Now
Fair
19°
High
47°
Low
29°

United Way change results in dramatic funding shifts

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY ERIN ANDERSEN / Lincoln Journal Star

Saturday, May 31, 2008 - 12:39:59 am CDT



The ARC is losing 64 percent of its United Way funding for 2008-09.

The Salvation Army and Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital each are losing nearly 50 percent of their United Way allocations.



Big winners



  • Catholic Social Services -- $126,319, up $42,527 from last year


  • Cedars Youth Services -- $437,348, up $229,545 from last year


  • Child Guidance Center -- $196,246; up $46,866 from last year


  • Clyde Malone Community Center -- $78,176; up $49,404 from last year


  • Family Service -- $231,259; up $27,195 from last year


  • Food Bank of Lincoln -- $112,246; up $38,997 from last year


  • Fresh Start Inc. -- $34,050; up $17,384 from last year


  • Lighthouse -- $88,930; up $42,798 from last year


  • Matt Talbot Kitchen and Outreach Inc. -- $94,902; up $17,590 from last year


  • Mourning Hope -- $24,108; up $13,969 from last year




Big losers



  • ARC of Lincoln/Lancaster County -- $46,229; down $61,824 from last year


  • CenterPointe -- $5,586, down $31,435 from last year


  • Community Justice Center -- $1,216; down $6,770 from last year


  • Heartland Big Brothers/Big Sisters -- $137,080; down $13,268 from last year


  • Lincoln Literacy Council -- $11,785; down $20,212 from last year


  • Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital -- $51,334; down $25,067


  • The Salvation Army -- $59,617; down $56,875 from last year


  • YWCA -- $149,570; down $25,584




Newcomers



  • City Impact -- $54,060


  • Community Crops -- $5,000


  • Good Neighbor Community Center -- $17,968


  • Lincoln/Lancaster County Child Advocacy Center -- $27,600


  • Northeast Family Center -- $23,530




No longer eligible



  • Dimensions Educational Research Foundation -- $1,922, all in donor designated funds


  • Lincoln Literacy Council -- $11,785 in donor designated funds


  • Lutheran Family Services of Nebraska Inc. -- $22,399 in donor designated funds






For a list of how much each agency will receive this year, go to: www.unitedwaylincoln.org/programs.html

Fresh Start, Lighthouse and some other organizations dedicated to children’s services will see their United Way funding nearly double this coming fiscal year.

And some nonprofits, like the Lincoln Literacy Council, CenterPointe and Lutheran Family Services, are no longer eligible for United Way general funds — at least until 2011 when they can reapply.

These dramatic shifts are because the United Way of Lincoln and Lancaster County changed the way it allocates its general donations.

It now targets the majority of its money toward programs aimed at helping children find success in school, said Robin Mahoney, the United Way’s director of fund distribution and community planning.

Every one of the more than 40 agencies the United Way supports saw at least a 10 percent change in funding, she said.

Mahoney acknowledges the shift is painful for agencies on the losing end.

“It’s not that we wouldn’t fund them. We would have funded a lot more had we had the dollars,” she said.

The United Way received nearly $3.8 million in funding requests for the 2008-09 fiscal year. But, it only collected $2.14 million in undesignated donations, she said.

The remaining $3.5 in contributions were earmarked by donors to go to specific nonprofit agencies. And as this option of designating donations becomes more popular, the amount of undesignated dollars has remained relatively flat, Mahoney said.

This prompted the United Way to look at where its money goes, and how it is distributed.

In May 2007, the United Way board of directors approved a switch to a two-year funding cycle with “zero” or “outcome” based funding — meaning every requesting agency starts at zero, regardless of how many years it has received United Way funds.

In addition, the United Way decided that 67 percent of its money should be earmarked for programs that directly affect children and their ability to do well in school.  The remaining 33 percent supports crisis programs that provide food, shelter and safety for victims and community preparedness.

As part of the new application process, organizations had to provide a 24-month history showing the success of the program for which they sought funding.

 Which is why the Lincoln Literacy Council lost general funds. Historically, the literacy council has served adults. Early in 2007 it started a family literacy program, designed to promote literacy among toddlers and preschoolers of immigrant and refugee families. It started too late to qualify for funding under the new 24-month history requirement.

Although Literacy Council Executive Director Clayton Naff is disappointed over losing the money, he did not criticize the United Way.

“I think the United Way was very fair in the process,” Naff said. “They told us what they were doing. They followed that very closely.

“The only regret I have is that we couldn’t go back in time and start our children’s program early enough to meet their technical criteria,” Naff said.

Nonprofits were notified of the changes last June, Mahoney said.

The process to decide who receives the money is comprehensive. Eighty community volunteers review the applications, rate them, clarify questions, divide them into funding categories and rank them for funding. Their recommendations then go to the United Way Board of Directors for final approval.

The board made its decisions on May 22. Notification was sent to the agencies on May 23. They will get their money on July 1.

Despite advanced warning, ARC Executive Director Teri Roberts was surprised by the $64,990 cut to the organization’s individual and family services support program for people with developmental disabilities.

“We really didn’t expect this drastic of a change,” she said. “We have been funded at $102,000 to $120,000 for several years.”

United Way money makes up more than half of the budget for the support services program. This year’s allocation is $37,000.

Now ARC is scrambling to find alternative sources to keep the program going at its current level.

“We were stretched to the limit even before this shortfall,” Roberts said.

City Impact was a winner under the new allocation method. Several years ago it was not selected for United Way funding. But this year it will receive $50,000 for its Impact Learning Center, an after-school literacy program for children in first through fifth grades. The United Way allocation will make up 20 percent of the learning center’s budget.

The Clyde Malone Center is getting a substantial increase in United Way funding for its after-school program. In 2007, it received $6,557 from the United Way. This year it will receive $65,000.

Malone Center executive director T.J. McDowell sees it as a testament to the program’s success. He said the United Way funding is “critical to the quality and future of our program.”

Major Robert Boone of The Salvation Army also sees United Way funding as crucial, and that’s why he is frustrated by the $40,000 cut in funding for its at-risk youth development program. And he disagreed with the United Way’s new funding formula.

Still, he vowed this funding cut will not hurt The Salvation Army’s programs.

“We can’t cut back. And we never have,” Boone said.

Reach Erin Andersen at 473-7217 or eandersen@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
A Joke wrote on May 31, 2008 9:34 am:
" Much like the Republican's on the City Council answers to LIBA, the major funders in this City are more or less controlled by a few individuals. The fallout for those served by agencies who aren't lined up the right way "politically" with some of the social service power brokers can be pretty devastating. I see some "class favorites" in the winners section, and some of the not so popular agencies in the losers section. Big surprise. Some of the power brokers have good intentions (along with a goodly amount of arrogance), but rarely do they have the on the ground level of detail that is necessary to justify such sweeping changes. Its one thing to make judgments from a progress report, its another thing to actually know a system inside and out. Its a little bit like the playground. So and so hears something, someone puts new rules in place, and next thing you know, an agency director is gone, or a program disappears. We need more scrutiny over those decision makers who thrust and parry at Lincoln's social service dollars the County level. Much more scrutiny. Its become a little to clubby and clique-ish at the top. Decsions that should be made by the community are being made by a handful of gatekeepers. Who suffers? Broad cross sections of the population who need all kinds of services. "

This sounds good to me wrote on May 31, 2008 1:39 pm:
" If the assistance leans towards "kids" then it's good news to me. If donations aren't specified where they should go then I'm happy to see them go for children first. Certainly there are "adult need" programs, but I'll always donate most of my cash to the kids first. "

disunited way wrote on May 31, 2008 2:11 pm:
" Fund raising flat at $2.14M??!! The previous UW presient boasted of annual fund rasining in the $4-5 M range. Apprently not--she blew a lot of smoke before leaving town. the United Way has cut way back on services to the community in Planning and eliminated the Volunteer Connection, one of its best, direct community service programs. The current volunteer coordination progream is a pale shadow of what the community used to have. Now UW is in the education business and social service programs for elderly and disabled will suffer. LPS has a huge foundation tht can fund many of these youth programs...UW has lost my support!!! "

George Rock wrote on May 31, 2008 3:39 pm:
" With cost-of-living increasing as it is (just see the article today about how people spent their stimulus rebates), why the sudden need to focus on children and education? Don't my taxes pay for public schools? I don't like the fact that UW is spending 67 percent of "its" money on something the already-bloated education system should be taking care of. I think I'm going to spend my donor dollars somewhere else from now on, someone who helps people with basic needs. "

to disunited way wrote on May 31, 2008 5:10 pm:
" I think the 2M figure is just the part of the pot that is the "United Way general fund." The other 3M or so are directed gifts (i.e. I want my $100 donation to go directly to the Food Bank.) I know they DID raise a bit over 5.5M last year and have a goal of around 6M this year. "

Look before you speak wrote on May 31, 2008 5:45 pm:
" The $2 million is undesignated funds...as in not assigned/requested to a particular area/agency. If you donate your money you can specify where you'd like it to go (i.e. aging). You don't have to spend any of your money on the future (i.e. children) if you don't want to. United Way has determined (hurray) that the children of our community need our help more than other areas. The total for United way (designated and undesignated) is over $5 million.

Before you quit supporting something it might be wise to learn the facts to assist your decision. "

disunited way wrote on May 31, 2008 6:01 pm:
" Nonetheless the actual amount of funds available for allocations is flat...and in fact have lost value over years through inflation. Donors are making their own decisions on what agenices they choose to support and not trusting others to allocate their charitable gifts....in a sense defeating the purpose of a community fund raising campiagn. Why not skip UW altogether and send a check straight to the charity. UW in Lincoln has suffered from poor managment decisions and competition for charitable dollars for years and has not been able to overcome their own fiscal fumble-itis. Remember for years they supported the Malone center whose director was charged with criminal offenses. Auditors concerns over Malone center management were by and large ignored. Meanwhile the local UW president was jetting off to important conferences in Disneyland. "

George Rock wrote on June 1, 2008 1:41 am:
" "Look before you speak"

Yes, I'm well aware you can designate funds via UW. That's great, let them take 15% for admin costsm too. The point is they want almost 70 percent of these undesignated funds going to childhood programs. I feel that if parents want a child to succeed, there are plenty of programs already in place for them to take advantage of. Unfortunately, many parents would rather not take an interest in their children's education. Look at how many show up to parent-teacher conferences. They have only themselves to blame. It's called personal responsibility-- NOT the responsibility of nanny government or UW wasting donor dollars on fruitless programs. For goodness sakes, ask the billions of people in the Third World if they'd like to experience our education system. I really wouldn't mind if we swapped all the losers of this country with people who'd place a priority on education instead of McDonald's 99-cent cheeseburgers and videogames. "

not a donor wrote on June 1, 2008 5:24 am:
" I stopped donated several years ago since they gave to the boy scouts. Use to volunteer with them until I found out how they treat people. Very much a click organization. Malone needs the money, she has been gone for osme time and the new leaders are doing great. I hate to see the ARC lose out. LPS has their own grants etc. give the money to some organization that needs it..NOT LPS "