Now
Overcast
74.0°
High
74°
Low
60°

Pedersen pulls support for slavery resolution

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY JoANNE YOUNG / Lincoln Journal Star

Tuesday, Apr 15, 2008 - 07:12:20 pm CDT



Nebraska will express no regrets about slavery this legislative session.

Sen. Dwite Pedersen of Elkhorn took a point of personal privilege Tuesday afternoon to tell senators he would withdraw a resolution that would have expressed regret — not an apology — for slavery in the Nebraska territory and condemned racial discrimination in any form toward African Americans.

Story Photo
Dwite Pedersen

“I do not do it with anger, without thought or without hurt,” Pedersen said.

The Judiciary Committee’s taking the word “apology” from the resolution has weighed heavily on him the past four days, he said.

“I cannot take up the time of the Legislature for something I cannot personally support,” he said.

The resolution was to have been discussed and voted upon Wednesday by the Legislature.

Pedersen introduced a resolution late in the session that called for an expression of regret to those who were enslaved and an apology for wrongs inflicted by slavery and its aftereffects in Nebraska.

The resolution also encouraged Nebraskans to teach their children about the history of slavery and its effects so such tragedies would be neither forgotten nor repeated.

When the Judiciary Committee discussed the resolution last week to decide whether to send it to the full Legislature, the committee voted to take out the apology and leave only an expression of regret and condemnation of racism.

Committee Chairman Brad Ashford and Vice Chairman Steve Lathrop, both of Omaha, argued against the apology.

Ashford said it would be more appropriate to pass laws that promote fairness, equality and equal opportunity.

Lathrop said it was not the role of the state to say “I’m sorry.”

After Pedersen withdrew the resolution, Omaha Sen. Ernie Chambers also took a point of personal privilege to support Pedersen’s decision. To present the resolution in a watered down form would be “a trivialization of a very serious, serious matter,” he said.

Six state legislatures have passed resolutions similar to Pedersen’s, with apologies, he said. Other countries, including German and Australia, have apologized for wrongs committed against groups of people there.

“All that has been shown by this exercise is the depth and breadth of racism in this state,” Chambers said.

He and others still bear the psychological scars of what slavery did to black people, he said, including the destruction of families and self-belief, and the harm to religions, culture and traditions.

“To be owned and treated like animals and bred and sold like animals is something, obviously, which my colleagues cannot understand,” he said.

He appreciated that Pedersen made the resolution a moral principle, he said, and that he would not compromise.

Ashford said withdrawing the resolution was probably best.

“It’s a complex issue,” he said. “It’s not a matter we should be taking up in the last few days of the session.”

Leola Bullock, a Lincoln civil rights and social justice advocate, said she had not been satisfied with the changes to the resolution by the Judiciary Committee.

Leaders of the state, she said, have shown an unwillingness to stand up for all Nebraskans.

Attorney General Jon Bruning’s unwillingness to support the requests of the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission, and Gov. Dave Heineman’s and Bruning’s sponsorship of a bill that would have taken away in-state college tuition from undocumented immigrants who attend high school in Nebraska show they weren’t working for all people in the state, she said.

“I reluctantly say that sounds racist to me,” Bullock said. “Nebraska should be better than that.”

All Nebraskans are not white, she said. There are many people of color who should be recognized, too.

“It’s really too bad,” she said. “I feel our state leaders have let us down.”

Reach JoAnne Young at 473-7228 or jyoung@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Sounds good to me wrote on April 15, 2008 6:07 pm:
" It was not a good idea in the first place, so I'm glad the bill is dead. The people living in Nebraska today have nothing to apologize for, and the people who suffered under slavery are dead and couldn't hear it, anyway. Let's move on, stop discriminating against anyone, and pass the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative. "

mike k wrote on April 15, 2008 6:17 pm:
" good what a waste of time to bad they did not put this effort into something useful "

Joseph P. Sokolovsky wrote on April 15, 2008 8:31 pm:
" I have no particular thoughts on this bill one way or the other. I just have one question of 'all' Nebraskans;
regardless of the color of your skin, religion, etc.,
isn't it about time we 'all' stop living in the past, and get on with better our future? Just like any person...every country in the world has made some mistakes over the years....thus why don't all Americans
stop spending their energy and time rehashing the past
couple of hundred years....and use that energy, time and money making life in the future better for 'all' Americans. That's my story and I am sticking to it, folks. "

monty wrote on April 15, 2008 8:35 pm:
" yeah, let's be real who cares.... "

E Jr wrote on April 15, 2008 9:04 pm:
" Black people are still suffering because of the slavery their ancestors experienced. I am a white person and I apologize for what my ancestors did to those of African heritage both during slavery and since it was outlawed. White people continue to benefit because of racism and discrimination. An apology by our state government for any part we played in the institution of slavery is still warranted. "

yo yo wrote on April 15, 2008 9:40 pm:
" My family is from Ireland...and we didn't come to the United States til the early 1900s...why should I have to apologize for slavery even if it was probably the most disappointing and humiliating period in our country's history "

Racists wrote on April 15, 2008 9:47 pm:
" As if we needed better evidence of racism being alive in this state, just look through a couple days worth of LJS comments and you're bound to rethink. If people don't think the vestiges of slavery are a live today, then they're either willfully ignorant or just not very with it. This was a nice gesture that would've meant a lot more to some people than it would have cost the rest of us. But we're all so egalitarian that we can't even take the time to pass such an obvious gesture that costs most of us nothing. Way to go legislature, just another slap at people who have been beaten down throughout history. Sens. Lathrop and Ashford should be embarrassed that they obviously put their personal political situations over this legislation and that they can't understand something that's obviously beyond their experience, but not that hard to conceptualize if you just try a little bit. Thank you Sen. Pedersen, a person who I don't always agree with, for trying to do the moral thing - even if it is about 140 years too late. "

old guy wrote on April 15, 2008 10:54 pm:
" In 1866 or so there was an end to slavery. I do not know of any person who was a slave after that law was passed. It is 138 years since 1870. What has anybody got to do with saying we apologize, we are sorry or any other sugar when nobody alive had anything to do with the practice since it is so long ago? A senator who is guilt ridden today is kind of taking on a burden he didn't bear through any action by himself. Time to rest it. The candidates are suffering the nation with enough crappolla on the subject. "

Outwesterner wrote on April 15, 2008 11:01 pm:
" I agree with Joseph and yo yo! Why should I have to apologize for something that neither I nor my ancestors did? Quit beating a dead horse and quit playing the victim! "

The deal wrote on April 16, 2008 12:29 am:
" Okay, so here's the deal. I would say that the likelihood of someone who actually participated in slavery still be alive is about nil. Why is it that I should apologize for something I HAD NO PART IN?? And how does this make me a racist? We are not at all responsible for what our ancestors took part in. I'm Irish also, am I seeking the apology of the English who persecuted the Irish during the potato famine?? I can't hold someone responsible for actions they didn't commit and won't. Why is it that I only hear African American people wanting reparations and their "due" for what happened to their ancestors? I don't hear the Irish or the Protestants making such noise. I personally think it's time that we take responsibility for our own personal deeds and leave the acts of slavery and such in the past. Far too often, and this will sound bad, I mean nothing by it, black people are looking to blame someone else for what is wrong in their lives now. Sure, slavery was a horrendous action against humanity, and I am glad it has long been abolished, however; is it not truly what you choose to do with the cards you were dealt?? And by the way, Nebraska was not even a state until after the Civil War, I looked this up.. Also, the slavery that did exist in NE was very short lived. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery and for the years 1854 to when the Civil War started in 1861 did slavery exist. Nebraska during these years, NOT A STATE, a territory. Before reparations and apology's are made for a state, the state should have existed first. Okay.. rant over!! "

enough wrote on April 16, 2008 4:42 am:
" African-Americans were not the only people to be forced into slavery. Why must we apologize to them. What makes them more important than any of the rest of the people that have been victimized by it? Where do start and stop apologizing for something that was so long ago? I am rather tired on people using things like this as a crutch or excuse as to why they can or can't be positive, responsible and productive US citizens! "

Ray-J wrote on April 16, 2008 6:22 am:
" Just how long do white people have to tell black people that slavery wasn't right?
The elimination of American Indian tribes wasn't right either but you don't hear them forever bringing it up.
None of us are the people who had slaves or supported it. "

Kurt wrote on April 16, 2008 7:54 am:
" Kansas-Nebraska Act? If recall the Kansas-Nebraska Act is one big contributer to the Civil War. This act was a battle to decide which state would be free and which would be a slave state. Nebraska was a free teritory before the war and a free state after the war. I would first like to see some evidence of slavery in Nebraska if there was any. If anyone deserves one of these ridiculus apologies, the Native Americans do. "

Jill wrote on April 16, 2008 7:59 am:
" Why doesn't the legislature work on actually accomplishing something? Dwelling in controversy over a resolution that will "apologize" or "express regret" is hardly productive. "

Mark wrote on April 16, 2008 8:20 am:
" My great-great-grandfather voted for Abraham Lincoln, fought and died in the Civil War to end slavery and preserve the Union. I don't expect thanks for that, because those were his actions, lived out by his character. It's 2008, and all races are represented at all levels of commerce, religion, education, and government in the United States. We are unique in that among nations - now or ever. "

Hank wrote on April 16, 2008 8:30 am:
" The reason for the apology is straightforward: Today's economic, social, and political conditions, which benefits the white majority at the expense of non-white minorities, are rooted in slavery and past oppression. An apology is a recognition not only of past wrongs, but it is also a recognition of the fact that today's Nebraskans live in conditions that continue to oppress minorities in so many ways. Note the biased police enforcement of drug laws, the high incarceration rates, the difficulties of achieving in our biased educational system, the lack of past accumulated wealth that limits options, and the hopelessness of Indian reservations, for example. All of these things have their roots in the past but effectively still cause discrimination and oppression today. The replies here suggest that we prefer to close our eyes and deny that current oppression is the result of past slavery, discrimination, and oppression. The decision by the legislature means that we are perfectly comfortable to continue the discrimination and oppression in the future under the guise of "It's not my fault!" Thank you Ernie and Dwite for trying to open some eyes. "

K. wrote on April 16, 2008 8:31 am:
" I haven't apologized for things I haven't done all of my life, I'm not about to start now. I don't care if your black, brown, white or purple with yellow spots. I also am not going to apologize on behalf of anyone I don't know. I don't know my grandma's grandma's grandma's grandma's whoever...i've never met them, don't know anything about them--i'm not sure i'd even like them if I had met them. I apologize for myself, and myself only---and on this issue-I don't have anything to apologize about. "

Brian wrote on April 16, 2008 8:36 am:
" I consider this whole motion a complete waste of time. I had relatives that fought on the Union side. I'm not apologizing for any thing. If law makers are going to apologize for every thing that happened before we were born, start with Native Americans. 130-140 years ago, the U.S. was committing genocide on them. "

CS wrote on April 16, 2008 8:36 am:
" Empty gestures aren't worth the paper they are printed on. Anyone can say 'im sorry' 130 years later. I find the idea itself insulting, as I also do reparations. This supposed guilt only continues to cloud current issues, as if saying 'im sorry' will make it all go away. How about we deal with racism and classism today instead of 130 years ago when it was a part of the time it occupied? "

Sen Pederson's actions were noble wrote on April 16, 2008 8:37 am:
" Pulling the resolution after the amendment that dramatically changed the face of the resolution was very admirable. In this case, he felt there was no room for compromise, and in this one particualar instance, it was very noble.

P.S.- Kurt, this very publication ran copies of old ads with slaves on the auction block in...Southeast Nebraska. Care for more evidence? "

Vern wrote on April 16, 2008 8:48 am:
" Get over it already. I don't have slaves and neither did any of my ancestors. Chambers is not now nor was he ever a slave. I repeat, get over it. "

Grundle wrote on April 16, 2008 9:00 am:
" Again...Nebraska did not achieve statehood until 1867. The Nebraska territorial (not state) legislature outlawed slavery in 1861...6 years before Nebraska achieved statehood. The state of Nebraska never allowed slavery. I also believe it is ridiculous to claim that African-Americans, today, still bear the scars of slavery. It has been over 130 years...it MAY just be time to move on. While I do believe that racism continues to exist, and more can be done to combat it, an empty apology does absolutely nothing to cure the problems of today. The people least willing to move past slavery, such as Ernie Chambers, Leola Bullocks, and Lela Shanks, seem to be doing quite well for themselves. Why don't they try concerning themselves less with the African-Americans who suffered over a century ago, and concern themselves more with the ones who are suffering now? "

as wrote on April 16, 2008 9:06 am:
" Like others who have commented here, none of my ancestors were here during slavery & therefore did not participate any way in it. No way am I apologizing or expressing any regret for something I had nothing to do with. Also there were none of the african americans here today alive then. People today need to stop looking for a scapegoat for their actions & decisions. "

Gene Hogan wrote on April 16, 2008 9:24 am:
" The resolution also encouraged parents to teach their children about slavery so we learn from our mistakes and don't marginalize a segment of the population in the future. Hispanic immigrants, for example. That's indeed moving on. "

JP wrote on April 16, 2008 9:40 am:
" “To be owned and treated like animals and bred and sold like animals is something, obviously, which my colleagues cannot understand,” he said. (Ernie)

I fail to see that after over a century, Ernie knows how this would feel any better than his colleagues, be it that racism still exists or not. He has certainly never been bought, sold, or bred.
"

Steve wrote on April 16, 2008 9:58 am:
" It's about time that we stop living in the past. After researching my family history as far back as my great-great-great grandparents, I can't not find any such information that shows my family was into slavery. Not everyone owned slaves, therefore not everyone needs to apologize.

As far as our State Senators, it's time you stop introducing resolutions to just to be introducing resolutions. I'm seeing more and more resolutions that have nothing to resolve the heavy tax burdens this state continues to place on taxpayers. Start looking at ways reduce the government and huge burden you place on the taxpayers. Quit making trivial laws, enforce the ones we already have. You can start with undocumented workers in the state of Nebraska and be a leader to the nation instead of waiting for the federal government. "

Stop with Civil War Nonsense wrote on April 16, 2008 9:58 am:
" The "end" of slavery was a side effect of the Civil War, not a primary reason. It was an argument over government control and power and decision making. And I'm sorry, because that is a vast oversimplification of the war, but it takes little research to discover that the war was more than the 3rd grade lesson of the end of slavery.

To argue that the Civil War victory was the apology and end of slavery is small minded and silly at best. "

Ted Haubrich wrote on April 16, 2008 10:05 am:
" Slavery did exist in Nebraska and the State allowed, if not outright supported slavery, and the State should apologize for its past acceptance of slavery. The slave and slave owners may be dead but they would not the ones giving or accepting the apology. The State of Nebraska is alive and well and so are many of the social scars left by slavery. This is a very relevant issue in part becasue slavery is, sadly, also alive and well today. Even more sad is that while a slave in the 1800's would have cost you thousands of dollars, you can buy a human being today for a couple hundred dollars.
The notion that we hold no responsibility for our ancestors or our offsprings actions is a mistaken one. The concept of the individual is an important one, but if people also understood that relatives, freinds, and future generations will be paying for their actions we would have fewer atrocities in our world.
The State owes an apology for its acceptance of slavery not to any individual or group of individuals but to the entire world for all the harm it has caused. perhaps the best thing that could come from an apology would be some eduction is clearly is sorely needed juding from some of these comments. Yes Kurt there were slaves in Nebraska they were brought to Nebraska, bought in Nebraska and sold in Nebraska, occasionaly by the Stae itself. Also, while illegal there are still slaves in Nebraska. Slavery has long been illegal in the entire world but we all know that doesn't stop supply and demand There are still despicable people in the world who want to buy people for housekeeping, farm labor, sex etc. And plenty of desparte families willing to sell their sons and daughters to human traffikers. "

DOC wrote on April 16, 2008 10:26 am:
" Okay Class. Would it have been that tough to say, "on behalf of those in this state that promoted slavery, we offer our apology." No, you didn't do it, but is it that difficult to say, I am sorry that it happened? It could have taken 5 minutes in the legislature. "

Concerned for our future wrote on April 16, 2008 10:30 am:
" It saddens me to read the comments of so many people, who are not decedents of slaves, who profess to know how it feels to be one or what it will take to heal old wounds.

The apology is not about accepting direct responsibility for slavery, it is about acknowledging a horrific wrong that was done to a specific group of people. We are supposed to care about what harms others in our community, but it is clear we don't when it steps on our conscience. It is clear that the guilt that white people feel about the history of racial oppression that is still being perpetuated in America is far to overwhelming for them to deal with.

Besides, apologizing assumes that you want to change the oppressive behavior and it is clear many of you do not. The more people argue about how much they "don't need to apologize for the past," or demonstrate insensitivity by saying things like, “get over it," the more I realize how far we have to go. How disappointing. "

SV wrote on April 16, 2008 10:40 am:
" I'm a witch. Where's my support for recognizing how the christians burned people at the stake? If Nebraska appoligizes to one group it needs too to all of the wronged groups out there. "

Get over it wrote on April 16, 2008 11:08 am:
" Time for the professional victim crowd to get over it, get to work, and make something of themselves without expecting the rest of the world to pat them on the head and say, "oh, you poor dears. Here, we apologize, and here, take some of our money and jobs you aren't the best qualified for, too." There's a wonderful thing that happens when you decide to take responsibility for your own life and your your own emotions - you become an adult. "

John B. wrote on April 16, 2008 11:36 am:
" It always makes me laugh when people use the "my ancestors didn't own slaves" argument. Anyone who did nothing to help end slavery while the institution of slavery continued was as complicit in that institution as any slaveholder---in a territory or a state. "

Justice wrote on April 16, 2008 11:36 am:
" Senator Chambers says, "To be owned and treated like animals and bred and sold like animals is something, obviously, which my colleagues cannot understand,” Well, Sen. Chambers cannot understand either unless he is over 100 years old. It also scares me that some people who do not understand the issues are asked to comment. Ms. Bullock says it is racist for AG Bruning to not take up the case of an illegal immigrant who was discriminated against. Similarly, she criticizes the Governor and Bruning for not supporting illegal immigrants paying in-state tuition. Where have we gone wrong with teaching people the rule of law and what is best for a State? Ms. Bullock, illegal immigrants are not "people of Nebraska". "

Linda wrote on April 16, 2008 11:45 am:
" I have a couple points.

Just because modern day white people and others do not think this amendment is needed does not make them racists. What about the black people in Africa that also participated in stealing members of other tribes and selling them to the slave traders. Did they not profit from such actions? Perhaps their descendants are in America. Should they have to apologize also?

As a genealogist, my ancestors participated on the Union side of the Civil War. Several loss their lives defending the Union and Lincoln's act to eliminate slavery. I believe this supreme act speaks volumes and no apology is needed.

We can't relive the past, but we sure can learn from it. Stop being a 'slave' to the past and blaming what happened more than 100 years ago for the actions of others today. I realize many people of color suffer discrimation, but so do so many other people.......women, the disabled, etc. We need to work on making the world better today. "

technomom wrote on April 16, 2008 12:15 pm:
" Wow, Have you read any of the comments on the Ernie Chambers story a couple of days ago??? Or the article on blacks being incarcerated at traffic stops in droves?? These are a couple more examples of white privilege Nebraskans as a whole have not tried to investigate. I am a 40 year old Irish decendent too. Born and raised in omaha and Lincoln. If people don't think the vestiges of slavery are alive today, then they're either willfully ignorant or just numb. I have travelled and lived in other states where the color of a person's skin is not a factor for credit, employment and the quality of their kid's education. I have also lived in communities where White is the minority- It is an experience that changed my life. One can only wonder why some folks have such a difficult time rendering an apology - it doesn't take anything from anyone- but may allow some transfer of dignity. Even if the apology is 140 yrs after the fact. The bill's value is in education of multicultural issues, and ability to look beyond appearance to the true individual. "

What a wrote on April 16, 2008 4:33 pm:
" utter waste of the leg's time! Where is the majority constituent support for this bill or its creation. "

Post Toasties wrote on April 16, 2008 5:31 pm:
" Census figures show that only about 20 slaves ever existed in the territory that became Nebraska, and that they were imported by Southern Democrats. Slavery was abolished in the Nebraska Territory six years before it became a state.

It's ridiculous to apologize for something that one (and especially one's ancestors) is not at fault for. Most of the ancestors of whites (those who hadn't immigrated after the Civil War) in the US fought against slavery.

I think there is something mentally and societally ill about most of this slavery reparations movement. "

JPB wrote on April 16, 2008 6:50 pm:
" If this resolution was a waste of time, so was paying Japanese internees $25,000. So was the passing of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act which allows Indians with casinos on their reservations to keep profits tax free. There is no money or restitution involved here ---just an apology and an acknowledgement the Nebraska Territory was a party to the slave issue.
It is an obvious reflection on the residents of this state that an apology is too much even though it costs nothing.
It's convenient for the majority pop. in a state that has 4% Black population to believe the reamins of slavery don't exist anymore. "

To Post Toasties wrote on April 16, 2008 9:25 pm:
" Slavery reparations? This resolution was about an apology and condemning racial discrimination...yeeeesh! "

Post Toasties wrote on April 17, 2008 1:56 am:
" There is no rational comparison to Indian Gaming Act or payments to the identical Japanese who were wrongly interned in WWII.

The slavery apology and reparations game is by its very nature not progressive but is instead backwards looking and actually memorializes and perpetuates the racist attitudes it purports to remedy, because it enables the victim and guilt trip (with associated resentment) mentality among blacks and whites respectively which are not mentally or societally healthy. "

Curious wrote on April 17, 2008 8:36 am:
" I have to ask...what is irrational about the analogy? GHW Bush issued a formal APOLOGY from the US Gov't to Japanese internees (with a $20,000 check included) and Indians pay NO TAXES on the billions of dollars in profits generated from casinos on reservations. This act was to serve as compensation and an APOLOGY for the wrongs done to North American Indian Tribes. Sen. Pedersen's resolution had no reparational provision included. "

Tired of Whining wrote on April 17, 2008 9:14 am:
" Here we have a bill introduced to make ammends for slavery and racial discrimination in the state and its only affect is to apologize to black americans? (notice I said black americans and not african americans? You are only an african american if you moved here from africa! Also, black is not a derogatory comment, its a word to describe a color. Should we teach kids then the difference between a blue ball, a red ball, and a dark tinted ball?) Anyway, once again if there is anything that constitutes as racist in this country it has to be against the black community. What about the native americans that were slaved and moved off of their lands? What about the chineese railroad employees that were treated so poorly. My father's ancestors came over from England just before the civil war (and fought for the union, by the way) where slavery had been abolished long before America thought it was wrong. Do I need to apologize to every person of Irish descent I meet? My mother's side where German's from Russia? Where's my apology for persecution from the German's? Seems a little silly when you add up all of the persecutions that happened to every single ethnic race through out the course of human history. Also, why is everyone that fights for racism so colorblind? Whenever there is a innitiative that dares take away ANY priviliage for the illegal immigrants (they are not "undocumented immigrants", they came over ILLEGALLY) all of the civil rights activists always assume that is soley intended for the blacks and hispanics. Are there not any white people in those countries that might decide to try to get to america? What about people that come over from europe with motives that differ from living a produtive life (I'm trying to drop the "T" word there). Shouldn't they be made a big deal and pampered just as well, or are the racial activits only interested in helping those of color? Talk about yoru racisim. "

It won't hurt to apologize, wrote on April 17, 2008 3:33 pm:
" but its not going to change anything. Until people realize that this issue isn't what is holding them back, nothing will change. People from all over the world have been enslaved, had civil wars, etc. and they've gotten over it and moved on to better lives. Slavery is far in the past and no Ernie, you do not know what its like. You can't you weren't there and therefore there are no scars to bear. "

Jericho wrote on April 17, 2008 3:43 pm:
" I would bet all of us have apologized for at least one thing that we were not responsible for in our lives...is an apology that slavery happened that hard? "

Legislature Coverage