Now
Fair
14°
High
35°
Low
24°

Don Walton: So, is it Raimondo or Kleeb?

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Monday, May 12, 2008 - 12:17:45 am CDT

OK, let’s do it.

At the end of a brief and puzzling Democratic Senate campaign, it’s time to mark your ballots.

Natural advantage at the beginning: Scott Kleeb, wouldn’t you think?

Kleeb is the established Democrat, the guy who stood in the spotlight two years ago when he rode the 3rd District congressional trail.

But don’t count newcomer Tony Raimondo out of this one.  Early Democratic concerns about him as a Republican interloper have been substantially reduced.

Jim Esch’s endorsement of Raimondo in Omaha is evidence of that.  Perhaps even more so is the blessing of Anne Boyle, consummate Democrat.

Now it looks like a horse race.

Democratic State Chairman Steve Achelpohl says he wasn’t kidding Saturday night when he declared: “I don’t have a clue who will win.”

Let’s break it down a little.

Raimondo appears to have been more bold than Kleeb in carving out positions during this abbreviated campaign.

Certainly more direct and decisive on the emotional and volatile issue of Iraq, an important concern for many voters.

Kleeb has seemed cautious by comparison. More philosophical and inspirational. 

Raimondo has positioned himself as a candidate uniquely qualified and experienced at a time of economic recession.  His business career has been all about job creation, trade expansion, global competition.

Kleeb appears to be the physical embodiment of change at a time when most voters are disillusioned with business as usual in  Washington and want to pursue a new course. 

It’s not only his comparative youth and appearance, but Kleeb has honed a post-partisan message first shaped during his 2006 congressional bid.

Both  candidates say they’re committed to operating in the middle as political moderates.  Not only open to bipartisan cooperation, they pledge to actively work to achieve it.

This has been a somewhat surprising campaign. More low-key and less urgent and engaging than I would have guessed. Or is it just me?

To the winner goes Mike Johanns, barring the biggest upset in Nebraska political history in Tuesday’s Republican primary.

At that point, the Democratic nominee better be ready to roll.

And be prepared to roll the dice, gamble a little, take some chances. He’s going to need to stir attention, draw contrasts.

It’s not exactly a winning formula to convey the message: Hey, I wouldn’t rock the boat and I’d not vote much differently than Johanns, only I’m a D.

Competing with Johanns will be a steeply uphill climb that requires both boldness and the promise of fundamental change.

So is that Raimondo or Kleeb?

Democratic voters get to make that decision.

More from Hart

Some leftovers from an interview with Gary Hart.

Scoffing at earlier talk about a brokered Democratic national convention, Hart said: “I don’t think there’s a collection of Democratic leaders who could make that decision in a back room. There would be a riot.”

Democratic divisions this year pale in comparison to 1968 and 1972, when the party broke apart over Vietnam, civil rights and cultural issues, Hart said.

“A great cultural upheaval is when it’s hard to put the party back together,” he said, not when the division is essentially generational.

Hart won Nebraska’s Democratic presidential primary election in 1984 with help from a young governor named Bob Kerrey. 

The 1984 results: Hart, 86,582; Walter Mondale, 39,635; Jesse Jackson, 13,495.

Finishing up

* No surprise: Johanns is prepared to draw a sharp contrast with his general election opponent on a number of specific issues once he knows the name of the Democratic winner.

* Ben Nelson says Democrats might find “fertile ground” in their contest with Johanns in 10 Nebraska communities that no longer have federal Farm Service Agency offices and in Hastings and Norfolk, the sites of beleaguered state mental health centers.

* Vic Covalt, who spearheaded Democratic presidential caucuses in Lancaster County that attracted 10,882 participants and added 2,400 registered Democratic voters, says he wants to continue to “build the party from the ground up” as the next Democratic state chairman.

* Let Joba be.

Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or dwalton@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Late ODay wrote on May 12, 2008 4:50 am:
" Don's comment that "[e]arly Democratic concerns about [Raimondo] as a Republican interloper have been substantially reduced." is unfounded. Indeed, it was greatly INCREASED since Raimondo pumped a ton of his own money into his campaign, reminding Nebraska voters how Republicans continue to think they can buy elections. Well, it didn't work for Ricketts either. "

Cynthia wrote on May 12, 2008 6:11 am:
" Anyone who thinks there is no difference between Raimondo and Kleeb is wrong. Raimondo's last-minute switch to the Democratic party should be the first warning sign that this move of expediency is just the beginning of things to come were he elected to the Senate. But don't take my word for it. Raimondo is the president of the National Association of Manufacturers. Go to the issues page of the NAM website and read how he really feels about the issues that affect the middle class -- not just the captains of industry. Reading even a few of the positions on that page should convince any Democrat once and for all that Mr. Raimondo is not a Democrat and has no intention of acting like one were he to make it to Washington. Scott Kleeb is a lifelong, moderate Democrat who is true to what the party stands for. He will represent working Nebraskans in Washington because he is a working Nebraskan himself. The notion that the best credential for our politicians is that they be successful businessmen is deeply flawed. It is one thing to be a leader by virtue of signing the paychecks, it is another thing altogether to show leadership through collaboration and fairness and a scholarly approach to understanding complicated issues. "

Which one wrote on May 12, 2008 9:20 am:
" Thank you for comparing and contrasting the candidates. But which one has the best shot against Johanns in November? "

Best chance wrote on May 12, 2008 11:48 am:
" Easy, they guy who has actually made known his positions and hasn't tried to tip-toe around SS and pro-life issues. Raimondo. "