Change to weed ordinance cut down
By CORY MATTESON / Lincoln Journal Star
The many people who spoke, called and e-mailed in opposition to easing weed abatement regulations can now relax, at least until their yards get too shaggy.
The Lincoln City Council voted 6-0 to keep the maximum height for weeds and other “worthless vegetation” at six inches. The superintendent of the office in charge of enforcing that code had asked that the maximum be increased to 12 inches.
“I think this is the wrong kind of change to make,” Councilman Jonathan Cook said.
He noted that members of the public who spoke about the issue during last week’s council meeting — 13 in all — all requested the rule remain as is.
Council members also said the public offered good ideas about how to better notify property owners who have been lackadaisical about toward yard care.
Those ideas included sending postcards or hanging notices on violators’ doors.
“We’re pleased that Council listened to the public and folks that are dealing with this on a daily basis,” said Michael Snodgrass, executive director of NeighborWorks Lincoln.
“I think some good came of this,” said Councilman Ken Svboda, who introduced the proposal.
Lancaster County Weed Control Authority Superintendent Russ Shultz wasn’t at the afternoon meeting to see the change he proposed voted down.
He said he understood why people didn’t want to ease the rule, though he noted that the photos of unsightly property that the public brought to last week’s hearing would still be problems if the ordinance had been altered.
“All those were talking about severe situations,” he said. “It’s the kind of thing we need to be dealing with.”
Shultz said perhaps the city could assist in producing education campaigns with neighborhood groups, letting them know that severe violators are the ones that need to be called in, and that when a yard does get mowed, that update needs to be called in, as well.
He said he and his three inspectors would continue to respond as best they can to calls from the public. He and the inspectors make about 5,000 inspections a year, he said.
“It’s not that we can’t continue with the program; we can’t do everything.”
Reach Cory Matteson at 473-7438 or cmatteson@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Scott wrote on May 19, 2008 5:44 pm:
WEED wrote on May 19, 2008 6:09 pm:
CS wrote on May 19, 2008 6:15 pm:
dewboy wrote on May 19, 2008 8:58 pm:
..... wrote on May 19, 2008 9:00 pm:
Lee wrote on May 19, 2008 10:03 pm:
Solution wrote on May 19, 2008 10:26 pm:
Sylvia wrote on May 20, 2008 8:44 am:
weed wacker wrote on May 20, 2008 8:48 am:
Big Chief wrote on May 20, 2008 9:09 am:
Jeff from AZ wrote on May 20, 2008 9:19 am:
pjb wrote on May 20, 2008 9:51 am:
hmm wrote on May 20, 2008 9:57 am:
TO CS wrote on May 20, 2008 10:38 am:
bobo wrote on May 20, 2008 10:43 am:
The people who want to cut CLC are probably the first people in line to tell there neighbors how to live. "
Pride wrote on May 20, 2008 11:01 am:
love my yard wrote on May 20, 2008 11:41 am:
Fed up neighbor wrote on May 20, 2008 11:49 am:
Bill wrote on May 20, 2008 2:44 pm:
It's soon to be the way of the future. Golf courses are doing it more and more off the fairways (Firethorn is a great example with their brome grass rough). I think all city courses should start doing this. No mowing 5 yards off the fairway. It'll save thousands of dollars per year. "
D wrote on May 20, 2008 2:49 pm:
Are you kidding me wrote on May 20, 2008 2:52 pm:
Kristen wrote on May 20, 2008 3:18 pm:
Doug wrote on May 20, 2008 3:43 pm:
to CS wrote on May 20, 2008 4:13 pm:
CS wrote on May 20, 2008 6:53 pm:
pjb wrote on May 20, 2008 8:51 pm:
COncerned Homeowner wrote on May 20, 2008 9:10 pm:
If you use hazardous sprays and fertizers that require children and animals to stay off for 24 hr, I want you to post large signs and keep the sidewalk clear of the pellets. I find the pellets just as annoying as tall weeds. It is about being responsible in ALL ways. It is funny that the manicured lawns here in the Highlands use the chemicals and happen to be watering the street but hey they have a manicured lawn. Way to think about the environment. "
New grass wrote on May 20, 2008 9:16 pm:
You think water restrictions the past 5 years have been bad??? Get ready to watch your kentucky blue and fescue mix suffer. As it should in this area being non-native. Those with buffalo grass won't have to resod, the ones with the fescue mix will. It's happening in Denver and soon will happen here. "
Dano wrote on May 21, 2008 8:29 am:
5000 inspections / 6 months = 833 inpsections per month.
833 inpsections / 3 inspectors = 278 inspections per FTE per month
There are an average of 21 working days per month, so with that said:
278 inspections / 21 days = 13.25 inspections per day per FTE
13.25 inspections / 7.5 hours = means they need to do 1.75 per hour or equal to 1 inspection takes 34.5 minutes (which includes travel)
Now I am no genius or anything, but I would hope there is some particular plan that would divide the city into some quadrants or something, to eliminate wasteful travel and plan some daily routes. I know we had one on the lawn crew I worked for in college (10 years ago) so I would hope the city has something similar. It seems like this is a bit long per inspection. I would think this could be better, but maybe I am wrong.
Can't you pretty much tell within 5 minutes, that it is bad? Is their seom formal paperwork that takes 20 minutes to do? If there is, think we can shorten that? I know 3 poeple and a supervisor isn't much, but it sounds a bit inefficient. "
K. wrote on May 21, 2008 12:37 pm:
SJL wrote on May 21, 2008 2:09 pm:
wow wrote on May 21, 2008 8:47 pm:
dewboy wrote on May 21, 2008 9:19 pm: