Groundbreaking set for state's largest wind farm
By ALGIS J. LAUKAITIS / Lincoln Journal Star
A ground-breaking ceremony for the state’s largest wind farm is set for Tuesday near Bloomfield in northeast Nebraska.
The Elkhorn Ridge Wind Farm, an 80-megawatt facility planned by Midwest Wind Energy, LLC, and its affiliate Elkhorn Ridge Wind, LCC, will be constructed about 5 miles north of Bloomfield.
When completed, Elkhorn Ridge will be larger than the 60-megawatt Ainsworth Wind Energy facility, owned by the Nebraska Public Power District.
After several months of negotiations, NPPD recently signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Midwest Wind Energy, based in Chicago. Under the terms of the agreement, Elkhorn Ridge Wind will own and operate the $140 million facility and NPPD will buy the electricity.
The wind farm, which is expected to be constructed by the end of this year in order to take advantage of federal renewable energy tax credits, could supply enough electricity to power 25,000 homes for a year. There will be 27 wind turbines at the site.
Gov. Dave Heineman, state Sen. Cap Dierks, representatives from NPPD and Midwest Wind Energy, and local officials will participate in the 2:15 p.m. groundbreaking ceremony.
A 3 p.m. wind celebration will follow at Bloomfield High School.
Officials say the Elkhorn Ridge power purchase agreement between NPPD and Midwest Wind Energy, a private developer, is the first of its kind in Nebraska, a public power state.
The wind farm project is structured to comply with the state’s Rural Community-Based Energy Development Act, which requires that not less than 33 percent of the power purchase agreement payments over the 20-year agreement flow to Nebraska owners.
Another major wind farm is also in the works.
NPPD recently announced that is has reached a 20-year agreement to buy electricity from a private wind energy developer for a 42-megawatt facility called Crofton Hills Wind Farm.
Planned for construction between Crofton and Bloomfield, the wind farm will have 17 turbines. Total cost of the project, which is scheduled to be completed next year, will be about $69 million. The project is being developed by Minnesota-based Juhl Energy Development.
Reach Algis J. Laukaitis at 402-473-7243 or alaukaitis@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Finally wrote on April 28, 2008 3:25 am:
R. J. Mercheson wrote on April 28, 2008 3:27 am:
I can think of few things that have ever been more environmentally unappealing. Not only are these hideous monstrosities an eyesore, but I seriously doubt that long-term they will have any real impact on this nation's efforts to come up with alternative energy resources.
In 25 years -- or even less -- I can see the Bloomfield project, and others like it, rusting away, monuments to man's shortsightedness and disregard for the ever-dwindling farmland across the nation. "
Mike in DC wrote on April 28, 2008 6:35 am:
My opinion wrote on April 28, 2008 7:22 am:
Nina wrote on April 28, 2008 8:27 am:
Dano wrote on April 28, 2008 8:28 am:
As for wind turbines killing millions of birds and bats, I wish you could back up a statement like that, with a scientfic study/evidence that shows the true numbers. If that were the true case, no one would build them , build there would tons of rotting carcasses all over the place. The smell and disease potential would have been brought forward long ago. Maybe a few hundred birds and bats, maybe even in to the low thousands, but millions. Are you really believing that? Ever been to a wind farm and seen hundreds of birds dead on the ground there because the farm was there?
I would like to appluad the group for the effort to reduce our needs for coal and oil powered resources. While this can't replace alll our energy needs, it can sure help to extend our other resources. "
russell wrote on April 28, 2008 8:30 am:
m wrote on April 28, 2008 9:01 am:
Theyre ugly wrote on April 28, 2008 9:23 am:
Larry wrote on April 28, 2008 9:30 am:
"
Joseph P. Sokolovsky wrote on April 28, 2008 9:33 am:
aaaah, they can hook him up too....and Nebraska will have all the wind they need!! "
Seriously wrote on April 28, 2008 9:37 am:
As far as looking unappealing, how about big 'ol smoke stacks, that looks great too! Nobody every said wind power was the complete solution, but its part of the answer.
"
Watch your rates go up..... wrote on April 28, 2008 9:43 am:
Sam wrote on April 28, 2008 9:53 am:
By the way, I did do a Google search on wind farms, and couldn't find any mention of birds and bats that I see as credible (most were from either opposition groups or private websites without any credible sources attached). "
renewable wrote on April 28, 2008 10:30 am:
Close wrote on April 28, 2008 11:04 am:
Tbmk wrote on April 28, 2008 11:35 am:
whatever wrote on April 28, 2008 12:08 pm:
Breezy wrote on April 28, 2008 12:29 pm:
better late wrote on April 28, 2008 12:32 pm:
bobo wrote on April 28, 2008 1:17 pm:
WindPwr wrote on April 28, 2008 1:17 pm:
BTW - those claiming they kill millions of birds and bats - where are all the dead birds and bats around farmers' wind mills (that have been used for about a century!) And, just how many millions birds/bats and other animals are killed by CARS?? Should we stop driving because of this?? Just consider the bird/bat deaths from wind generators as supplementing neighboring cats' and coyotes' diets... "
Seriously wrote on April 28, 2008 1:18 pm:
What wrote on April 28, 2008 2:05 pm:
bum wrote on April 28, 2008 2:16 pm:
White Feather wrote on April 28, 2008 2:19 pm:
Nuclear power produces a tremendous amount of energy giving the amount of waste produced at a few grams per person per year. The biggest controversy involving nuclear energy is waste management and unfortunately, the public is really left in the dark on this subject. And yes, I do work in the nuclear industry. Not in power generation, but in waste processing. As far as radioactivity lasting forever, after a few half-lifes, it is reduced to less than background levels. Backgroud levels are what everyone experiences from the sun, earth and his/her own body. Remember, it was not that long ago Uranium Oxide was used as a glazing for fine china. Half-lifes can last anywhere form a few seconds for some fissle materals to even billions of years. The half-Life for common Iodine is about 4.5 billion years, yet we treat scrapes and cuts with it. The public-at-large seems to really fear that word: Radioactivity.
Believe it or not, nuclear fuel is considerably less exspensive than traditional fuel like coal and natural gas. A chunk of nuclear fuel roughly the size of a lemon can push an aircraft carrier about 2.5 to 3 times around the planet, image how much diesel that will take. Although I would really like to see a better solution. Maybe the scientists will perfect the fusion reaction better sometime in the future. Helium or Hydrogen as a by-product wouldn't be as severe as a problem.
What I wonder is why we are not experimenting more with geothermal energy. The earth's crust does contain tremendous amounts of heat energy a few hundred feet below the surface, depending on location. This energy would be free from having to constantly refuel it as well as free from emmisions and waste disposal.
When it comes to Biofuels, it has been proven tht Algae can produce anywhere from 7 to 30 times the energy output per acre than terrestrial crops.
Well, I rambled enough, so if you want me to cite my examples, you have to ask and I will post later. I hope at least one or two of you found this insightful. Goodbye for now. "
about time wrote on April 28, 2008 3:15 pm:
Ex-Nebraskan wrote on April 28, 2008 3:36 pm:
About time wrote on April 28, 2008 3:43 pm:
... wrote on April 28, 2008 3:46 pm:
There's your article on bird kills and wind turbines. The reason you don't see dead birds around farm wind turbines? They aren't big enough to be a problem.
I'm not really for or against wind turbines, but I do believe there are much better options for renewable energy then them. Problem with turbines: you cannot store the energy from really windy days. If it's not windy, you get no benefits from a wind turbine at all. Plus, you actually have to heat the turbines in the winter to keep the gears from freezing up, so they may end up using more energy then they put out. Using biomass for electricity makes more sense, but we're diverting all of that to ethanol production (which is really really dumb). "
NS wrote on April 28, 2008 3:48 pm:
Ken wrote on April 28, 2008 4:18 pm:
Matt Poulsen wrote on April 28, 2008 6:01 pm:
InTheWind wrote on April 28, 2008 6:18 pm:
As for the lack of wind to always keep the windmills going - we used to live on a farm whose sole water supply was from a cistern filled by a windmill (no electric motor connected to it, just the windmill itself). We never had to worry about not having water. On the contrary, we typically had to shut the windmill off so as not to overflow the cistern!!
"
... wrote on April 28, 2008 7:45 pm:
joewicket wrote on April 28, 2008 8:48 pm:
Wind turbine technology has improved greatly since LES put up those two sad towers by the interstate, the reason they have to shut them down is because if the wind blows too hard, those propellors would reach a terminal velocity and fall apart. Turbines built now have braking to prevent this, and as far as birds and bats..... far more bats and birds die getting hit by cars than by wind turbine... give it a rest. I think the full length of I-80 should be strung with wind turbines.... sure would make the drive more interesting, which in the near future should be more inclined toward electric. "
Bill wrote on April 28, 2008 8:54 pm:
two words wrote on April 29, 2008 8:14 am:
MarkyMark wrote on April 29, 2008 9:20 am:
Joe wrote on April 29, 2008 9:33 am:
but what wrote on April 29, 2008 10:16 am:
toasted wrote on April 29, 2008 1:07 pm:
OK now we are doing something green.....Everyone shouts "EUWWW, It's such an inconvience to me!" "
Im amazed.. wrote on April 29, 2008 2:25 pm:
Everyone is worried about Nebraska having a "brain drain" where anyone with intelligence will move out of the state. Read about a week of comments on any article in the paper, and you'll see we're too late. "