Now
Fair
30°
High
51°
Low
29°

Schools feel the pinch as cost of diesel rises

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY MARGARET REIST / Lincoln Journal Star

Saturday, Apr 12, 2008 - 12:44:13 am CDT

It’s no fun watching the news when you’re in charge of 111 big yellow school buses.

Not when diesel prices are hitting record highs and your budget is already broken.

“Here’s the kicker,” said Bill McCoy, Lincoln Public Schools director of custodial and transportation services. “We were able to increase the budget for diesel fuel $147,000 this year.”

But, here’s what they didn’t expect, even with that increase: “We’re paying a dollar more (a gallon) than we were at the same time last year.

“It’s just unbelievable,” he said.

As of the end of March, the district had spent $422,260 on diesel fuel. Its budget was $393,950.

Officials predict they’ll spend another  $170,740 through the end of the fiscal year.

Rural area schools are also feeling the pinch.

Malcolm Public Schools isn’t over budget and officials think the $30,000 they have budgeted will get them to the end of the year. The Waverly and Norris school districts are in a similar position.

But Malcolm Superintendent Gene Neddenriep said rising fuel prices have already had an effect.

 A couple of years ago, the district curtailed extra field trips, limiting classes to one in the spring and one in the fall.

And high fuel prices affect more than just bus routes, he said.

They raise the cost of supplies, such as new textbooks and food, that are brought in by semis. 

Neddenriep said he doesn’t know yet how the rising prices will affect next year’s budget, but he knows it will.

“When it takes that big a jump, it’s going to be an issue,” he said.

Raymond Central Superintendent Gary Oxley said fuel prices have put his district’s transportation budget over the top in the past month.

That means holding off on some things, like furniture upgrades or some repairs.

Oxley, who’s been a school administrator since the gas crunch of the 1970s, said he’s never seen anything like this.

“This, in terms of prices and percentage of prices increases, certainly matches anything we’ve seen in the past,” he said.

What makes it worse, he said, is that levy lids limit how districts can deal with such fluctuations.

“This is very concerning to all school districts,” he said. “It seems like whenever we have a meeting (of administrators) this is certainly a topic that gets talked about.”

 At LPS, officials are counting on close to $180,000 in savings by eliminating a number of bus routes through boundary changes.

“Even that is not enough if we stay on our current path,” McCoy said.

LPS bids its fuel, which means it gets a better price than that at the pump.

 Nationally, retail diesel prices rose 2.1 cents to $4.066 Friday, topping the previous high set a day earlier.

The last diesel purchase LPS made was at $3.51 a gallon, McCoy said.

LPS has gone over its transportation budget for the past five years, by increasingly large amounts.

Among the cost saving measures they’ve taken is a non-idling policy for drivers.

That began mostly as an effort to be more environmentally conscious, but it also saved money. A study comparing bus usage in 2003-04 to 2004-05 showed the number of miles LPS buses drove increased, but the number of gallons used decreased.

Dennis Van Horn, LPS associate superintendent of business affairs, said although diesel prices are a concern, he worries more about utility costs, which take up a bigger chunk of the district’s budget.

As for McCoy, if prices keep going up, the transportation budget will have to increase also, because nearly all the current bus routes are required by law.

And he’s done about as much streamlining as possible.

“Our ability to absorb it is becoming very, very difficult,” he said.

Reach Margaret Reist at 473-7226 or mreist@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Wondering wrote on April 12, 2008 10:03 am:
" Why is the "budgeted" amount so far away from the "actual" amount for so many years? I could see a surprise year when fuel prices are high, but wouldn't the LPS budget office get the hint and budget for more? "

Mr. Citizen wrote on April 12, 2008 10:44 am:
" Okay, here's a perfect example of how LPS wastes money: At the end of the article it states that 'nearly all the current bus routes are required by law.' That's true; he's referring to busing for special education students and English Language Learners. But just drive by any school in Lincoln when students are getting off a bus and you'll see those very few SpEd and ELL students getting off of buses that seat 50 or more students. Waste much? My question to LPS is why don't they have at least a small contingent of mini-buses for the two-or-three student routes instead of using the monster buses that drink so much diesel?

As for the routes that aren't 'required by law,' these are routes that the public either doesn't know about or has forgotten about. Otherwise, there would be a public protest to get rid of them. Remember a couple of years ago when the Everett families who live on the opposite side of three 'dangerous' railroad tracks whined and whined until LPS decided to reward them for choosing to rent where they did by giving them a bus all their own? Guess who's paying for all that diesel? And don't tell me those rentals were the only place those families could afford. There are vacancies galore within walking distance of Everett school.

So my point is that before anyone sympathizes with LPS in regards to the high cost of diesel fuel, let's see some trimming of the fat.

Gosh, I wrote all that and I'm not even a conservative. Now let's hear from the real conservatives. "

Fat Trimmer wrote on April 12, 2008 11:32 am:
" This is all part of the run-up to yet more school bond issues on the ballot later this year. Speaking of trimming the fat, there are sure a lot of paper-pushing administrators on the LPS payroll. How about they get rid of half of them? Sounds like a good plan to me. I think that the paper ought to list the positions and salaries of the top 100 most highly-paid LPS employees. It would be an eye opener for a lot of people. "

Well wrote on April 12, 2008 12:14 pm:
" Mr Citizen, Lincoln doesn't even protest high taxes
(3rd from the highest as per U.S. census bureau) so why
would anyone protest LPS busing practices?? And gee,
when we have city buses riding around town with None to
3 to 6 people on them, why would we get upset over raising taxes MORE!!!!?? People can scream all they want, but whether its the legislature,LPS, or the city,
in NE. their ears are CLOSED. NE. doesn't operate for
the betterment and care for their citizens, its been that way for years and years! Not that way in other states, been there.!! "

CS wrote on April 12, 2008 1:02 pm:
" I think its deplorable that Lincoln DOESN'T have bus service to their schools, unless of course you fall into a few select categories. As for your assumption that there are vacancies galore in the Everett neighborhood, that may be true, but unless you are the LL for all of those homes how do YOU know what the circumstances, deposit, and rent are for all of them, or if they are suitable for a family or maintained? You make many assumptions, yet your main point is that you don't like paying for buses for developmentally disabled people and immigrants. Life must be tough in your cul de sac. "

Sarah wrote on April 12, 2008 1:15 pm:
" We wouldn't need as many buses if LPS moved their boundary lines for some elementary schools. Of course if they did that, some rich children might have to go to school with poor children. We can't have that now, can we! (insert sarcasm). "

JamesJimmyAlan wrote on April 12, 2008 1:16 pm:
" I would recommend the idea of having all the school districts in Nebraska canceling school on snowy days to conserve the fuel and the cost of so many items that the school districts have to spend on snowy days at a time of higher fuel and energy costs. "

Facts please wrote on April 12, 2008 1:33 pm:
" I'm having a tough time finding the figure that "Lincoln...taxes (3rd from the highest as per U.S census bureau...)" Sure would love proof, or does it even exist in the real world? Wonder what the "former city" is ranked?

As for LPS...there are certainly some areas that need to be examined a little closer in these tight economic times. "

ds wrote on April 12, 2008 1:58 pm:
" so do we think they are the only ones feeling the crunch? i work for a company that has over 30 trucks..however, we're privately owned so i doubt if anyone will assist us. "

Jim J wrote on April 12, 2008 2:16 pm:
" Ha, Mccoy says "“Even that is not enough if we stay on our current path,”

Mr. McCoy does not read the news or follow world events. For your information Mr. McCoy, the price of oil is not going down. In fact if/when the gas facilitys are attacked your fuel is going to at LEAST eight dollars a gallon. As far as economy of fuel milage the bus gets, I would say in five years you can kiss your bus dept goodbye. It most respect I know for a fact you run a wasteful operation and that will NEVER change. "

RE facts please and CS wrote on April 12, 2008 2:59 pm:
" Lincoln don't make their tax formula very easy to get. One town in mind out of nebraska has a very easy formula. County appraised value X .19% X mill levy. A house that is 150,000 and is taxed 3600 dollars in lincoln would be by this formula 150K X .19= 28,500 X$3.50 = 997.50. Same for cars except it is book value X .33% X mill levy. Tell you what, call chamber of commerce is several cities around the u.s. and ask the formula for figuring taxes on homes and cars. Do the numbers. Myself I do this for a living and can tell you that lincoln maybe one of the highest taxed cities in the u.s. "

Name the neighborhood wrote on April 12, 2008 3:17 pm:
" Sarah, I'd love to know which school(s) you're referring to when you state some elementary schools are exclusively "rich." I can only speak for what I know, but the Rollings Hills - Knolls - The Ridge neighborhoods are all fed into Hill Elementary. I wouldn't judge "Hill" as being poor, but it's certainly not exclusively "rich." It's an excellent school with a mix of low/middle/high class families. So, your assumption isn't accurate in this part of town. "

Galen wrote on April 12, 2008 4:28 pm:
" THANK GOD for levy limits! Without them the worthless public schools in this state could suck even MORE money out of tax payers. "

Crazy Buses wrote on April 12, 2008 7:22 pm:
" The buses are everywhere. I have counted three different buses in my neighborhood every morning.
The law needs to be changed. Able bodied children need to go to their local educational center to be picked. Door-to-door transporation for able bodied kids is insane, outdated, and expensive. It is outlandish that we already have to spend extra money educating most of these special kids, but at least try to be reasonable about the costs. Cut the costs by requiring these kids to go to their local educational center for pickup. The time is right for a change. We need to respond to a changing environment. Some old ways of doing business are inefficient and wasteful. Of course, the school system being a government entity is by nature extremely wasteful. Why would the citizenery of this community expect to get value for their dollars. With any government agency, as long as the dollars are provided, they will continue to be wasteful.
"

Get a clue wrote on April 12, 2008 10:16 pm:
" Hey Galen, I think you need to move to a different state. Every comment you leave on every article is you whining about taxes. Whah, whah, whah, whah. Maybe if you'd gone to a 'worthless public school in this state', you'd have half a brain and I could take your comments more seriously. Try that one state that doesn't have taxes. Then you'd have to find something else to complain about. "

Lemme guess wrote on April 12, 2008 11:06 pm:
" Fuel surcharge for each student?
Here in Millard it costs kids about $1.50 each way to ride to school.
They are very good at inventing scams in the Millard school district. "

Busing wrote on April 13, 2008 7:02 am:
" We can bus ESL and developmentally challenged kids but we can't bus the poorer child that does not have the warm clothes or miles from school that walks? I've seen little ones attempting to cross busy streets, how unsafe. We need to help all kids get to school, not a select bunch "

In the Real World wrote on April 13, 2008 10:27 am:
" If LPS was a real business they would be bankrupt by now. How on earth can an organization have passed a $250,000,000 bond issue and receive 68% of property tax and still not be able to function? It is time to look at the administration and the school board and begin to hold them accountable for why the rest of the community both with taxes and the continued reduction in services (Public Works, Parks, Police, Etc.) taking it in the shorts because of their inefficiency. "

JP wrote on April 13, 2008 10:28 am:
" Changing to smaller busses oddly enough would not save any money. They get the same gas mileage, 9-12 MPG. "