Now
Fair
60°
High
61°
Low
40°

Our fear is causing a loss of the rule of law

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By DOUGLAS K. GERMAN / For the Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, May 01, 2008 - 11:35:24 am CDT

Recently I asked a group of future leaders in a rural Nebraska community whether they were familiar with the term “rule of law.” A couple of hands went up, half-heartedly. The theme for Law Day 2008 is “The Rule of Law: Foundation for Communities of Opportunity and Equity.”

The importance of the rule of law is apparently not well understood, lacks support and there even may be hostility toward it. For some, notably politicized faith communities, the rule of law means the loss of their values agenda.

So I posed this to a friend: Suppose you had a strong values-based political agenda. If you were a conservative, for example, that agenda might include no gun control, no abortions, minimal government and similar issues. We could pose a liberal agenda just as well.

Then suppose you had a choice: Make this values-based agenda dominant throughout our nation, or keep and strengthen our democratic, open society with the mixture of values we have traditionally enjoyed. Which would most people choose? Are many people now ready to forgo the rule of law, based on democratic principles, for what they consider a greater set of values? To the extent this happens, and I believe it is in some quarters, we are flirting with fascism. It can come from the left or the right.

What is driving this development is fear. Fear as a result of Sept. 11. Fear intentionally whipped up by certain political interests. And more insidious fears, fears of loss of self-worth and security and a fear of death without resurrection, which make people vulnerable to demagogues and charlatans. Because of fear we are losing moderation, give-and-take, tolerance and, yes, the rule of law.

The loss of the rule of law can be so subtle. … It was a glorious day in the central plaza of Cali, Colombia. It was 1973. The sun was shining and people were bustling along the sidewalks, enjoying shopping and each other. I was on my way to an appointment, taking in the sights. There was freedom in the air.

Suddenly, several tarp-covered army trucks pulled into the square. Soldiers with machine guns jumped out and randomly grabbed men, women and children by the arm and put them into the trucks. Then they drove off. The rest of us went about our business as if nothing happened. To this day I have no idea what happened to those people. I learned later this was done to intimidate the citizens to prevent them from joining national demonstrations. There was no rule of law that day.

Given the fear we are experiencing, it is so easy to think, “It doesn’t involve me. It’s those other guys. If they are after them, it must be for a good reason.” All the while, our individual rights and Constitutional protections are being eroded.

The president says he can unilaterally, without review, declare war and finger a citizen an enemy-combatant. That person then loses all rights and can be tortured. If necessary, will we fight back? Defend our tradition of the rule of law? The Pakistani judges and lawyers did. They protested, took to the streets and resigned their positions for the rule of law.

Douglas K. German is executive director of Legal Aid of Nebraska.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Columns > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Josh wrote on May 1, 2008 8:14 am:
" I would say it is less the dear factor and more the Bush/Cheney Republicans who have no regard for the law. The Bush II administration will go down in the history books as one of the worst, most-damning in history. "

Big Chief wrote on May 1, 2008 10:24 am:
" I guess Rule of Law means we throw all moral values out the window? Now I get it. "

Sean wrote on May 1, 2008 11:08 am:
" It's okay Dougy...you can come out from hiding under your bed. No one is
coming in the night to arrest you for your ACLU membership. "

Living Free wrote on May 1, 2008 12:04 pm:
" I would rather have few moral values imposed on me than the "moral values" that the right want us to live under. Under those, you couldn't even look at a person of the opposite sex without being charged with rape. "

peb wrote on May 1, 2008 12:44 pm:
" I find it hard to understand the thinking behind the people who pride themselves with having "moral values" and then wanting those moral values legislated into law by the government. Currently most of these same people also belong to the political party that wants to limit government's involvement in people's lives. It feels a little crazy-making to me. "

Rules wrote on May 2, 2008 1:42 pm:
" "Rule of law" means that those in the executive branches of government have to follow the laws they are in charge of. They don't get to disobey or throw out laws when they're inconvenient to their goals, even when those goals were what brought them into office. At best, they must work with the legislative branch to make changes to laws that they feel don't serve the Constitution or the needs of the nation. It's an internal check-and-balance system, like the Golden Rule, not an abrasion of morality. It's a way to require "good faith." "

quoted the coach more than once wrote on May 2, 2008 2:33 pm:
" I'm appalled by the double standards and lack of honesty and reflectiveness
apparent in the way the "rule of law" is enforced in Lancaster County. Don't try
to reason with anyone here who feels deeply entitled to their judgmental,
and extremely simplistic attitudes about what comprises rules, ethics
and principled codes of behavior. That will get you arrested for sure.In fact,
if you've ever wanted your day in court just move to Lincoln. Then it becomes quite likely someone will pronto misrepresent you so unkindly you'll quickly receive that coveted summons. "