Statewide testing measure passes in Legislature
By TIMBERLY ROSS / The Associated Press
OMAHA — Nebraska’s unique approach to measuring student achievement appears to be history.
State lawmakers on Monday gave final-round approval to a bill (LB1157) that would require uniform, statewide tests in reading, math and science in many elementary and high school grades.
Thirty-three senators voted for the bill — enough to override a veto, were one to come from Gov. Dave Heineman. His spokeswoman said the governor will review the bill in detail.
Related Link(s):
Nebraska’s current system of assessments, which Commissioner of Education Doug Christensen has fought long and hard to keep, lets school districts create their own tests to measure achievement for the federal No Child Left Behind Act and for state purposes.
But Sen. Ron Raikes of Lincoln, chairman of the Education Committee and sponsor of the bill, has said local assessments fail to provide results that indicate what students are learning and how they compare with their peers.
A call to Raikes at his office Monday by The Associated Press was not immediately returned.
If signed into law, the legislation would replace a 2007 law mandating state tests in reading, math, science and social studies beginning in the 2009-10 school year.
Raikes and other advocates of the bill have said last year’s law gives the State Board of Education the ability to require both state tests and local assessments, which they say overloads school districts. The latest measure would prevent the board from requiring anything other than state tests.
Christensen, who announced last week he’ll step down in July, was not available to comment Monday.
Brian Halstead, in the department’s general counsel office, said staff members have been revising the state’s education standards in compliance with the 2007 law. He said that work would still be necessary under the new legislation. The additional work would come mainly from expanding the standardized tests from three grades to seven.
“There’s a lot of questions on how one implements this. ... That will all have to be fleshed out as we go ahead,” he said.
No Child Left Behind was passed in 2001 in an effort make sure children receive an adequate education. States were called upon to devise and offer the same tests in reading and math for every child each year in third through eighth grades, as well as one year of high school.
Nebraska is the only state that uses local assessments to monitor student achievement.
While those assessments are allowed under the federal law, the state has failed to show that they are a valid measure of students’ knowledge, according to several letters sent to Christensen by the U.S. Department of Education since December 2005.
The state’s testing remains under review, with approval pending. Failure to get approval would put the state at risk of losing federal funding.
Christensen has said he has until May 1 to submit a plan that would explain the state’s testing plans for the next two years, which would include implementation of standardized tests.
Halstead said Monday that a testing plan was being devised, but he didn’t think it would be delayed in light of the Legislature’s action.
Christensen, who’s called standardized tests the “worst public policy you could ever put in place,” has spent years advocating the use of district-created assessments — even butting heads with federal education officials who’ve tried to force standardized tests.
Christensen said local assessments are superior to statewide testing because they include student performance on things such as presentations and projects in addition to exams. He said they also rely on individual teachers to determine whether students have learned class lessons.
Associated Press Writer Anna Jo Bratton in Lincoln contributed to this report.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Blooms wrote on April 7, 2008 10:50 am:
Rudy wrote on April 7, 2008 10:51 am:
Mr. Accountability wrote on April 7, 2008 10:56 am:
Educator wrote on April 7, 2008 11:38 am:
mvwoma wrote on April 7, 2008 11:57 am:
E Jr wrote on April 7, 2008 12:00 pm:
T wrote on April 7, 2008 12:19 pm:
Teacher wrote on April 7, 2008 12:28 pm:
Mother with kids wrote on April 7, 2008 1:11 pm:
Jim Ward of Lincoln wrote on April 7, 2008 1:53 pm:
Former Teacher wrote on April 7, 2008 2:10 pm:
Small Town Teacher wrote on April 7, 2008 3:33 pm:
Educator wrote on April 7, 2008 3:59 pm:
iconoclast wrote on April 7, 2008 6:15 pm:
As of 2007, Nebraska consistently ranks first or second, year after year, in ACT scores among all states who test 70% or more of their students. This is an independent ranking that can't be fixed or doctored in any way.
Soon, the football mentality of this legislature will lead us to publishing rankings of all schools in the state.
Good, some of you say. I would ask: What possible good can come of this? Some schools will rank lower than others. How will this help us? Are we going to send more, or less money to the lower ranking schools? Nobody is going to rank low on purpose. Actually, the schools that rank lower will have a disproportionate number of poor students. How will we change socio-economic status?
This will depress, even more, real estate values.
There is just absolutely no good that will come of this. The information that it gives us will not help anyone in any way.
But it doesn't matter, because in 20 years our teachers will be the bottom of the barrel because of salaries being so low. In yesterday's paper, a Wyoming school district advertised a starting salary of $38,000, with other incentives totaling $5500. We will be losing our best teachers to nearby states who pay much more.
All this while the legislature wants to keep score in a game that is clearly not a zero-sum game "
Mr. Mac wrote on April 7, 2008 10:18 pm:
1) What perceived problems were Raikes and the other members of the education committee trying to solve? The nationally standardized norm referenced scores showed that Nebraska students outperformed 60-70% of the other students in the country, and local assessments showed that 70-80% of Nebraska students were proficient. What was the problem again?
2) Sen. Raikes and Sen. Avery and others believe that switching to the new system of statewide tests will satisfy NCLB. There are MANY other states with statewide assessments that still don't get approved by the federal department of education, and NCLB will soon be changing the the new administration.
I hope everyone calling for "accountability" has a really good idea of what you think the current "crisis" is in your school, and you have a great rationale why you think "comparable" scores will solve your specific crisis. And please watch what happens in your school in the next few years as administrators and teachers feel compelled to chase scores instead of work hard to help students learn. "
Hold it wrote on April 8, 2008 5:57 am:
Shadow wrote on April 8, 2008 9:25 am:
VA Teacher wrote on April 8, 2008 2:22 pm: