 2005.

The Lincoln ordinance includes only a small number of exemptions, and, compared to anti-smoking laws nationwide, is considered a 100 percent ban, Skinner said.

“The Lincoln City Council deserves a lot of credit for keeping away from a lot of exemptions,” she said. “They did it right.”

Sites that conduct research on the effects of smoking and hotel and motel rooms are exempt under the Lincoln ordinance. It permits smoking in 20 percent of the rooms in a given hotel or motel, regardless of the establishment’s total number of rooms, Skinner said.

She said the two exemptions were also included in the Omaha ordinance. The ruling Friday did not apply to those exemptions.

K.C. Engdahl, attorney for Marylebone Tavern co-owner Michelle Hug, the plaintiff in the Omaha case, said the court reached the right decision.

He said Hug was not challenging the ban, but was seeking a level playing field with businesses that could claim the exemption.

“The exemption was unacceptable,” Engdahl said. “The delay in implementing it for some establishments was irrelevant. The fact that it had a sunset provision for some doesn’t change the fact that it’s illegal.”

The Omaha City Council adopted the ordinance in June 2006, “‘to protect the public health and welfare by prohibiting smoking in public gathering places and places of employment,’’” according to the ruling Friday.

Council members exempted certain businesses from compliance until May 2011.

Nebraska will enact a statewide smoking ban June 1, 2009. The only workplace exemptions to the statewide ban are for retail tobacco shops and places where smoking research is done.

Reach Clarence Mabin at 473-7234 or cmabin@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Go To Kansas wrote on May 30, 2008 2:29 pm:
" Great, now they can take all their Keno money down to Kansas, and...hey, wait a minute. "

not likely to go to kansas wrote on May 30, 2008 4:32 pm:
" Yeah, waste your gas money driving to a Keno in Kansas just so you can smoke a cigarette! "

Pete wrote on May 30, 2008 4:32 pm:
" This is more reason that smoking bans need to be across the board and without exemptions for some politician's favorite business. Workers and customers need to be protected from the hazards of secondhand smoke in all businesses and in all workplaces. "

To Pete wrote on May 31, 2008 8:12 am:
" So few places now allow smoking that you should easily be able to find somewhere to go without the exposure. Quit your gripping. "

nemo wrote on June 2, 2008 9:53 am:
" Smoking stinks, and I hate it, but the government telling businesses that they cannot allow a legal substance on their property rankles. If I think a place is too smoky I leave or I don't go in at all. The stuff should be illegal everywhere, if it's so dangerous. Hey maybe we could force smokers to monitor their personal air quality, if an alarm goes off they have to put their cigarettes out until it clears. You know maybe a necklace or badge of some sort. There would be like scarlet butts inside a circle with a line thru on their foreheads or something while their air quality doesn't comply. Just joshing y'all "

Inconsequential wrote on June 2, 2008 4:44 pm:
" This ruling is of little consequence. With the statewide ban taking effect in 12 months, all this did was more up the date for some businesses (and level the playing field).

And for those who are so opposed to the smoking ban - if you feel so strongly start a petition drive to get it on the November ballot. Then it can be defeated with two-thirds of the vote like it was in Lincoln. Otherwise, let it go and enjoy your cancer sticks in your home and car. "