Now
Fair
30°
High
51°
Low
29°

Statewide testing measure passes in Legislature

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By TIMBERLY ROSS / The Associated Press

Monday, Apr 07, 2008 - 03:36:27 pm CDT

OMAHA — Nebraska’s unique approach to measuring student achievement appears to be history.

State lawmakers on Monday gave final-round approval to a bill (LB1157) that would require uniform, statewide tests in reading, math and science in many elementary and high school grades.

Thirty-three senators voted for the bill — enough to override a veto, were one to come from Gov. Dave Heineman. His spokeswoman said the governor will review the bill in detail.

Related Link(s):

Nebraska’s current system of assessments, which Commissioner of Education Doug Christensen has fought long and hard to keep, lets school districts create their own tests to measure achievement for the federal No Child Left Behind Act and for state purposes.

But Sen. Ron Raikes of Lincoln, chairman of the Education Committee and sponsor of the bill, has said local assessments fail to provide results that indicate what students are learning and how they compare with their peers.

A call to Raikes at his office Monday by The Associated Press was not immediately returned.

If signed into law, the legislation would replace a 2007 law mandating state tests in reading, math, science and social studies beginning in the 2009-10 school year.

Raikes and other advocates of the bill have said last year’s law gives the State Board of Education the ability to require both state tests and local assessments, which they say overloads school districts. The latest measure would prevent the board from requiring anything other than state tests.

Christensen, who announced last week he’ll step down in July, was not available to comment Monday.

Brian Halstead, in the department’s general counsel office, said staff members have been revising the state’s education standards in compliance with the 2007 law. He said that work would still be necessary under the new legislation. The additional work would come mainly from expanding the standardized tests from three grades to seven.

“There’s a lot of questions on how one implements this. ... That will all have to be fleshed out as we go ahead,” he said.

No Child Left Behind was passed in 2001 in an effort make sure children receive an adequate education. States were called upon to devise and offer the same tests in reading and math for every child each year in third through eighth grades, as well as one year of high school.

Nebraska is the only state that uses local assessments to monitor student achievement.

While those assessments are allowed under the federal law, the state has failed to show that they are a valid measure of students’ knowledge, according to several letters sent to Christensen by the U.S. Department of Education since December 2005.

The state’s testing remains under review, with approval pending. Failure to get approval would put the state at risk of losing federal funding.

Christensen has said he has until May 1 to submit a plan that would explain the state’s testing plans for the next two years, which would include implementation of standardized tests.

Halstead said Monday that a testing plan was being devised, but he didn’t think it would be delayed in light of the Legislature’s action.

Christensen, who’s called standardized tests the “worst public policy you could ever put in place,” has spent years advocating the use of district-created assessments — even butting heads with federal education officials who’ve tried to force standardized tests.

Christensen said local assessments are superior to statewide testing because they include student performance on things such as presentations and projects in addition to exams. He said they also rely on individual teachers to determine whether students have learned class lessons.

Associated Press Writer Anna Jo Bratton in Lincoln contributed to this report.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
taxpayer wrote on April 7, 2008 10:13 am:
" Now that the state is telling my locally elected school board how my children shall be evaluated, I believe the expenditure of my property taxes is no longer in my school board's hands. Thus, I further vote to fund schooling at the state level through a different taxing mechanism (after all, the state can't levy a property tax itself or through its political subdivisions for a state purpose). "

Blooms wrote on April 7, 2008 10:50 am:
" Bravo! This is a step that should help develop a statewide understanding of how to focus and fund schools or take other corrective measures. This also should to allow students and parents to compare student progress on a playing field that is standard across districts to assist educators who will be able to better compare their success experiences. "

Rudy wrote on April 7, 2008 10:51 am:
" State-mandated. Has a nice ring to it doesn't it? How about more state-mandated things. Communism anyone? "

Mr. Accountability wrote on April 7, 2008 10:56 am:
" Its about time, districts can skew their testing data to show whatever they want. Now we can truly measure each district based on the merits that every state and every district uses. It can be improved, but to put your head in the sand as nebraska has done shows their hiding something. "

Educator wrote on April 7, 2008 11:38 am:
" This is another attempt by those outside of education to pursue their own personal agendas. Comparing progress of different school districts is like comparing apples to oranges. It is much more important to compare the progress of each individual student from year to year. Hopefully we will one day have a governor and a legislature that makes quality public schools a priority. "

mvwoma wrote on April 7, 2008 11:57 am:
" Good--Now lets test all schools, private, public, home, church, whatever. Lets see the true resilts, FOR EVERYONE ! "

E Jr wrote on April 7, 2008 12:00 pm:
" Evaluation of student progress is not only a local issue but a regional and national one. There has never been 100% local control in any public school that I am aware of. Good thing, too. "

T wrote on April 7, 2008 12:19 pm:
" The state and federal government is already paying for your child to go to school. The reason for the evaluation is partially to receive more state and federal funds in addition to your property tax. "

Teacher wrote on April 7, 2008 12:28 pm:
" We educators don't tell anyone else how to do their jobs so why is the legislature sticking their nose so deep in ours. This goes way deeper than just the type of tests we give and has little to do with the quality of education kids are getting because no test will measure that. "

Mother with kids wrote on April 7, 2008 1:11 pm:
" HMM, got to test the kids some how. Besides, every district creates their own sets of test and hire people to do it. Now, we should be able to save the money somehow and have representative from each district to work on the standardize test. This is pre-SAT or pre-ACT format. Interesting. It will be good. "

Jim Ward of Lincoln wrote on April 7, 2008 1:53 pm:
" To all the teachers commenting on this blog: GET BACK TO WORK. You now have some standards to which we are going to hold you. "

Former Teacher wrote on April 7, 2008 2:10 pm:
" OK teachers, You can quit wining about your low salaries. This just made your job easier - teach to the test. Nice to know government cares. So much for our kids' education. "

Small Town Teacher wrote on April 7, 2008 3:33 pm:
" I don't think some of you even understand what the tests will consist of. The individual tests from the school district are that much different from what the standardized tests look like, then there is something wrong. And it is probably the local test that is off. "

Educator wrote on April 7, 2008 3:59 pm:
" Jim Ward, thanks to Doug Christensen Nebraska educators have long been held to a higher standard than those mandated my NCLB, thats No Child Left Behind just incase you were ignorant to that fact as well. It will be a great day when people like yourself wake up and realize that Nebraska has some of the best teachers in the country, who do it for one of the lowest wages of any state. But that day will only come once all the good teachers have fled the state and Nebraska's education system has been reduced to shambles. "

iconoclast wrote on April 7, 2008 6:15 pm:
" Mark my words(for the next twenty years or so), this current time, the Raikes era, will mark the end of the outstanding education for which Nebraska is known.
As of 2007, Nebraska consistently ranks first or second, year after year, in ACT scores among all states who test 70% or more of their students. This is an independent ranking that can't be fixed or doctored in any way.
Soon, the football mentality of this legislature will lead us to publishing rankings of all schools in the state.
Good, some of you say. I would ask: What possible good can come of this? Some schools will rank lower than others. How will this help us? Are we going to send more, or less money to the lower ranking schools? Nobody is going to rank low on purpose. Actually, the schools that rank lower will have a disproportionate number of poor students. How will we change socio-economic status?
This will depress, even more, real estate values.
There is just absolutely no good that will come of this. The information that it gives us will not help anyone in any way.
But it doesn't matter, because in 20 years our teachers will be the bottom of the barrel because of salaries being so low. In yesterday's paper, a Wyoming school district advertised a starting salary of $38,000, with other incentives totaling $5500. We will be losing our best teachers to nearby states who pay much more.
All this while the legislature wants to keep score in a game that is clearly not a zero-sum game "

Mr. Mac wrote on April 7, 2008 10:18 pm:
" Good points, iconoclast. A couple points come to mind:
1) What perceived problems were Raikes and the other members of the education committee trying to solve? The nationally standardized norm referenced scores showed that Nebraska students outperformed 60-70% of the other students in the country, and local assessments showed that 70-80% of Nebraska students were proficient. What was the problem again?
2) Sen. Raikes and Sen. Avery and others believe that switching to the new system of statewide tests will satisfy NCLB. There are MANY other states with statewide assessments that still don't get approved by the federal department of education, and NCLB will soon be changing the the new administration.

I hope everyone calling for "accountability" has a really good idea of what you think the current "crisis" is in your school, and you have a great rationale why you think "comparable" scores will solve your specific crisis. And please watch what happens in your school in the next few years as administrators and teachers feel compelled to chase scores instead of work hard to help students learn. "

Hold it wrote on April 8, 2008 5:57 am:
" What gets measured gets done. What does not gets left in the open ended area of well, we think we did, not sure, but it should have been, oh, I know we do that, etc., etc., and then nothing is for certian. Even a small measurement is better than no measurement. Why not test for the same, the diploma means the same, whether from a small school or a large school. "

Shadow wrote on April 8, 2008 9:25 am:
" what about the kids that have to move with their parents to a different city, thus moving to a different school district? if the schools in nebraska arent teaching the same thing the progrees of that student will be affected. standard tests mandated by the state would go a long way to ensure this doesnt happen. i do agree that the way it has been is an easy way for each district to create their own tests making them look good on paper. if the students in these districts are getting the propper education they need, the ALL teachers should not fear this test and be ready and willing to prove how much they have outperformed other districts setting a good example. this is an excellent case of "put your money where your mouth is". i also think that these tests should not be limited to only public education. hit everyone that calls themselves an educator (especially home schooled). all to often i have seen what some say is "home schooling" turn out to be nintendo and barney all day. "

VA Teacher wrote on April 8, 2008 2:22 pm:
" I've attended a few national conferences for educators and heard Nebrasks ridiculed for its current (lack of) adherence to NCLB. On the other hand, last year, I taught in a large Virginia high school that devoted the first staff meeting of the year to publicizing teachers' pass rates from the year before. Those with 100% pass rates were applauded. No explanation of the student populations were made--no distinction between AP classes and resource, for example. Teachers were striving for that 100% pass rate, and would move students who put that in jeopardy out of their classes. "