Now
Fair
77°
High
82°
Low
49°

Letters, 5/3: Vote for Soper

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Saturday, May 03, 2008 - 12:05:30 am CDT

I’m writing to express my support for Tami Soper, who is running for the Legislature in District 21.

I have known Tami Soper for several years. She is and has always been a people person. Her slogan “Putting People before Politics” is true, and that is her lifestyle.

When our nonprofit was starting out, we needed funds to support our Hispanic youth organization. We didn’t really know Soper, but my husband heard about her, and we got in contact. She wanted to help us and was willing to give her time and her grant-writing ability to do so. Not only did she meet with us, she came to our home, brought her daughter along, got to know us and the organization, and became a supporter and even more, a friend.

Soper visited with us several times and became familiar with our mission and our needs. She did write a grant application, and it was approved. We were able to get the jump-start that we needed, and we are still going strong after six years.

I support Tami Soper not only as a politician but as a friend who cares about others!

Dana Rodriguez, Lincoln

Johnson got it done

Let’s hear three hips and a hooray for the heroes of the city of Johnson. They cleaned up their town after the tornado devastated it without waiting for the Federal Emergency Management Agency to come in and take charge.

Guess that’s how Midwesterners get the tough jobs done — just put your shoulder to the wheel and “git ’er done.”

Roger L. Kopf, Nebraska City

Some arena questions

The city of Lincoln has now chosen an architect and a builder for the arena and related projects, that is, if it passes the vote of the people. It’s amazing that it’s even asking the people of this city what they want.

I was born and raised in Lincoln, and I am in close to my sixth decade in this city. I have voted in every election since I turned 21, so it’s pretty safe to say I know a little bit about this city. I have a couple of questions about this new arena.

First, did city officials think by blighting that area it would help them get the arena in place?

Second, most of that land is owned by the railroad, and blighting doesn’t bother it. Has or does the city hold the title to that land so the city can legally build on it, or are city officials in negotiating mode with the railroad to buy that land?

Now, I don’t know how much you know about the railroad, but many towns have gone into financial peril trying to fight railroads over land such as the land that their main line runs down, right where the city wants its new arena.

My husband and I come from railroad families, and talking to current employees of the railroad, they just laugh because city officials think if they blight the area, the railroad will move. Can we afford the price of litigation?

Sharon K. Fish-Radke, Lincoln

No quick oil fix

Being in our upper 60s, we realize we’ll not live long enough to see an end to the oil crisis. There’s no permanent quick fix. A long-term solution is to start opening up U.S. land to mine our own oil beneath.

Most suggestions I’ve heard are only a Band-Aid. One suggestion is to open the oil reserve. What’ll happen when the reserve is depleted? Another one is to negotiate with the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, which doesn’t make sense. A third is alternative fuel, which is helping some but is creating other problems. A fourth suggestion is to make car manufacturing companies make more fuel-efficient cars, but as long as people keep buying gas guzzlers, automakers will keep making them. Lastly, the United States could make oil companies pay a windfall tax, but that’ll only move more cost back to the consumer.

The big problem is, while we’re spinning our wheels, the Chinas and Indias are taking advantage.

Bill Allen, Blue Springs


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Jeff wrote on May 3, 2008 8:08 am:
" The long term solution to our energy problems is to keep developing alternative energy sources, hybrid vehicles, etc. Drilling for more oil under/in our own territory would only serve to prolong our dependency on fossil fuels. It will likely be done at some point, but it isn't the answer. And most experts, including those in the oil industry, say that drilling in the Artic Wildlife refuge would only lower gas a few cents a gallon (under current market conditions) and it would take a decade to accomplish. Therefore, it does seem appropriate to allow that part of our country to remain pristine. Americans are already moving away from the gas guzzlers. "

The Oil wrote on May 3, 2008 9:34 am:
" prices will never come back down until we get new congress, senate, president. We have the world supply of grain but, do you think they will use that as leverage? No. We are using our grain to make ethanol which is subsidized by the government. I fear this country is slowly going down the road to a form of communism with the government controling our every more. I have noticed that this has shown up more with GW as president. "

FarmGirl wrote on May 3, 2008 12:15 pm:
" Do you think oil isn't subsidized through massize tax breaks? Ethanol isn't the solution. Independence from oil IS. Ethanol & other biofuels are a stepping stone to that goal. If you listen to experts - even the ones who think biofuels are forcing food prices up - biofuels are a way to reduce the price of fuel. Without them the fuel costs rise. Ask any farmer where there money is going right now. Those tractors & combines & trucks & pickups need fuel & with higher prices come higher food costs. By the way - since grain prices have effectively been stable for the last 80 years, what's accounted for the increase in bread from 10 cents a loaf to $3 a loaf. "

saturated wrote on May 3, 2008 8:36 pm:
" Dear Journal Star, Can you please keep the political garbage out of the opinion page? Every other facet of media is saturated with the bologna that is politics. I beg you to keep this small section of the news paper free from hacks trying to push their agenda,,,,I mean candidate "

Don wrote on May 3, 2008 10:09 pm:
" I am in favor of drilling in ANWR. It will still remain pristine even if drilling takes place. The whole area is the size of North Carolina, and the area it takes to drill is only the size of JFK airport. With todays drilling technology there will be no destruction of the environment. "

JR wrote on May 4, 2008 5:42 pm:
" So Don, let's say you drill an area the size of JFK airport, inside an area the size of NC. Are you saying that is the only spot where we need to drill? Surely if we can get oil in one spot that size, we can get twice as much with two drilling areas. And with the added consumption of third world countries, wouldn't four sites be better yet? And another thing, how do we get all that drilling equipment into that JFK sized property? I guess if we are to keep the rest of the land pristine, we need to bring it in by helicopter. But, doesn't drilling take some mighty big equipment? So, I guess we would need to build a road ... or two, to cut through the middle of this pristine land to get all this heavy equipment up there. And of course, to build these roads you would need to bulldoze hills, damn up streams, cut down thousands of trees, all the while adding pollution to the pristine air and water. So, now we have built the roads, drilled for oil in one, two or maybe even four sites the size of JFK each. But, how do we get the oil out? Do we truck it? Seems like kind of a waste of fuel to truck all that oil. I suppose we would need a pipeline. So, is this an above ground pipeline, or below ground? Below ground you would need years to dig up all that pristine land while trenching, chopping down even more trees, cutting through hills, and damming up streams.And above ground you have this God awful big pipe laying on top the ground blocking wildlife paths as well as pretty much destroying any myth of the area being pristine any longer. I don't know. But for my few cents it would save me, I would rather have leave this pristine land as a testament to man's commitment to nature and proof we really can be God's good steward of what he has given us. "