Now
Fair
77°
High
82°
Low
49°

Local view: Consider bicyclists in grand scheme

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY BETH THACKER

Friday, May 02, 2008 - 12:29:58 am CDT

Downtown Lincoln is facing the perfect storm — the Antelope Valley Project and accompanying Union Plaza to the east, the UNL Research facility to the north and the Haymarket renovations to the west. All of these projects create the ripples that ultimately will grow into a gale, changing the look and function of our downtown for generations.

This change comes at a time when, on a local and national level, we are facing issues of equally epic proportions: both a health crisis of obesity with related complications and an energy crisis, with a rate of consumption that is quickly outstripping our resources.

In this reshaping of downtown Lincoln, there is a unique opportunity for our city officials to create a space that is sustainable, healthy and welcoming to alternative transportation modes. This opportunity would move Lincoln closer to becoming a greener and healthier community.

Story Photo
Beth Thacker

City Hall moved in that direction when it went through the most recent update of the Downtown Master Plan and subsequent East Downtown Redesign. Part of the update process included recommendations from a transportation expert who studied our downtown area and came up with suggestions for improving its bikeability.

Because of that study — and with direction from a working group consisting of downtown business interests, the bicycling community and city officials — in August of 2006 bike lanes were installed on 11th and 14th streets. User counts conducted since then (twice in 2007 and once so far in 2008) have shown that bicycle traffic along those streets has increased significantly from before the lanes were installed. An examination of accident reports from before the bike lane installations and after their installations has shown no increase in accidents involving bicycles and cars.

Research bears out that appropriate bicycle facilities enable proper driving behavior for cyclists and motorists alike and decrease the likelihood of crashes. Numerous studies have shown that bicycle lanes improve safety and promote proper riding behavior. A well-designed bike lane supports and encourages bicycling as a means of transportation. Studies also show that when more bicyclists are present on the street more regularly, conditions become safer. Bike lanes help define road space, promote a more orderly flow of traffic, and signal motorists that cyclists have a right to the road, to name just a few advantages.

Historically, downtown Lincoln has not been a bike-friendly environment. Too often, motorists are not looking for vehicles other than cars. They seem amazed to see a cyclist on the street and sometimes even seem a little miffed if they have to share a lane with that bicyclist. On the other side, cyclists too many times disregard traffic laws, creating dangerous situations and engendering bad feelings toward cyclists in general. Both parties need to realize that a bicycle and a car both have a legal right to use all the roads in downtown and are subject to the same rules and regulations. Awareness and respect on both sides needs to be heightened.

Heightened awareness can and will make all downtown traffic lanes less stressful for bicyclists. The advantages to creating a downtown that is welcoming and safe to cyclists are just too numerous to be ignored.

In the coming months, as the redesign of this area evolves, I would like to encourage City Hall to implement specific bicycle facilities (e.g. bike lanes along M and N Streets for east/west traffic; bike lanes along 16th and 17th Streets, once the new Antelope Valley roadway diverts most through traffic away from these two streets; and possibly a separate multi-use trail facility through downtown).

Design it so that more university students want to bicycle to class rather than congest downtown with another car. Design it to encourage those families that enjoy the facilities of the new Union Plaza to ride their bicycles instead of driving, and maybe even ride through downtown to the Haymarket area (old and new). Design it to better accommodate those cyclists who already commute to their work downtown and encourage those who currently drive to consider hopping on a bicycle instead.

Being known as a bike-friendly city will only enhance the decision-making process individuals and corporations alike go through when looking to settle in Lincoln. To become a bike-friendly city will improve the health of each citizen, clean up and decongest a growing downtown area and conserve precious natural resources. An improved environment for downtown cycling can lead to smooth sailing through, and after, this perfect storm.

Beth Thacker is chairwoman of the Mayor’s Pedestrian/Bicycle Advisory Committee.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Columns > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Jody P. wrote on May 2, 2008 6:33 am:
" Beth is a master of the understatement. She wrote that "[drivers] sometimes even seem a little miffed if they have to share a lane with that bicyclist. On the other side, cyclists too many times disregard traffic laws...".

What "miffs" me is having to slow to a crawl behind a cyclist who is in effect announcing to me that he/she has the same rights of a motor vehicle on the road as I do, and then seeing that same cyclist shoot past a stop-sign without so much as slowing to even acknowledge it's physical existance, in effect telling me that he/she does not believe they are subject to the same traffic laws for motor vehicles as I am. That is to say, they want all the advantages of riding on the street without any of the annoying disadvantages, such as stopping at stop-signs. "

curly wrote on May 2, 2008 7:09 am:
" Well stated. I appreciate the effort in including alternative transportation
into the master design plan of the new downtown. "

jc wrote on May 2, 2008 9:37 am:
" Just as not all motorists develop road rage because of cyclists, not all cyclists disobey traffic rules. It is perfectly legal for cyclists to be on the road, and is actually much safer than riding on sidewalks. Here's food for thought, maybe the cyclist ran the stop sign so that the raging motorist behind them would not have to wait for them any longer. Personally, I always obey the traffic rules and consequently make motorists wait for me no matter how many curse words / death threats I recieve! "

Michael D. wrote on May 2, 2008 9:41 am:
" Great letter! Thank you for pointing out that cyclists must also obey the laws for this to work. As a cyclist, nothing peeves me more than seeing other cyclists blatantly disregard things like stop signs, red lights, etc. Just like drivers, a few bad apples gives us all a bad name. "

check your ordinances wrote on May 2, 2008 12:27 pm:
" jc it looks like you do not obey all the traffic rules. You might want to check the city ordinances on riding bicycles. Making motorists wait is not only dangerous, but against city ordinance.

10.48.180 Riding to Right of Roadway.
Bicycles proceeding with the normal flow of traffic shall be operated in the right-hand travel lane of a roadway. Bicycles proceeding at less than the normal speed of traffic at the time and place and under the onditions then existing shall stay as close as practicable to the right-hand side of the right-hand travel lane except when passing or preparing for a left turn. (Ord. 15649 §18; July 9, 1990: P.C. §10.64.120: Ord. 11981 §7; May 16, 1977: prior Ord. 5699 §1512; April 12, 1954). "

Terry wrote on May 2, 2008 12:56 pm:
" Hopefully something can be done about the cyclist's blatant disregard for traffic regulations. About 90% of the cyclists passing through downtown ignore stop lights, stop signs, one way streets and the restricion from riding on sidewalks in the downtown area. The police just look the other way. I have to obey the laws in my vehicle why are they allowed to ignore them? "

jc wrote on May 2, 2008 3:31 pm:
" CYO - My comment and scenario of "making motorists wait" was only intended to refer to stop signs / lights. The previous senctence was meant to indicate this, but I see where it was unclear. It generally takes a cyclist more time than a motorist to come to a complete stop and then start up again to go through an intersection. Since it is illegal for anyone to pass while in an intersection, even if the bike is to the right, the motorist should have to wait. Unfortunatly this does not always happen.

I agree that cyclists should stay as far to the right as road conditions allow when riding with the normal flow, and I do follow this practice. This practice also has it's drawbacks as motorists often pass cyclists when they shouldn't and with dangerously close proximity.

I definitely agree that cyclists should always follow the rules, unless of course they are avoiding an accident. What motorists need to remember when sharing the road is that when it comes to bike / car accidents - the car always wins. "

Julie wrote on May 2, 2008 5:46 pm:
" Bicyclists and motorists: SIGNAL your intentions! If you are turning, changing lanes, or slowing, you need to let people around you know what you are doing whether you are in a car or on a bicycle. This is especially important downtown where their is a higher density of pedestrians, bicycles, and motor vehicles. "

Debbie wrote on May 2, 2008 6:16 pm:
" Where was Beth and the rest of the biking community when they were designing and building the first portion of the Antelope Valley? Why didn't they speak up when the powers that be put the bike trail up on top rather than under the State Fair brige? They knew about it. A resident of the North Bottoms mentioned it at one of their annual meetings, but they all kept quiet. Why? "

dewboy wrote on May 2, 2008 10:56 pm:
" The ones (bikers)that are a pain seem to think they are macho and have the right to hold up traffic and ride two and three wide, or in the middle of the traffic lane. STILL not many lights as REQUIRED. Of special concern should be the coming trend of motorized bikes and the lack of regulations covering them. "

Cyclops wrote on May 2, 2008 11:16 pm:
" As a cyclist, my opinion is that it is often SAFER to blow through a red light when there is no cross-traffic than it is to proceed through the intersection WITH traffic on a green. While I stay to the right as far as possible, often times drivers will "pinch" a cyclist into the curb on the far side of an intersection. This is a dangerous yet regular habit of many drivers. Like it or not, I choose personal safety without regard to what the traffic light says. "

Big Chief wrote on May 5, 2008 5:04 pm:
" Has anyone added up the total acres of land that are reserved for students cars at our local High Schools, Colleges and the University? What a waste of resources.Outlawing students taking a car to school would solve a lot of problems: The extra calories burned would help solve the obesity problem, free up valuable real estate now used for parking, improve the student morale of the ones whose Mommy and Daddy can't buy a set of wheels for them, eliminate the need for after work jobs to make car payments and reduce pollution by taking thousands of cars off our streets. "

CS wrote on May 16, 2008 12:29 pm:
" There already is a statute that covers motorized bikes-if its under 49CCs its a moped, if its over that its a scooter and requires licensing and a helmet. Motor assisted bikes have a motor only range of about 20 miles, and at top speed can still be passed relatively easily by a regular cyclist with pedals. We don't need more laws for stuff that is already addressed. "